5G in Defense Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Frequency (High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz), Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz), Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)), Network Type, Deployment Environment, Platform Type, Spectrum Access Model, Technolo
Description
The 5G in Defense Market was valued at USD 1.66 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.35%, reaching USD 4.36 billion by 2030.
A strategic primer on how 5G architectures, security dynamics, and acquisition considerations are reshaping military communications and operational effectiveness
The advent of 5G presents defense organizations with a fundamentally different set of communications capabilities, operational possibilities, and security trade-offs than legacy generations of wireless technology. Beyond faster data rates, 5G introduces architecture-level changes such as virtualization, distributed edge compute, and programmable network functions that reshape how information is collected, fused, transported, and acted upon in contested environments. These capabilities support new mission sets ranging from persistent sensing and distributed command and control to autonomous collaboration among platforms. However, realizing those advantages requires a clear assessment of technology readiness, integration complexity, and the security posture necessary to operate in environments where denial, deception, and disruption are persistent threats.
Transitioning from experimental pilots to operational deployments necessitates alignment across doctrine, acquisition, and industry collaboration. Technical architects must reconcile the benefits of heterogeneous spectrum use, network slicing, and low-latency links with the realities of spectrum management, electromagnetic signature control, and lifecycle sustainment. Meanwhile, program managers must balance interoperability with allies, supplier diversity, and logistics constraints that affect deployment tempo. In short, 5G is not merely an incremental upgrade but an enabling layer of the battlespace that requires strategic planning, modular acquisition approaches, and strong governance to achieve resilient and mission-aligned outcomes.
How the convergence of edge compute, virtualization, and open interfaces is fundamentally transforming defense communications, procurement and operational paradigms
Recent developments in commercial and defense-grade 5G have accelerated changes in operational concepts, force structure, and systems delivery. The rapid maturation of edge compute, network function virtualization, and intelligent radio technologies has enabled distributed architectures in which compute and decisioning move closer to the tactical edge. This shift reduces latency and increases autonomy for platform-level sensors and effectors, enabling new tactics that rely on rapid sensor-to-shooter timelines and collaborative multi-domain operations. At the same time, the emergence of software-defined networks and programmability means that capabilities can be iterated via software upgrades rather than hardware replacements, altering lifecycle planning and enabling continuous capability insertion.
Concurrently, adversaries are actively targeting supply chains, firmware integrity, and open interfaces, forcing defense programs to adopt zero-trust principles and hardware provenance controls. Commercial ecosystems are responding by modularizing RAN and core functions, fostering vendor interoperability through open interfaces while also creating commercial dependencies. These twin trends-greater software dependency and broader interoperability-are transforming procurement logic, shifting emphasis from monolithic systems to integrated ecosystems where systems integrators and orchestration frameworks play a pivotal role. As a result, capability roadmaps must embed security engineering, certification pathways, and cross-domain integration exercises earlier and more frequently than in previous acquisition cycles.
Evaluating how tariff policy changes in 2025 are reshaping defense 5G procurement, supplier footprints, and industrial cooperation priorities across global programs
Policy shifts in tariff regimes during 2025 introduced new variables into defense 5G supply chains that extend beyond direct cost effects to influence sourcing strategies, supplier relationships, and industrial policy decisions. Tariffs increase the relative cost of imported components and assemblies, which in turn incentivize defense acquisition authorities to reassess supplier footprints, accelerate localization or allied sourcing, and re-evaluate total lifecycle cost implications for sustainment and upgrade paths. This recalibration often prioritizes supplier qualification, long-term availability, and domestic industrial base resilience as criteria nearly as important as unit cost.
The cumulative impact manifests in several observable behaviors. Procuring agencies intensify pre-contract risk assessments and stipulate enhanced supplier vetting requirements focused on security of supply, dual-sourcing strategies, and potential substitution paths. Systems engineers respond by re-architecting designs for greater modularity to accommodate multiple vendors and to reduce dependency on single-source components that may be subject to tariff volatility. Industry partners, anticipating procurement shifts, reconfigure global manufacturing footprints and adjust inventory policies to mitigate near-term disruptions. In combination, these actions shift program timelines, change negotiation dynamics in teaming arrangements, and elevate the importance of industrial cooperation agreements among allies as a means to harmonize standards and reduce exposure to unilateral trade measures.
