Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market by Service (Sampling, Testing), Technology (Biological Testing, Chemical Testing, Physical Testing), Sampling Method, Crop Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market was valued at USD 1.90 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.05 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.33%, reaching USD 3.60 billion by 2032.
A compelling overview of how advancing technologies policy pressures and grower needs are reshaping soil sampling and testing into a strategic operational capability
The agriculture sector is undergoing a rapid evolution in how soil health is assessed, managed, and governed, and soil sampling and testing occupy a central role in that transformation. Reliable soil data underpins crop input decisions, regulatory compliance, environmental stewardship, and supply chain traceability, creating a convergence of scientific, commercial, and policy drivers that elevate the importance of standardized sampling and robust analytical methods. As precision agriculture practices scale, growers and service providers increasingly demand higher resolution, faster turnaround, and integrated interpretations that translate test results into actionable field strategies.
Consequently, service providers and technology vendors are innovating along multiple fronts: automation and remote sensing integration streamline field sampling, advanced laboratory platforms expand the suite of analytes, and data platforms synthesize heterogeneous datasets into prescriptive guidance. Meanwhile, end users ranging from commercial input manufacturers to government research bodies prioritize reproducibility and chain-of-custody controls to satisfy regulatory and certification requirements. Transitioning from traditional, calendar-based soil testing to evidence-driven, crop- and site-specific programs is not instantaneous; it requires investment in capacity building, standardized protocols, and interoperability across sampling, testing, and advisory systems. Nonetheless, the direction is clear: soil sampling and testing are shifting from periodic compliance checks to continuous inputs for adaptive agronomic management, and stakeholders who align processes, technology, and governance will be best positioned to capture downstream value.
How sensor convergence regulatory expectations and laboratory innovation are converging to transform soil sampling and testing into integrated agronomic and compliance ecosystems
The landscape for soil sampling and testing is shifting in ways that alter both operational practices and strategic priorities, and several transformative forces are converging to redefine industry norms. First, digital agriculture and sensor convergence are enabling higher frequency and spatially resolved data capture, which in turn increases demand for laboratory methods that are scalable, reproducible, and harmonized with in-field measurements. Second, regulatory frameworks and sustainability commitments are reinforcing the need for transparent provenance and standardized reporting, prompting laboratories and advisory services to adopt traceable workflows and verified methodologies.
Third, consolidation among service providers and increased partnerships with agricultural technology firms are driving vertical integration, where sampling, analytics, and decision-support are bundled into end-to-end solutions. Fourth, advances in spectroscopy and molecular biology expand the analytical toolbox, enabling detection of micronutrients, contaminants, and biological indicators that were previously impractical at scale. As a result, decision timelines are compressing: farmers and commodity handlers expect near-real-time interpretation, and research institutions are pushing for interoperable datasets to enable cross-study comparisons. Together, these shifts favor players who can bridge field operations, cutting-edge analytics, and actionable advisory services, while also maintaining stringent quality assurance and regulatory alignment.
Assessing how cumulative tariff actions through 2025 affect equipment costs logistics compliance and strategic choices across soil testing and sampling ecosystems
Policy decisions on tariffs can ripple through agricultural input supply chains, and cumulative tariff actions announced or implemented through 2025 have produced measurable implications for soil sampling and testing stakeholders. Increased duties on laboratory instrumentation, consumables, and chemicals raise the landed cost of critical testing equipment and reagents, exerting upward pressure on capital and operating expenditures for both commercial laboratories and research institutions. In turn, higher input costs incentivize consolidation of testing volumes, deferred equipment upgrades in smaller labs, and a search for alternative suppliers and regional manufacturing sources to mitigate exposure.
Concurrently, tariffs affecting fertilizer and agrochemical imports alter cropping practices and input mixes, which can change the frequency and focus of soil testing as growers seek to optimize altered nutrient strategies. For multinational service providers, shifts in cross-border trade flows create complexity in sample logistics, customs handling, and chain-of-custody documentation, increasing turnaround times and administrative burdens. Moreover, tariff-driven volatility heightens the value of local testing capacity and decentralised, field-deployable technologies that reduce dependency on internationally sourced laboratory infrastructure.
Consequently, stakeholders are prioritizing supply chain resilience, strategic inventory management of key consumables, and diversification of analytical portfolios towards methods less reliant on vulnerable imports. Over time, these adaptations influence investment decisions, partnership strategies, and the balance between centralized high-throughput labs and agile, in-field testing approaches.
