Acrylonitrile Market by Application (Acrylic Acid Esters, Acrylic Fibers, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), Production Process (Fixed Bed Reactor, Fluidized Bed Reactor), End Use Industry, Grade - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Acrylonitrile Market was valued at USD 12.16 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 12.70 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.46%, reaching USD 17.26 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to acrylonitrile that synthesizes feedstock pressures, process technology evolution, regulatory drivers, and application-driven quality demands
Acrylonitrile has emerged as a foundational intermediate in multiple polymer and chemical value chains, where feedstock availability, process technology choices, and evolving regulatory expectations converge to shape commercial outcomes. The compound’s role as a precursor to polymers such as nitrile rubber and ABS situates it at the intersection of traditional commodity chemistry and higher-value specialty applications, driving a need for nuanced supply chain management and process optimization. Stakeholders must reconcile the cyclicality of industrial demand with persistent pressures on feedstock sourcing and environmental compliance, which are reshaping capital allocation and operational priorities across production facilities.
Recent advances in catalyst design, reactor engineering, and downstream integration are producing incremental improvements in conversion efficiency and impurity control, while the industry balances investments between established production routes and experimental pathways. Concurrently, end-use industries such as automotive and medical manufacturing are imposing tighter specifications for performance and traceability, which in turn influence procurement strategies. For strategic and technical leaders, understanding the interplay between raw material costs, reactor choice, and product specification is essential for managing both near-term disruptions and medium-term competitiveness.
Strategic and technological forces reshaping the acrylonitrile landscape through process innovation, regulatory tightening, and evolving end-use performance expectations
The acrylonitrile landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advances, regulatory tightening, and changing demand patterns across downstream industries. On the technology front, innovations in reactor design and catalyst formulations are enabling producers to squeeze higher yields from existing assets and reduce impurity burdens that complicate downstream polymerization. These technical shifts are complemented by a widening focus on decarbonization and emissions control, prompting upgrades to energy integration and waste management systems at many production sites.
At the same time, downstream demand is maturing: automotive manufacturers are requesting materials with improved thermal and mechanical performance, construction specifiers are requiring greater durability and fire resistance, and healthcare providers are emphasizing purity and biocompatibility for medical-grade nitrile products. These demand signals are catalyzing refinements in product grade segmentation and quality assurance practices. Regulatory momentum toward stricter emissions and safety reporting is adding another layer of complexity, changing the calculus for investment in retrofits versus new-build capacity. Overall, the sector’s transformative shifts are less about a single disruptive event and more about parallel, reinforcing dynamics across technology, regulations, and evolving end-use requirements.
Assessment of how tariff measures in 2025 altered sourcing strategies, investment calculus, and supplier resilience expectations across acrylonitrile value chains
The imposition of tariffs and trade barriers by the United States in 2025 introduced a recalibration of supply chain flows and commercial decision-making for firms engaged in acrylonitrile-related value chains. In response to tariff-induced cost asymmetries, procurement teams have had to reassess sourcing strategies, prioritize suppliers with integrated logistics advantages, and revisit contractual terms to mitigate exposure to sudden policy shifts. Manufacturers with vertically integrated operations found flexibility to reroute internal volumes, while independent converters and specialty producers faced heightened pressure to secure stable, cost-competitive feedstock.