In-depth segmentation analysis showing how component, frequency, network, platform, deployment, spectrum and application choices converge to shape defense 5G outcomes
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals where investment and integration effort must be focused to unlock operational value while managing risk. Component-level distinctions matter because hardware, services, and software play different roles across the lifecycle: hardware encompasses core network elements, edge devices, and radio access network assets such as antennas, macro base stations, massive MIMO units, RF front-end modules, and small cells; services include both managed services and professional services that provide deployment, optimization, and lifecycle support; and software ranges from anomaly detection and intrusion detection systems to network management and orchestration, RAN intelligent controller applications, security modules, and software-defined networking with network functions virtualization. Frequency choices further influence coverage and capability trade-offs as high-band spectrum above 24 GHz delivers capacity in dense environments while mid-band between 1 and 6 GHz balances coverage and throughput and low-band below 1 GHz provides extended reach and propagation characteristics suitable for broad-area connectivity. Network topology decisions hinge on whether non-standalone or standalone architectures are employed, with non-standalone options enabling incremental adoption atop existing infrastructure while standalone networks permit native 5G features like end-to-end slicing.
Deployment environment segmentation highlights distinct operational needs: fixed installations such as airfields, bases and garrisons, and ports and shipyards demand hardened, long-term systems with robust physical security and structured maintenance, while tactical deployable setups require rapid assembly, transportability, and resilient ad hoc networking. Urban operations emphasize stealth, interoperability with civil infrastructure, and dense spectrum management. Platform diversity-from aircraft including manned platforms and unmanned aerial systems, to ground vehicles such as armored vehicles, robotic ground vehicles, and tactical trucks, to naval vessels encompassing submarines, surface ships, and unmanned surface and underwater vehicles, as well as space systems comprising ground stations and satellites-creates unique form-factor, certification, and electromagnetic signature requirements. Spectrum access models matter for operational planning and policy: exclusive licensed allocations, government-allocated bands, shared licensed approaches, and unlicensed spectrum each provide different trade-offs in terms of control, interference risk, and operational flexibility. Finally, technology enablers such as enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine type communications, network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications map directly to application needs spanning base security and protection, command and control systems, cybersecurity and network resilience, logistics and supply chain management, surveillance and reconnaissance, and training and simulation. End users across air force, army, and navy domains apply these technologies in ways that require tailored integration pathways and doctrine updates to maximize mission impact.
Regional operational and procurement distinctions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence defense 5G deployment strategy and alliances
Regional dynamics drive divergent operational requirements, procurement behavior, and alliance structures, creating distinct strategic imperatives for program planners. In the Americas, defense programs benefit from close industrial collaboration between government and suppliers, a mature telecommunications ecosystem, and extensive testing infrastructure that supports rapid prototyping and trials. These conditions favor pilot programs that integrate commercial innovations with defense-grade controls, while procurement priorities emphasize interoperability with existing coalition partners and domestic industrial resilience.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, fragmentation of spectrum policy, diverse procurement regimes, and varying industrial base capabilities create both challenges and opportunities. Nations in this region often pursue cooperative procurement frameworks or multinational testing initiatives to harmonize standards and share development burdens. This approach supports interoperability across allied forces while balancing the need to protect critical supply chains and sensitive technologies.
Across Asia-Pacific, high rates of commercial 5G adoption and significant investments in both terrestrial and space-based communications create an environment where defense agencies can rapidly field-test advanced capabilities but must also contend with contested supply chains and regional geopolitical competition. As a result, defense stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific prioritize rapid fielding, sovereign capability development, and resilience measures that mitigate exposure to external trade or component disruptions. Taken together, regional variation necessitates policy-driven strategies that align procurement, alliance coordination, and industrial policy with operational requirements and threat assessments.
Competitive and corporate dynamics outlining how integrators, specialists, and software innovators are assembling end-to-end defense 5G solutions and service models
Understanding the competitive dynamics of the defense 5G ecosystem is essential for planners who must evaluate partners for system integration, hardware supply, and secure software development. The landscape now includes incumbent telecommunications equipment manufacturers who supply core and RAN elements, specialist defense contractors who integrate communications into platforms and systems, and a growing set of software and cybersecurity firms focused on orchestration, anomaly detection, and assurance. Systems integrators are increasingly important as end customers demand turnkey solutions that combine commercial best practices with defense-grade security controls and sustainment models. New entrants and niche suppliers are driving innovation in areas such as massive MIMO, compact edge compute modules tailored for constrained platforms, and secure waveform technologies suitable for contested electromagnetic environments.
