AI-based Surgical Robots Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Robotic System Type (AI-Enabled Autonomous Robotic Systems, Tethered Robotic Systems, Untethered Robotic Systems), Level of Autonomy, Application Areas, End-User - Global Forecas
Description
The AI-based Surgical Robots Market was valued at USD 6.43 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.75 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.11%, reaching USD 10.34 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive framing that situates AI-enhanced surgical robotics within clinical imperatives, technological maturity, regulatory pressure, and institutional planning
The surgical robotics landscape stands at the intersection of precision engineering, advanced algorithms, and evolving clinical expectations. Recent developments in sensing fidelity, control architectures, and machine learning have expanded what is technologically feasible in the operating room, and clinical teams are increasingly testing how these capabilities translate into improved procedural consistency and patient outcomes. At the same time, healthcare systems are reexamining care pathways to incorporate minimally invasive techniques enabled by robotic platforms, while institutions balance capital planning against long-term clinical value and workforce readiness.
Against this backdrop, attention has shifted from novelty demonstrations to operational integration, which demands robust interoperability with hospital information systems, refined training curricula for multidisciplinary teams, and carefully managed regulatory strategies. As a result, stakeholders are prioritizing clinical validation studies, human factors engineering, and data governance frameworks that enable safe deployment at scale. This introductory overview frames the remainder of the report by outlining the technological pillars, clinical imperatives, and organizational considerations that together will determine the pace and shape of adoption in the near term.
Critical transformative trends accelerating the integration of intelligent autonomy, sensor fusion, clinical workflows, and service-oriented commercial models in surgical robotics
The coming phase of surgical robotics will be defined by several interlinked shifts that change how systems are designed, validated, and used in practice. First, algorithmic maturity is pushing autonomy from narrow assistance toward more complex task execution, which in turn requires new approaches to validation that combine simulation, bench testing, and staged clinical trials. Second, sensor and imaging integration is creating richer perioperative datasets, enabling real-time decision support and tighter closed-loop control; this fusion of modalities is reducing ambiguity in tissue identification and instrument guidance.
Third, human–machine collaboration models are evolving. Surgeons are transitioning from direct manipulators of instruments to supervisors of intelligence-augmented systems, necessitating investment in training that emphasizes cognitive oversight, system calibration, and contingency management. Fourth, software-defined functionality is increasing the pace at which capabilities can be deployed through updates and modular apps, which creates opportunities but also new regulatory and cybersecurity responsibilities. Finally, commercial models are shifting away from pure capital sales toward service-centric arrangements that bundle installation, ongoing support, and data services, reshaping supplier relationships and total cost considerations. Together, these transformative trends are accelerating the emergence of a more interoperable, intelligent, and clinically integrated generation of surgical robots.
How recent United States tariff adjustments are reshaping supply chains, sourcing decisions, procurement priorities, and vendor localization strategies for surgical robotics
Tariff changes originating from policy adjustments in the United States have a cumulative impact across global supply chains, procurement cycles, and supplier strategies. Import levies on components and subassemblies increase the cost sensitivity of manufacturers and buying institutions, prompting re-evaluation of sourcing footprints and supplier diversification strategies. In response, some vendors accelerate localization of key subsystems or renegotiate supplier contracts to protect margins, while others explore design adjustments to substitute affected components with alternatives that have more favorable tariff classifications.
Beyond cost implications, tariffs influence inventory planning and lead-time management. Manufacturers and healthcare providers may increase safety stocks or shift to nearshoring to mitigate the risk of sudden cost escalations, which in turn affects working capital and operational cadence. These measures create ripple effects in supplier capacity planning and manufacturing prioritization.
Additionally, tariff-driven changes often accelerate strategic partnerships and manufacturing investments aimed at supply resilience. Companies that can demonstrate local production capabilities may gain procurement preference, while those reliant on complex transnational supply chains face heightened scrutiny during bidding and contracting. For healthcare systems, procurement teams are consequently placing greater emphasis on total cost of ownership, vendor continuity plans, and contractual protections against future policy changes. Collectively, these dynamics are reshaping vendor selection criteria and prompting a reassessment of where and how surgical robotics ecosystems are structured.
