Advanced Composites Market by Fiber Type (Aramid Fiber, Carbon Fiber, Glass Fiber), Matrix Type (Thermoplastic, Thermoset), Product Type, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Advanced Composites Market was valued at USD 35.32 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 38.45 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.69%, reaching USD 74.04 billion by 2032.
A clear contextual overview explaining how advanced composite materials have transitioned into strategic enablers across multiple high-performance industries
Advanced composite materials have moved from niche applications to mainstream strategic assets across high-value industries. Driven by the imperative for lighter, stronger and more durable structures, carbon, glass and aramid fiber reinforced systems have been integrated into critical subsystems for aerospace, transportation, renewable energy and infrastructure. This introduction establishes the technical, commercial and regulatory context within which product developers, procurement leaders and policy makers now operate.
Over recent years, material science breakthroughs in fiber technology and matrix chemistries have broadened performance envelopes, enabling new form factors and manufacturing paradigms. Concurrently, demand-side dynamics-stricter fuel efficiency targets, lifecycle carbon scrutiny, and the electrification of transport-have elevated composites from engineering curiosities to central design levers. As a result, organizations must evaluate materials not only on mechanical metrics but also on recyclability, processing throughput and end-of-life pathways. This report synthesizes those converging drivers to frame strategic choices, laying the groundwork for deeper analysis of market shifts, tariff effects, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics and competitive positioning.
How material innovations, manufacturing automation, supply chain realignment and policy pressures are converging to reshape competitive dynamics in advanced composites
The landscape for advanced composites is undergoing transformative shifts that extend beyond incremental material improvements to systemic changes in supply chains, manufacturing, and regulatory frameworks. One of the most consequential transitions is the accelerating adoption of thermoplastic matrices alongside established thermoset systems, driven by the need for faster cycle times, improved damage tolerance and enhanced recyclability. In parallel, fiber innovations-particularly in high-modulus and ultra-high-modulus carbon grades-are enabling lighter, stiffer structures that expand design possibilities for aerospace and high-end automotive sectors.
Manufacturing is also being reshaped by automation and high-rate processes such as high-pressure resin transfer molding and advanced compression molding modalities. These developments are lowering unit costs and improving consistency, which in turn broaden use cases for composites in price-sensitive applications like automotive body panels and certain construction elements. Supply chains are adapting through greater vertical integration and strategic partnerships between fiber producers, resin formulators and tier suppliers. At the policy level, trade measures and sustainability mandates are incentivizing onshore capacity and circularity initiatives, prompting companies to reassess sourcing strategies and invest in material recovery and reuse programs. Taken together, these shifts create a new competitive matrix where technology leadership, manufacturing agility and regulatory alignment determine long-term advantage.
Assessment of the persistent operational and strategic consequences stemming from United States tariffs implemented in 2025 and how they influence sourcing and production choices
Cumulative tariffs enacted by the United States in 2025 have introduced a lasting inflection point for cross-border trade and sourcing strategies in the composites ecosystem. Rather than a single shock, the tariffs have precipitated a sequence of operational responses: relocation of sensitive production stages, reconfiguration of supplier relationships, and accelerated efforts to secure domestic feedstock. As a consequence, firms have prioritized resilience and traceability, placing a premium on local qualifications and certification to ensure continuity of supply for regulated sectors such as aerospace and defense.
Trade barriers have also altered commercial math for complex assemblies that combine imported fibers or resins with domestically produced components. Many manufacturers have shifted higher-value processing activities closer to end markets to mitigate tariff exposure, even when this entails capital investment in automated molding and consolidation cells. Additionally, strategic buyers are diversifying supplier portfolios to include multiple geographies and alternative materials with lower tariff risk profiles. While these adjustments have raised near-term operational costs for some players, they have also catalyzed longer-term benefits in supply chain transparency and reduced lead-time volatility. Importantly, the tariff environment has intensified scrutiny on total landed cost and lifecycle trade-offs, compelling procurement and engineering teams to collaborate more tightly when assessing material and process choices.
