Adhesive Resins Market by Product Type (Acrylic, Epoxy, Polyurethane), Technology (Hot Melt, Solvent Based, Uv Curable), Form, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Adhesive Resins Market was valued at USD 17.41 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 18.26 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.07%, reaching USD 24.62 billion by 2032.
Overview of adhesive resin dynamics and strategic imperatives shaping innovation, supply chains, and application-driven demand in modern industrial ecosystems
The adhesive resin sector sits at the intersection of chemistries, manufacturing innovation, and end-use performance demands, driving a complex landscape where formulation science meets supply chain realities. This introduction frames the most critical considerations for stakeholders, highlighting how evolving regulatory environments, sustainability commitments, and application-specific requirements are converging to reshape priorities across R&D, procurement, and commercialization functions.
As companies pursue higher-performing formulations and lower environmental footprints, they must simultaneously navigate raw material volatility and increasingly sophisticated customer specifications. In this context, strategic clarity on product differentiation, technology selection, and collaborative partnerships becomes essential. The following sections expand on transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional drivers, competitive behavior, recommended actions, methodology, and concluding implications to provide a coherent foundation for decision-making.
Emerging transformative shifts in chemistry, sustainability mandates, and digitized manufacturing that are redefining adhesive resin value chains globally
Adhesive resin manufacturers and their customers are experiencing a period of rapid transformation where multiple vectors of change interact to create new sources of competitive advantage. Advances in polymer science are enabling resins with improved bond strength, faster cure profiles, and enhanced durability, while parallel developments in additive chemistry and process controls allow formulators to tailor properties with unprecedented precision. At the same time, sustainability mandates and customer expectations are accelerating the shift toward lower-VOC and bio-based chemistries, prompting both incremental reformulations and more radical platform shifts.
Operationally, digitized manufacturing and greater process transparency are reshaping quality assurance and traceability across supply chains. Real-time analytics, predictive maintenance, and integrated supplier portals are reducing downtime and improving consistency, yet they require investment and cross-functional governance. Consequently, companies that align their R&D pipelines, procurement strategies, and digital transformation plans will be better positioned to capture emerging opportunities. Looking ahead, collaboration across the value chain-between raw material suppliers, formulators, and end users-will determine which players lead on performance, compliance, and total-cost-of-ownership outcomes.
Assessment of the cumulative impact of United States tariffs in 2025 on raw material flows, supplier strategies, and downstream adhesive resin procurement practices
The United States tariff actions in 2025 have introduced new frictions in raw material flows and commercial decision-making that reverberate through formulation laboratories and procurement desks. Sourcing strategies that previously relied on predictable cross-border supply corridors now require contingency planning, and procurement teams are recalibrating supplier relationships to manage cost exposure while preserving technical specifications. Consequently, many manufacturers are reviewing localized sourcing options and assessing the trade-offs between raw material consistency and tariff-driven cost differentials.
In response, some organizations are accelerating qualification programs for alternative chemistries and diversifying supplier bases to reduce dependency on single-country supply chains. These adjustments influence product roadmaps and inventory policies, as formulators aim to maintain performance while substituting or blending inputs. Importantly, the tariff environment has elevated the strategic importance of supplier intelligence, contract flexibility, and scenario-driven procurement playbooks, prompting a broader reassessment of how pricing, lead times, and quality risks are managed across the adhesive resin lifecycle.
Key segmentation intelligence revealing product, application, and technology-driven differentiation that influences formulation, performance, and commercialization pathways
A granular understanding of product, application, and technology segmentation reveals how distinct market needs translate into formulation choices and commercialization pathways. When analyzing products by type, it is critical to recognize the different performance and regulatory profiles of Acrylic, Epoxy, Polyurethane, and Silicone chemistries; within Acrylics, alkyl and methacrylate variants serve divergent adhesion and cure requirements, while Epoxy derivatives such as Bisphenol A, cycloaliphatic, and novolac families underpin high‑performance structural and electrical applications. Polyurethane systems further bifurcate into aliphatic and aromatic categories, which influence weathering resistance and cost dynamics, and silicones continue to play a specialized role where temperature stability and flexibility are paramount.
