Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market by Equipment Type (Baling Equipment, Harvesters, Planting Equipment), Horsepower Range (100-500 Horsepower, 40-100 Horsepower, Greater Than 500 Horsepower), Power Source, Operation Mode, Mechanization Level, Application
Description
The Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market was valued at USD 123.15 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 130.23 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.66%, reaching USD 193.51 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to the multi-dimensional forces reshaping agricultural equipment demand and the strategic implications for industry participants
The agricultural equipment sector stands at an inflection point driven by converging technological, environmental, and structural forces that are reshaping how crops are planted, protected, harvested, and processed. Advances in electrification, automation, and precision control are altering product architectures and business models, while heightened scrutiny of emissions and resource efficiency is reshaping procurement priorities among large-scale operators and smaller farms alike.
Transitioning from labor-intensive workflows to data-enabled decision cycles has also elevated the role of software, sensors, and telematics as core differentiators. Concurrently, changing farm structures, including consolidation in some regions and fragmentation in specialty horticulture, are creating differentiated demand for versatile, scalable equipment. This introduction synthesizes those drivers and frames the subsequent analysis so executives can prioritize investments that balance short-term resilience and long-term competitive advantage.
Holistic analysis of the persistent and accelerating transformational forces disrupting product architectures, business models, and supply chains across the agricultural equipment industry
A wave of transformative shifts is redefining competitive advantage across the agricultural equipment value chain, with technological adoption accelerating as operational and environmental priorities realign. Electrification and hybrid powertrains are rising from niche experiments into viable alternatives for low- and mid-power applications, supported by improving battery technology and attention to total cost of ownership. In parallel, autonomy and assisted-driving solutions are moving beyond proof-of-concept deployments into repeatable models that reduce labor dependency and enable precision operations on larger contiguous farms.
Data-driven services are emerging as recurring-revenue opportunities; manufacturers that combine hardware with cloud-based analytics and predictive maintenance can deepen customer relationships and differentiate on uptime. Supply chain diversification and regionalized sourcing are becoming strategic responses to geopolitical shifts and trade friction. Finally, sustainability and regenerative practices are influencing machinery specifications, with equipment increasingly designed to support soil health, reduced tillage, and targeted inputs. Taken together, these changes create an environment where modularity, interoperability, and service orientation determine winners and laggards alike.
Detailed examination of the layered operational and strategic consequences stemming from United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and the ensuing industry responses
United States tariff actions in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity to sourcing, pricing, and inventory strategies across the agricultural equipment ecosystem. Tariff adjustments influenced component procurement from global suppliers, prompting original equipment manufacturers to evaluate nearshoring, dual-sourcing, and supplier consolidation as levers to stabilize costs and delivery windows. These changes also accelerated conversations about localized manufacturing and capacity investments intended to mitigate exposure to future trade policy shifts.
Operationally, dealers and distributors adjusted stocking strategies and financing offers to maintain equipment availability for time-sensitive seasonal demand. At the farm level, procurement cycles lengthened as buyers weighed total acquisition costs, after-sales support, and the potential impact of tariffs on replacement parts. To navigate this environment, firms strengthened cross-functional coordination between procurement, legal, and commercial teams and increased engagement with logistics partners to secure transit capacity and alternative routing. Regulatory monitoring and scenario planning became standard practice, and many organizations adopted dynamic pricing frameworks and customer communication plans to preserve trust while transferring necessary cost adjustments in a measured manner.
Strategic segmentation insights integrating equipment classes, power ranges, energy sources, operation modes, mechanization tiers, and application-specific subsegments to reveal demand corridors
Insightful segmentation analysis reveals nuanced demand patterns when equipment categories, horsepower bands, power sources, operation modes, mechanization levels, and applications are considered together. Equipment types such as baling equipment, harvesters, planting equipment, spraying equipment, and tractors exhibit distinct innovation pathways: baling equipment divides into round balers and square balers, while harvesters differentiate into combine harvesters, forage harvesters, and multi crop harvesters, each with unique torque, control, and residue-management requirements. Planting equipment spans planters, seeders, and transplanters, where seed placement accuracy and soil engagement are critical, and spraying equipment ranges from aerial spraying to airblast sprayers and boom sprayers, with drift management and precision targeting shaping design priorities.