In-depth segmentation analysis linking components, system architectures, autonomy tiers, clinical applications, and end-user environments to inform targeted strategies
A nuanced view of segmentation reveals how distinct technology and commercial boundaries determine development trajectories and adoption patterns. Based on component, the ecosystem comprises Hardware, Services, and Software. Hardware encompasses control systems, imaging systems, robotic arms, and sensors and actuators, each demanding specialized engineering disciplines and supplier networks. Services include installation and training as well as maintenance and support, which are increasingly positioned as continuity and outcomes enablers. Software spans AI and machine learning algorithms, augmented reality and virtual reality tools for surgical simulation, and data analytics and decision support systems, which together provide the cognitive layer that elevates raw mechanical capability.
Examining robotic system types clarifies market differentiation across AI-enabled autonomous robotic systems, tethered robotic systems, and untethered robotic systems. This taxonomy helps distinguish architectures that rely on fixed infrastructure from those designed for greater mobility or independent operation. Level of autonomy segmentation further stratifies solutions into fully autonomous surgical robots, semi-autonomous surgical robots, and supervised AI-assisted robotics, capturing the spectrum of human oversight and algorithmic control. Application areas provide clinical context, spanning cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, gynecological surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology surgery, and each specialty imposes distinct requirements for dexterity, imaging, and workflow integration. Finally, end-user segmentation differentiates ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, and specialty clinics, highlighting variations in purchasing power, case mix, staffing models, and infrastructure readiness.
Taken together, these segmentation lenses illuminate how technology choices intersect with clinical use cases and procurement dynamics, and they inform tailored go-to-market approaches and development roadmaps that align product capabilities with the needs of specific surgical specialties and care settings.
Regional strategic nuances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine product design, clinical evidence, and commercialization pathways
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping strategic priorities for developers, suppliers, and health systems. In the Americas, a concentrated mix of academic medical centers, large hospital networks, and ambulatory surgery centers creates demand for both high-end clinical capabilities and scalable service models, with a focus on clinical validation and interoperability with enterprise IT. Meanwhile, procurement processes and payer influences drive careful consideration of downstream support and lifecycle servicing commitments.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous, with advanced healthcare systems prioritizing regulatory harmonization, patient safety, and cross-border clinical collaboration, while emerging markets emphasize affordability, portability, and adaptability to constrained infrastructure. This region often fosters collaborative research networks and multi-stakeholder regulatory dialogues that influence device approval and clinical adoption pathways. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid technological adoption and strong manufacturing ecosystems catalyze both innovation and competition. Health systems in this region are balancing investments in advanced tertiary centers with broader initiatives to expand access to minimally invasive care, creating a dual demand for cutting-edge capabilities and cost-effective platforms.
These regional distinctions have implications for product design, go-to-market strategies, and local partnerships. Vendors seeking global reach must therefore reconcile differing regulatory expectations, service models, and clinical priorities while tailoring their commercial and clinical evidence strategies to regional decision-making norms.
Competitive and partnership dynamics revealing how IP, regulatory strength, talent, and ecosystem strategies shape leadership in surgical robotics
Competitive dynamics among leading organizations are characterized by differentiation through platform ecosystems, intellectual property portfolios, and service capabilities. Some established manufacturers leverage deep clinical relationships and broad device portfolios to secure long-term partnerships with hospital systems, while newer entrants compete on modular architectures, software-first value propositions, and targeted clinical use cases. Strategic alliances between component suppliers, imaging innovators, and software developers are increasingly common as firms seek to accelerate time-to-clinic and mitigate development risk.
Intellectual property and regulatory credentials serve as powerful barriers to entry, meaning that companies with robust patent positions or streamlined approval pathways often command strategic advantage. At the same time, talent acquisition in areas such as machine learning, robotic control, and clinical engineering is a differentiator that shapes innovation velocity. Supply chain resilience and manufacturing flexibility are also pivotal, particularly in light of recent policy and tariff pressures that prioritize localized capabilities.
Finally, go-to-market approaches vary widely: some companies emphasize direct clinical partnerships and centers of excellence to build clinician advocacy, while others pursue channel partnerships with distributors and system integrators to scale adoption. Across all approaches, a successful strategy balances clinical validation, service excellence, and an ecosystem of third-party developers that extend platform functionality over time.
Actionable strategic moves for device makers and health systems focusing on interoperability, supply resilience, clinician training, and flexible commercialization to secure long-term value
Leaders in device development, procurement, and clinical operations must adopt pragmatic actions to align technology investments with clinical value. First, prioritize interoperability and data standards early in product design and procurement discussions to reduce integration friction and enable richer perioperative analytics. Second, invest in staged clinical validation and human factors testing that demonstrate not only technical performance but also workflow compatibility and surgeon ergonomics, thereby building clinician confidence.