Partnership arrangements vary from strategic supplier relationships to consortia and public-private research collaborations. Large primes often act as integrators that combine subsystems from multiple suppliers, while specialized vendors focus on critical subsystems where technical differentiation can be leveraged into long-term contracts. Cybersecurity firms are becoming integral partners, embedding resilience and assurance features into network management and orchestration layers. Meanwhile, service providers offering managed services for deployed networks are positioning themselves to support lifecycle operations, patching, and monitoring in both fixed installations and deployed tactical contexts. The competitive picture therefore rewards organizations that can demonstrate end-to-end capability, rigorous security engineering, and a track record of interoperability testing and fielded performance.
Practical strategic actions that defense program leaders and industry executives should implement to accelerate secure, modular, and interoperable 5G deployments with measurable impact
Leaders in defense programs and industry should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to accelerate secure, resilient, and interoperable 5G adoption. First, embed security and provenance controls at the outset of system design, ensuring hardware root-of-trust, firmware integrity validation, and continuous monitoring capabilities are in scope for acquisition contracts. This approach reduces retrofit costs and supports rapid certification in contested operational environments. Second, adopt modular architectures and open interfaces to enable multi-vendor sourcing, facilitate rapid upgrades, and avoid single-vendor lock-in; doing so enhances long-term competitiveness and supports allied interoperability.
Third, institutionalize cross-domain exercises and live trials that exercise edge compute, network slicing, and low-latency capabilities under realistic threat conditions; these exercises uncover integration gaps, inform training requirements, and validate orchestration workflows. Fourth, align procurement and industrial policy to encourage domestic and allied supplier ecosystems where strategic dependencies exist, balancing cost, quality, and security objectives. Fifth, invest in workforce development programs that equip systems engineers and cybersecurity teams with skills in software-defined networking, virtualized infrastructures, and secure DevSecOps practices. Finally, foster a governance framework that accelerates iterative capability delivery while preserving rigorous risk management, enabling defense organizations to capture commercial innovation without compromising operational security.
Transparent research methodology explaining expert engagements, standards analysis, scenario validation, and triangulation techniques used to derive actionable defense 5G insights
The insights presented derive from a structured, multi-method research approach combining primary expert engagements, technical literature review, and synthesis of open-source policy documents and standards activity. Subject-matter experts included telecommunications architects, defense systems engineers, procurement officers, and cybersecurity practitioners whose operational experience informed scenario-based validation of technical trade-offs. Technical review encompassed standards work in 3GPP and relevant defense specifications, as well as analysis of interoperability demonstrations and public trial reports to assess maturity and integration pathways.
Data synthesis prioritized triangulation: qualitative findings from expert interviews were cross-checked against technical documentation and program-level procurement records where publicly available, and scenario analysis explored the implications of alternative sourcing, spectrum, and architecture choices. Validation steps included peer reviews by additional domain experts, red-team assessments of threat vectors affecting supply chains and network resilience, and iterative refinement to ensure recommendations are actionable within typical defense acquisition frameworks. This layered methodology balances depth and operational relevance, enabling insights that are technically grounded and practically applicable to defense stakeholders planning 5G adoption.
Synthesis of strategic takeaways emphasizing integrated planning across security, acquisition, and operations to realize the operational advantages of 5G technologies
Adopting 5G in defense will be a defining technical and organizational effort that extends beyond radio upgrades to influence doctrine, logistics, and alliance cooperation. The most effective programs will be those that treat 5G as an enabling infrastructure requiring integrated planning across cybersecurity, systems engineering, procurement, and operations. Early investments in secure architectures, modular designs, and rigorous supplier vetting pay dividends through reduced integration risk and greater operational resilience. Equally important is the alignment of training and exercises with technological capability to ensure that personnel can exploit latency, bandwidth, and slicing features effectively under stress.