Horsepower segmentation further clarifies product-market fit across operator types: ranges such as less than 40 horsepower, 40 to 100 horsepower, 100 to 500 horsepower, and greater than 500 horsepower determine the feasibility of electrified powertrains, transmission choices, and implement compatibility. Power source preferences-diesel, electric, and petrol-interact with these horsepower bands and with operational mode distinctions between PTO driven, self propelled, and towed equipment. Mechanization levels that span automatic, manual, and semi automatic deployment models influence user training, cycle times, and aftermarket requirements. Application contexts-crop farming, horticulture, and livestock farming-further segment demand; crop farming itself comprises cereals and grains, oilseeds and pulses, and vegetables and fruits, while horticulture includes greenhouse, nursery, and open field systems, and livestock farming covers cattle ranching, dairy farming, and poultry farming. When layered together, these segmentation dimensions reveal corridors of rapid technological adoption, pockets of persistent manual operation where cost and simplicity dominate, and clear opportunities for solutions that bridge powertrain efficiency, precision control, and serviceability to meet the needs of diverse agricultural end users.
Regional competitive and operational intelligence examining how geographic crop profiles, regulation, and capital structures drive differentiated equipment demand and go-to-market approaches
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and strategic priorities, with the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each presenting distinct combinations of crop profiles, regulatory pressures, and capital structures. In the Americas, broadacre grain and oilseed production drives demand for high-horsepower tractors and large-scale planting and harvesting platforms, while aftermarket service networks and equipment financing play critical roles in adoption cycles. Transitioning to lower-emission options is influenced by state and provincial incentives, as well as commercial fleet commitments.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits heterogeneity: intensive horticulture and smaller field sizes in parts of Europe favor compact, high-precision implements and electrified or hybrid solutions compatible with greenhouse and nursery operations, while regions in the Middle East and parts of Africa prioritize ruggedness, fuel flexibility, and low total-cost-of-ownership models. In Asia-Pacific, a mix of smallholder operations and industrial-scale farming creates demand for a broad spectrum of equipment, from compact transplanters and low-horsepower tractors to self propelled harvesters in commercial operations. Supply chain localization, dealer networks, and regulatory alignment around emissions and safety standards are recurring themes across all regions, influencing manufacturers’ product roadmaps and go-to-market structures.
Actionable corporate intelligence on how incumbents and disruptors are leveraging product, digital, and service capabilities to capture enduring competitive advantage
Leading firms and new entrants are redefining competitive advantage by combining hardware excellence with software-enabled services, aftermarket reach, and flexible financing. Established manufacturers are broadening their portfolios to include electrified variants, telemetry-enabled maintenance offerings, and modular implements that reduce time-to-value for customers. At the same time, agile component suppliers and vertically integrated startups are accelerating niche innovations-such as advanced sensing packages, precision applicators, and retrofit autonomy kits-that can be embedded into legacy platforms to extend asset life and functionality.
Distribution partners and dealer networks remain pivotal, serving as the primary interface for training, customization, and field support. Companies that invest in dealer digitalization, remote diagnostics, and parts availability enhance uptime and customer loyalty. Financial services providers and captive finance arms are also playing an increasingly strategic role by structuring payment solutions tied to yield outcomes or seasonal cash flows. Competitive positioning is therefore shaped by the ability to orchestrate cross-functional capabilities that span R&D, manufacturing, software, financing, and field support to deliver a coherent value proposition across diverse customer segments.
Prioritised actionable recommendations for leaders to build resilient supply chains, modular product architectures, and commercially viable service models that accelerate market adoption
Industry leaders should prioritize a balanced agenda that simultaneously addresses supply chain resilience, technological differentiation, and commercial model innovation. Investing in flexible manufacturing and nearshore supplier relationships will reduce exposure to trade policy volatility while enabling faster product customization for regional needs. Product roadmaps should emphasize modular architectures that allow the same platform to support diesel, hybrid, or full-electric powertrains and to accept sensor and autonomy modules without significant redesign.