Application-driven differentiation further refines market priorities. Automotive, construction, electronics, footwear, and packaging sectors each impose unique criteria around durability, regulatory compliance, process integration, and cosmetic finish, thereby shaping resin selection and formulation complexity. Meanwhile, technology platforms act as the enabling lens through which formulator choices are implemented: hot melt, solvent-based, UV curable, and water-based technologies each bring distinct processing requirements, environmental considerations, and equipment investments that affect adoption. Taken together, product type, application context, and technology platform form an interdependent matrix that guides R&D focus, pilot validation, and commercialization sequencing for resin suppliers and end users alike.
Regional competitive dynamics and demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape procurement and innovation priorities
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence over adhesive resin priorities, as demand profiles, regulatory regimes, and supply chain architectures vary markedly across geographies. In the Americas, for instance, commercial pressures emphasize process efficiency, high-volume manufacturing, and regulatory alignment with federal and state environmental standards, which often accelerate adoption of lower-VOC and solvent-reduction strategies. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory stringency and end-use sophistication, with European markets driving the vanguard of sustainability mandates and certification frameworks while other subregions prioritize cost-competitive solutions and infrastructure resilience. Asia-Pacific remains a critical center of manufacturing scale and innovation diffusion, balancing rapid industrial expansion with a growing focus on performance differentiation and sustainability credentials.
These regional distinctions inform how companies allocate investment across manufacturing footprint, R&D centers, and commercial channels. For example, firms that maintain regionalized supply and technical support demonstrate faster response to customer needs and regulatory shifts, whereas those that centralize production may achieve operational scale but face longer qualification cycles for local customers. Therefore, aligning regional market strategies with local regulatory trends and customer value propositions is essential to maintaining competitiveness and reducing time to market for new resin systems.
Strategic company-level insights highlighting portfolio rationalization, collaborative R&D models, and competitive moves that matter to adhesive resin stakeholders
Company-level activity reveals several persistent patterns that shape competitive outcomes in the adhesive resin sector. Portfolio rationalization has become a dominant theme as firms prioritize higher-margin platforms and divest non-core lines to focus R&D spending and manufacturing capacity. Concurrently, strategic partnerships and joint development collaborations are accelerating, with manufacturers, raw material suppliers, and end users co-investing in application-specific formulations and validation programs to shorten qualification cycles.
Mergers and acquisitions remain an important mechanism for securing technology access or geographic reach, but many leading organizations also invest selectively in pilot capacity and application labs to demonstrate performance under customer processing conditions. In addition, firms that integrate sustainability metrics and lifecycle thinking into product development tend to differentiate more effectively with procurement teams focused on total-cost-of-ownership and regulatory compliance. Overall, the competitive landscape favors companies that combine technical depth with distribution agility and an ability to deliver tailored solutions to complex, industry-specific challenges.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate resilient supply chains, sustainable formulations, and market-focused commercialization strategies
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated set of actions that align technical capability with commercial resilience. First, invest in modular formulation platforms that enable rapid substitution of feedstocks without compromising core performance attributes, thereby reducing exposure to supply shocks and tariff-driven cost variability. Second, deepen collaborative arrangements with key downstream customers through co‑development programs and shared validation protocols, ensuring that new resin solutions integrate smoothly into customer processes and achieve faster adoption.
Third, accelerate adoption of lower-emission and bio-based chemistries where technically feasible, coupling these material shifts with transparent lifecycle data and third-party certifications to de‑risk procurement decisions. Fourth, pursue regional supply diversification by combining localized sourcing and strategic inventory buffering to balance lead-time reliability against cost efficiency. Lastly, embed digital tools in manufacturing and quality operations to improve traceability and predictive maintenance, which will reduce variability and support premium positioning for high-reliability applications. Implementing these steps in a phased, resource-aware manner will help firms translate strategic priorities into measurable operational outcomes.
Transparent research methodology combining primary expert interviews, material characterization analysis, and structured supply chain mapping for robust insights
The research approach integrates multiple methodological pillars to ensure robust, triangulated insights. Primary engagement included structured interviews with technical experts, procurement leaders, and application specialists to capture qualitative perspectives on formulation trends, supplier dynamics, and adoption barriers. These interviews were complemented by material characterization analysis and technology evaluation to validate performance claims and to compare trade-offs across resin chemistries and processing platforms.