Looking ahead, interoperability and industrial policy will remain central levers for managing geopolitical and supply-chain risks. Defense organizations that partner with trusted suppliers, pursue cooperative development with allies, and adopt iterative fielding approaches will be best positioned to capture the full mission advantage of 5G technologies. In summary, realizing strategic 5G benefits requires a balanced program that integrates technical excellence, robust governance, and adaptive procurement practices to transform capability at the pace of operational need.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Component
Hardware
Core Network
Edge Devices
Radio Access Network
Antennas
Macro Base Stations
Massive MIMO Units
RF Front-End Modules
Small Cells
Services
Managed Services
Professional Services
Software
Anomaly Detection & Intrusion Detection System (IDS)
Network Management & Orchestration
RAN Intelligent Controller Applications
Security
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) & Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)
Frequency
High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz)
Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz)
Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)
Network Type
Non-Standalone
Standalone
Deployment Environment
Fixed Installations
Airfields
Bases & Garrisons
Ports & Shipyards
Tactical Deployable
Urban Operations
Platform Type
Aircraft
Manned Aircraft
Unmanned Aerial Systems
Ground Vehicles
Armored Vehicles
Robotic Ground Vehicles
Tactical Trucks
Naval Vessels
Submarines
Surface Ships
Unmanned Surface & Underwater Vehicles
Soldier Systems
Space Systems
Ground Stations
Satellites
Spectrum Access Model
Exclusive Licensed
Government-Allocated
Shared Licensed
Unlicensed
Technology
Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB)
Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC)
Network Slicing
Positioning
Sidelink
Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC)
Application
Base Security & Protection
Command & Control Systems
Cybersecurity & Network Resilience
Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Surveillance & Reconnaissance
Training & Simulation
End User
Air Force
Army
Navy
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Analog Devices, Inc.
AT&T Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cubic Corporation
Deutsche Telekom AG
Fujitsu Limited
Honeywell International Inc.
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Nokia Corporation
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Telefónica S.A.
Thales Group
Verizon Communications Inc.
Viasat, Inc.
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Orange SA
Telia Company AB
Leonardo S.p.A.
Grupo Oesía
INTRACOM DEFENSE S.A.
BAE Systems plc
Hughes Systique Private Limited
Oceus Networks
Northrop Grumman Corporation
General Dynamics Corporation
Saab AB
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic primer on how 5G architectures, security dynamics, and acquisition considerations are reshaping military communications and operational effectiveness
The advent of 5G presents defense organizations with a fundamentally different set of communications capabilities, operational possibilities, and security trade-offs than legacy generations of wireless technology. Beyond faster data rates, 5G introduces architecture-level changes such as virtualization, distributed edge compute, and programmable network functions that reshape how information is collected, fused, transported, and acted upon in contested environments. These capabilities support new mission sets ranging from persistent sensing and distributed command and control to autonomous collaboration among platforms. However, realizing those advantages requires a clear assessment of technology readiness, integration complexity, and the security posture necessary to operate in environments where denial, deception, and disruption are persistent threats.
Transitioning from experimental pilots to operational deployments necessitates alignment across doctrine, acquisition, and industry collaboration. Technical architects must reconcile the benefits of heterogeneous spectrum use, network slicing, and low-latency links with the realities of spectrum management, electromagnetic signature control, and lifecycle sustainment. Meanwhile, program managers must balance interoperability with allies, supplier diversity, and logistics constraints that affect deployment tempo. In short, 5G is not merely an incremental upgrade but an enabling layer of the battlespace that requires strategic planning, modular acquisition approaches, and strong governance to achieve resilient and mission-aligned outcomes.
How the convergence of edge compute, virtualization, and open interfaces is fundamentally transforming defense communications, procurement and operational paradigms
Recent developments in commercial and defense-grade 5G have accelerated changes in operational concepts, force structure, and systems delivery. The rapid maturation of edge compute, network function virtualization, and intelligent radio technologies has enabled distributed architectures in which compute and decisioning move closer to the tactical edge. This shift reduces latency and increases autonomy for platform-level sensors and effectors, enabling new tactics that rely on rapid sensor-to-shooter timelines and collaborative multi-domain operations. At the same time, the emergence of software-defined networks and programmability means that capabilities can be iterated via software upgrades rather than hardware replacements, altering lifecycle planning and enabling continuous capability insertion.
Concurrently, adversaries are actively targeting supply chains, firmware integrity, and open interfaces, forcing defense programs to adopt zero-trust principles and hardware provenance controls. Commercial ecosystems are responding by modularizing RAN and core functions, fostering vendor interoperability through open interfaces while also creating commercial dependencies. These twin trends-greater software dependency and broader interoperability-are transforming procurement logic, shifting emphasis from monolithic systems to integrated ecosystems where systems integrators and orchestration frameworks play a pivotal role. As a result, capability roadmaps must embed security engineering, certification pathways, and cross-domain integration exercises earlier and more frequently than in previous acquisition cycles.
