5G in Defense Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Frequency (High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz), Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz), Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)), Network Type, Deployment Environment, Platform Type, Spectrum Access Model, Technolo
Description
The 5G in Defense Market was valued at USD 1.66 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.43%, reaching USD 6.03 billion by 2032.
Understanding how 5G transforms defense communications architectures operationally strategically and industrially to create a new class of mission-enabled networks
The emergence of 5G as a foundational technology in defense is reshaping how militaries conceptualize communications, command structures, and mission effectiveness. Beyond higher throughput and lower latency, 5G enables an architecture that converges software-defined networking, edge compute, and advanced sensor fusion to create decision advantage across contested environments. As a result, defense planners are evaluating 5G not as a point capability but as a platform that integrates platforms, sensors, and weapons into coherent, resilient systems of systems.
In operational terms, this transition compels a rethinking of legacy procurement, lifecycle sustainment, and workforce skill sets. Where tactical commanders once prioritized isolated upgrades, they now require interoperable, secure, and rapidly reconfigurable networks that can sustain operations across fixed installations, tactical deployable sites, and dense urban theaters. Concurrently, the technology community is accelerating innovations in network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications to meet mission-critical performance envelopes.
Strategically, the adoption of 5G raises important questions about spectrum management, trust in supplier ecosystems, and the balance between commercial innovation and defense-specific assurance. The interplay between technology, policy, and operational doctrine will determine the pace and shape of adoption. Therefore, defense stakeholders must adopt a holistic approach that aligns technical roadmaps, acquisition pathways, and industrial partnerships to realize the transformative potential of 5G.
Identifying the pivotal trends reshaping defense networks including supply chain evolution operational doctrine modernization and the convergence of cyber and physical resilience
The landscape for defense networks is undergoing several transformative shifts driven by both capability advances and changing threat dynamics. First, there is an operational shift from platform-centric to network-centric design, where the value of individual platforms is increasingly measured by their ability to share data in real time and support distributed decision-making. This shift elevates the importance of software-defined capabilities, orchestration, and edge compute resources to ensure missions remain agile and resilient under contested conditions.
Second, supply chains and industrial partnerships are evolving. Defense organizations are diversifying supplier bases, investing in domestic capabilities, and forging alliances with commercial firms to accelerate innovation while managing security risks. Open architecture initiatives and modular hardware designs are disrupting legacy vendor lock-in, enabling faster upgrades and more competitive procurement cycles. In parallel, cyber and physical security considerations are becoming inseparable from capability design, pushing security features earlier into the development lifecycle.
Third, doctrinal and training paradigms are adapting to exploit the unique attributes of 5G. Doctrine must account for network-enabled effects, contested spectrum environments, and the need for rapid reconstitution of services. Training pipelines are now emphasizing software skills, network operations, and integrated test ranges to validate performance across Combined Arms exercises. Collectively, these shifts create a defense ecosystem that is more interconnected, digitally native, and dependent on the agility of both industry and military institutions.
Assessing how cumulative tariff measures through 2025 are reshaping procurement strategies supplier diversification and supply chain resilience for defense 5G programs
Recent tariff measures implemented by the United States through 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity into defense technology acquisition and supply chain planning. The cumulative impact is felt across procurement timelines, unit costs, and supplier strategy, prompting defense organizations and prime contractors to reevaluate sourcing decisions for critical components such as radio access network modules, RF front-end parts, and specialized semiconductors. These pressures incentivize a strategic pivot toward supplier diversification, including increased engagement with trusted domestic sources and allied suppliers.
As organizations adapt, there is an observable acceleration of onshoring and nearshoring efforts to reduce exposure to tariff volatility and to enhance supply chain resilience. This shift is accompanied by targeted investments in domestic manufacturing and qualification processes, which in turn affect the cadence of capability deliveries. Furthermore, tariffs have amplified the importance of lifecycle cost assessment and total cost of ownership analyses in defense acquisition boards, where short-term price increases may be offset by longer-term gains in security, sustainment, and sovereign control.
Equally important is the geopolitical signaling of tariff policy. Allies and partners are recalibrating procurement alliances and industrial cooperation frameworks to mitigate disruptions and sustain interoperability. In response, defense program managers are integrating tariff risk into scenario planning and contracting approaches, using longer lead times, dual-sourcing requirements, and modular architectures to preserve program momentum. Ultimately, while tariffs can increase near-term friction, they are also catalyzing structural changes that may yield more resilient and secure defense supply chains over time.