Third, diversify supply chains and develop contractual protections that address policy volatility and component availability, while considering localized manufacturing for critical subsystems where appropriate. Fourth, create comprehensive training and credentialing programs that move beyond initial onboarding to include simulation-based refreshers and competency assessments tied to clinical outcomes. Fifth, adopt flexible commercial models that combine capital and service elements to align incentives between vendors and providers and support predictable lifecycle servicing. Lastly, cultivate cross-industry partnerships with imaging specialists, AI developers, and hospital IT teams to accelerate functional integration and co-develop solutions that address specialty-specific needs.
Taken together, these actions will position organizations to deploy surgical robotics in ways that emphasize safety, operational efficiency, and sustainable clinician adoption.
Robust mixed-methods research combining clinician interviews, technical literature, patent mapping, regulatory review, and supply chain analysis to validate practical insights
The research approach synthesized primary qualitative insights with systematic secondary intelligence to construct a multidimensional view of the surgical robotics ecosystem. Primary research included structured interviews with clinical leaders, surgical technologists, procurement executives, and engineering teams to surface real-world adoption barriers and clinical workflow considerations. These conversations were complemented by targeted consultations with regulatory specialists and service leaders to understand approval pathways and post-deployment support models.
Secondary intelligence involved technical literature reviews, patent landscape mapping, and regulatory documentation analysis to validate technology trends and identify areas of differentiation. Competitive benchmarking examined product architectures, software toolchains, and integration capabilities to identify patterns in platform development. Supply chain analyses evaluated component sourcing strategies and manufacturing footprints to assess resilience factors. Throughout the process, findings were iteratively validated via expert panels and cross-checked against clinical case studies to ensure that conclusions reflect current operational realities and technological capabilities.
This mixed-methods methodology ensures that the report balances empirical clinical perspective with technical and commercial rigor, producing insights that are both actionable and grounded in observable industry behavior.
Concluding synthesis highlighting integration of human-centered design, regulatory engagement, supply resilience, and clinical partnership as determinants of long-term success
As artificial intelligence and robotics continue to converge, the field of surgical robotics is entering a phase where clinical integration, data governance, and service models will determine which technologies deliver sustained value. The path ahead emphasizes the importance of human-centered design, rigorous clinical validation, and partnerships that bridge engineering excellence with clinical expertise. Organizations that align product roadmaps with the needs of specific surgical specialties and care settings, while also investing in interoperability and workforce readiness, will be best positioned to translate technical capability into improved procedural consistency and patient outcomes.
Regulatory and policy environments will remain influential, and proactive engagement with regulators and payers will be essential to ensure safe, ethical, and economically viable adoption. Meanwhile, supply chain diversification and strategic localization can mitigate policy-driven disruptions and support long-term operational continuity. In sum, success will depend on a holistic approach that integrates technical innovation with pragmatic commercialization and clinical adoption strategies.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive framing that situates AI-enhanced surgical robotics within clinical imperatives, technological maturity, regulatory pressure, and institutional planning
The surgical robotics landscape stands at the intersection of precision engineering, advanced algorithms, and evolving clinical expectations. Recent developments in sensing fidelity, control architectures, and machine learning have expanded what is technologically feasible in the operating room, and clinical teams are increasingly testing how these capabilities translate into improved procedural consistency and patient outcomes. At the same time, healthcare systems are reexamining care pathways to incorporate minimally invasive techniques enabled by robotic platforms, while institutions balance capital planning against long-term clinical value and workforce readiness.
Against this backdrop, attention has shifted from novelty demonstrations to operational integration, which demands robust interoperability with hospital information systems, refined training curricula for multidisciplinary teams, and carefully managed regulatory strategies. As a result, stakeholders are prioritizing clinical validation studies, human factors engineering, and data governance frameworks that enable safe deployment at scale. This introductory overview frames the remainder of the report by outlining the technological pillars, clinical imperatives, and organizational considerations that together will determine the pace and shape of adoption in the near term.