Evaluating how tariff policy changes in 2025 are reshaping defense 5G procurement, supplier footprints, and industrial cooperation priorities across global programs
Policy shifts in tariff regimes during 2025 introduced new variables into defense 5G supply chains that extend beyond direct cost effects to influence sourcing strategies, supplier relationships, and industrial policy decisions. Tariffs increase the relative cost of imported components and assemblies, which in turn incentivize defense acquisition authorities to reassess supplier footprints, accelerate localization or allied sourcing, and re-evaluate total lifecycle cost implications for sustainment and upgrade paths. This recalibration often prioritizes supplier qualification, long-term availability, and domestic industrial base resilience as criteria nearly as important as unit cost.
The cumulative impact manifests in several observable behaviors. Procuring agencies intensify pre-contract risk assessments and stipulate enhanced supplier vetting requirements focused on security of supply, dual-sourcing strategies, and potential substitution paths. Systems engineers respond by re-architecting designs for greater modularity to accommodate multiple vendors and to reduce dependency on single-source components that may be subject to tariff volatility. Industry partners, anticipating procurement shifts, reconfigure global manufacturing footprints and adjust inventory policies to mitigate near-term disruptions. In combination, these actions shift program timelines, change negotiation dynamics in teaming arrangements, and elevate the importance of industrial cooperation agreements among allies as a means to harmonize standards and reduce exposure to unilateral trade measures.
In-depth segmentation analysis showing how component, frequency, network, platform, deployment, spectrum and application choices converge to shape defense 5G outcomes
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals where investment and integration effort must be focused to unlock operational value while managing risk. Component-level distinctions matter because hardware, services, and software play different roles across the lifecycle: hardware encompasses core network elements, edge devices, and radio access network assets such as antennas, macro base stations, massive MIMO units, RF front-end modules, and small cells; services include both managed services and professional services that provide deployment, optimization, and lifecycle support; and software ranges from anomaly detection and intrusion detection systems to network management and orchestration, RAN intelligent controller applications, security modules, and software-defined networking with network functions virtualization. Frequency choices further influence coverage and capability trade-offs as high-band spectrum above 24 GHz delivers capacity in dense environments while mid-band between 1 and 6 GHz balances coverage and throughput and low-band below 1 GHz provides extended reach and propagation characteristics suitable for broad-area connectivity. Network topology decisions hinge on whether non-standalone or standalone architectures are employed, with non-standalone options enabling incremental adoption atop existing infrastructure while standalone networks permit native 5G features like end-to-end slicing.
Deployment environment segmentation highlights distinct operational needs: fixed installations such as airfields, bases and garrisons, and ports and shipyards demand hardened, long-term systems with robust physical security and structured maintenance, while tactical deployable setups require rapid assembly, transportability, and resilient ad hoc networking. Urban operations emphasize stealth, interoperability with civil infrastructure, and dense spectrum management. Platform diversity-from aircraft including manned platforms and unmanned aerial systems, to ground vehicles such as armored vehicles, robotic ground vehicles, and tactical trucks, to naval vessels encompassing submarines, surface ships, and unmanned surface and underwater vehicles, as well as space systems comprising ground stations and satellites-creates unique form-factor, certification, and electromagnetic signature requirements. Spectrum access models matter for operational planning and policy: exclusive licensed allocations, government-allocated bands, shared licensed approaches, and unlicensed spectrum each provide different trade-offs in terms of control, interference risk, and operational flexibility. Finally, technology enablers such as enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine type communications, network slicing, positioning, sidelink, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications map directly to application needs spanning base security and protection, command and control systems, cybersecurity and network resilience, logistics and supply chain management, surveillance and reconnaissance, and training and simulation. End users across air force, army, and navy domains apply these technologies in ways that require tailored integration pathways and doctrine updates to maximize mission impact.