Commercial strategies must evolve to reflect customer cash-flow cycles and performance expectations; offering flexible financing, outcome-linked contracts, and bundled service plans will help convert short-term cost sensitivity into longer-term loyalty. On the aftermarket side, strengthening diagnostics, parts logistics, and technician training will protect uptime and create recurring revenue streams. Finally, proactive regulatory engagement and participation in cross-industry consortia will shape standards for safety, interoperability, and emissions, enabling companies to de-risk investments and accelerate adoption through aligned policy frameworks.
Robust mixed-method research methodology combining primary engagements, field validation, expert panels, and rigorous triangulation to ensure defensible strategic insights
The research underpinning this executive summary relied on a mixed-methods approach that triangulates qualitative and quantitative inputs to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagement included structured interviews with OEM executives, dealer principals, equipment operators, and component suppliers, supplemented by field observations and site visits to understand real-world operating conditions and service workflows. Expert panels and validation workshops provided iterative feedback on emerging themes and allowed for scenario testing across trade and technology variables.
Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed industry literature, regulatory filings, and technical specifications to contextualize primary findings and to map trends in product architecture and policy. Data quality procedures included cross-validation across sources, temporal consistency checks, and methodological documentation to ensure transparency. Where applicable, sensitivity analysis and scenario modelling were used to explore the implications of tariff changes, technology adoption rates, and regional policy shifts, enabling a grounded interpretation of strategic options for stakeholders.
Concise concluding synthesis emphasizing the strategic priorities that will determine who captures long-term value as agricultural equipment markets modernize and trade dynamics evolve
In conclusion, the agricultural equipment industry is undergoing a period of sustained transformation driven by technology, policy, and shifting operator economics. Electrification, autonomy, and data-enabled services are not isolated trends but interconnected vectors that together redefine product lifecycles and customer relationships. Trade policy developments have added complexity to sourcing and pricing decisions, but they have also incentivized strategic nearshoring and supplier diversification that enhance long-term resilience.
Executives who align product modularity with digital services, and who integrate supply chain flexibility with customer-centric commercial models, will be well positioned to capture value as the sector modernizes. Continued investment in dealer capabilities, technician training, and sustainability-aligned product features will further differentiate market leaders. Ultimately, the ability to turn insights into operational plans will determine which organizations translate disruptive change into sustainable competitive advantage.
Comprehensive introduction to the multi-dimensional forces reshaping agricultural equipment demand and the strategic implications for industry participants
The agricultural equipment sector stands at an inflection point driven by converging technological, environmental, and structural forces that are reshaping how crops are planted, protected, harvested, and processed. Advances in electrification, automation, and precision control are altering product architectures and business models, while heightened scrutiny of emissions and resource efficiency is reshaping procurement priorities among large-scale operators and smaller farms alike.
Transitioning from labor-intensive workflows to data-enabled decision cycles has also elevated the role of software, sensors, and telematics as core differentiators. Concurrently, changing farm structures, including consolidation in some regions and fragmentation in specialty horticulture, are creating differentiated demand for versatile, scalable equipment. This introduction synthesizes those drivers and frames the subsequent analysis so executives can prioritize investments that balance short-term resilience and long-term competitive advantage.
Holistic analysis of the persistent and accelerating transformational forces disrupting product architectures, business models, and supply chains across the agricultural equipment industry
A wave of transformative shifts is redefining competitive advantage across the agricultural equipment value chain, with technological adoption accelerating as operational and environmental priorities realign. Electrification and hybrid powertrains are rising from niche experiments into viable alternatives for low- and mid-power applications, supported by improving battery technology and attention to total cost of ownership. In parallel, autonomy and assisted-driving solutions are moving beyond proof-of-concept deployments into repeatable models that reduce labor dependency and enable precision operations on larger contiguous farms.
