Market Research Logo

Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market: Internal Fixators to Retain Top Position by Product Type Upcoming Decade to Present Multiple Growth Opportunities: Global Industry Analysis 2013 - 2017 and Opportunity Assessment 2018 - 2028

Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market: Internal Fixators to Retain Top Position by Product Type Upcoming Decade to Present Multiple Growth Opportunities: Global Industry Analysis 2013 - 2017 and Opportunity Assessment 2018 - 2028

A surging number of road accidents, fractures and sports injuries is expected to predominantly fuel the demand for orthopedic trauma devices in next few years. According to a recently put forth research on the global market for orthopedic trauma devices, the market is witnessing a primary push from a growing base of geriatric population, in addition to a swelling number of orthopedic disease instances. Another significant driver to growth of the global orthopedic trauma devices market is the strong presence of leading local players in their respective regional markets.

With advances in 3D printing, the industry is discovering new applications in orthopedics and the resultant 3D printed implants are trending rapidly worldwide. A more successful reverse shoulder arthroplasty is also trending in the market since recent past. Attributed to these and more such factors, the global orthopedic trauma devices market is apprehended to attain the revenues in excess of US$ 14 Bn by the end of 2028. Over a 10 year forecast period, the global market for orthopedic trauma devices will possibly expand at a promising CAGR of 6.8%, as per the research.

Internal Fixators Continue to Win over External Fixators, on the Basis of Product Type

By the product type, internal fixators currently hold a massive revenue share of more than 82%, which is expected to witness a slight decline over the next few years. This fall in the revenue share is attributed to growing demand for another product type, i.e. external fixators. However, internal fixators segment is foreseen to maintain dominance through to 2028, according to the research. In contrast, the external fixators segment will experience relatively higher growth at a CAGR of over 17% during 2018-2028. Escalating unit sales of plates and screws majorly contribute to an enlarged revenue share of internal fixators. Whereas, favourable reimbursement policies will continue to play a crucial role in strengthening the market for internal fixators, eventually resulting in augmented adoption for use during orthopedic surgeries.

The internal fixators segment is further classified as screws, plates, intramedullary nails, and others, including wires and staples. While plates and screws are presumed to continue presenting dominant revenue shares, the market will experience relatively higher sales of staples and wires. External fixators include unilateral fixators, circular fixators, and hybrid fixators, among which circular and hybrid fixators are expected represent the key sub-segments responsible for positive growth prospects for the parent segment.

North America’s Dominance Prevails, Market to See Remarkable Growth in Emerging Economies

By geographical region, North America currently occupies a dominant revenue share of over 48%. Western Europe will be the second largest regional market generating decent demand for orthopedic trauma devices. China and Japan are identified to emerge at the fastest pace over the forecast period. Soaring use of bioresorbable plates and screws is prominently driving the orthopedic trauma devices market in North America. This region is currently witnessing the much expected robust sales of hybrid plates and screws, which is anticipated to continue throughout the next decade. Intramedullary nails are lately gaining rapid traction among majority orthopedic surgeons in the North American industry, owing to their growing popularity as an ideal orthopedic trauma device for various anatomies.

On the backdrop of an expanding market in developing Asian economies, flourishing medical tourism will continue to fuel the market for orthopedic trauma devices in India, which currently leads the APECJ market. Increasing preference for minimally invasive fixation is expected to provide a thrust to the market in China, whereas trending incorporation of robotics technology during orthopedic surgeries is anticipated to push the MEA market in upcoming years. Favourable efforts taken by the Japan Medical Devices Manufacturers Association in promoting the development and dissemination of a range of medical devices has been a major booster in the growth of Japan’s orthopedic trauma devices market.

Global Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market Holds Optimistic Growth Prospects by 2028 End

Leading companies active in the global orthopedic trauma devices marketplace are likely to encounter with various attractive opportunities in near future, such as bolstering demand for outpatient surgical procedures, increasing funds for delivering state-of-the-art trauma care, and ongoing development of innovative, efficient, and effective orthopedic trauma care products. The dawn of digital orthopedics is foreseen to hold an immensely positive influence on the overall scenario of the global orthopedic trauma devices market.