Regional operational and procurement distinctions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence defense 5G deployment strategy and alliances
Regional dynamics drive divergent operational requirements, procurement behavior, and alliance structures, creating distinct strategic imperatives for program planners. In the Americas, defense programs benefit from close industrial collaboration between government and suppliers, a mature telecommunications ecosystem, and extensive testing infrastructure that supports rapid prototyping and trials. These conditions favor pilot programs that integrate commercial innovations with defense-grade controls, while procurement priorities emphasize interoperability with existing coalition partners and domestic industrial resilience.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, fragmentation of spectrum policy, diverse procurement regimes, and varying industrial base capabilities create both challenges and opportunities. Nations in this region often pursue cooperative procurement frameworks or multinational testing initiatives to harmonize standards and share development burdens. This approach supports interoperability across allied forces while balancing the need to protect critical supply chains and sensitive technologies.
Across Asia-Pacific, high rates of commercial 5G adoption and significant investments in both terrestrial and space-based communications create an environment where defense agencies can rapidly field-test advanced capabilities but must also contend with contested supply chains and regional geopolitical competition. As a result, defense stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific prioritize rapid fielding, sovereign capability development, and resilience measures that mitigate exposure to external trade or component disruptions. Taken together, regional variation necessitates policy-driven strategies that align procurement, alliance coordination, and industrial policy with operational requirements and threat assessments.
Competitive and corporate dynamics outlining how integrators, specialists, and software innovators are assembling end-to-end defense 5G solutions and service models
Understanding the competitive dynamics of the defense 5G ecosystem is essential for planners who must evaluate partners for system integration, hardware supply, and secure software development. The landscape now includes incumbent telecommunications equipment manufacturers who supply core and RAN elements, specialist defense contractors who integrate communications into platforms and systems, and a growing set of software and cybersecurity firms focused on orchestration, anomaly detection, and assurance. Systems integrators are increasingly important as end customers demand turnkey solutions that combine commercial best practices with defense-grade security controls and sustainment models. New entrants and niche suppliers are driving innovation in areas such as massive MIMO, compact edge compute modules tailored for constrained platforms, and secure waveform technologies suitable for contested electromagnetic environments.
Partnership arrangements vary from strategic supplier relationships to consortia and public-private research collaborations. Large primes often act as integrators that combine subsystems from multiple suppliers, while specialized vendors focus on critical subsystems where technical differentiation can be leveraged into long-term contracts. Cybersecurity firms are becoming integral partners, embedding resilience and assurance features into network management and orchestration layers. Meanwhile, service providers offering managed services for deployed networks are positioning themselves to support lifecycle operations, patching, and monitoring in both fixed installations and deployed tactical contexts. The competitive picture therefore rewards organizations that can demonstrate end-to-end capability, rigorous security engineering, and a track record of interoperability testing and fielded performance.
Practical strategic actions that defense program leaders and industry executives should implement to accelerate secure, modular, and interoperable 5G deployments with measurable impact
Leaders in defense programs and industry should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to accelerate secure, resilient, and interoperable 5G adoption. First, embed security and provenance controls at the outset of system design, ensuring hardware root-of-trust, firmware integrity validation, and continuous monitoring capabilities are in scope for acquisition contracts. This approach reduces retrofit costs and supports rapid certification in contested operational environments. Second, adopt modular architectures and open interfaces to enable multi-vendor sourcing, facilitate rapid upgrades, and avoid single-vendor lock-in; doing so enhances long-term competitiveness and supports allied interoperability.
Third, institutionalize cross-domain exercises and live trials that exercise edge compute, network slicing, and low-latency capabilities under realistic threat conditions; these exercises uncover integration gaps, inform training requirements, and validate orchestration workflows. Fourth, align procurement and industrial policy to encourage domestic and allied supplier ecosystems where strategic dependencies exist, balancing cost, quality, and security objectives. Fifth, invest in workforce development programs that equip systems engineers and cybersecurity teams with skills in software-defined networking, virtualized infrastructures, and secure DevSecOps practices. Finally, foster a governance framework that accelerates iterative capability delivery while preserving rigorous risk management, enabling defense organizations to capture commercial innovation without compromising operational security.
Transparent research methodology explaining expert engagements, standards analysis, scenario validation, and triangulation techniques used to derive actionable defense 5G insights
The insights presented derive from a structured, multi-method research approach combining primary expert engagements, technical literature review, and synthesis of open-source policy documents and standards activity. Subject-matter experts included telecommunications architects, defense systems engineers, procurement officers, and cybersecurity practitioners whose operational experience informed scenario-based validation of technical trade-offs. Technical review encompassed standards work in 3GPP and relevant defense specifications, as well as analysis of interoperability demonstrations and public trial reports to assess maturity and integration pathways.