Critical transformative trends accelerating the integration of intelligent autonomy, sensor fusion, clinical workflows, and service-oriented commercial models in surgical robotics
The coming phase of surgical robotics will be defined by several interlinked shifts that change how systems are designed, validated, and used in practice. First, algorithmic maturity is pushing autonomy from narrow assistance toward more complex task execution, which in turn requires new approaches to validation that combine simulation, bench testing, and staged clinical trials. Second, sensor and imaging integration is creating richer perioperative datasets, enabling real-time decision support and tighter closed-loop control; this fusion of modalities is reducing ambiguity in tissue identification and instrument guidance.
Third, human–machine collaboration models are evolving. Surgeons are transitioning from direct manipulators of instruments to supervisors of intelligence-augmented systems, necessitating investment in training that emphasizes cognitive oversight, system calibration, and contingency management. Fourth, software-defined functionality is increasing the pace at which capabilities can be deployed through updates and modular apps, which creates opportunities but also new regulatory and cybersecurity responsibilities. Finally, commercial models are shifting away from pure capital sales toward service-centric arrangements that bundle installation, ongoing support, and data services, reshaping supplier relationships and total cost considerations. Together, these transformative trends are accelerating the emergence of a more interoperable, intelligent, and clinically integrated generation of surgical robots.
How recent United States tariff adjustments are reshaping supply chains, sourcing decisions, procurement priorities, and vendor localization strategies for surgical robotics
Tariff changes originating from policy adjustments in the United States have a cumulative impact across global supply chains, procurement cycles, and supplier strategies. Import levies on components and subassemblies increase the cost sensitivity of manufacturers and buying institutions, prompting re-evaluation of sourcing footprints and supplier diversification strategies. In response, some vendors accelerate localization of key subsystems or renegotiate supplier contracts to protect margins, while others explore design adjustments to substitute affected components with alternatives that have more favorable tariff classifications.
Beyond cost implications, tariffs influence inventory planning and lead-time management. Manufacturers and healthcare providers may increase safety stocks or shift to nearshoring to mitigate the risk of sudden cost escalations, which in turn affects working capital and operational cadence. These measures create ripple effects in supplier capacity planning and manufacturing prioritization.
Additionally, tariff-driven changes often accelerate strategic partnerships and manufacturing investments aimed at supply resilience. Companies that can demonstrate local production capabilities may gain procurement preference, while those reliant on complex transnational supply chains face heightened scrutiny during bidding and contracting. For healthcare systems, procurement teams are consequently placing greater emphasis on total cost of ownership, vendor continuity plans, and contractual protections against future policy changes. Collectively, these dynamics are reshaping vendor selection criteria and prompting a reassessment of where and how surgical robotics ecosystems are structured.
In-depth segmentation analysis linking components, system architectures, autonomy tiers, clinical applications, and end-user environments to inform targeted strategies
A nuanced view of segmentation reveals how distinct technology and commercial boundaries determine development trajectories and adoption patterns. Based on component, the ecosystem comprises Hardware, Services, and Software. Hardware encompasses control systems, imaging systems, robotic arms, and sensors and actuators, each demanding specialized engineering disciplines and supplier networks. Services include installation and training as well as maintenance and support, which are increasingly positioned as continuity and outcomes enablers. Software spans AI and machine learning algorithms, augmented reality and virtual reality tools for surgical simulation, and data analytics and decision support systems, which together provide the cognitive layer that elevates raw mechanical capability.
Examining robotic system types clarifies market differentiation across AI-enabled autonomous robotic systems, tethered robotic systems, and untethered robotic systems. This taxonomy helps distinguish architectures that rely on fixed infrastructure from those designed for greater mobility or independent operation. Level of autonomy segmentation further stratifies solutions into fully autonomous surgical robots, semi-autonomous surgical robots, and supervised AI-assisted robotics, capturing the spectrum of human oversight and algorithmic control. Application areas provide clinical context, spanning cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, gynecological surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology surgery, and each specialty imposes distinct requirements for dexterity, imaging, and workflow integration. Finally, end-user segmentation differentiates ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, and specialty clinics, highlighting variations in purchasing power, case mix, staffing models, and infrastructure readiness.
Taken together, these segmentation lenses illuminate how technology choices intersect with clinical use cases and procurement dynamics, and they inform tailored go-to-market approaches and development roadmaps that align product capabilities with the needs of specific surgical specialties and care settings.