Detailed segmentation-driven insights that clarify material, matrix, processing, application and product type differentiators and their implications for commercial strategy
Segment-level understanding is essential for translating material science into business strategy, and this analysis organizes the market across fiber type, matrix type, manufacturing process, application, and product type to highlight differentiated value pathways. In fiber type, the market is examined across aramid fiber, carbon fiber, and glass fiber, with carbon fiber further differentiated into high modulus, intermediate modulus, standard modulus, and ultra high modulus classes; this gradation captures the trade-offs between stiffness, toughness and cost that dictate suitability for aerospace versus automotive structural parts. In matrix type, the landscape is divided into thermoplastic and thermoset chemistries, with thermoplastic families including PEEK, polyamide, polyetherimide and PPS, while thermoset families encompass epoxy, phenolic, polyester and vinyl ester; these distinctions reflect processing windows, repairability, and end-of-life pathways that influence OEM selection.
Manufacturing process segmentation highlights distinct throughput and design implications, spanning compression molding, filament winding, hand layup, pultrusion, resin transfer molding, and vacuum infusion. Within compression molding, cold compression and hot compression capture different cure regimes and cycle constraints; hand layup differentiates manual layup from spray up to reflect labor intensity; and resin transfer molding separates high-pressure RTM and VARTM to indicate differences in part fidelity and cycle time. Application segmentation spans aerospace & defense, automotive & transportation, construction, and wind energy, with aerospace & defense categorized into engine components, interiors and structural airframe while automotive & transportation covers body panels, interior components and structural components; construction considers building components, flooring and roofing, and wind energy focuses on blades, nacelles and towers. Finally, product type analysis reviews pipes & tanks, profiles, rods & bars, sheets & plates, and tubes, with each product further sub-divided to capture pressure vs non-pressure use cases, custom profiles and standard beams, circular and square geometries, composite laminates versus FRP sheets, and tube cross-sections. Understanding these layered segments enables stakeholders to align material selection, processing investments and commercialization strategies with the specific performance and cost drivers of each end use.
Region-specific drivers and strategic responses shaping production footprints, innovation and supply chain resilience across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics continue to shape strategic investments and supply chain footprints, with distinct drivers and constraints in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, policy emphasis on domestic manufacturing, advanced defense procurements and automotive electrification has encouraged investment in localized fiber processing and higher-rate molding capacity, while producer-supplier relationships increasingly emphasize nearshoring to reduce logistic exposure and comply with regulatory provenance requirements.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa the regulatory environment and aggressive decarbonization targets have elevated demand for recyclable systems and circular-design initiatives, prompting manufacturers to refine matrix choices and invest in material recovery routes. Collaboration between OEMs and research institutions in this region is accelerating development of thermoplastic recycling streams and standardized end-of-life testing. In Asia-Pacific, the combination of broad manufacturing base, established fiber production and fast-moving adoption in wind energy and automotive markets continues to support high-volume deployments, but rising labor costs and local content regulations are shifting emphasis toward automation and higher value-added activities. Across all regions, cross-border partnerships and capacity investments are being evaluated against tariff regimes, supply chain resilience goals and evolving regulatory norms, making regional strategy a core dimension of corporate planning.
How material suppliers, processors and systems integrators differentiate through technical capability, vertical integration and sustainability credentials to secure strategic contracts
Competitive dynamics in the advanced composites space are defined by a mix of integrated material suppliers, specialized processors, and systems integrators, each pursuing distinct but complementary strategies. Leading fiber manufacturers have focused on scaling high-modulus carbon grades and improving precursor and tow economics to support high-performance aerospace and renewable energy applications, while resin formulators have developed tougher, higher-temperature thermoset systems and an expanding portfolio of thermoplastic resins optimized for automated processing. At the processing level, strategic investments in high-throughput molding cells, automated fiber placement, and closed-loop quality control systems are differentiators for suppliers targeting automotive and industrial segments.