Data synthesis prioritized triangulation: qualitative findings from expert interviews were cross-checked against technical documentation and program-level procurement records where publicly available, and scenario analysis explored the implications of alternative sourcing, spectrum, and architecture choices. Validation steps included peer reviews by additional domain experts, red-team assessments of threat vectors affecting supply chains and network resilience, and iterative refinement to ensure recommendations are actionable within typical defense acquisition frameworks. This layered methodology balances depth and operational relevance, enabling insights that are technically grounded and practically applicable to defense stakeholders planning 5G adoption.
Synthesis of strategic takeaways emphasizing integrated planning across security, acquisition, and operations to realize the operational advantages of 5G technologies
Adopting 5G in defense will be a defining technical and organizational effort that extends beyond radio upgrades to influence doctrine, logistics, and alliance cooperation. The most effective programs will be those that treat 5G as an enabling infrastructure requiring integrated planning across cybersecurity, systems engineering, procurement, and operations. Early investments in secure architectures, modular designs, and rigorous supplier vetting pay dividends through reduced integration risk and greater operational resilience. Equally important is the alignment of training and exercises with technological capability to ensure that personnel can exploit latency, bandwidth, and slicing features effectively under stress.
Looking ahead, interoperability and industrial policy will remain central levers for managing geopolitical and supply-chain risks. Defense organizations that partner with trusted suppliers, pursue cooperative development with allies, and adopt iterative fielding approaches will be best positioned to capture the full mission advantage of 5G technologies. In summary, realizing strategic 5G benefits requires a balanced program that integrates technical excellence, robust governance, and adaptive procurement practices to transform capability at the pace of operational need.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Component
Hardware
Core Network
Edge Devices
Radio Access Network
Antennas
Macro Base Stations
Massive MIMO Units
RF Front-End Modules
Small Cells
Services
Managed Services
Professional Services
Software
Anomaly Detection & Intrusion Detection System (IDS)
Network Management & Orchestration
RAN Intelligent Controller Applications
Security
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) & Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)
Frequency
High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz)
Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz)
Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)
Network Type
Non-Standalone
Standalone
Deployment Environment
Fixed Installations
Airfields
Bases & Garrisons
Ports & Shipyards
Tactical Deployable
Urban Operations
Platform Type
Aircraft
Manned Aircraft
Unmanned Aerial Systems
Ground Vehicles
Armored Vehicles
Robotic Ground Vehicles
Tactical Trucks
Naval Vessels
Submarines
Surface Ships
Unmanned Surface & Underwater Vehicles
Soldier Systems
Space Systems
Ground Stations
Satellites
Spectrum Access Model
Exclusive Licensed
Government-Allocated
Shared Licensed
Unlicensed
Technology
Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB)
Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC)
Network Slicing
Positioning
Sidelink
Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC)
Application
Base Security & Protection
Command & Control Systems
Cybersecurity & Network Resilience
Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Surveillance & Reconnaissance
Training & Simulation
End User
Air Force
Army
Navy
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Analog Devices, Inc.
AT&T Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cubic Corporation
Deutsche Telekom AG
Fujitsu Limited
Honeywell International Inc.
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Nokia Corporation
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Telefónica S.A.
Thales Group
Verizon Communications Inc.
Viasat, Inc.
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Orange SA
Telia Company AB
Leonardo S.p.A.
Grupo Oesía
INTRACOM DEFENSE S.A.