Regional strategic nuances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine product design, clinical evidence, and commercialization pathways
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping strategic priorities for developers, suppliers, and health systems. In the Americas, a concentrated mix of academic medical centers, large hospital networks, and ambulatory surgery centers creates demand for both high-end clinical capabilities and scalable service models, with a focus on clinical validation and interoperability with enterprise IT. Meanwhile, procurement processes and payer influences drive careful consideration of downstream support and lifecycle servicing commitments.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous, with advanced healthcare systems prioritizing regulatory harmonization, patient safety, and cross-border clinical collaboration, while emerging markets emphasize affordability, portability, and adaptability to constrained infrastructure. This region often fosters collaborative research networks and multi-stakeholder regulatory dialogues that influence device approval and clinical adoption pathways. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid technological adoption and strong manufacturing ecosystems catalyze both innovation and competition. Health systems in this region are balancing investments in advanced tertiary centers with broader initiatives to expand access to minimally invasive care, creating a dual demand for cutting-edge capabilities and cost-effective platforms.
These regional distinctions have implications for product design, go-to-market strategies, and local partnerships. Vendors seeking global reach must therefore reconcile differing regulatory expectations, service models, and clinical priorities while tailoring their commercial and clinical evidence strategies to regional decision-making norms.
Competitive and partnership dynamics revealing how IP, regulatory strength, talent, and ecosystem strategies shape leadership in surgical robotics
Competitive dynamics among leading organizations are characterized by differentiation through platform ecosystems, intellectual property portfolios, and service capabilities. Some established manufacturers leverage deep clinical relationships and broad device portfolios to secure long-term partnerships with hospital systems, while newer entrants compete on modular architectures, software-first value propositions, and targeted clinical use cases. Strategic alliances between component suppliers, imaging innovators, and software developers are increasingly common as firms seek to accelerate time-to-clinic and mitigate development risk.
Intellectual property and regulatory credentials serve as powerful barriers to entry, meaning that companies with robust patent positions or streamlined approval pathways often command strategic advantage. At the same time, talent acquisition in areas such as machine learning, robotic control, and clinical engineering is a differentiator that shapes innovation velocity. Supply chain resilience and manufacturing flexibility are also pivotal, particularly in light of recent policy and tariff pressures that prioritize localized capabilities.
Finally, go-to-market approaches vary widely: some companies emphasize direct clinical partnerships and centers of excellence to build clinician advocacy, while others pursue channel partnerships with distributors and system integrators to scale adoption. Across all approaches, a successful strategy balances clinical validation, service excellence, and an ecosystem of third-party developers that extend platform functionality over time.
Actionable strategic moves for device makers and health systems focusing on interoperability, supply resilience, clinician training, and flexible commercialization to secure long-term value
Leaders in device development, procurement, and clinical operations must adopt pragmatic actions to align technology investments with clinical value. First, prioritize interoperability and data standards early in product design and procurement discussions to reduce integration friction and enable richer perioperative analytics. Second, invest in staged clinical validation and human factors testing that demonstrate not only technical performance but also workflow compatibility and surgeon ergonomics, thereby building clinician confidence.
Third, diversify supply chains and develop contractual protections that address policy volatility and component availability, while considering localized manufacturing for critical subsystems where appropriate. Fourth, create comprehensive training and credentialing programs that move beyond initial onboarding to include simulation-based refreshers and competency assessments tied to clinical outcomes. Fifth, adopt flexible commercial models that combine capital and service elements to align incentives between vendors and providers and support predictable lifecycle servicing. Lastly, cultivate cross-industry partnerships with imaging specialists, AI developers, and hospital IT teams to accelerate functional integration and co-develop solutions that address specialty-specific needs.
Taken together, these actions will position organizations to deploy surgical robotics in ways that emphasize safety, operational efficiency, and sustainable clinician adoption.
Robust mixed-methods research combining clinician interviews, technical literature, patent mapping, regulatory review, and supply chain analysis to validate practical insights
The research approach synthesized primary qualitative insights with systematic secondary intelligence to construct a multidimensional view of the surgical robotics ecosystem. Primary research included structured interviews with clinical leaders, surgical technologists, procurement executives, and engineering teams to surface real-world adoption barriers and clinical workflow considerations. These conversations were complemented by targeted consultations with regulatory specialists and service leaders to understand approval pathways and post-deployment support models.