Delivering an integrated multi-axial segmentation framework that aligns components frequencies platforms and operational environments to defense 5G capability needs and procurement pathways
A nuanced segmentation of the 5G defense market reveals how capability requirements, acquisition pathways, and operational contexts vary across components, frequencies, network types, deployment environments, platforms, spectrum access models, technologies, applications, and end users. Based on component, the market divides into hardware, services, and software where hardware encompasses core network elements, edge devices, and radio access network equipment with the radio access network further differentiated into antennas, macro base stations, massive MIMO units, RF front-end modules, and small cells; services include managed services and professional services, while software spans anomaly detection and intrusion detection systems, network management and orchestration, RAN intelligent controller applications, security, and software-defined networking with network functions virtualization. Based on frequency, differing propagation and throughput characteristics create distinct use cases across high-band spectrum above 24 GHz, low-band spectrum below 1 GHz, and mid-band spectrum between 1 GHz and 6 GHz. Based on network type, operational choices fall between non-standalone architectures that leverage existing infrastructure and standalone networks that support native 5G features and full programmability.
Based on deployment environment, requirements diverge for fixed installations, tactical deployable sites, and urban operations with fixed installations further differentiated by airfields, bases and garrisons, and ports and shipyards. Based on platform type, system design must accommodate aircraft, ground vehicles, naval vessels, soldier systems, and space systems where aircraft distinctions include manned aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, ground vehicles segregate into armored vehicles, robotic ground vehicles, and tactical trucks, naval vessels encompass submarines, surface ships, and unmanned surface and underwater vehicles, and space systems cover ground stations and satellites. Based on spectrum access model, procurement and operations are shaped by exclusive licensed, government-allocated, shared licensed, and unlicensed regimes. Based on technology, mission needs steer investments toward enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine-type communications, network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Based on application, priority areas include base security and protection, command and control systems, cybersecurity and network resilience, logistics and supply chain management, surveillance and reconnaissance, and training and simulation. Based on end user, operational requirements and acquisition channels differ markedly among air force, army, and navy operators. Together, these segmentation dimensions provide a multi-axial framework for aligning technical specifications, procurement strategies, and operational testing to specific mission profiles.
Explaining regional dynamics across the Americas Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific that shape defense 5G adoption industrial strategy and coalition interoperability
Geographic dynamics exert a powerful influence on how defense 5G programs are structured, funded, and executed. In the Americas, defense stakeholders are increasingly focused on integrating commercially matured 5G technologies into military architectures while emphasizing domestic resilience and secure industrial bases to protect critical supply chains. Collaborative exercises and procurement programs with allied nations inform interoperability standards and offer pathways to scale defense-grade implementations of 5G technologies.
Europe, the Middle East and Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where defense modernization priorities, regulatory environments, and industrial capacities vary widely. In some nations, rapid adoption is driven by urgent modernization needs and strong industrial policy support, whereas other jurisdictions prioritize interoperability, spectrum harmonization, and tightly controlled supply chains. Regional cooperation mechanisms and multinational procurement initiatives are emerging as pragmatic approaches to reconcile capability gaps and accelerate time to capability.
Asia-Pacific is notable for both intense demand for advanced communications and a dynamic industrial ecosystem that includes major OEMs, innovative suppliers, and expanding defense budgets in select countries. The competitive and cooperative interplay among regional powers is driving investment in sovereign manufacturing, advanced R&D in radio and semiconductor technologies, and increased focus on contested spectrum resilience. Across all regions, program success hinges on aligning policy, procurement, and industrial incentives to local strategic priorities while maintaining pathways for international interoperability and coalition operations.
Profiling the ecosystem of defense primes carriers integrators semiconductor specialists and software innovators driving secure interoperable 5G solutions and strategic partnerships
The competitive landscape for defense 5G combines legacy defense primes, global telecommunications vendors, systems integrators, and specialized semiconductor and software firms. Established defense contractors are leveraging their knowledge of military requirements, certification processes, and sustainment cycles to integrate 5G capabilities into larger platforms and services. Telecommunications vendors are adapting commercial innovations for defense use cases by hardening equipment, enabling secure orchestration, and participating in joint testing environments to validate operational performance under contested conditions.