BAE Systems plc
Hughes Systique Private Limited
Oceus Networks
Northrop Grumman Corporation
General Dynamics Corporation
Saab AB
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency & Pricing
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of standalone 5G networks for secure battlefield communications
- 5.2. Use of 5G-enabled edge computing for real-time AI processing at forward operating bases
- 5.3. Deployment of private 5G networks on naval vessels for integrated maritime surveillance
- 5.4. Adoption of network slicing to allocate dedicated bandwidth for mission critical defense systems
- 5.5. Enhancement of drone swarm operations through ultra-reliable low latency 5G connectivity
- 5.6. Implementation of 5G-based secure mobile ad hoc networks for rapid tactical deployments
- 5.7. Cybersecurity frameworks for protecting defense 5G infrastructures against advanced threats
- 5.8. Collaboration between defense contractors and telecom operators to develop 5G interoperable systems for joint exercises
- 5.9. Rapid deployment of 5G private networks accelerates battlefield data sharing
- 5.10. Convergence of 5G with unmanned systems and robotics to enhance real-time situational awareness and response
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. 5G in Defense Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Core Network
- 8.1.2. Edge Devices
- 8.1.3. Radio Access Network
- 8.1.3.1. Antennas
- 8.1.3.2. Macro Base Stations
- 8.1.3.3. Massive MIMO Units
- 8.1.3.4. RF Front-End Modules
- 8.1.3.5. Small Cells
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Managed Services
- 8.2.2. Professional Services
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Anomaly Detection & Intrusion Detection System (IDS)
- 8.3.2. Network Management & Orchestration
- 8.3.3. RAN Intelligent Controller Applications
- 8.3.4. Security
- 8.3.5. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) & Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)
- 9. 5G in Defense Market, by Frequency
- 9.1. High-Band Spectrum (>24 GHz)
- 9.2. Low-Band Spectrum (<1 GHz)
- 9.3. Mid-Band Spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz)
- 10. 5G in Defense Market, by Network Type
- 10.1. Non-Standalone
- 10.2. Standalone
- 11. 5G in Defense Market, by Deployment Environment
- 11.1. Fixed Installations
- 11.1.1. Airfields
- 11.1.2. Bases & Garrisons
- 11.1.3. Ports & Shipyards
- 11.2. Tactical Deployable
- 11.3. Urban Operations
- 12. 5G in Defense Market, by Platform Type
- 12.1. Aircraft
- 12.1.1. Manned Aircraft
- 12.1.2. Unmanned Aerial Systems
- 12.2. Ground Vehicles
- 12.2.1. Armored Vehicles
- 12.2.2. Robotic Ground Vehicles
- 12.2.3. Tactical Trucks
- 12.3. Naval Vessels
- 12.3.1. Submarines
- 12.3.2. Surface Ships
- 12.3.3. Unmanned Surface & Underwater Vehicles
- 12.4. Soldier Systems
- 12.5. Space Systems
- 12.5.1. Ground Stations
- 12.5.2. Satellites
- 13. 5G in Defense Market, by Spectrum Access Model
- 13.1. Exclusive Licensed
- 13.2. Government-Allocated
- 13.3. Shared Licensed
- 13.4. Unlicensed
- 14. 5G in Defense Market, by Technology
- 14.1. Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB)
- 14.2. Massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC)
- 14.3. Network Slicing
- 14.4. Positioning
- 14.5. Sidelink
- 14.6. Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC)
- 15. 5G in Defense Market, by Application
- 15.1. Base Security & Protection
- 15.2. Command & Control Systems
- 15.3. Cybersecurity & Network Resilience
- 15.4. Logistics & Supply Chain Management
- 15.5. Surveillance & Reconnaissance
- 15.6. Training & Simulation
- 16. 5G in Defense Market, by End User
- 16.1. Air Force
- 16.2. Army
- 16.3. Navy
- 17. 5G in Defense Market, by Region
- 17.1. Americas
- 17.1.1. North America
- 17.1.2. Latin America
- 17.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 17.2.1. Europe
- 17.2.2. Middle East
- 17.2.3. Africa
- 17.3. Asia-Pacific
- 18. 5G in Defense Market, by Group
- 18.1. ASEAN
- 18.2. GCC
- 18.3. European Union
- 18.4. BRICS
- 18.5. G7
- 18.6. NATO
- 19. 5G in Defense Market, by Country
- 19.1. United States
- 19.2. Canada
- 19.3. Mexico
- 19.4. Brazil
- 19.5. United Kingdom
- 19.6. Germany
- 19.7. France
- 19.8. Russia
- 19.9. Italy
- 19.10. Spain
- 19.11. China
- 19.12. India
- 19.13. Japan
- 19.14. Australia
- 19.15. South Korea
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 20.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 20.3. Competitive Analysis
- 20.3.1. Analog Devices, Inc.
- 20.3.2. AT&T Inc.
- 20.3.3. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 20.3.4. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 20.3.5. Nokia Corporation
- 20.3.6. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 20.3.7. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.8. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- 20.3.9. Oceus Networks
- 20.3.10. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 20.3.11. General Dynamics Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