Supplementing primary data, supply chain mapping and scenario analysis were used to explore vulnerability points and the implications of tariff changes on sourcing strategies. Data synthesis employed a cross-functional review process to reconcile technical, commercial, and regulatory inputs, and findings were stress-tested through expert validation sessions. This mixed-methods design ensures that conclusions rest on both empirical evidence and practitioner judgment, yielding insights that are actionable for R&D teams, procurement functions, and corporate strategists.
Concise synthesis of findings and strategic conclusions designed to inform boardroom decisions, procurement choices, and R&D prioritization across sectors
This synthesis brings together technical, commercial, and regional perspectives to equip decision-makers with a clear line of sight into adhesive resin priorities. The interplay between product chemistry, application requirements, and processing technology shapes both near-term operational choices and longer-term strategic commitments. As such, stakeholders should treat formulation agility, supplier intelligence, and sustainability integration as complementary pillars of competitive differentiation.
In closing, the adhesive resin landscape rewards organizations that adopt a systems perspective, aligning innovation agendas with procurement flexibility and regional market realities. By translating the insights in this report into prioritized pilots, supplier agreements, and targeted R&D investments, leaders can strengthen their position in rapidly evolving end-use markets while managing regulatory and geopolitical risks effectively.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Overview of adhesive resin dynamics and strategic imperatives shaping innovation, supply chains, and application-driven demand in modern industrial ecosystems
The adhesive resin sector sits at the intersection of chemistries, manufacturing innovation, and end-use performance demands, driving a complex landscape where formulation science meets supply chain realities. This introduction frames the most critical considerations for stakeholders, highlighting how evolving regulatory environments, sustainability commitments, and application-specific requirements are converging to reshape priorities across R&D, procurement, and commercialization functions.
As companies pursue higher-performing formulations and lower environmental footprints, they must simultaneously navigate raw material volatility and increasingly sophisticated customer specifications. In this context, strategic clarity on product differentiation, technology selection, and collaborative partnerships becomes essential. The following sections expand on transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional drivers, competitive behavior, recommended actions, methodology, and concluding implications to provide a coherent foundation for decision-making.
Emerging transformative shifts in chemistry, sustainability mandates, and digitized manufacturing that are redefining adhesive resin value chains globally
Adhesive resin manufacturers and their customers are experiencing a period of rapid transformation where multiple vectors of change interact to create new sources of competitive advantage. Advances in polymer science are enabling resins with improved bond strength, faster cure profiles, and enhanced durability, while parallel developments in additive chemistry and process controls allow formulators to tailor properties with unprecedented precision. At the same time, sustainability mandates and customer expectations are accelerating the shift toward lower-VOC and bio-based chemistries, prompting both incremental reformulations and more radical platform shifts.
Operationally, digitized manufacturing and greater process transparency are reshaping quality assurance and traceability across supply chains. Real-time analytics, predictive maintenance, and integrated supplier portals are reducing downtime and improving consistency, yet they require investment and cross-functional governance. Consequently, companies that align their R&D pipelines, procurement strategies, and digital transformation plans will be better positioned to capture emerging opportunities. Looking ahead, collaboration across the value chain-between raw material suppliers, formulators, and end users-will determine which players lead on performance, compliance, and total-cost-of-ownership outcomes.
Assessment of the cumulative impact of United States tariffs in 2025 on raw material flows, supplier strategies, and downstream adhesive resin procurement practices
The United States tariff actions in 2025 have introduced new frictions in raw material flows and commercial decision-making that reverberate through formulation laboratories and procurement desks. Sourcing strategies that previously relied on predictable cross-border supply corridors now require contingency planning, and procurement teams are recalibrating supplier relationships to manage cost exposure while preserving technical specifications. Consequently, many manufacturers are reviewing localized sourcing options and assessing the trade-offs between raw material consistency and tariff-driven cost differentials.
In response, some organizations are accelerating qualification programs for alternative chemistries and diversifying supplier bases to reduce dependency on single-country supply chains. These adjustments influence product roadmaps and inventory policies, as formulators aim to maintain performance while substituting or blending inputs. Importantly, the tariff environment has elevated the strategic importance of supplier intelligence, contract flexibility, and scenario-driven procurement playbooks, prompting a broader reassessment of how pricing, lead times, and quality risks are managed across the adhesive resin lifecycle.