Systems integrators and managed service providers are emerging as critical enablers by combining multi-vendor solutions, lifecycle support, and operational training to reduce risk for defense customers. Semiconductor suppliers and RF specialists play a crucial role in delivering the performance and miniaturization required for airborne, naval, and land platforms, while software companies are advancing capabilities in network management, anomaly detection, and RAN intelligent controllers. Strategic partnerships, joint ventures, and R&D consortia are becoming commonplace as organizations seek to blend commercial speed with defense-specific assurance, and mergers and acquisitions continue to reshape capability portfolios and access to critical IP. Ultimately, competitive advantage will accrue to organizations that can demonstrate secure, interoperable, and mission-optimized 5G solutions supported by proven supply chain resilience and long-term sustainment commitments.
Prescriptive steps for defense and industry leaders to accelerate deployment secure supply chains and align workforce and procurement to mission-driven 5G outcomes
Industry leaders pursuing defense 5G programs should adopt a set of practical, outcome-driven actions that align technology investments with operational needs and procurement realities. First, embed security and supply chain assurance into early-stage design decisions and supplier selection criteria to reduce retrofit costs and mitigate program risks. Second, prioritize modular, open architectures that enable multi-supplier competition, faster upgrades, and graceful degradation under contested conditions. This approach supports both cost control and rapid capability insertion.
Third, invest in joint testbeds and field trials that simulate contested electromagnetic environments, enabling honest validation of performance and interoperability across platforms and coalition partners. Fourth, accelerate workforce transformation by investing in network engineering, software development, and operational test skills that are essential to sustain 5G-enabled capabilities. Fifth, reframe contracting mechanisms to incentivize lifecycle outcomes-such as resilience, maintainability, and cyber posture-rather than one-off equipment delivery. Sixth, engage proactively with regulators and spectrum authorities to secure access models that match mission profiles and to shape policies that support defense-grade deployments. Finally, cultivate industrial partnerships with domestic manufacturers and trusted allies to balance innovation speed with sovereign assurance. Taken together, these steps reduce program risk and shorten the path from prototype to deployed, mission-ready capability.
Describing a rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews technical reviews scenario analysis and triangulation to validate defense 5G insights
The research underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and structured approaches to ensure robustness and relevance to defense stakeholders. Primary inputs included structured interviews with defense acquisition officials, program managers, industry executives, and technical subject matter experts to capture firsthand perspectives on operational requirements, acquisition constraints, and maturation timelines. These insights were complemented by technical reviews of open architecture specifications, standards activity, and published doctrine to map how 5G technologies intersect with military concepts of operations and spectrum policy.
Analytical methods included capability gap mapping across deployment environments and platforms, scenario-based stress testing for supply chain and tariff exposures, and cross-segmentation alignment to identify where technology choices yield the greatest operational leverage. Triangulation was performed by comparing primary inputs with vendor roadmaps, public procurement announcements, and observable testbed outcomes to validate assumptions. Limitations of the methodology are acknowledged, including the evolving nature of policy decisions and the pace of technological change; therefore, findings emphasize structural trends and risk-managed pathways rather than fixed timelines. Validation workshops with external experts were used to refine conclusions and ensure practical relevance for defense decision-makers.
Concluding observations on how integrated secure 5G adoption strategic procurement and industrial resilience will determine operational advantage across joint warfighting domains
In summary, 5G represents a strategic inflection point for defense organizations seeking to gain operational advantage through network-enabled effects. The technology’s capabilities-when combined with secure architectures, resilient supply chains, and adaptive doctrine-can materially improve situational awareness, command and control, and joint operations across air, land, sea, and space domains. However, realizing this potential requires deliberate choices across procurement, industrial policy, and workforce development to manage security risks and to sustain long-term capability.
Tariff dynamics and geopolitical pressures are accelerating structural changes in supplier strategies and are prompting investments in domestic manufacturing, diversified sourcing, and cooperative frameworks with trusted partners. Segmentation across components, frequencies, deployment environments, platforms, spectrum models, technologies, applications, and end users offers a pragmatic blueprint for aligning technical solutions to mission requirements. Ultimately, success will be defined by the ability of defense leaders to integrate commercial innovation with defense-grade assurance, validated through rigorous testing and supported by enduring industrial partnerships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Understanding how 5G transforms defense communications architectures operationally strategically and industrially to create a new class of mission-enabled networks
The emergence of 5G as a foundational technology in defense is reshaping how militaries conceptualize communications, command structures, and mission effectiveness. Beyond higher throughput and lower latency, 5G enables an architecture that converges software-defined networking, edge compute, and advanced sensor fusion to create decision advantage across contested environments. As a result, defense planners are evaluating 5G not as a point capability but as a platform that integrates platforms, sensors, and weapons into coherent, resilient systems of systems.