Tariff measures also had a signaling effect on investment planning and capacity deployment. Risk-averse capital committees deferred or re-scoped projects that depended on cross-border feedstock flows subject to policy volatility, and firms accelerated contingency plans to diversify supply or to localize critical processing steps. At the commercial interface, buyers became more exacting about supplier resilience metrics and inventory visibility, seeking counterparties that demonstrated multi-source procurement and robust logistics continuity. Regulatory trade actions therefore reshaped both tactical procurement behavior and longer-term industrial strategy, reinforcing the need for scenario-based planning and strengthened supplier partnerships to manage elevated policy risk.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how applications, reactor technology choices, industry end uses, and grade differentiation jointly determine strategic priorities and competitive positioning
A nuanced view of market segmentation reveals how application, production process, end-use industry, and grade distinctions interact to define competitive advantage and operational focus. Based on Application, the landscape spans Acrylic Acid Esters, Acrylic Fibers, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, and Nitrile Rubber, each channel imposing distinct purity, impurity profile, and specification requirements that cascade back to process control and quality assurance practices. Based on Production Process, producers operate with either Fixed Bed Reactor or Fluidized Bed Reactor technologies, with each offering trade-offs in terms of throughput stability, catalyst management, and ease of scale-up for incremental capacity investments. Based on End Use Industry, demand drivers differ across Automotive, Construction, Electrical And Electronics, and Medical And Healthcare sectors, where performance criteria, compliance obligations, and product lifecycles necessitate tailored formulations and supply chain agreements. Based on Grade, distinctions between High Purity and Standard grades influence the degree of analytical oversight, traceability requirements, and margin structures that producers and converters can sustain.
Intersections among these segmentation axes create important strategic contours. For example, meeting medical and healthcare specifications often requires high-purity acrylonitrile produced on processes that minimize byproduct formation, which affects reactor selection and catalyst regimen. Conversely, large-volume construction applications may accept standard grades produced on higher-throughput platforms but demand consistent logistics and cost-competitive pricing. The segmentation profile therefore provides a framework for prioritizing investment, aligning R&D efforts with customer specifications, and calibrating commercial propositions for different buyer archetypes.
Regional strategic insights mapping feedstock realities, regulatory environments, and downstream demand patterns across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific to guide operational placement and partnerships
Regional dynamics are a key determinant of operational strategy and risk exposure in the acrylonitrile ecosystem, with each geography presenting distinct feedstock endowments, regulatory regimes, and demand profiles. In the Americas, legacy petrochemical hubs and established logistics corridors support a mix of integrated and merchant production models, while customer concentration in automotive clusters and manufacturing centers shapes demand seasonality and quality expectations. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, producers navigate a highly fragmented regulatory environment, a strong emphasis on emissions control and circularity, and variable infrastructure maturity that affects the cost and reliability of raw material supply. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization combined with dense downstream convertor networks creates intense demand heterogeneity, where proximity to large polymer converters and rubber producers can confer logistical and commercial advantages.
These regional characteristics inform where players opt to locate new assets, how they structure distribution networks, and the balance they strike between centralized, scale-driven production and decentralized, demand-proximate operations. Cross-border logistical considerations, regulatory compliance costs, and regional customer specification profiles jointly influence contract terms, inventory strategies, and local partnerships. Consequently, executives must calibrate regional strategies to account for feedstock sourcing realities, local regulatory expectations, and the competitive landscape in each operating geography.
Key company-level insights highlighting how scale, process know-how, grade specialization, and sustainability investments define competitive advantage in the acrylonitrile sector
Competitive dynamics among key companies in the acrylonitrile space are shaped by a mix of operational scale, technological differentiation, and the ability to deliver tailored product grades to demanding end markets. Leading producers maintain advantages through integrated feedstock sourcing, proprietary catalyst regimens, and process know-how that reduce impurity formation and improve downstream polymerization performance. Other players differentiate by focusing on specialty grades, investing in analytical capabilities and quality systems to serve medical and electronics applications that command stricter specifications.
Strategic behavior in the sector includes targeted partnerships with downstream converters, long-term feedstock agreements that secure cost and supply stability, and selective investments to upgrade emissions controls and energy integration. Companies that demonstrate agility in shifting volumes between grades and channels - and that invest in traceability and customer service infrastructures - tend to sustain stronger commercial relationships with major converters. Intellectual property around catalysts and process conditions remains an important source of differentiation, as does the ability to scale production with minimal quality drift. Sustainability positioning, including emissions reduction, solvent recovery, and waste minimization, is increasingly influencing buyer preference and is becoming a competitive axis in discussions with large industrial customers.