Deep segmentation insights that reveal how service types user profiles technologies sampling approaches and crop classes shape capability priorities and commercial focus
Segmentation-driven insight provides a practical framework to align services, capabilities, and go-to-market strategies to specific user needs and operational contexts. Based on Service, the field divides between Sampling and Testing, where sampling protocols determine data quality and testing platforms deliver analytical depth, creating a dependency chain that requires coordinated quality assurance across both phases. Based on End User, stakeholders range from Chemical & Fertilizer Companies that rely on soil data for product formulation and efficacy testing, to Farmers who use results for field-level decision making, and Research Institutes & Government Bodies that require rigorous, reproducible data for policy development and long-term studies, each demanding distinct service levels and reporting formats.
Based on Technology, analytical approaches encompass Biological Testing, Chemical Testing, Physical Testing, and Spectroscopy, and the choice among these methods depends on the analytes of interest, desired sensitivity, and throughput requirements. Based on Sampling Method, practices include Directed, Grid, and Random approaches, each optimized for different objectives such as targeted diagnostics, spatial variability mapping, and representative estimations. Based on Crop Type, priorities shift across Cereals & Grains, Fruits & Vegetables, Oilseeds & Pulses, and Turf & Ornamentals due to differing nutrient regimes, contaminant risk profiles, and value-per-acre considerations. Synthesizing these segmentation axes clarifies where investment in capabilities and service design will yield the greatest differentiation and client impact, and it helps to prioritize product development and commercial outreach according to segment-specific operational constraints and value drivers.
A nuanced examination of regional contrasts in regulatory pressure infrastructure and adoption trends shaping soil testing and sampling strategies worldwide
Regional dynamics shape the demand drivers, regulatory environments, and supply chain architectures that determine how soil sampling and testing services develop and scale. In the Americas, agricultural intensification, strong agribusiness ecosystems, and expansive commodity production underpin demand for high-throughput testing and integrated advisory services, while regulatory scrutiny and sustainability programs push stakeholders to document practices with rigorous sampling and analytical records. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory stringency, resource constraints, and localized cropping systems, where harmonization efforts and capacity-building initiatives influence the adoption of standardized protocols and decentralized testing solutions.
Asia-Pacific combines rapid technology adoption with diverse farming scales, leading to strong interest in cost-effective, field-deployable tools complemented by centralized laboratory confirmation. Across regions, infrastructure for sample logistics, availability of reagents and consumables, and proximity to manufacturing centers vary significantly, which affects turnaround times and the viability of different business models. Furthermore, regional trade policies and environmental regulations create distinct compliance demands that laboratories and service providers must address through tailored reporting and validation approaches. Recognizing these regional contrasts enables strategy teams to align investments, partnerships, and service designs with local operational realities and regulatory expectations.
Strategic profiles of leading players highlighting how technology integration accreditation and service bundling drive competitive advantage and client value
Key companies in the soil sampling and testing ecosystem are differentiating through a combination of technological capability, service integration, and strategic partnerships. Leading laboratory networks are expanding their analytical portfolios to include advanced spectroscopy and molecular assays while investing in quality management systems and accreditation to meet diverse regulatory and commercial requirements. Technology firms focused on in-field sensing and automated sampling devices are partnering with analytics providers to offer end-to-end solutions that reduce friction between data capture and interpretive output.
At the same time, input suppliers and agribusinesses are developing proprietary testing protocols and advisory services to support product positioning and value-added services for growers. Research institutions and public bodies continue to play a pivotal role by validating novel methods and establishing reference standards that underpin industry adoption. Across these players, successful strategies emphasize interoperability, data provenance, and client-centric reporting that translates analytical results into prescriptive management recommendations. In addition, corporate approaches that balance centralized high-throughput capabilities with localized sampling and rapid-response testing are demonstrating resilience in the face of logistical and tariff-related pressures, underscoring the importance of flexible operating models.
Actionable recommendations that operationalize resilience interoperability and quality assurance to convert technological and regulatory shifts into competitive advantage
For industry leaders seeking to translate insight into advantage, pragmatic and actionable steps are essential to navigate technological change, regulatory complexity, and supply chain uncertainty. First, prioritize investments in interoperable data platforms that integrate sampling metadata, laboratory results, and agronomic models to deliver prescriptive recommendations rather than raw outputs. Second, diversify supplier relationships for critical instrumentation, consumables, and reagents to reduce exposure to tariff-driven supply shocks, and explore regional manufacturing partnerships that lower logistical risk.