In operational terms, this transition compels a rethinking of legacy procurement, lifecycle sustainment, and workforce skill sets. Where tactical commanders once prioritized isolated upgrades, they now require interoperable, secure, and rapidly reconfigurable networks that can sustain operations across fixed installations, tactical deployable sites, and dense urban theaters. Concurrently, the technology community is accelerating innovations in network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications to meet mission-critical performance envelopes.
Strategically, the adoption of 5G raises important questions about spectrum management, trust in supplier ecosystems, and the balance between commercial innovation and defense-specific assurance. The interplay between technology, policy, and operational doctrine will determine the pace and shape of adoption. Therefore, defense stakeholders must adopt a holistic approach that aligns technical roadmaps, acquisition pathways, and industrial partnerships to realize the transformative potential of 5G.
Identifying the pivotal trends reshaping defense networks including supply chain evolution operational doctrine modernization and the convergence of cyber and physical resilience
The landscape for defense networks is undergoing several transformative shifts driven by both capability advances and changing threat dynamics. First, there is an operational shift from platform-centric to network-centric design, where the value of individual platforms is increasingly measured by their ability to share data in real time and support distributed decision-making. This shift elevates the importance of software-defined capabilities, orchestration, and edge compute resources to ensure missions remain agile and resilient under contested conditions.
Second, supply chains and industrial partnerships are evolving. Defense organizations are diversifying supplier bases, investing in domestic capabilities, and forging alliances with commercial firms to accelerate innovation while managing security risks. Open architecture initiatives and modular hardware designs are disrupting legacy vendor lock-in, enabling faster upgrades and more competitive procurement cycles. In parallel, cyber and physical security considerations are becoming inseparable from capability design, pushing security features earlier into the development lifecycle.
Third, doctrinal and training paradigms are adapting to exploit the unique attributes of 5G. Doctrine must account for network-enabled effects, contested spectrum environments, and the need for rapid reconstitution of services. Training pipelines are now emphasizing software skills, network operations, and integrated test ranges to validate performance across Combined Arms exercises. Collectively, these shifts create a defense ecosystem that is more interconnected, digitally native, and dependent on the agility of both industry and military institutions.
Assessing how cumulative tariff measures through 2025 are reshaping procurement strategies supplier diversification and supply chain resilience for defense 5G programs
Recent tariff measures implemented by the United States through 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity into defense technology acquisition and supply chain planning. The cumulative impact is felt across procurement timelines, unit costs, and supplier strategy, prompting defense organizations and prime contractors to reevaluate sourcing decisions for critical components such as radio access network modules, RF front-end parts, and specialized semiconductors. These pressures incentivize a strategic pivot toward supplier diversification, including increased engagement with trusted domestic sources and allied suppliers.
As organizations adapt, there is an observable acceleration of onshoring and nearshoring efforts to reduce exposure to tariff volatility and to enhance supply chain resilience. This shift is accompanied by targeted investments in domestic manufacturing and qualification processes, which in turn affect the cadence of capability deliveries. Furthermore, tariffs have amplified the importance of lifecycle cost assessment and total cost of ownership analyses in defense acquisition boards, where short-term price increases may be offset by longer-term gains in security, sustainment, and sovereign control.
Equally important is the geopolitical signaling of tariff policy. Allies and partners are recalibrating procurement alliances and industrial cooperation frameworks to mitigate disruptions and sustain interoperability. In response, defense program managers are integrating tariff risk into scenario planning and contracting approaches, using longer lead times, dual-sourcing requirements, and modular architectures to preserve program momentum. Ultimately, while tariffs can increase near-term friction, they are also catalyzing structural changes that may yield more resilient and secure defense supply chains over time.