Data-driven services are emerging as recurring-revenue opportunities; manufacturers that combine hardware with cloud-based analytics and predictive maintenance can deepen customer relationships and differentiate on uptime. Supply chain diversification and regionalized sourcing are becoming strategic responses to geopolitical shifts and trade friction. Finally, sustainability and regenerative practices are influencing machinery specifications, with equipment increasingly designed to support soil health, reduced tillage, and targeted inputs. Taken together, these changes create an environment where modularity, interoperability, and service orientation determine winners and laggards alike.
Detailed examination of the layered operational and strategic consequences stemming from United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and the ensuing industry responses
United States tariff actions in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity to sourcing, pricing, and inventory strategies across the agricultural equipment ecosystem. Tariff adjustments influenced component procurement from global suppliers, prompting original equipment manufacturers to evaluate nearshoring, dual-sourcing, and supplier consolidation as levers to stabilize costs and delivery windows. These changes also accelerated conversations about localized manufacturing and capacity investments intended to mitigate exposure to future trade policy shifts.
Operationally, dealers and distributors adjusted stocking strategies and financing offers to maintain equipment availability for time-sensitive seasonal demand. At the farm level, procurement cycles lengthened as buyers weighed total acquisition costs, after-sales support, and the potential impact of tariffs on replacement parts. To navigate this environment, firms strengthened cross-functional coordination between procurement, legal, and commercial teams and increased engagement with logistics partners to secure transit capacity and alternative routing. Regulatory monitoring and scenario planning became standard practice, and many organizations adopted dynamic pricing frameworks and customer communication plans to preserve trust while transferring necessary cost adjustments in a measured manner.
Strategic segmentation insights integrating equipment classes, power ranges, energy sources, operation modes, mechanization tiers, and application-specific subsegments to reveal demand corridors
Insightful segmentation analysis reveals nuanced demand patterns when equipment categories, horsepower bands, power sources, operation modes, mechanization levels, and applications are considered together. Equipment types such as baling equipment, harvesters, planting equipment, spraying equipment, and tractors exhibit distinct innovation pathways: baling equipment divides into round balers and square balers, while harvesters differentiate into combine harvesters, forage harvesters, and multi crop harvesters, each with unique torque, control, and residue-management requirements. Planting equipment spans planters, seeders, and transplanters, where seed placement accuracy and soil engagement are critical, and spraying equipment ranges from aerial spraying to airblast sprayers and boom sprayers, with drift management and precision targeting shaping design priorities.
Horsepower segmentation further clarifies product-market fit across operator types: ranges such as less than 40 horsepower, 40 to 100 horsepower, 100 to 500 horsepower, and greater than 500 horsepower determine the feasibility of electrified powertrains, transmission choices, and implement compatibility. Power source preferences-diesel, electric, and petrol-interact with these horsepower bands and with operational mode distinctions between PTO driven, self propelled, and towed equipment. Mechanization levels that span automatic, manual, and semi automatic deployment models influence user training, cycle times, and aftermarket requirements. Application contexts-crop farming, horticulture, and livestock farming-further segment demand; crop farming itself comprises cereals and grains, oilseeds and pulses, and vegetables and fruits, while horticulture includes greenhouse, nursery, and open field systems, and livestock farming covers cattle ranching, dairy farming, and poultry farming. When layered together, these segmentation dimensions reveal corridors of rapid technological adoption, pockets of persistent manual operation where cost and simplicity dominate, and clear opportunities for solutions that bridge powertrain efficiency, precision control, and serviceability to meet the needs of diverse agricultural end users.