Partnerships and M&A activity remain important mechanisms for capability extension, with many firms seeking to vertically integrate to secure feedstock and intellectual property. Simultaneously, specialist contract manufacturers continue to thrive by offering application-specific development capabilities, rapid prototyping and certified production for regulated sectors. Sustainability credentials have become a competitive axis as well; companies that can demonstrate material circularity, certified recycling pathways, or low-carbon feedstocks are obtaining preferential consideration from OEMs and project developers. Ultimately, competitive advantage is being shaped by the ability to combine material innovation, scalable processing and demonstrable supply security in customer-relevant timelines.
Practical action plan for executives to align materials strategy, manufacturing investments, supply chain reconfiguration and circularity initiatives for competitive advantage
To convert insight into measurable outcomes, industry leaders must adopt an integrated set of actions that encompass materials strategy, manufacturing investment, supply chain engineering and sustainability programs. First, engineering and procurement teams should jointly prioritize qualification pathways for thermoplastic and next-generation carbon grades where cycle time and end-of-life considerations produce total-cost advantages, ensuring that pilot programs feed back into design-for-manufacturability processes. Second, capital plans should target automation and high-rate molding platforms to lower per-unit variability and enable cost-competitive production for high-volume segments, while maintaining capacity flexibility for specialized aerospace and defense work.
Third, companies should redesign supplier ecosystems to reduce tariff exposure and improve traceability, employing multi-sourcing, strategic onshoring and contractual frameworks that incentivize quality and delivery performance. Fourth, embedding circularity principles into product roadmaps-through material selection, modular design for repair, and investment in recycling partnerships-will mitigate regulatory risk and create differentiation with sustainability-conscious customers. Finally, firms should institute cross-functional governance that links R&D, operations, procurement and commercial teams, supported by performance metrics that reflect lifecycle cost, supply resilience and carbon intensity, thereby ensuring that strategic choices are implemented coherently and measured against business outcomes.
Transparent, evidence-based research methodology combining targeted primary interviews, technical site observations, lifecycle assessment and scenario analysis for reliable strategic guidance
This research synthesizes primary and secondary investigative methods to ensure robust, replicable findings and clear traceability of conclusions. Primary inputs were drawn from structured interviews with senior engineering, procurement and program management professionals across OEMs, tier suppliers and material producers, complemented by site visits to representative manufacturing facilities and technology validation centers to observe process capabilities and automation footprints. These qualitative engagements were triangulated with secondary sources including peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, regulatory filings and public disclosures to validate technology readiness and supply chain claims.
Analytical steps included comparative process mapping to evaluate throughput and quality trade-offs between manufacturing routes, lifecycle assessment frameworks to compare recyclability and carbon implications of matrix choices, and scenario analysis to explore operational impacts of trade and tariff disruptions. Wherever proprietary commercial metrics were discussed, they were anonymized and cross-checked for consistency. The methodology prioritizes evidence-based inference, transparency in assumptions and a conservative approach to extrapolation that focuses on strategic implications rather than speculative numerical forecasts. This approach ensures the report is actionable for decision-makers while maintaining methodological rigor and reproducibility.
Concluding synthesis highlighting the critical need for integrated strategies that combine material innovation, manufacturing capability and supply chain resilience to realize commercial potential
In conclusion, advanced composites now sit at the intersection of material science, manufacturing innovation and strategic supply chain design. The industry is moving toward faster, more sustainable processing routes and higher-value fiber classes, driven by performance demands in aerospace, renewables and electrified transportation. Meanwhile, trade policy shifts and region-specific incentives are reshaping where and how companies invest, nudging the sector toward greater geographic diversification and supply chain transparency. As a result, competitive success will increasingly depend on the ability to coordinate material selection, processing capability and procurement strategy in a holistic fashion.