Delivering an integrated multi-axial segmentation framework that aligns components frequencies platforms and operational environments to defense 5G capability needs and procurement pathways
A nuanced segmentation of the 5G defense market reveals how capability requirements, acquisition pathways, and operational contexts vary across components, frequencies, network types, deployment environments, platforms, spectrum access models, technologies, applications, and end users. Based on component, the market divides into hardware, services, and software where hardware encompasses core network elements, edge devices, and radio access network equipment with the radio access network further differentiated into antennas, macro base stations, massive MIMO units, RF front-end modules, and small cells; services include managed services and professional services, while software spans anomaly detection and intrusion detection systems, network management and orchestration, RAN intelligent controller applications, security, and software-defined networking with network functions virtualization. Based on frequency, differing propagation and throughput characteristics create distinct use cases across high-band spectrum above 24 GHz, low-band spectrum below 1 GHz, and mid-band spectrum between 1 GHz and 6 GHz. Based on network type, operational choices fall between non-standalone architectures that leverage existing infrastructure and standalone networks that support native 5G features and full programmability.
Based on deployment environment, requirements diverge for fixed installations, tactical deployable sites, and urban operations with fixed installations further differentiated by airfields, bases and garrisons, and ports and shipyards. Based on platform type, system design must accommodate aircraft, ground vehicles, naval vessels, soldier systems, and space systems where aircraft distinctions include manned aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, ground vehicles segregate into armored vehicles, robotic ground vehicles, and tactical trucks, naval vessels encompass submarines, surface ships, and unmanned surface and underwater vehicles, and space systems cover ground stations and satellites. Based on spectrum access model, procurement and operations are shaped by exclusive licensed, government-allocated, shared licensed, and unlicensed regimes. Based on technology, mission needs steer investments toward enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine-type communications, network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Based on application, priority areas include base security and protection, command and control systems, cybersecurity and network resilience, logistics and supply chain management, surveillance and reconnaissance, and training and simulation. Based on end user, operational requirements and acquisition channels differ markedly among air force, army, and navy operators. Together, these segmentation dimensions provide a multi-axial framework for aligning technical specifications, procurement strategies, and operational testing to specific mission profiles.
Explaining regional dynamics across the Americas Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific that shape defense 5G adoption industrial strategy and coalition interoperability
Geographic dynamics exert a powerful influence on how defense 5G programs are structured, funded, and executed. In the Americas, defense stakeholders are increasingly focused on integrating commercially matured 5G technologies into military architectures while emphasizing domestic resilience and secure industrial bases to protect critical supply chains. Collaborative exercises and procurement programs with allied nations inform interoperability standards and offer pathways to scale defense-grade implementations of 5G technologies.
Europe, the Middle East and Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where defense modernization priorities, regulatory environments, and industrial capacities vary widely. In some nations, rapid adoption is driven by urgent modernization needs and strong industrial policy support, whereas other jurisdictions prioritize interoperability, spectrum harmonization, and tightly controlled supply chains. Regional cooperation mechanisms and multinational procurement initiatives are emerging as pragmatic approaches to reconcile capability gaps and accelerate time to capability.
Asia-Pacific is notable for both intense demand for advanced communications and a dynamic industrial ecosystem that includes major OEMs, innovative suppliers, and expanding defense budgets in select countries. The competitive and cooperative interplay among regional powers is driving investment in sovereign manufacturing, advanced R&D in radio and semiconductor technologies, and increased focus on contested spectrum resilience. Across all regions, program success hinges on aligning policy, procurement, and industrial incentives to local strategic priorities while maintaining pathways for international interoperability and coalition operations.
Profiling the ecosystem of defense primes carriers integrators semiconductor specialists and software innovators driving secure interoperable 5G solutions and strategic partnerships
The competitive landscape for defense 5G combines legacy defense primes, global telecommunications vendors, systems integrators, and specialized semiconductor and software firms. Established defense contractors are leveraging their knowledge of military requirements, certification processes, and sustainment cycles to integrate 5G capabilities into larger platforms and services. Telecommunications vendors are adapting commercial innovations for defense use cases by hardening equipment, enabling secure orchestration, and participating in joint testing environments to validate operational performance under contested conditions.
Systems integrators and managed service providers are emerging as critical enablers by combining multi-vendor solutions, lifecycle support, and operational training to reduce risk for defense customers. Semiconductor suppliers and RF specialists play a crucial role in delivering the performance and miniaturization required for airborne, naval, and land platforms, while software companies are advancing capabilities in network management, anomaly detection, and RAN intelligent controllers. Strategic partnerships, joint ventures, and R&D consortia are becoming commonplace as organizations seek to blend commercial speed with defense-specific assurance, and mergers and acquisitions continue to reshape capability portfolios and access to critical IP. Ultimately, competitive advantage will accrue to organizations that can demonstrate secure, interoperable, and mission-optimized 5G solutions supported by proven supply chain resilience and long-term sustainment commitments.