Third, standardize sampling protocols and invest in training to ensure data comparability across clients and geographies, thereby strengthening trust in analytical outputs. Fourth, pursue accreditation and third-party validation for key methods to meet regulatory and procurement expectations of large commercial and governmental buyers. Fifth, adopt a hybrid service model that combines centralized high-throughput labs with mobile or field-deployable testing to optimize turnaround times and cost profiles. Finally, embed sustainability and traceability features into reporting frameworks to meet evolving compliance and buyer demands. Implementing these actions in a phased manner, with clear metrics for operational performance and client impact, will help organizations convert strategic intent into measurable returns.
A transparent and rigorous research methodology combining stakeholder engagement field validation and secondary synthesis to ensure practical and defensible insights
The research approach underpinning these insights integrates primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous secondary synthesis and methodological triangulation to ensure credibility and applicability. Primary inputs include structured interviews and consultations with laboratory directors, agronomic advisors, equipment suppliers, and policy stakeholders, capturing real-world operational constraints, procurement drivers, and emerging method preferences. These qualitative inputs are complemented by field visits and procedural audits that validate sampling workflows and laboratory chain-of-custody practices.
Secondary synthesis draws on peer-reviewed literature, standards bodies, and publicly available regulatory guidance to contextualize primary findings and to map technological trajectories against established validation frameworks. Throughout, methodological triangulation ensures that conclusions reflect convergent evidence across sources and that recommendations address both strategic imperatives and operational feasibility. Quality assurance is reinforced through iterative validation with domain experts and by documenting assumptions and limitations transparently, enabling readers to interpret applicability across different organizational contexts and geographies. Where appropriate, sensitivity to regional infrastructure and supply chain constraints has been embedded in analytical judgments to enhance practical relevance.
A concise synthesis of how capability alignment and resilient operational design determine who will scale trusted soil sampling and testing solutions across diverse agricultural contexts
In summary, soil sampling and testing are transitioning from episodic compliance instruments to foundational elements of data-driven agronomy, sustainability reporting, and supply chain traceability. Technological advances in sensing and laboratory analytics, coupled with regulatory and commercial demands for provenance and standardized reporting, are elevating expectations for turnaround, reproducibility, and actionable interpretation. At the same time, tariff-related cost dynamics and regional infrastructure variability are reshaping investment priorities and operating models, favoring adaptable organizations that can combine centralized analytical depth with decentralized responsiveness.
Looking ahead, success will depend on the ability to harmonize sampling protocols, invest in interoperable data systems, and pursue diversified supply and partnership strategies that mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks. Organizations that embed quality assurance, accreditation, and client-centric reporting into their service offerings will be better positioned to meet the evolving needs of growers, input suppliers, and public-sector stakeholders. Ultimately, the strategic choices made today about technology adoption, supply chain resilience, and service design will determine which players can scale trusted, high-value soil testing capabilities across diverse agricultural contexts.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A compelling overview of how advancing technologies policy pressures and grower needs are reshaping soil sampling and testing into a strategic operational capability
The agriculture sector is undergoing a rapid evolution in how soil health is assessed, managed, and governed, and soil sampling and testing occupy a central role in that transformation. Reliable soil data underpins crop input decisions, regulatory compliance, environmental stewardship, and supply chain traceability, creating a convergence of scientific, commercial, and policy drivers that elevate the importance of standardized sampling and robust analytical methods. As precision agriculture practices scale, growers and service providers increasingly demand higher resolution, faster turnaround, and integrated interpretations that translate test results into actionable field strategies.
Consequently, service providers and technology vendors are innovating along multiple fronts: automation and remote sensing integration streamline field sampling, advanced laboratory platforms expand the suite of analytes, and data platforms synthesize heterogeneous datasets into prescriptive guidance. Meanwhile, end users ranging from commercial input manufacturers to government research bodies prioritize reproducibility and chain-of-custody controls to satisfy regulatory and certification requirements. Transitioning from traditional, calendar-based soil testing to evidence-driven, crop- and site-specific programs is not instantaneous; it requires investment in capacity building, standardized protocols, and interoperability across sampling, testing, and advisory systems. Nonetheless, the direction is clear: soil sampling and testing are shifting from periodic compliance checks to continuous inputs for adaptive agronomic management, and stakeholders who align processes, technology, and governance will be best positioned to capture downstream value.