Key segmentation intelligence revealing product, application, and technology-driven differentiation that influences formulation, performance, and commercialization pathways
A granular understanding of product, application, and technology segmentation reveals how distinct market needs translate into formulation choices and commercialization pathways. When analyzing products by type, it is critical to recognize the different performance and regulatory profiles of Acrylic, Epoxy, Polyurethane, and Silicone chemistries; within Acrylics, alkyl and methacrylate variants serve divergent adhesion and cure requirements, while Epoxy derivatives such as Bisphenol A, cycloaliphatic, and novolac families underpin high‑performance structural and electrical applications. Polyurethane systems further bifurcate into aliphatic and aromatic categories, which influence weathering resistance and cost dynamics, and silicones continue to play a specialized role where temperature stability and flexibility are paramount.
Application-driven differentiation further refines market priorities. Automotive, construction, electronics, footwear, and packaging sectors each impose unique criteria around durability, regulatory compliance, process integration, and cosmetic finish, thereby shaping resin selection and formulation complexity. Meanwhile, technology platforms act as the enabling lens through which formulator choices are implemented: hot melt, solvent-based, UV curable, and water-based technologies each bring distinct processing requirements, environmental considerations, and equipment investments that affect adoption. Taken together, product type, application context, and technology platform form an interdependent matrix that guides R&D focus, pilot validation, and commercialization sequencing for resin suppliers and end users alike.
Regional competitive dynamics and demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape procurement and innovation priorities
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence over adhesive resin priorities, as demand profiles, regulatory regimes, and supply chain architectures vary markedly across geographies. In the Americas, for instance, commercial pressures emphasize process efficiency, high-volume manufacturing, and regulatory alignment with federal and state environmental standards, which often accelerate adoption of lower-VOC and solvent-reduction strategies. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory stringency and end-use sophistication, with European markets driving the vanguard of sustainability mandates and certification frameworks while other subregions prioritize cost-competitive solutions and infrastructure resilience. Asia-Pacific remains a critical center of manufacturing scale and innovation diffusion, balancing rapid industrial expansion with a growing focus on performance differentiation and sustainability credentials.
These regional distinctions inform how companies allocate investment across manufacturing footprint, R&D centers, and commercial channels. For example, firms that maintain regionalized supply and technical support demonstrate faster response to customer needs and regulatory shifts, whereas those that centralize production may achieve operational scale but face longer qualification cycles for local customers. Therefore, aligning regional market strategies with local regulatory trends and customer value propositions is essential to maintaining competitiveness and reducing time to market for new resin systems.
Strategic company-level insights highlighting portfolio rationalization, collaborative R&D models, and competitive moves that matter to adhesive resin stakeholders
Company-level activity reveals several persistent patterns that shape competitive outcomes in the adhesive resin sector. Portfolio rationalization has become a dominant theme as firms prioritize higher-margin platforms and divest non-core lines to focus R&D spending and manufacturing capacity. Concurrently, strategic partnerships and joint development collaborations are accelerating, with manufacturers, raw material suppliers, and end users co-investing in application-specific formulations and validation programs to shorten qualification cycles.
Mergers and acquisitions remain an important mechanism for securing technology access or geographic reach, but many leading organizations also invest selectively in pilot capacity and application labs to demonstrate performance under customer processing conditions. In addition, firms that integrate sustainability metrics and lifecycle thinking into product development tend to differentiate more effectively with procurement teams focused on total-cost-of-ownership and regulatory compliance. Overall, the competitive landscape favors companies that combine technical depth with distribution agility and an ability to deliver tailored solutions to complex, industry-specific challenges.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate resilient supply chains, sustainable formulations, and market-focused commercialization strategies
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated set of actions that align technical capability with commercial resilience. First, invest in modular formulation platforms that enable rapid substitution of feedstocks without compromising core performance attributes, thereby reducing exposure to supply shocks and tariff-driven cost variability. Second, deepen collaborative arrangements with key downstream customers through co‑development programs and shared validation protocols, ensuring that new resin solutions integrate smoothly into customer processes and achieve faster adoption.
Third, accelerate adoption of lower-emission and bio-based chemistries where technically feasible, coupling these material shifts with transparent lifecycle data and third-party certifications to de‑risk procurement decisions. Fourth, pursue regional supply diversification by combining localized sourcing and strategic inventory buffering to balance lead-time reliability against cost efficiency. Lastly, embed digital tools in manufacturing and quality operations to improve traceability and predictive maintenance, which will reduce variability and support premium positioning for high-reliability applications. Implementing these steps in a phased, resource-aware manner will help firms translate strategic priorities into measurable operational outcomes.