Looking ahead, organizations that systematically integrate lifecycle considerations, invest in automation to achieve consistent quality at scale, and cultivate resilient multi-regional supply bases will be better positioned to capture value as composites expand into mainstream applications. The strategic imperative is clear: move from siloed decision-making to cross-functional programs that align technical choices with commercial and regulatory realities, enabling companies to convert material advantages into sustainable business outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A clear contextual overview explaining how advanced composite materials have transitioned into strategic enablers across multiple high-performance industries
Advanced composite materials have moved from niche applications to mainstream strategic assets across high-value industries. Driven by the imperative for lighter, stronger and more durable structures, carbon, glass and aramid fiber reinforced systems have been integrated into critical subsystems for aerospace, transportation, renewable energy and infrastructure. This introduction establishes the technical, commercial and regulatory context within which product developers, procurement leaders and policy makers now operate.
Over recent years, material science breakthroughs in fiber technology and matrix chemistries have broadened performance envelopes, enabling new form factors and manufacturing paradigms. Concurrently, demand-side dynamics-stricter fuel efficiency targets, lifecycle carbon scrutiny, and the electrification of transport-have elevated composites from engineering curiosities to central design levers. As a result, organizations must evaluate materials not only on mechanical metrics but also on recyclability, processing throughput and end-of-life pathways. This report synthesizes those converging drivers to frame strategic choices, laying the groundwork for deeper analysis of market shifts, tariff effects, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics and competitive positioning.
How material innovations, manufacturing automation, supply chain realignment and policy pressures are converging to reshape competitive dynamics in advanced composites
The landscape for advanced composites is undergoing transformative shifts that extend beyond incremental material improvements to systemic changes in supply chains, manufacturing, and regulatory frameworks. One of the most consequential transitions is the accelerating adoption of thermoplastic matrices alongside established thermoset systems, driven by the need for faster cycle times, improved damage tolerance and enhanced recyclability. In parallel, fiber innovations-particularly in high-modulus and ultra-high-modulus carbon grades-are enabling lighter, stiffer structures that expand design possibilities for aerospace and high-end automotive sectors.
Manufacturing is also being reshaped by automation and high-rate processes such as high-pressure resin transfer molding and advanced compression molding modalities. These developments are lowering unit costs and improving consistency, which in turn broaden use cases for composites in price-sensitive applications like automotive body panels and certain construction elements. Supply chains are adapting through greater vertical integration and strategic partnerships between fiber producers, resin formulators and tier suppliers. At the policy level, trade measures and sustainability mandates are incentivizing onshore capacity and circularity initiatives, prompting companies to reassess sourcing strategies and invest in material recovery and reuse programs. Taken together, these shifts create a new competitive matrix where technology leadership, manufacturing agility and regulatory alignment determine long-term advantage.
Assessment of the persistent operational and strategic consequences stemming from United States tariffs implemented in 2025 and how they influence sourcing and production choices
Cumulative tariffs enacted by the United States in 2025 have introduced a lasting inflection point for cross-border trade and sourcing strategies in the composites ecosystem. Rather than a single shock, the tariffs have precipitated a sequence of operational responses: relocation of sensitive production stages, reconfiguration of supplier relationships, and accelerated efforts to secure domestic feedstock. As a consequence, firms have prioritized resilience and traceability, placing a premium on local qualifications and certification to ensure continuity of supply for regulated sectors such as aerospace and defense.
Trade barriers have also altered commercial math for complex assemblies that combine imported fibers or resins with domestically produced components. Many manufacturers have shifted higher-value processing activities closer to end markets to mitigate tariff exposure, even when this entails capital investment in automated molding and consolidation cells. Additionally, strategic buyers are diversifying supplier portfolios to include multiple geographies and alternative materials with lower tariff risk profiles. While these adjustments have raised near-term operational costs for some players, they have also catalyzed longer-term benefits in supply chain transparency and reduced lead-time volatility. Importantly, the tariff environment has intensified scrutiny on total landed cost and lifecycle trade-offs, compelling procurement and engineering teams to collaborate more tightly when assessing material and process choices.