How sensor convergence regulatory expectations and laboratory innovation are converging to transform soil sampling and testing into integrated agronomic and compliance ecosystems
The landscape for soil sampling and testing is shifting in ways that alter both operational practices and strategic priorities, and several transformative forces are converging to redefine industry norms. First, digital agriculture and sensor convergence are enabling higher frequency and spatially resolved data capture, which in turn increases demand for laboratory methods that are scalable, reproducible, and harmonized with in-field measurements. Second, regulatory frameworks and sustainability commitments are reinforcing the need for transparent provenance and standardized reporting, prompting laboratories and advisory services to adopt traceable workflows and verified methodologies.
Third, consolidation among service providers and increased partnerships with agricultural technology firms are driving vertical integration, where sampling, analytics, and decision-support are bundled into end-to-end solutions. Fourth, advances in spectroscopy and molecular biology expand the analytical toolbox, enabling detection of micronutrients, contaminants, and biological indicators that were previously impractical at scale. As a result, decision timelines are compressing: farmers and commodity handlers expect near-real-time interpretation, and research institutions are pushing for interoperable datasets to enable cross-study comparisons. Together, these shifts favor players who can bridge field operations, cutting-edge analytics, and actionable advisory services, while also maintaining stringent quality assurance and regulatory alignment.
Assessing how cumulative tariff actions through 2025 affect equipment costs logistics compliance and strategic choices across soil testing and sampling ecosystems
Policy decisions on tariffs can ripple through agricultural input supply chains, and cumulative tariff actions announced or implemented through 2025 have produced measurable implications for soil sampling and testing stakeholders. Increased duties on laboratory instrumentation, consumables, and chemicals raise the landed cost of critical testing equipment and reagents, exerting upward pressure on capital and operating expenditures for both commercial laboratories and research institutions. In turn, higher input costs incentivize consolidation of testing volumes, deferred equipment upgrades in smaller labs, and a search for alternative suppliers and regional manufacturing sources to mitigate exposure.
Concurrently, tariffs affecting fertilizer and agrochemical imports alter cropping practices and input mixes, which can change the frequency and focus of soil testing as growers seek to optimize altered nutrient strategies. For multinational service providers, shifts in cross-border trade flows create complexity in sample logistics, customs handling, and chain-of-custody documentation, increasing turnaround times and administrative burdens. Moreover, tariff-driven volatility heightens the value of local testing capacity and decentralised, field-deployable technologies that reduce dependency on internationally sourced laboratory infrastructure.
Consequently, stakeholders are prioritizing supply chain resilience, strategic inventory management of key consumables, and diversification of analytical portfolios towards methods less reliant on vulnerable imports. Over time, these adaptations influence investment decisions, partnership strategies, and the balance between centralized high-throughput labs and agile, in-field testing approaches.
Deep segmentation insights that reveal how service types user profiles technologies sampling approaches and crop classes shape capability priorities and commercial focus
Segmentation-driven insight provides a practical framework to align services, capabilities, and go-to-market strategies to specific user needs and operational contexts. Based on Service, the field divides between Sampling and Testing, where sampling protocols determine data quality and testing platforms deliver analytical depth, creating a dependency chain that requires coordinated quality assurance across both phases. Based on End User, stakeholders range from Chemical & Fertilizer Companies that rely on soil data for product formulation and efficacy testing, to Farmers who use results for field-level decision making, and Research Institutes & Government Bodies that require rigorous, reproducible data for policy development and long-term studies, each demanding distinct service levels and reporting formats.
Based on Technology, analytical approaches encompass Biological Testing, Chemical Testing, Physical Testing, and Spectroscopy, and the choice among these methods depends on the analytes of interest, desired sensitivity, and throughput requirements. Based on Sampling Method, practices include Directed, Grid, and Random approaches, each optimized for different objectives such as targeted diagnostics, spatial variability mapping, and representative estimations. Based on Crop Type, priorities shift across Cereals & Grains, Fruits & Vegetables, Oilseeds & Pulses, and Turf & Ornamentals due to differing nutrient regimes, contaminant risk profiles, and value-per-acre considerations. Synthesizing these segmentation axes clarifies where investment in capabilities and service design will yield the greatest differentiation and client impact, and it helps to prioritize product development and commercial outreach according to segment-specific operational constraints and value drivers.