Transparent research methodology combining primary expert interviews, material characterization analysis, and structured supply chain mapping for robust insights
The research approach integrates multiple methodological pillars to ensure robust, triangulated insights. Primary engagement included structured interviews with technical experts, procurement leaders, and application specialists to capture qualitative perspectives on formulation trends, supplier dynamics, and adoption barriers. These interviews were complemented by material characterization analysis and technology evaluation to validate performance claims and to compare trade-offs across resin chemistries and processing platforms.
Supplementing primary data, supply chain mapping and scenario analysis were used to explore vulnerability points and the implications of tariff changes on sourcing strategies. Data synthesis employed a cross-functional review process to reconcile technical, commercial, and regulatory inputs, and findings were stress-tested through expert validation sessions. This mixed-methods design ensures that conclusions rest on both empirical evidence and practitioner judgment, yielding insights that are actionable for R&D teams, procurement functions, and corporate strategists.
Concise synthesis of findings and strategic conclusions designed to inform boardroom decisions, procurement choices, and R&D prioritization across sectors
This synthesis brings together technical, commercial, and regional perspectives to equip decision-makers with a clear line of sight into adhesive resin priorities. The interplay between product chemistry, application requirements, and processing technology shapes both near-term operational choices and longer-term strategic commitments. As such, stakeholders should treat formulation agility, supplier intelligence, and sustainability integration as complementary pillars of competitive differentiation.
In closing, the adhesive resin landscape rewards organizations that adopt a systems perspective, aligning innovation agendas with procurement flexibility and regional market realities. By translating the insights in this report into prioritized pilots, supplier agreements, and targeted R&D investments, leaders can strengthen their position in rapidly evolving end-use markets while managing regulatory and geopolitical risks effectively.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Adhesive Resins Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Acrylic
- 8.1.1. Alkyl
- 8.1.2. Methacrylate
- 8.2. Epoxy
- 8.2.1. Bisphenol A
- 8.2.2. Cycloaliphatic
- 8.2.3. Novolac
- 8.3. Polyurethane
- 8.3.1. Aliphatic
- 8.3.2. Aromatic
- 8.4. Silicone
- 9. Adhesive Resins Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Hot Melt
- 9.2. Solvent Based
- 9.3. Uv Curable
- 9.4. Water Based
- 10. Adhesive Resins Market, by Form
- 10.1. Liquid
- 10.2. Solid
- 10.3. Film
- 10.4. Paste
- 11. Adhesive Resins Market, by Application
- 11.1. Automotive
- 11.2. Construction
- 11.3. Electronics
- 11.4. Footwear
- 11.5. Packaging
- 12. Adhesive Resins Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Adhesive Resins Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Adhesive Resins Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. United States Adhesive Resins Market
- 16. China Adhesive Resins Market
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 17.5. 3M Company
- 17.6. Arkema S.A.
- 17.7. Ashland Inc.
- 17.8. Beardow & Adams (Adhesives) Limited
- 17.9. Cattie Adhesives
- 17.10. Chang Chun Group
- 17.11. Chempoint by Univar Solutions Inc.
- 17.12. Daubert Chemical Company, Inc.
- 17.13. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 17.14. Eastman Chemical Company
- 17.15. Evonik Industries AG
- 17.16. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 17.17. Georgia-Pacific Chemicals LLC
- 17.18. H.B. Fuller Company
- 17.19. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
- 17.20. Hexion Inc.
- 17.21. Huntsman International LLC
- 17.22. Jowat SE
- 17.23. Kukdo Chemical Co.,Ltd.
- 17.24. Lawter Inc.
- 17.25. Lesaffre & CIE
- 17.26. MAPEI S.p.A.
- 17.27. Master Bond, Inc.
- 17.28. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 17.29. Nan Ya Plastics Corporation
- 17.30. NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO., LTD.
- 17.31. Panacol-Elosol GmbH
- 17.32. Polyram Plastic Industries LTD
- 17.33. Sika AG
- 17.34. Soudal Holding N.V.
- 17.35. The Dow Chemical Company
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