Actionable strategic recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen resilience, pursue value-accretive product differentiation, and align investments with regulatory and customer-driven priorities
Industry leaders should prioritize a sequence of practical actions that enhance resilience, capture value from application-specific differentiation, and prepare operations for regulatory and market shifts. First, accelerate investments in process upgrades that improve impurity control and energy efficiency, as these yield immediate quality benefits and position assets for stricter environmental standards. Second, develop flexible feedstock sourcing frameworks that combine long-term agreements with opportunistic spot access and regional hedging to mitigate tariff and logistics risks. Third, deepen collaboration with key downstream customers to co-develop grades that meet evolving performance and traceability needs, thereby locking in strategic supply arrangements and raising entry barriers for competitors.
Additionally, integrate sustainability metrics into capital allocation decisions and communicate progress transparently to downstream buyers, as environmental performance is becoming a decisive procurement filter. Strengthen scenario-based planning and stress-testing of supply chains to identify choke points and to prioritize investments that deliver the highest resilience per dollar spent. Finally, align commercial and technical teams around a portfolio approach that balances high-purity, margin-accretive offerings with standardized volume plays, ensuring the organization can pivot between channels as demand conditions change.
Transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, targeted secondary validation, and multi-source triangulation to ensure robust and actionable findings
The research underpinning this analysis was developed through a structured methodology combining primary interviews, targeted secondary research, and iterative triangulation to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagement included discussions with technical leaders at production facilities, procurement managers at converter firms, and regulatory specialists who provided contextual interpretation of policy impacts. These qualitative interactions were complemented by secondary review of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, and company disclosures to validate process descriptions and investment rationales.
To ensure analytical rigor, findings from interviews were cross-checked against multiple independent sources and reconciled through internal expert review. The methodology prioritized reproducibility by documenting assumptions, interview protocols, and the provenance of key evidence. Limitations of the approach were acknowledged and addressed through sensitivity checks, particularly where policy shifts or proprietary technologies introduced uncertainty. Overall, the research approach balanced depth of technical understanding with practical market intelligence to produce insights that are actionable for commercial, technical, and executive audiences.
Concluding synthesis that emphasizes process excellence, customer alignment, and supply chain resilience as the core strategic priorities for sustainable competitiveness
The body of evidence synthesized in this executive summary points to an acrylonitrile landscape defined by incremental technological progress, tightening regulatory expectations, and differentiated demand from diverse downstream industries. The confluence of these forces favors producers who can combine process excellence with commercial agility, offering both high-purity grades for demanding applications and cost-competitive volumes for bulk polymer production. Supply chain resilience, manifested through diversified feedstock sourcing and strong logistics partnerships, has become a critical operational determinant in the face of trade policy volatility and evolving compliance regimes.
Looking ahead, firms that invest selectively in process improvements, strengthen ties with downstream customers, and embed sustainability metrics into their operational playbooks will be better positioned to capture value and manage risk. The strategic imperative is not merely to grow capacity, but to align technical capabilities, commercial propositions, and regulatory preparedness so that organizations can adapt profitably to shifting market and policy conditions. Those that do will secure stronger contractual relationships and improved operational continuity in a complex and evolving environment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to acrylonitrile that synthesizes feedstock pressures, process technology evolution, regulatory drivers, and application-driven quality demands
Acrylonitrile has emerged as a foundational intermediate in multiple polymer and chemical value chains, where feedstock availability, process technology choices, and evolving regulatory expectations converge to shape commercial outcomes. The compound’s role as a precursor to polymers such as nitrile rubber and ABS situates it at the intersection of traditional commodity chemistry and higher-value specialty applications, driving a need for nuanced supply chain management and process optimization. Stakeholders must reconcile the cyclicality of industrial demand with persistent pressures on feedstock sourcing and environmental compliance, which are reshaping capital allocation and operational priorities across production facilities.
Recent advances in catalyst design, reactor engineering, and downstream integration are producing incremental improvements in conversion efficiency and impurity control, while the industry balances investments between established production routes and experimental pathways. Concurrently, end-use industries such as automotive and medical manufacturing are imposing tighter specifications for performance and traceability, which in turn influence procurement strategies. For strategic and technical leaders, understanding the interplay between raw material costs, reactor choice, and product specification is essential for managing both near-term disruptions and medium-term competitiveness.