A nuanced examination of regional contrasts in regulatory pressure infrastructure and adoption trends shaping soil testing and sampling strategies worldwide
Regional dynamics shape the demand drivers, regulatory environments, and supply chain architectures that determine how soil sampling and testing services develop and scale. In the Americas, agricultural intensification, strong agribusiness ecosystems, and expansive commodity production underpin demand for high-throughput testing and integrated advisory services, while regulatory scrutiny and sustainability programs push stakeholders to document practices with rigorous sampling and analytical records. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory stringency, resource constraints, and localized cropping systems, where harmonization efforts and capacity-building initiatives influence the adoption of standardized protocols and decentralized testing solutions.
Asia-Pacific combines rapid technology adoption with diverse farming scales, leading to strong interest in cost-effective, field-deployable tools complemented by centralized laboratory confirmation. Across regions, infrastructure for sample logistics, availability of reagents and consumables, and proximity to manufacturing centers vary significantly, which affects turnaround times and the viability of different business models. Furthermore, regional trade policies and environmental regulations create distinct compliance demands that laboratories and service providers must address through tailored reporting and validation approaches. Recognizing these regional contrasts enables strategy teams to align investments, partnerships, and service designs with local operational realities and regulatory expectations.
Strategic profiles of leading players highlighting how technology integration accreditation and service bundling drive competitive advantage and client value
Key companies in the soil sampling and testing ecosystem are differentiating through a combination of technological capability, service integration, and strategic partnerships. Leading laboratory networks are expanding their analytical portfolios to include advanced spectroscopy and molecular assays while investing in quality management systems and accreditation to meet diverse regulatory and commercial requirements. Technology firms focused on in-field sensing and automated sampling devices are partnering with analytics providers to offer end-to-end solutions that reduce friction between data capture and interpretive output.
At the same time, input suppliers and agribusinesses are developing proprietary testing protocols and advisory services to support product positioning and value-added services for growers. Research institutions and public bodies continue to play a pivotal role by validating novel methods and establishing reference standards that underpin industry adoption. Across these players, successful strategies emphasize interoperability, data provenance, and client-centric reporting that translates analytical results into prescriptive management recommendations. In addition, corporate approaches that balance centralized high-throughput capabilities with localized sampling and rapid-response testing are demonstrating resilience in the face of logistical and tariff-related pressures, underscoring the importance of flexible operating models.
Actionable recommendations that operationalize resilience interoperability and quality assurance to convert technological and regulatory shifts into competitive advantage
For industry leaders seeking to translate insight into advantage, pragmatic and actionable steps are essential to navigate technological change, regulatory complexity, and supply chain uncertainty. First, prioritize investments in interoperable data platforms that integrate sampling metadata, laboratory results, and agronomic models to deliver prescriptive recommendations rather than raw outputs. Second, diversify supplier relationships for critical instrumentation, consumables, and reagents to reduce exposure to tariff-driven supply shocks, and explore regional manufacturing partnerships that lower logistical risk.
Third, standardize sampling protocols and invest in training to ensure data comparability across clients and geographies, thereby strengthening trust in analytical outputs. Fourth, pursue accreditation and third-party validation for key methods to meet regulatory and procurement expectations of large commercial and governmental buyers. Fifth, adopt a hybrid service model that combines centralized high-throughput labs with mobile or field-deployable testing to optimize turnaround times and cost profiles. Finally, embed sustainability and traceability features into reporting frameworks to meet evolving compliance and buyer demands. Implementing these actions in a phased manner, with clear metrics for operational performance and client impact, will help organizations convert strategic intent into measurable returns.
A transparent and rigorous research methodology combining stakeholder engagement field validation and secondary synthesis to ensure practical and defensible insights
The research approach underpinning these insights integrates primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous secondary synthesis and methodological triangulation to ensure credibility and applicability. Primary inputs include structured interviews and consultations with laboratory directors, agronomic advisors, equipment suppliers, and policy stakeholders, capturing real-world operational constraints, procurement drivers, and emerging method preferences. These qualitative inputs are complemented by field visits and procedural audits that validate sampling workflows and laboratory chain-of-custody practices.