Detailed segmentation-driven insights that clarify material, matrix, processing, application and product type differentiators and their implications for commercial strategy
Segment-level understanding is essential for translating material science into business strategy, and this analysis organizes the market across fiber type, matrix type, manufacturing process, application, and product type to highlight differentiated value pathways. In fiber type, the market is examined across aramid fiber, carbon fiber, and glass fiber, with carbon fiber further differentiated into high modulus, intermediate modulus, standard modulus, and ultra high modulus classes; this gradation captures the trade-offs between stiffness, toughness and cost that dictate suitability for aerospace versus automotive structural parts. In matrix type, the landscape is divided into thermoplastic and thermoset chemistries, with thermoplastic families including PEEK, polyamide, polyetherimide and PPS, while thermoset families encompass epoxy, phenolic, polyester and vinyl ester; these distinctions reflect processing windows, repairability, and end-of-life pathways that influence OEM selection.
Manufacturing process segmentation highlights distinct throughput and design implications, spanning compression molding, filament winding, hand layup, pultrusion, resin transfer molding, and vacuum infusion. Within compression molding, cold compression and hot compression capture different cure regimes and cycle constraints; hand layup differentiates manual layup from spray up to reflect labor intensity; and resin transfer molding separates high-pressure RTM and VARTM to indicate differences in part fidelity and cycle time. Application segmentation spans aerospace & defense, automotive & transportation, construction, and wind energy, with aerospace & defense categorized into engine components, interiors and structural airframe while automotive & transportation covers body panels, interior components and structural components; construction considers building components, flooring and roofing, and wind energy focuses on blades, nacelles and towers. Finally, product type analysis reviews pipes & tanks, profiles, rods & bars, sheets & plates, and tubes, with each product further sub-divided to capture pressure vs non-pressure use cases, custom profiles and standard beams, circular and square geometries, composite laminates versus FRP sheets, and tube cross-sections. Understanding these layered segments enables stakeholders to align material selection, processing investments and commercialization strategies with the specific performance and cost drivers of each end use.
Region-specific drivers and strategic responses shaping production footprints, innovation and supply chain resilience across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics continue to shape strategic investments and supply chain footprints, with distinct drivers and constraints in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, policy emphasis on domestic manufacturing, advanced defense procurements and automotive electrification has encouraged investment in localized fiber processing and higher-rate molding capacity, while producer-supplier relationships increasingly emphasize nearshoring to reduce logistic exposure and comply with regulatory provenance requirements.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa the regulatory environment and aggressive decarbonization targets have elevated demand for recyclable systems and circular-design initiatives, prompting manufacturers to refine matrix choices and invest in material recovery routes. Collaboration between OEMs and research institutions in this region is accelerating development of thermoplastic recycling streams and standardized end-of-life testing. In Asia-Pacific, the combination of broad manufacturing base, established fiber production and fast-moving adoption in wind energy and automotive markets continues to support high-volume deployments, but rising labor costs and local content regulations are shifting emphasis toward automation and higher value-added activities. Across all regions, cross-border partnerships and capacity investments are being evaluated against tariff regimes, supply chain resilience goals and evolving regulatory norms, making regional strategy a core dimension of corporate planning.
How material suppliers, processors and systems integrators differentiate through technical capability, vertical integration and sustainability credentials to secure strategic contracts
Competitive dynamics in the advanced composites space are defined by a mix of integrated material suppliers, specialized processors, and systems integrators, each pursuing distinct but complementary strategies. Leading fiber manufacturers have focused on scaling high-modulus carbon grades and improving precursor and tow economics to support high-performance aerospace and renewable energy applications, while resin formulators have developed tougher, higher-temperature thermoset systems and an expanding portfolio of thermoplastic resins optimized for automated processing. At the processing level, strategic investments in high-throughput molding cells, automated fiber placement, and closed-loop quality control systems are differentiators for suppliers targeting automotive and industrial segments.