Prescriptive steps for defense and industry leaders to accelerate deployment secure supply chains and align workforce and procurement to mission-driven 5G outcomes
Industry leaders pursuing defense 5G programs should adopt a set of practical, outcome-driven actions that align technology investments with operational needs and procurement realities. First, embed security and supply chain assurance into early-stage design decisions and supplier selection criteria to reduce retrofit costs and mitigate program risks. Second, prioritize modular, open architectures that enable multi-supplier competition, faster upgrades, and graceful degradation under contested conditions. This approach supports both cost control and rapid capability insertion.
Third, invest in joint testbeds and field trials that simulate contested electromagnetic environments, enabling honest validation of performance and interoperability across platforms and coalition partners. Fourth, accelerate workforce transformation by investing in network engineering, software development, and operational test skills that are essential to sustain 5G-enabled capabilities. Fifth, reframe contracting mechanisms to incentivize lifecycle outcomes-such as resilience, maintainability, and cyber posture-rather than one-off equipment delivery. Sixth, engage proactively with regulators and spectrum authorities to secure access models that match mission profiles and to shape policies that support defense-grade deployments. Finally, cultivate industrial partnerships with domestic manufacturers and trusted allies to balance innovation speed with sovereign assurance. Taken together, these steps reduce program risk and shorten the path from prototype to deployed, mission-ready capability.
Describing a rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews technical reviews scenario analysis and triangulation to validate defense 5G insights
The research underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and structured approaches to ensure robustness and relevance to defense stakeholders. Primary inputs included structured interviews with defense acquisition officials, program managers, industry executives, and technical subject matter experts to capture firsthand perspectives on operational requirements, acquisition constraints, and maturation timelines. These insights were complemented by technical reviews of open architecture specifications, standards activity, and published doctrine to map how 5G technologies intersect with military concepts of operations and spectrum policy.
Analytical methods included capability gap mapping across deployment environments and platforms, scenario-based stress testing for supply chain and tariff exposures, and cross-segmentation alignment to identify where technology choices yield the greatest operational leverage. Triangulation was performed by comparing primary inputs with vendor roadmaps, public procurement announcements, and observable testbed outcomes to validate assumptions. Limitations of the methodology are acknowledged, including the evolving nature of policy decisions and the pace of technological change; therefore, findings emphasize structural trends and risk-managed pathways rather than fixed timelines. Validation workshops with external experts were used to refine conclusions and ensure practical relevance for defense decision-makers.
Concluding observations on how integrated secure 5G adoption strategic procurement and industrial resilience will determine operational advantage across joint warfighting domains
In summary, 5G represents a strategic inflection point for defense organizations seeking to gain operational advantage through network-enabled effects. The technology’s capabilities-when combined with secure architectures, resilient supply chains, and adaptive doctrine-can materially improve situational awareness, command and control, and joint operations across air, land, sea, and space domains. However, realizing this potential requires deliberate choices across procurement, industrial policy, and workforce development to manage security risks and to sustain long-term capability.
