|
Published by: Datamonitor
Published: Sep. 19, 2002 - 126 Pages
Table of Contents Overview
Introduction
This report assesses 30 wealth managers against 30 strategic and financial variables. It is data-heavy and gives the most complete and quantitative picture of the competitive structure of the wealth management industry in existence. In addition to the figures, we also analyse the success stories of the winners in each of the thirty categories, and demonstrate what strategies are necessary to achieve this winning position. For those companies not included in the survey, a "do-it-yourself" test+
Scope
Analysis of annual reports, industry interviews and use of industry publications went into creating this report.
30 different companies are analyzed, by 30 different strategic and financial variables. Companies are all European and US-based, and are divided into global, regional and single country players.
Report Highlights
Royal Bank of Scotland is the outright winner in our benchmarking survey. Its segmentation and its strong internal referral system helped seal the victory Goldman Sachs, Julius Baer, Credit Agricole and Citigroup also performed well. Commerzbank, Bank Vontobel and Lloyds TSB Private Banking came last on the survey, all three were poor on strategic alliances/expansionist aspirations and scored badly on targeting intermediaries.
Reasons to Purchase
This report shows you how your wealth management operation compares to its peers
Benchmarking Wealth Managers identifies the strategies needed for success going forward in wealth management
This report shows who your main competitors are in wealth and how to beat them
Benchmarks on strategy and financials give the clearest and most detailed picture yet of today's wealth landscape.
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Results of Datamonitor’s financial benchmarking
Results of Datamonitor’s strategic benchmarking
The results and the success stories
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION
What is this report about?
Who is the target reader?
How to use this report
CHAPTER 3 FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING
Introduction
Assets under management
Assets under management growth 2000-2001
Income
Operating income
Operating income growth
Interest income/fees and commissions
Fees and commission income per asset under management
Expenses
Operating expenses growth 2000-2001
Personnel expenses
Results
Cost/income ratio 2000-1
Results 2000-1
CHAPTER 4 STRATEGIC BENCHMARKING
Introduction
Diversification
Reliance on the home market
Reliance on stockbroking
Expansion and strategic alliances
Strategic alliances
Expansionist aspirations
Specialist capabilities
Alternative Investments
Offshore focus
Expatriate services
Distribution
Use of intermediaries
Use of internal referrals
Dedicated transactional client website
Business alignment and future investment
Use of customer segmentation to align products, services and distribution
CHAPTER 5 THE RESULTS & THE SUCCESS STORIES
Introduction
The results
The Winners
Royal Bank of Scotland - customer segmentation
Goldman Sachs - the hard sell
Credit Agricole - Strategic alliances
Citigroup - today the world
Rabobank: Deal of the year
Threads drawn together
CHAPTER 6 ACTION POINTS
CHAPTER 7 APPENDIX
Self-assessment form
The results
Definitions
Research methodology
Future readings
SPP writing team
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: The benchmark for assets under management, 2001
Table 2: Global players, assets under management benchmarked, 2001
Table 3: Regional players, assets under management benchmarked, 2001
Table 4: Single country players, assets under management benchmarked, 2001
Table 5: Assets under management growth benchmarked, 2000-01
Table 6: Global players: Assets under management growth benchmarked, 2000-01
Table 7: Regional players: Assets under management growth benchmarked, 2000-01
Table 8: Single country players: Assets under management growth benchmarked, 2000-01
Table 9: Operating income, including number of staff and operating income per staff member benchmarked, 2001
Table 10: Operating income 2000 and operating income 2001, with growth benchmarked
Table 11: Net interest income, net fee income and the percentage of the total made up of net interest income benchmarked, 2001
Table 12: Fees and commissions income per asset under management benchmarked, 2001
Table 13: Operating expenses 2000-01 and percentage change benchmarked
Table 14: Personnel expense, staff numbers and expense per staff, 2001
Table 15: Cost/income ratio 2000 and 2001 (benchmarked) with percentage point change
Table 16: Cost/income ratio 2000 and 2001 (benchmarked) with percentage point change benchmarked, global players
Table 17: Cost/income ratio 2000 and 2001 (benchmarked) with percentage point change, regional players
Table 18: Cost/income ratio 2000 and 2001 (benchmarked) with percentage point change, single country players
Table 19: Results 2001 and percentage change from previous year benchmarked