1. Executive Summary
1.1. Market Overview
1.2. Market Analysis
1.3. FMI Analysis and Recommendations
1.4. Wheel of Fortune
2. Market Introduction
2.1. Market Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition
3. Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market View Point
3.1. Macro-Economic Factors
3.2. Opportunity Analysis
3.3. Product Classification
3.4. Reimbursement Scenario
3.5. Regional Pricing Analysis
4. Global Economic Outlook
4.1. Global Gross Domestic Product by Region & Country
4.2. Global Healthcare Market Indicator
5. Market Background
5.1. Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market Evolution
5.2. Value Chain Analysis
5.3. Market Dynamics
5.3.1. Drivers
5.3.2. Restraints
5.3.3. Trends
5.4. Market Dynamics Impact Analysis
6. North America Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Regional Market Trends
6.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
6.3.1. U.S.
6.3.2. Canada
6.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
6.4.1. U.S.
6.4.2. Canada
6.5. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
6.5.1. Internal Fixators
6.5.1.1. Screws
6.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
6.5.1.3. Plates
6.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
6.5.2. External Fixators
6.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
6.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
6.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
6.6. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
6.7. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
6.7.1. Hospitals
6.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
6.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
6.8. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
6.9. Market Attractiveness Analysis
6.9.1. By Country
6.9.2. By Product Type
6.9.3. By End User
6.10.Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
7. Latin America Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Regional Market Trends
7.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
7.3.1. Brazil
7.3.2. Mexico
7.3.3. Rest of Latin America
7.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
7.4.1. Brazil
7.4.2. Mexico
7.4.3. Rest of Latin America
7.5. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
7.5.1. Internal Fixators
7.5.1.1. Screws
7.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
7.5.1.3. Plates
7.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
7.5.2. External Fixators
7.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
7.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
7.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
7.6. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
7.7. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
7.7.1. Hospitals
7.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
7.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
7.8. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
7.9. Market Attractiveness Analysis
7.9.1. By Country
7.9.2. By Product Type
7.9.3. By End User
7.10. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
8. Western Europe Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Regional Market Trends
8.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
8.3.1. Germany
8.3.2. U.K
8.3.3. France
8.3.4. Italy
8.3.5. Spain
8.3.6. Rest of Western Europe
8.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
8.4.1. Germany
8.4.2. U.K
8.4.3. France
8.4.4. Italy
8.4.5. Spain
8.4.6. Rest of Western Europe
8.5. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
8.5.1. Internal Fixators
8.5.1.1. Screws
8.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
8.5.1.3. Plates
8.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
8.5.2. External Fixators
8.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
8.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
8.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
8.6. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
8.7. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
8.7.1. Hospitals
8.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
8.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
8.8. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
8.9. Market Attractiveness Analysis
8.9.1. By Country
8.9.2. By Product Type
8.9.3. By End User
8.10. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
9. Eastern Europe Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Regional Market Trends
9.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
9.3.1. Russia
9.3.2. Poland
9.3.3. Rest of Eastern Europe
9.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
9.4.1. Russia
9.4.2. Poland
9.4.3. Rest of Eastern Europe
9.5. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
9.5.1. Internal Fixators
9.5.1.1. Screws
9.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
9.5.1.3. Plates
9.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
9.5.2. External Fixators
9.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
9.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
9.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
9.6. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
9.7. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
9.7.1. Hospitals
9.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
9.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
9.8. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
9.9. Market Attractiveness Analysis
9.9.1. By Country
9.9.2. By Product Type
9.9.3. By End User
9.10. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
10. Asia Pacific Excluding China & Japan Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
10.1.Introduction
10.2.Regional Market Trends
10.3.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
10.3.1. India
10.3.2. Australia and New Zealand
10.3.3. ASEAN
10.3.4. Rest of APECJ
10.4.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
10.4.1. India
10.4.2. Australia and New Zealand
10.4.3. ASEAN
10.4.4. Rest of APECJ
10.5.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
10.5.1. Internal Fixators
10.5.1.1. Screws
10.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
10.5.1.3. Plates
10.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
10.5.2. External Fixators
10.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
10.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
10.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
10.6.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
10.7.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
10.7.1. Hospitals
10.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
10.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
10.8.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
10.9.Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.9.1. By Country
10.9.2. By Product Type
10.9.3. By End User
10.10. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
11. China Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
11.1. Introduction
11.2.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
11.2.1. Internal Fixators
11.2.1.1. Screws
11.2.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
11.2.1.3. Plates
11.2.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
11.2.2. External Fixators
11.2.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
11.2.2.2. Circular Fixators
11.2.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
11.3.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