Tariff dynamics and geopolitical pressures are accelerating structural changes in supplier strategies and are prompting investments in domestic manufacturing, diversified sourcing, and cooperative frameworks with trusted partners. Segmentation across components, frequencies, deployment environments, platforms, spectrum models, technologies, applications, and end users offers a pragmatic blueprint for aligning technical solutions to mission requirements. Ultimately, success will be defined by the ability of defense leaders to integrate commercial innovation with defense-grade assurance, validated through rigorous testing and supported by enduring industrial partnerships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of standalone 5G networks for secure battlefield communications
- 5.2. Use of 5G-enabled edge computing for real-time AI processing at forward operating bases
- 5.3. Deployment of private 5G networks on naval vessels for integrated maritime surveillance
- 5.4. Adoption of network slicing to allocate dedicated bandwidth for mission critical defense systems
- 5.5. Enhancement of drone swarm operations through ultra-reliable low latency 5G connectivity
- 5.6. Implementation of 5G-based secure mobile ad hoc networks for rapid tactical deployments
- 5.7. Cybersecurity frameworks for protecting defense 5G infrastructures against advanced threats
- 5.8. Collaboration between defense contractors and telecom operators to develop 5G interoperable systems for joint exercises
- 5.9. Rapid deployment of 5G private networks accelerates battlefield data sharing
- 5.10. Convergence of 5G with unmanned systems and robotics to enhance real-time situational awareness and response
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. 5G in Defense Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Core Network
- 8.1.2. Edge Devices
- 8.1.3. Radio Access Network
- 8.1.3.1. Antennas
- 8.1.3.2. Macro Base Stations
- 8.1.3.3. Massive MIMO Units
- 8.1.3.4. RF Front-End Modules
- 8.1.3.5. Small Cells
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Managed Services
- 8.2.2. Professional Services
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Anomaly Detection & Intrusion Detection System (IDS)
- 8.3.2. Network Management & Orchestration
- 8.3.3. RAN Intelligent Controller Applications
- 8.3.4. Security
- 8.3.5. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) & Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)
- 9. 5G in Defense Market, by Frequency
- 9.1. High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz)
- 9.2. Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz)
- 9.3. Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)
- 10. 5G in Defense Market, by Network Type
- 10.1. Non-Standalone
- 10.2. Standalone
- 11. 5G in Defense Market, by Deployment Environment
- 11.1. Fixed Installations
- 11.1.1. Airfields
- 11.1.2. Bases & Garrisons
- 11.1.3. Ports & Shipyards
- 11.2. Tactical Deployable
- 11.3. Urban Operations
- 12. 5G in Defense Market, by Platform Type
- 12.1. Aircraft
- 12.1.1. Manned Aircraft
- 12.1.2. Unmanned Aerial Systems
- 12.2. Ground Vehicles
- 12.2.1. Armored Vehicles
- 12.2.2. Robotic Ground Vehicles
- 12.2.3. Tactical Trucks
- 12.3. Naval Vessels
- 12.3.1. Submarines
- 12.3.2. Surface Ships
- 12.3.3. Unmanned Surface & Underwater Vehicles
- 12.4. Soldier Systems
- 12.5. Space Systems
- 12.5.1. Ground Stations
- 12.5.2. Satellites
- 13. 5G in Defense Market, by Spectrum Access Model
- 13.1. Exclusive Licensed
- 13.2. Government-Allocated
- 13.3. Shared Licensed
- 13.4. Unlicensed
- 14. 5G in Defense Market, by Technology
- 14.1. Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB)
- 14.2. Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC)
- 14.3. Network Slicing
- 14.4. Positioning
- 14.5. Sidelink
- 14.6. Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC)
- 15. 5G in Defense Market, by Application
- 15.1. Base Security & Protection
- 15.2. Command & Control Systems
- 15.3. Cybersecurity & Network Resilience
- 15.4. Logistics & Supply Chain Management
- 15.5. Surveillance & Reconnaissance
- 15.6. Training & Simulation
- 16. 5G in Defense Market, by End User
- 16.1. Air Force
- 16.2. Army
- 16.3. Navy
- 17. 5G in Defense Market, by Region
- 17.1. Americas
- 17.1.1. North America
- 17.1.2. Latin America
- 17.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 17.2.1. Europe
- 17.2.2. Middle East
- 17.2.3. Africa
- 17.3. Asia-Pacific
- 18. 5G in Defense Market, by Group
- 18.1. ASEAN
- 18.2. GCC
- 18.3. European Union
- 18.4. BRICS
- 18.5. G7
- 18.6. NATO
- 19. 5G in Defense Market, by Country
- 19.1. United States
- 19.2. Canada
- 19.3. Mexico
- 19.4. Brazil
- 19.5. United Kingdom
- 19.6. Germany
- 19.7. France
- 19.8. Russia
- 19.9. Italy
- 19.10. Spain
- 19.11. China
- 19.12. India
- 19.13. Japan
- 19.14. Australia
- 19.15. South Korea
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 20.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 20.3. Competitive Analysis
- 20.3.1. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 20.3.2. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 20.3.3. Analog Devices, Inc.
- 20.3.4. AT&T Inc.
- 20.3.5. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 20.3.6. Nokia Corporation
- 20.3.7. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.8. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- 20.3.9. Oceus Networks
- 20.3.10. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 20.3.11. General Dynamics Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