Table 20: Competitors ranked on their reliance on their home market
Table 21: Dependence on stockbroking ranked (1)
Table 22: Dependence on stockbroking ranked (2)
Table 23: Strategic alliances: ranking the players (1)
Table 24: Strategic alliances: ranking the players (2)
Table 25: Expansionist aspirations ranked (1)
Table 26: Expansionist aspirations ranked (2)
Table 27: Alternative investments focus ranked (1)
Table 28: Alternative investments focus ranked (2)
Table 29: Offshore capability ranked (1)
Table 30: Offshore capability ranked (2)
Table 31: Expatriate focus ranked
Table 32: Targeting IFAs ranked
Table 33: Internal referral schemes ranked (1)
Table 34: Internal referral schemes ranked (2)
Table 35: Dedicated transactional client websites ranked (1)
Table 36: Dedicated transactional client website (2)
Table 37: Customer segmentation ranked (1)
Table 38: Customer segmentation ranked (2)
Table 39: Grade yourself against the benchmark: financials
Table 40: Grade yourself against the benchmark: strategy
Table 41: Benchmarking league table (1)
Table 42: Benchmarking league table (2)
Table 43: Benchmarking league table (3)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Bank Vontobel and Merrill Lynch have been the most successful at keeping costs down
Figure 2: Citigroup, UBS and Credit Suisse are the best diversified of the competitors
Figure 3: The players benchmarked, Benchmarking Wealth Managers 2002
Figure 4: Bank Vontobel and Merrill Lynch have been the most successful at keeping costs down
Figure 5: Global players, assets under management benchmarked
Figure 6: Regional players, assets under management benchmarked, 2001
Figure 7: Single country players, assets under management benchmarked
Figure 8: Global players: Assets under management and growth 2000-01
Figure 9: Regional players: Assets under management and growth 2000-01
Figure 10: Single country players: Assets under management and growth 2000-01
Figure 11: Operating income growth 2000-01 by player, benchmarked
Figure 12: Fees and commission income per asset under management, 2001
Figure 13: Merrill Lynch and Bank Vontobel have seen the most marked decline in operating expenses between 2000 and 2001
Figure 14: Personnel expense per staff member benchmarked, 2001
Figure 15: Cost/income ratio 2001 and percentage point growth from previous year benchmarked, global players
Figure 16: Cost/income ratio 2001 and percentage point growth from previous year benchmarked, regional players
Figure 17: Cost/income ratio 2001 and percentage point growth from previous year benchmarked, single country players
Figure 18: Citigroup, UBS and Credit Suisse are the best diversified of the competitors
Figure 19: Citigroup, UBS and Credit Suisse are the best diversified of the competitors
Figure 20: Rabobank and Credit Agricole are the best at expansionist and strategic alliances
Figure 21: ERSTE and BBVA vie for bottom place in our offshore/expat survey
Figure 22: Credit Suisse is among the top performers in wealth distribution
Figure 23: The results: RBS and Goldman Sachs win the league
Figure 24: RBS has a host of private banking brands
Figure 25: Citigroup’s online advertisements emphasize its global strength
Figure 26: The Rabobank/Sarasin deal exposes other Swiss private banks as likely takeover targets for larger players
AbstractIntroduction: This report assesses 30 wealth managers against 30 strategic and financial variables. It is data-heavy and gives the most complete and quantitative picture of the competitive structure of the wealth management industry in existence. In addition to the figures, we also analyse the success stories of the winners in each of the thirty categories, and demonstrate what strategies are necessary to achieve this winning position. Scope of the Report: * Analysis of annual reports, industry interviews and use of industry publications went into creating this report. * 30 different companies are analyzed, by 30 different strategic and financial variables. * Companies are all European and US-based, and are divided into global, regional and single country players. Report Highlights: Royal Bank of Scotland is the outright winner in our benchmarking survey. Its segmentation and its strong internal referral system helped seal the victory. Goldman Sachs, Julius Baer, Credit Agricole and Citigroup also performed well. Commerzbank, Bank Vontobel and Lloyds TSB Private Banking came last on the survey, all three were poor on strategic alliances/expansionist aspirations and scored badly on targeting intermediaries. Key Reason to Buy this Report: * This report shows you how your wealth management operation compares to its peers. * Benchmarking Wealth Managers identifies the strategies needed for success going forward in wealth management. * This report shows who your main competitors are in wealth and how to beat them. * Benchmarks on strategy and financials give the clearest and most detailed picture yet of today's wealth landscape.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|