Partnerships and M&A activity remain important mechanisms for capability extension, with many firms seeking to vertically integrate to secure feedstock and intellectual property. Simultaneously, specialist contract manufacturers continue to thrive by offering application-specific development capabilities, rapid prototyping and certified production for regulated sectors. Sustainability credentials have become a competitive axis as well; companies that can demonstrate material circularity, certified recycling pathways, or low-carbon feedstocks are obtaining preferential consideration from OEMs and project developers. Ultimately, competitive advantage is being shaped by the ability to combine material innovation, scalable processing and demonstrable supply security in customer-relevant timelines.
Practical action plan for executives to align materials strategy, manufacturing investments, supply chain reconfiguration and circularity initiatives for competitive advantage
To convert insight into measurable outcomes, industry leaders must adopt an integrated set of actions that encompass materials strategy, manufacturing investment, supply chain engineering and sustainability programs. First, engineering and procurement teams should jointly prioritize qualification pathways for thermoplastic and next-generation carbon grades where cycle time and end-of-life considerations produce total-cost advantages, ensuring that pilot programs feed back into design-for-manufacturability processes. Second, capital plans should target automation and high-rate molding platforms to lower per-unit variability and enable cost-competitive production for high-volume segments, while maintaining capacity flexibility for specialized aerospace and defense work.
Third, companies should redesign supplier ecosystems to reduce tariff exposure and improve traceability, employing multi-sourcing, strategic onshoring and contractual frameworks that incentivize quality and delivery performance. Fourth, embedding circularity principles into product roadmaps-through material selection, modular design for repair, and investment in recycling partnerships-will mitigate regulatory risk and create differentiation with sustainability-conscious customers. Finally, firms should institute cross-functional governance that links R&D, operations, procurement and commercial teams, supported by performance metrics that reflect lifecycle cost, supply resilience and carbon intensity, thereby ensuring that strategic choices are implemented coherently and measured against business outcomes.
Transparent, evidence-based research methodology combining targeted primary interviews, technical site observations, lifecycle assessment and scenario analysis for reliable strategic guidance
This research synthesizes primary and secondary investigative methods to ensure robust, replicable findings and clear traceability of conclusions. Primary inputs were drawn from structured interviews with senior engineering, procurement and program management professionals across OEMs, tier suppliers and material producers, complemented by site visits to representative manufacturing facilities and technology validation centers to observe process capabilities and automation footprints. These qualitative engagements were triangulated with secondary sources including peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, regulatory filings and public disclosures to validate technology readiness and supply chain claims.
Analytical steps included comparative process mapping to evaluate throughput and quality trade-offs between manufacturing routes, lifecycle assessment frameworks to compare recyclability and carbon implications of matrix choices, and scenario analysis to explore operational impacts of trade and tariff disruptions. Wherever proprietary commercial metrics were discussed, they were anonymized and cross-checked for consistency. The methodology prioritizes evidence-based inference, transparency in assumptions and a conservative approach to extrapolation that focuses on strategic implications rather than speculative numerical forecasts. This approach ensures the report is actionable for decision-makers while maintaining methodological rigor and reproducibility.
Concluding synthesis highlighting the critical need for integrated strategies that combine material innovation, manufacturing capability and supply chain resilience to realize commercial potential
In conclusion, advanced composites now sit at the intersection of material science, manufacturing innovation and strategic supply chain design. The industry is moving toward faster, more sustainable processing routes and higher-value fiber classes, driven by performance demands in aerospace, renewables and electrified transportation. Meanwhile, trade policy shifts and region-specific incentives are reshaping where and how companies invest, nudging the sector toward greater geographic diversification and supply chain transparency. As a result, competitive success will increasingly depend on the ability to coordinate material selection, processing capability and procurement strategy in a holistic fashion.
