Market Research Logo

US Product Portfolio for Surgical Navigation and Robotics Systems 2017 - MedFolio

US Product Portfolio for Surgical Navigation and Robotics Systems 2017 - MedFolio

The shift from open cavity procedures to minimally invasive procedures has already occurred within the United States. For hospitals to attract top talent, they must be equipped with the latest in high-tech equipment and facilities in order to increase efficiency for the surgeon. Incorporating surgical navigation and robotic systems into operating rooms helps institutions promote themselves as industry leaders. Surgical navigation is a more established technology which has become the standard of care in neurosurgery, with adoption increasing in other segments. In addition, the growth of the surgical robotics market is expected to broaden the variety of procedures which can be done using a minimally invasive approach while reinforcing existing clinical benefits. For many procedures, the use of an IGS or robotic system increases the duration of the operation. Facilities and surgeons will therefore lose money as they are forced to schedule fewer procedures. This delay has decreased with newer models; however, any increase in time may reduce the number of operations that can be scheduled in a facility. This negatively impacts both surgeons and facilities, and can make potential clients less willing to pay the high costs associated with robotics systems. Surgical navigation systems are often marketed by implant companies and bundled with other products, while robotics companies have traditionally been smaller and focused on a narrower range of technologies. However, partnerships have led to a series of acquisitions of smaller robotics companies by larger, more established medical device companies. Since the technologies can be considered competitors, this trend is expected to continue as robotic technology becomes more widely adopted and accepted.