Strategic and technological forces reshaping the acrylonitrile landscape through process innovation, regulatory tightening, and evolving end-use performance expectations
The acrylonitrile landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advances, regulatory tightening, and changing demand patterns across downstream industries. On the technology front, innovations in reactor design and catalyst formulations are enabling producers to squeeze higher yields from existing assets and reduce impurity burdens that complicate downstream polymerization. These technical shifts are complemented by a widening focus on decarbonization and emissions control, prompting upgrades to energy integration and waste management systems at many production sites.
At the same time, downstream demand is maturing: automotive manufacturers are requesting materials with improved thermal and mechanical performance, construction specifiers are requiring greater durability and fire resistance, and healthcare providers are emphasizing purity and biocompatibility for medical-grade nitrile products. These demand signals are catalyzing refinements in product grade segmentation and quality assurance practices. Regulatory momentum toward stricter emissions and safety reporting is adding another layer of complexity, changing the calculus for investment in retrofits versus new-build capacity. Overall, the sector’s transformative shifts are less about a single disruptive event and more about parallel, reinforcing dynamics across technology, regulations, and evolving end-use requirements.
Assessment of how tariff measures in 2025 altered sourcing strategies, investment calculus, and supplier resilience expectations across acrylonitrile value chains
The imposition of tariffs and trade barriers by the United States in 2025 introduced a recalibration of supply chain flows and commercial decision-making for firms engaged in acrylonitrile-related value chains. In response to tariff-induced cost asymmetries, procurement teams have had to reassess sourcing strategies, prioritize suppliers with integrated logistics advantages, and revisit contractual terms to mitigate exposure to sudden policy shifts. Manufacturers with vertically integrated operations found flexibility to reroute internal volumes, while independent converters and specialty producers faced heightened pressure to secure stable, cost-competitive feedstock.
Tariff measures also had a signaling effect on investment planning and capacity deployment. Risk-averse capital committees deferred or re-scoped projects that depended on cross-border feedstock flows subject to policy volatility, and firms accelerated contingency plans to diversify supply or to localize critical processing steps. At the commercial interface, buyers became more exacting about supplier resilience metrics and inventory visibility, seeking counterparties that demonstrated multi-source procurement and robust logistics continuity. Regulatory trade actions therefore reshaped both tactical procurement behavior and longer-term industrial strategy, reinforcing the need for scenario-based planning and strengthened supplier partnerships to manage elevated policy risk.
In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how applications, reactor technology choices, industry end uses, and grade differentiation jointly determine strategic priorities and competitive positioning
A nuanced view of market segmentation reveals how application, production process, end-use industry, and grade distinctions interact to define competitive advantage and operational focus. Based on Application, the landscape spans Acrylic Acid Esters, Acrylic Fibers, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, and Nitrile Rubber, each channel imposing distinct purity, impurity profile, and specification requirements that cascade back to process control and quality assurance practices. Based on Production Process, producers operate with either Fixed Bed Reactor or Fluidized Bed Reactor technologies, with each offering trade-offs in terms of throughput stability, catalyst management, and ease of scale-up for incremental capacity investments. Based on End Use Industry, demand drivers differ across Automotive, Construction, Electrical And Electronics, and Medical And Healthcare sectors, where performance criteria, compliance obligations, and product lifecycles necessitate tailored formulations and supply chain agreements. Based on Grade, distinctions between High Purity and Standard grades influence the degree of analytical oversight, traceability requirements, and margin structures that producers and converters can sustain.
Intersections among these segmentation axes create important strategic contours. For example, meeting medical and healthcare specifications often requires high-purity acrylonitrile produced on processes that minimize byproduct formation, which affects reactor selection and catalyst regimen. Conversely, large-volume construction applications may accept standard grades produced on higher-throughput platforms but demand consistent logistics and cost-competitive pricing. The segmentation profile therefore provides a framework for prioritizing investment, aligning R&D efforts with customer specifications, and calibrating commercial propositions for different buyer archetypes.