Looking ahead, organizations that systematically integrate lifecycle considerations, invest in automation to achieve consistent quality at scale, and cultivate resilient multi-regional supply bases will be better positioned to capture value as composites expand into mainstream applications. The strategic imperative is clear: move from siloed decision-making to cross-functional programs that align technical choices with commercial and regulatory realities, enabling companies to convert material advantages into sustainable business outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid expansion of automated fiber placement for precision aerospace structural components
- 5.2. Integration of recycled carbon fiber materials into lightweight automotive body panels
- 5.3. Development of bio-based epoxy resin systems for sustainable aerospace composite manufacturing
- 5.4. Implementation of digital twin technology for predictive maintenance of wind turbine blades
- 5.5. Adoption of graphene-enhanced composite laminates to improve thermal management in electronics
- 5.6. Deployment of large-scale resin infusion techniques for offshore wind turbine blade production
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Advanced Composites Market, by Fiber Type
- 8.1. Aramid Fiber
- 8.2. Carbon Fiber
- 8.2.1. High Modulus
- 8.2.2. Intermediate Modulus
- 8.2.3. Standard Modulus
- 8.2.4. Ultra High Modulus
- 8.3. Glass Fiber
- 9. Advanced Composites Market, by Matrix Type
- 9.1. Thermoplastic
- 9.1.1. PEEK
- 9.1.2. Polyamide
- 9.1.3. Polyetherimide
- 9.1.4. PPS
- 9.2. Thermoset
- 9.2.1. Epoxy
- 9.2.2. Phenolic
- 9.2.3. Polyester
- 9.2.4. Vinyl Ester
- 10. Advanced Composites Market, by Product Type
- 10.1. Pipes & Tanks
- 10.1.1. Non-Pressure Vessels
- 10.1.2. Pressure Vessels
- 10.2. Profiles
- 10.2.1. Custom Profiles
- 10.2.2. I-Beams
- 10.3. Rods & Bars
- 10.3.1. Circular Rods
- 10.3.2. Square Bars
- 10.4. Sheets & Plates
- 10.4.1. Composite Laminates
- 10.4.2. FRP Sheets
- 10.5. Tubes
- 10.5.1. Circular Tubes
- 10.5.2. Square Tubes
- 11. Advanced Composites Market, by Application
- 11.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 11.1.1. Engine Components
- 11.1.2. Interiors
- 11.1.3. Structural Airframe
- 11.2. Automotive & Transportation
- 11.2.1. Body Panels
- 11.2.2. Interior Components
- 11.2.3. Structural Components
- 11.3. Construction
- 11.3.1. Building Components
- 11.3.2. Flooring
- 11.3.3. Roofing
- 11.4. Wind Energy
- 11.4.1. Blades
- 11.4.2. Nacelles
- 11.4.3. Towers
- 12. Advanced Composites Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Advanced Composites Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Advanced Composites Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ACPT Inc.
- 15.3.2. Advanced Composites Solutions Srl
- 15.3.3. AGY Holding Corp.
- 15.3.4. Akzo Nobel N.V.
- 15.3.5. ARRIS Composites, Inc.
- 15.3.6. Avient Corporation
- 15.3.7. BASF SE
- 15.3.8. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 15.3.9. Evonik Industries AG
- 15.3.10. FormosaM Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.11. Gurit Services AG
- 15.3.12. Hexcel Corporation
- 15.3.13. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.14. LyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V.
- 15.3.15. Mitsubishi Chemical Carbon Fiber and Composites, Inc.
- 15.3.16. MITSUI CHEMICALS INDIA, PVT. LTD
- 15.3.17. Momentive Performance Materials Inc.
- 15.3.18. Owens Corning, Inc.
- 15.3.19. Plasan Carbon Composites
- 15.3.20. Rockman Advance Composites Private Limited
- 15.3.21. SGL Carbon SE
- 15.3.22. Solvay S.A.
- 15.3.23. ST Advanced Composites
- 15.3.24. Teijin Limited
- 15.3.25. Toray Industries, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