The full report suite on the U.S. robotics and surgical navigation systems includes four segments in surgical navigation and six segments in robotics. The segmentation for surgical navigation systems includes systems with neurosurgery applications, spinal surgery applications, ENT (ear/nose/throat) applications, and orthopedic hip and knee applications. The segmentation for surgical robotics systems includes spinal, neurosurgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), radiosurgery, catheter, and orthopedic robotically assisted systems.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
U.S. SURGICAL NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC SYSTEMS MARKET
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
MARKETS INCLUDED
PROCEDURES
KEY REPORT UPDATES
VERSION HISTORY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
DISEASE OVERVIEW
2.1 MEDICAL CONDITIONS
2.1.1 Neurosurgery Conditions
2.1.1.1 Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.2 Communicating Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.3 Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.4 Non-Communicating Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.5 Brain Tumor
2.1.1.6 Intracranial Pressure
2.1.1.7 Intracranial Aneurysm
2.1.1.8 Intracranial Atherosclerosis Disease
2.1.2 Spinal Conditions
2.1.2.1 Herniated Disc
2.1.2.2 Spinal Stenosis
2.1.2.3 Spondylosis
2.1.2.4 Scoliosis
2.1.2.5 Lordosis
2.1.2.6 Kyphosis
2.1.3 ENT Conditions
2.1.3.1 Otitis Media
2.1.3.2 Cholesteatomas
2.1.3.3 Otosclerosis
2.1.3.4 Chronic Sinusitis
2.1.3.5 Tonsillitis
2.1.4 Orthopedic Conditions
2.1.4.1 Fractures
2.1.4.2 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.3 Arthritis
2.1.5 Gynecological Conditions
2.1.5.1 Gynecological Cancers
2.1.5.2 Uterine Fibroids
2.1.5.3 Endometriosis
2.1.5.4 Menorrhagia
2.1.5.5 Pelvic Prolapse
2.1.6 Urological Conditions
2.1.6.1 Prostate Cancer
2.1.6.2 Bladder Cancer
2.1.6.3 Kidney Cancer
2.1.6.4 Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH)
2.1.7 Digestive Tract Conditions
2.1.7.1 Achalasia
2.1.7.2 Stomach Cancer
2.1.7.3 Hernia
2.1.7.4 Gallbladder Attack
2.1.7.5 Gastroesophageal Reflex Disease
2.1.8 Colorectal Conditions
2.1.8.1 Colorectal Cancer
2.1.8.2 Inflammatory Bowel Disease
2.1.8.3 Diverticulitis
2.1.9 Cardiac Conditions
2.1.9.1 Mitral Valve Prolapse
2.1.9.2 Coronary Artery Disease
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
3.1 ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.1.1 Robotic-Assisted Surgery Overview
3.1.2 Neurosurgery
3.1.3 Spine Surgery
3.1.4 Orthopedic Surgery
3.1.5 Minimally Invasive Surgery
3.1.6 Radiosurgery
3.1.7 Catheter Placement
3.2 SURGICAL NAVIGATION PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.2.1 Overview
3.2.2 Neurosurgery
3.2.3 Spine Surgery
3.2.4 Ear, Nose, Throat Surgery
3.2.5 Orthopedic Surgery
3.4 RAS REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
3.4.1 Accuray Inc.
3.4.2 Blue Belt Technologies
3.4.3 Hansen Medical Inc.
3.4.4 Intuitive Surgical
3.4.5 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
3.4.6 OMNIlife Science
3.5 SURGICAL NAVIGATION REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
3.5.1 Brainlab
3.5.2 Medtronic
3.5.3 Stryker
3.6 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.7 RAS CLINICAL TRIALS
3.7.1 Accuray Inc.
3.7.2 Catheter Precision
3.7.3 Corindus Inc
3.7.4 Hansen Medical
3.7.5 Intuitive Surgical
3.7.6 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
3.7.7 Mazor
3.7.8 Medrobotics
3.7.9 Medtech
3.8 SURGICAL NAVIGATION CLINICAL TRIALS
3.8.1 Stryker
ABBREVIATIONS
List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, U.S, 2013 – 2023
Chart 1 2: Surgical Robotics Systems Market by Segment, U.S, 2013 – 2023
Chart 1 3: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market Overview, U.S., 2013 & 2023
List of Figures
Figure 1 1: Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 2: Surgical Robotics Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 of 3)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 of 3)
Figure 1 6: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 (3 of 3)
Figure 1 7: Recent Events in the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems, Europe, 2013 – 2016
Figure 1 8: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 9: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 10: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 12: Version History
Figure 3 1: Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery Products by Company
Figure 3 2: Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery Products by Company
Figure 3 3: Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Products by Company
Figure 3 4: Robot-Assisted Radiosurgery Products by Company
Figure 3 5: Robot-Assisted Catheter Placement Products by Company
Figure 3 6: Neurosurgery Navigation Products by Company
Figure 3 7: Spine Navigation Products by Company
Figure 3 8: ENT Navigation Products by Company
Figure 3 9: Orthopedic Navigation Products by Company
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 73: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 74: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 75: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 76: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 77: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 78: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 79: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 80: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG
Figure 3 81: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 82: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG
Figure 3 83: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG
Figure 3 84: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG
Figure 3 85: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 86: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 87: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG
Figure 3 88: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 89: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 90: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 91: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 92: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 93: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 94: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 95: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 96: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab
Figure 3 97: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 98: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 99: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 100: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 101: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 102: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 103: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 104: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 105: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 106: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 107: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 108: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 109: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 110: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 111: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 112: Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer
Figure 3 113: CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Figure 3 114: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prostate Tumors
Figure 3 115: Study To Establish Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cyberknife in Patients
Figure 3 116: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Radiosurgery to Perioptic Tumors
Figure 3 117: Evaluation of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer
Figure 3 118: An Effectiveness and Toxicity of CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson Disease
Figure 3 119: CyberKnife Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (SAPBI) (CK-SAPBI)
Figure 3 120: Safety and Efficacy Study of Five-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Figure 3 121: A Study of Pre-Operative Cyberknife in Patients With Potentially Resectable Pancreas Cancer
Figure 3 122: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Figure 3 123: A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Figure 3 124: Safety and Feasibility of Arrhythmia Ablation Using the Amigo Remote Robotic System
Figure 3 125: Evaluation of the Amigo Robotic System for Ablation of the Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus
Figure 3 126: Manual vs Amigo SmartTouch Atrial Fibrillation Study (MAST-AF)
Figure 3 127: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease (RAPID)
Figure 3 128: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease II (RAPID II)
Figure 3 129: Post-Market CorPath Registry on the CorPath 200 System
Figure 3 130: Embolization Procedures in the Peripheral Vasculature Using the Magellan™ Robotic System
Figure 3 131: Registry of the Magellan Robotic System (ROVER)
Figure 3 132: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair
Figure 3 133: A Retrospective Multicenter Investigation of the Use of the da Vinci® Surgical System
Figure 3 134: Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci
Figure 3 135: Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
Figure 3 136: Prospective Investigation of Robotic Single-port System
Figure 3 137: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement
Figure 3 138: A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot
Figure 3 139: Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 140: Outcomes of Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty
Figure 3 141: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
Figure 3 142: Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries
Figure 3 143: Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery
Figure 3 144: Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis (PEDSCOLI)
Figure 3 145: ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity
Figure 3 146: MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
Figure 3 147: A Post-Market Clinical Trial for Access and Visualization
Figure 3 148: Robotic-assisted Pedicule Screw Placement (ARASS)
Figure 3 149: Navigation With X3 vs Non-Navigation With X3 Study
Figure 3 150: Computer-Assisted Navigation for Intramedullary Nail Fixation

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Share this report