Regional strategic insights mapping feedstock realities, regulatory environments, and downstream demand patterns across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific to guide operational placement and partnerships
Regional dynamics are a key determinant of operational strategy and risk exposure in the acrylonitrile ecosystem, with each geography presenting distinct feedstock endowments, regulatory regimes, and demand profiles. In the Americas, legacy petrochemical hubs and established logistics corridors support a mix of integrated and merchant production models, while customer concentration in automotive clusters and manufacturing centers shapes demand seasonality and quality expectations. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, producers navigate a highly fragmented regulatory environment, a strong emphasis on emissions control and circularity, and variable infrastructure maturity that affects the cost and reliability of raw material supply. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization combined with dense downstream convertor networks creates intense demand heterogeneity, where proximity to large polymer converters and rubber producers can confer logistical and commercial advantages.
These regional characteristics inform where players opt to locate new assets, how they structure distribution networks, and the balance they strike between centralized, scale-driven production and decentralized, demand-proximate operations. Cross-border logistical considerations, regulatory compliance costs, and regional customer specification profiles jointly influence contract terms, inventory strategies, and local partnerships. Consequently, executives must calibrate regional strategies to account for feedstock sourcing realities, local regulatory expectations, and the competitive landscape in each operating geography.
Key company-level insights highlighting how scale, process know-how, grade specialization, and sustainability investments define competitive advantage in the acrylonitrile sector
Competitive dynamics among key companies in the acrylonitrile space are shaped by a mix of operational scale, technological differentiation, and the ability to deliver tailored product grades to demanding end markets. Leading producers maintain advantages through integrated feedstock sourcing, proprietary catalyst regimens, and process know-how that reduce impurity formation and improve downstream polymerization performance. Other players differentiate by focusing on specialty grades, investing in analytical capabilities and quality systems to serve medical and electronics applications that command stricter specifications.
Strategic behavior in the sector includes targeted partnerships with downstream converters, long-term feedstock agreements that secure cost and supply stability, and selective investments to upgrade emissions controls and energy integration. Companies that demonstrate agility in shifting volumes between grades and channels - and that invest in traceability and customer service infrastructures - tend to sustain stronger commercial relationships with major converters. Intellectual property around catalysts and process conditions remains an important source of differentiation, as does the ability to scale production with minimal quality drift. Sustainability positioning, including emissions reduction, solvent recovery, and waste minimization, is increasingly influencing buyer preference and is becoming a competitive axis in discussions with large industrial customers.
Actionable strategic recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen resilience, pursue value-accretive product differentiation, and align investments with regulatory and customer-driven priorities
Industry leaders should prioritize a sequence of practical actions that enhance resilience, capture value from application-specific differentiation, and prepare operations for regulatory and market shifts. First, accelerate investments in process upgrades that improve impurity control and energy efficiency, as these yield immediate quality benefits and position assets for stricter environmental standards. Second, develop flexible feedstock sourcing frameworks that combine long-term agreements with opportunistic spot access and regional hedging to mitigate tariff and logistics risks. Third, deepen collaboration with key downstream customers to co-develop grades that meet evolving performance and traceability needs, thereby locking in strategic supply arrangements and raising entry barriers for competitors.
Additionally, integrate sustainability metrics into capital allocation decisions and communicate progress transparently to downstream buyers, as environmental performance is becoming a decisive procurement filter. Strengthen scenario-based planning and stress-testing of supply chains to identify choke points and to prioritize investments that deliver the highest resilience per dollar spent. Finally, align commercial and technical teams around a portfolio approach that balances high-purity, margin-accretive offerings with standardized volume plays, ensuring the organization can pivot between channels as demand conditions change.
Transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, targeted secondary validation, and multi-source triangulation to ensure robust and actionable findings
The research underpinning this analysis was developed through a structured methodology combining primary interviews, targeted secondary research, and iterative triangulation to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary engagement included discussions with technical leaders at production facilities, procurement managers at converter firms, and regulatory specialists who provided contextual interpretation of policy impacts. These qualitative interactions were complemented by secondary review of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, and company disclosures to validate process descriptions and investment rationales.