11.4.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
11.4.1. Hospitals
11.4.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
11.4.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
11.5.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
11.6.Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.6.1. By Product Type
11.6.2. By End User
11.7.Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
12. Japan Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
12.1.Introduction
12.2.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
12.2.1. Internal Fixators
12.2.1.1. Screws
12.2.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
12.2.1.3. Plates
12.2.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
12.2.2. External Fixators
12.2.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
12.2.2.2. Circular Fixators
12.2.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
12.3.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
12.4.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
12.4.1. Hospitals
12.4.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
12.4.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
12.5.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
12.6.Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.6.1. By Product Type
12.6.2. By End User
12.7. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
13. Middle East and Africa Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028
13.1.Introduction
13.2.Regional Market Trends
13.3.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Country, 2013-2017
13.3.1. GCC Countries
13.3.2. South Africa
13.3.3. Rest of Middle East and Africa
13.4.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2018-2028
13.5.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2013-2017
13.5.1. Internal Fixators
13.5.1.1. Screws
13.5.1.2. Intramedullary Nails
13.5.1.3. Plates
13.5.1.4. Others (Wires, Pins, Staples)
13.5.2. External Fixators
13.5.2.1. Unilateral Fixators
13.5.2.2. Circular Fixators
13.5.2.3. Hybrid Fixators
13.6.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2018-2028
13.7.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By End User, 2013-2017
13.7.1. Hospitals
13.7.2. Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
13.7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
13.8.Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2018-2028
13.9.Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.9.1. By Country
13.9.2. By Product Type
13.9.3. By End User
13.10. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
14. Forecast Factors: Relevance and Impact
15. Forecast Assumptions
16. Market Structure Analysis
16.1.Market Structure by Tier
16.2.Market Share Analysis (2017) for Top Players, By Region
17. Competition Analysis
17.1.Competition Dashboard
17.2.Competition Benchmarking
17.3.Profitability and Gross Margin Analysis By Competition
17.4.Competitors Deep Dive
17.4.1. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
17.4.1.1. Overview
17.4.1.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.1.3. Production Footprint
17.4.1.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.1.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.1.6. Strategy
17.4.1.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.1.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.1.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.2. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
17.4.2.1. Overview
17.4.2.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.2.3. Production Footprint
17.4.2.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.2.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.2.6. Strategy
17.4.2.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.2.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.2.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.3. Stryker Corporation
17.4.3.1. Overview
17.4.3.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.3.3. Production Footprint
17.4.3.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.3.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.3.6. Strategy
17.4.3.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.3.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.3.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.4. Smith & Nephew
17.4.4.1. Overview
17.4.4.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.4.3. Production Footprint
17.4.4.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.4.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.4.6. Strategy
17.4.4.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.4.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.4.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.5. B. Braun Melsungen AG
17.4.5.1. Overview
17.4.5.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.5.3. Production Footprint
17.4.5.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.5.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.5.6. Strategy
17.4.5.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.5.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.5.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.6. Wright Medical Group N.V.
17.4.6.1. Overview
17.4.6.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.6.3. Production Footprint
17.4.6.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.6.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.6.6. Strategy
17.4.6.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.6.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.6.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.7. Orthofix International N.V.
17.4.7.1. Overview
17.4.7.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.7.3. Production Footprint
17.4.7.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.7.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.7.6. Strategy
17.4.7.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.7.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.7.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.8. Integra LifeSciences
17.4.8.1. Overview
17.4.8.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.8.3. Production Footprint
17.4.8.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.8.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.8.6. Strategy
17.4.8.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.8.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.8.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.9. Citieffe S.R.L
17.4.9.1. Overview
17.4.9.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.9.3. Production Footprint
17.4.9.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.9.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.9.6. Strategy
17.4.9.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.9.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.9.6.3. Channel Strategy
17.4.10. Acumed
17.4.10.1. Overview
17.4.10.2. Product and Age Portfolio
17.4.10.3. Production Footprint
17.4.10.4. Sales Footprint
17.4.10.5. Channel Footprint
17.4.10.6. Strategy
17.4.10.6.1. Marketing Strategy
17.4.10.6.2. Product Strategy
17.4.10.6.3. Channel Strategy
18. Global Orthopaedic Trauma Devices Market Analysis 2013–2017 and Forecast 2018–2028 By Region
18.1.Introduction / Key Findings
18.2.Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Region
18.2.1. North America

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Share this report