Secondary synthesis draws on peer-reviewed literature, standards bodies, and publicly available regulatory guidance to contextualize primary findings and to map technological trajectories against established validation frameworks. Throughout, methodological triangulation ensures that conclusions reflect convergent evidence across sources and that recommendations address both strategic imperatives and operational feasibility. Quality assurance is reinforced through iterative validation with domain experts and by documenting assumptions and limitations transparently, enabling readers to interpret applicability across different organizational contexts and geographies. Where appropriate, sensitivity to regional infrastructure and supply chain constraints has been embedded in analytical judgments to enhance practical relevance.
A concise synthesis of how capability alignment and resilient operational design determine who will scale trusted soil sampling and testing solutions across diverse agricultural contexts
In summary, soil sampling and testing are transitioning from episodic compliance instruments to foundational elements of data-driven agronomy, sustainability reporting, and supply chain traceability. Technological advances in sensing and laboratory analytics, coupled with regulatory and commercial demands for provenance and standardized reporting, are elevating expectations for turnaround, reproducibility, and actionable interpretation. At the same time, tariff-related cost dynamics and regional infrastructure variability are reshaping investment priorities and operating models, favoring adaptable organizations that can combine centralized analytical depth with decentralized responsiveness.
Looking ahead, success will depend on the ability to harmonize sampling protocols, invest in interoperable data systems, and pursue diversified supply and partnership strategies that mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks. Organizations that embed quality assurance, accreditation, and client-centric reporting into their service offerings will be better positioned to meet the evolving needs of growers, input suppliers, and public-sector stakeholders. Ultimately, the strategic choices made today about technology adoption, supply chain resilience, and service design will determine which players can scale trusted, high-value soil testing capabilities across diverse agricultural contexts.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven nutrient analytics to optimize variable rate fertilization applications
- 5.2. Deployment of drone-assisted soil sampling methods for high-resolution field variability mapping
- 5.3. Adoption of in-situ electrochemical sensors for real-time monitoring of soil moisture and pH levels
- 5.4. Expansion of microbial community profiling services for comprehensive soil health assessment
- 5.5. Use of blockchain-enabled traceability platforms to certify soil test data integrity
- 5.6. Implementation of carbon sequestration measurement protocols in soil testing for sustainability credits
- 5.7. Growth of remote sensing and GIS-based predictive soil fertility modeling tools for precision ag
- 5.8. Development of rapid field-based spectroscopic devices for immediate nutrient and contaminant detection
- 5.9. Emergence of data-driven decision support systems integrating soil test results with crop management planning
- 5.10. Collaboration between agritech startups and research institutions to standardize soil organic matter assays
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Service
- 8.1. Sampling
- 8.2. Testing
- 9. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Biological Testing
- 9.2. Chemical Testing
- 9.3. Physical Testing
- 9.4. Spectroscopy
- 10. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Sampling Method
- 10.1. Directed
- 10.2. Grid
- 10.3. Random
- 11. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Crop Type
- 11.1. Cereals & Grains
- 11.2. Fruits & Vegetables
- 11.3. Oilseeds & Pulses
- 11.4. Turf & Ornamentals
- 12. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by End User
- 12.1. Chemical & Fertilizer Companies
- 12.2. Farmers
- 12.3. Research Institutes & Government Bodies
- 13. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Agriculture Soil Sampling & Testing Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. A&L Canada Laboratories Inc.
- 16.3.2. Advantech Manufacturing, Inc. by W.S. Tyler
- 16.3.3. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.4. AgroCares B.V.
- 16.3.5. Agvise Laboratories
- 16.3.6. EIE Instruments Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Eurofins Scientific SE
- 16.3.8. Geotechnical Testing Equipment UK Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Gilson Company Inc.
- 16.3.10. Humboldt Mfg. Co.
- 16.3.11. LaMotte Company
- 16.3.12. LogiAg
- 16.3.13. Martin Lishman Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Matest S.p.A.
- 16.3.15. Merck KGaA
- 16.3.16. Nanbei Instrument Limited
- 16.3.17. PerkinElmer Inc.
- 16.3.18. Perry Agricultural Laboratory Inc.
- 16.3.19. Precision Laboratories LLC
- 16.3.20. Premier Tech Chronos
- 16.3.21. Rock River Laboratory Inc.
- 16.3.22. Soiltech (PTY) Ltd.
- 16.3.23. Symbio Laboratories
- 16.3.24. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 16.3.25. Ward Laboratories Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