Secondary intelligence involved technical literature reviews, patent landscape mapping, and regulatory documentation analysis to validate technology trends and identify areas of differentiation. Competitive benchmarking examined product architectures, software toolchains, and integration capabilities to identify patterns in platform development. Supply chain analyses evaluated component sourcing strategies and manufacturing footprints to assess resilience factors. Throughout the process, findings were iteratively validated via expert panels and cross-checked against clinical case studies to ensure that conclusions reflect current operational realities and technological capabilities.
This mixed-methods methodology ensures that the report balances empirical clinical perspective with technical and commercial rigor, producing insights that are both actionable and grounded in observable industry behavior.
Concluding synthesis highlighting integration of human-centered design, regulatory engagement, supply resilience, and clinical partnership as determinants of long-term success
As artificial intelligence and robotics continue to converge, the field of surgical robotics is entering a phase where clinical integration, data governance, and service models will determine which technologies deliver sustained value. The path ahead emphasizes the importance of human-centered design, rigorous clinical validation, and partnerships that bridge engineering excellence with clinical expertise. Organizations that align product roadmaps with the needs of specific surgical specialties and care settings, while also investing in interoperability and workforce readiness, will be best positioned to translate technical capability into improved procedural consistency and patient outcomes.
Regulatory and policy environments will remain influential, and proactive engagement with regulators and payers will be essential to ensure safe, ethical, and economically viable adoption. Meanwhile, supply chain diversification and strategic localization can mitigate policy-driven disruptions and support long-term operational continuity. In sum, success will depend on a holistic approach that integrates technical innovation with pragmatic commercialization and clinical adoption strategies.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven intraoperative decision support systems for real-time surgical guidance
- 5.2. Development of autonomous robotic suturing modules with machine learning for soft tissue adaptation
- 5.3. Implementation of 5G-enabled remote robotic surgery platforms for cross-border medical access
- 5.4. Adoption of deep learning algorithms for predictive maintenance and error reduction in surgical robots
- 5.5. Emergence of haptic-feedback augmented robotic instruments using AI for enhanced surgeon tactile perception
- 5.6. Expansion of cloud-based AI analytics for continuous improvement of robotic surgical outcomes
- 5.7. Regulatory approvals for AI-enabled robotic systems with explainable decision-making frameworks
- 5.8. Collaboration between AI companies and medical device manufacturers to create modular robotic platforms
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Control Systems
- 8.1.2. Imaging Systems
- 8.1.3. Robotic Arms
- 8.1.4. Sensors & Actuators
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Installation & Training
- 8.2.2. Maintenance & Support
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. AI & Machine Learning Algorithms
- 8.3.2. Augmented Reality (AR) & Virtual Reality (VR) for surgical simulation
- 8.3.3. Data Analytics & Decision Support Systems
- 9. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Robotic System Type
- 9.1. AI-Enabled Autonomous Robotic Systems
- 9.2. Tethered Robotic Systems
- 9.3. Untethered Robotic Systems
- 10. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Level of Autonomy
- 10.1. Fully Autonomous Surgical Robots
- 10.2. Semi-Autonomous Surgical Robots
- 10.3. Supervised AI-Assisted Robotics
- 11. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Application Areas
- 11.1. Cardiothoracic Surgery
- 11.2. General Surgery
- 11.3. Gynecological Surgery
- 11.4. Neurosurgery
- 11.5. Orthopedic Surgery
- 11.6. Urology Surgery
- 12. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by End-User
- 12.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
- 12.2. Hospitals
- 12.3. Specialty Clinics
- 13. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. AI-based Surgical Robots Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Accuray Incorporated
- 16.3.2. Activ Surgical, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Asensus Surgical US, Inc.
- 16.3.4. CMR Surgical Limited
- 16.3.5. Globus Medical, Inc.
- 16.3.6. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
- 16.3.8. KUKA AG
- 16.3.9. Medtronic PLC
- 16.3.10. Monteris Medical Corporation
- 16.3.11. Moon Surgical
- 16.3.12. Neocis, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Noah Medical Corporation
- 16.3.14. Olympus Corporation
- 16.3.15. Robocath SAS
- 16.3.16. Shimadzu Corporation
- 16.3.17. Siemens AG
- 16.3.18. Smith & Nephew PLC
- 16.3.19. Stereotaxis, Inc.
- 16.3.20. Stryker Corporation
- 16.3.21. Synaptive Medical Inc.
- 16.3.22. THINK Surgical, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Titan Medical Inc.
- 16.3.24. Virtual Incision Corporation
- 16.3.25. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