Regional competitive and operational intelligence examining how geographic crop profiles, regulation, and capital structures drive differentiated equipment demand and go-to-market approaches
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and strategic priorities, with the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each presenting distinct combinations of crop profiles, regulatory pressures, and capital structures. In the Americas, broadacre grain and oilseed production drives demand for high-horsepower tractors and large-scale planting and harvesting platforms, while aftermarket service networks and equipment financing play critical roles in adoption cycles. Transitioning to lower-emission options is influenced by state and provincial incentives, as well as commercial fleet commitments.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits heterogeneity: intensive horticulture and smaller field sizes in parts of Europe favor compact, high-precision implements and electrified or hybrid solutions compatible with greenhouse and nursery operations, while regions in the Middle East and parts of Africa prioritize ruggedness, fuel flexibility, and low total-cost-of-ownership models. In Asia-Pacific, a mix of smallholder operations and industrial-scale farming creates demand for a broad spectrum of equipment, from compact transplanters and low-horsepower tractors to self propelled harvesters in commercial operations. Supply chain localization, dealer networks, and regulatory alignment around emissions and safety standards are recurring themes across all regions, influencing manufacturers’ product roadmaps and go-to-market structures.
Actionable corporate intelligence on how incumbents and disruptors are leveraging product, digital, and service capabilities to capture enduring competitive advantage
Leading firms and new entrants are redefining competitive advantage by combining hardware excellence with software-enabled services, aftermarket reach, and flexible financing. Established manufacturers are broadening their portfolios to include electrified variants, telemetry-enabled maintenance offerings, and modular implements that reduce time-to-value for customers. At the same time, agile component suppliers and vertically integrated startups are accelerating niche innovations-such as advanced sensing packages, precision applicators, and retrofit autonomy kits-that can be embedded into legacy platforms to extend asset life and functionality.
Distribution partners and dealer networks remain pivotal, serving as the primary interface for training, customization, and field support. Companies that invest in dealer digitalization, remote diagnostics, and parts availability enhance uptime and customer loyalty. Financial services providers and captive finance arms are also playing an increasingly strategic role by structuring payment solutions tied to yield outcomes or seasonal cash flows. Competitive positioning is therefore shaped by the ability to orchestrate cross-functional capabilities that span R&D, manufacturing, software, financing, and field support to deliver a coherent value proposition across diverse customer segments.
Prioritised actionable recommendations for leaders to build resilient supply chains, modular product architectures, and commercially viable service models that accelerate market adoption
Industry leaders should prioritize a balanced agenda that simultaneously addresses supply chain resilience, technological differentiation, and commercial model innovation. Investing in flexible manufacturing and nearshore supplier relationships will reduce exposure to trade policy volatility while enabling faster product customization for regional needs. Product roadmaps should emphasize modular architectures that allow the same platform to support diesel, hybrid, or full-electric powertrains and to accept sensor and autonomy modules without significant redesign.
Commercial strategies must evolve to reflect customer cash-flow cycles and performance expectations; offering flexible financing, outcome-linked contracts, and bundled service plans will help convert short-term cost sensitivity into longer-term loyalty. On the aftermarket side, strengthening diagnostics, parts logistics, and technician training will protect uptime and create recurring revenue streams. Finally, proactive regulatory engagement and participation in cross-industry consortia will shape standards for safety, interoperability, and emissions, enabling companies to de-risk investments and accelerate adoption through aligned policy frameworks.
Robust mixed-method research methodology combining primary engagements, field validation, expert panels, and rigorous triangulation to ensure defensible strategic insights
The research underpinning this executive summary relied on a mixed-methods approach that triangulates qualitative and quantitative inputs to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagement included structured interviews with OEM executives, dealer principals, equipment operators, and component suppliers, supplemented by field observations and site visits to understand real-world operating conditions and service workflows. Expert panels and validation workshops provided iterative feedback on emerging themes and allowed for scenario testing across trade and technology variables.
Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed industry literature, regulatory filings, and technical specifications to contextualize primary findings and to map trends in product architecture and policy. Data quality procedures included cross-validation across sources, temporal consistency checks, and methodological documentation to ensure transparency. Where applicable, sensitivity analysis and scenario modelling were used to explore the implications of tariff changes, technology adoption rates, and regional policy shifts, enabling a grounded interpretation of strategic options for stakeholders.