To ensure analytical rigor, findings from interviews were cross-checked against multiple independent sources and reconciled through internal expert review. The methodology prioritized reproducibility by documenting assumptions, interview protocols, and the provenance of key evidence. Limitations of the approach were acknowledged and addressed through sensitivity checks, particularly where policy shifts or proprietary technologies introduced uncertainty. Overall, the research approach balanced depth of technical understanding with practical market intelligence to produce insights that are actionable for commercial, technical, and executive audiences.
Concluding synthesis that emphasizes process excellence, customer alignment, and supply chain resilience as the core strategic priorities for sustainable competitiveness
The body of evidence synthesized in this executive summary points to an acrylonitrile landscape defined by incremental technological progress, tightening regulatory expectations, and differentiated demand from diverse downstream industries. The confluence of these forces favors producers who can combine process excellence with commercial agility, offering both high-purity grades for demanding applications and cost-competitive volumes for bulk polymer production. Supply chain resilience, manifested through diversified feedstock sourcing and strong logistics partnerships, has become a critical operational determinant in the face of trade policy volatility and evolving compliance regimes.
Looking ahead, firms that invest selectively in process improvements, strengthen ties with downstream customers, and embed sustainability metrics into their operational playbooks will be better positioned to capture value and manage risk. The strategic imperative is not merely to grow capacity, but to align technical capabilities, commercial propositions, and regulatory preparedness so that organizations can adapt profitably to shifting market and policy conditions. Those that do will secure stronger contractual relationships and improved operational continuity in a complex and evolving environment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of bio-based feedstocks for sustainable acrylonitrile production reducing carbon footprint
- 5.2. Expansion of acrylonitrile capacity in Asia-Pacific driven by rising nitrile rubber demand in automotive industry
- 5.3. Innovations in membrane technology using polyacrylonitrile for advanced water treatment applications
- 5.4. Integration of carbon capture and utilization systems in acrylonitrile manufacturing to meet regulatory standards
- 5.5. Fluctuating propylene feedstock prices influencing acrylonitrile production economics and margin volatility
- 5.6. Development of novel catalysts for lower-energy acrylonitrile synthesis to improve process efficiency
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Acrylonitrile Market, by Application
- 8.1. Acrylic Acid Esters
- 8.2. Acrylic Fibers
- 8.3. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene
- 8.4. Nitrile Rubber
- 9. Acrylonitrile Market, by Production Process
- 9.1. Fixed Bed Reactor
- 9.2. Fluidized Bed Reactor
- 10. Acrylonitrile Market, by End Use Industry
- 10.1. Automotive
- 10.2. Construction
- 10.3. Electrical And Electronics
- 10.4. Medical And Healthcare
- 11. Acrylonitrile Market, by Grade
- 11.1. High Purity
- 11.2. Standard
- 12. Acrylonitrile Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Acrylonitrile Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Acrylonitrile Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. AnQore BV
- 15.3.2. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 15.3.3. Ascend Performance Materials LLC
- 15.3.4. China Petrochemical Corporation
- 15.3.5. Cornerstone Chemical Company
- 15.3.6. Dow Chemical Company
- 15.3.7. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 15.3.8. Hengli Petrochemical
- 15.3.9. INEOS Group Limited
- 15.3.10. Jiangsu Sailboat Petrochemical
- 15.3.11. Jiangsu Shenghong Petrochemical
- 15.3.12. Jilin Petrochemical Company Limited
- 15.3.13. LG Chem
- 15.3.14. Lotte Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.15. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
- 15.3.16. Petkim Petrokimya Holding
- 15.3.17. PetroChina Company Limited
- 15.3.18. Reliance Industries Limited
- 15.3.19. Repsol S.A.
- 15.3.20. SABIC
- 15.3.21. Shanghai SECCO Petrochemical Company Limited
- 15.3.22. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.23. Taekwang Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.24. TONGSUH PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION,LTD.
- 15.3.25. Toray Industries
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