Concise concluding synthesis emphasizing the strategic priorities that will determine who captures long-term value as agricultural equipment markets modernize and trade dynamics evolve
In conclusion, the agricultural equipment industry is undergoing a period of sustained transformation driven by technology, policy, and shifting operator economics. Electrification, autonomy, and data-enabled services are not isolated trends but interconnected vectors that together redefine product lifecycles and customer relationships. Trade policy developments have added complexity to sourcing and pricing decisions, but they have also incentivized strategic nearshoring and supplier diversification that enhance long-term resilience.
Executives who align product modularity with digital services, and who integrate supply chain flexibility with customer-centric commercial models, will be well positioned to capture value as the sector modernizes. Continued investment in dealer capabilities, technician training, and sustainability-aligned product features will further differentiate market leaders. Ultimately, the ability to turn insights into operational plans will determine which organizations translate disruptive change into sustainable competitive advantage.
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Equipment Type
- 8.1. Baling Equipment
- 8.1.1. Round Baler
- 8.1.2. Square Baler
- 8.2. Harvesters
- 8.2.1. Combine Harvester
- 8.2.2. Forage Harvester
- 8.2.3. Multi Crop Harvester
- 8.3. Planting Equipment
- 8.3.1. Planters
- 8.3.2. Seeders
- 8.3.3. Transplanters
- 8.4. Spraying Equipment
- 8.4.1. Aerial Spraying
- 8.4.2. Airblast Sprayer
- 8.4.3. Boom Sprayer
- 8.5. Tractors
- 9. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Horsepower Range
- 9.1. 100-500 Horsepower
- 9.2. 40-100 Horsepower
- 9.3. Greater Than 500 Horsepower
- 9.4. Less Than 40 Horsepower
- 10. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Power Source
- 10.1. Diesel
- 10.2. Electric
- 10.3. Petrol
- 11. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Operation Mode
- 11.1. PTO Driven
- 11.2. Self Propelled
- 11.3. Towed
- 12. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Mechanization Level
- 12.1. Automatic
- 12.2. Manual
- 12.3. Semi Automatic
- 13. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Application
- 13.1. Crop Farming
- 13.1.1. Cereals And Grains
- 13.1.2. Oilseeds And Pulses
- 13.1.3. Vegetables And Fruits
- 13.2. Horticulture
- 13.2.1. Greenhouse
- 13.2.2. Nursery
- 13.2.3. Open Field
- 13.3. Livestock Farming
- 13.3.1. Cattle Ranching
- 13.3.2. Dairy Farming
- 13.3.3. Poultry Farming
- 14. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. United States Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market
- 18. China Agriculture & Farm Equipment Market
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 19.5. AGCO Corporation
- 19.6. Alamo Group Inc.
- 19.7. Bucher Industries AG
- 19.8. Caterpillar Inc.
- 19.9. CLAAS KGaA mbH
- 19.10. CNH Industrial N.V.
- 19.11. Deere & Company
- 19.12. Doosan Group
- 19.13. GRIMME Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- 19.14. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 19.15. Iseki & Co., Ltd.
- 19.16. JC Bamford Excavators Ltd.
- 19.17. Kubota Corporation
- 19.18. LEMKEN GmbH & Co. KG
- 19.19. Lindsay Corporation
- 19.20. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- 19.21. Maschinenfabrik Bernard KRONE GmbH & Co.KG
- 19.22. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
- 19.23. PÖTTINGER Landtechnik GmbH
- 19.24. SDF Group
- 19.25. Valmont Industries, Inc.
- 19.26. Väderstad Group
- 19.27. Weichai Lovol Intelligent Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.
- 19.28. Yanmar Holdings Co., Ltd.
- FIGURE 1. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 2. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
- FIGURE 3. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
- FIGURE 4. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 5. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY HORSEPOWER RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 6. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY POWER SOURCE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 7. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION MODE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 8. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANIZATION LEVEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 9. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 10. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 11. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 12. GLOBAL AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 14. CHINA AGRICULTURE & FARM EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
