|
Published by: Millennium Research Group
Published: Oct. 17, 2011
Table of Contents
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE
- 1.1 Background
- 1.2 Diagnosis and Referral Patterns
- 1.3 Procedure Overview
- 1.3.1 Body Contouring Procedures
- 1.3.2 Competing Treatments
- 1.3.3 Emerging Competing Treatments and Technologies
- 1.4 Clinical Guidelines
- 1.4.1 Liposuction Treatment Guidelines
- 1.4.2 Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Treatment Guidelines
- 1.5 Reimbursement Guidelines
- 1.6 Country Overview
- 1.6.1 Demographics and Economy
- 1.6.2 Health Care System
- 1.6.3 Regulatory Environment
- 2.0 PRODUCTS
- 2.1 Overview
- 2.1.1 Products Covered
- 2.2 Cellulite Reduction Devices
- 2.2.1 Functions
- 2.2.2 Differentiating Features
- 2.2.3 Labeled Indications
- 2.2.4 Emerging Products
- 2.3 Skin Tightening Devices
- 2.3.1 Functions
- 2.3.2 Labeled Indications
- 2.3.3 Emerging Products
- 2.4 Fat Reduction Devices
- 2.4.1 Functions
- 2.4.2 Differentiating Features
- 2.4.3 Emerging Products
- 2.5 Gastric Bands
- 2.5.1 Functions
- 2.5.2 Labeled Indications
- 3.0 CLINICAL TRIALS
- 3.1 Completed Clinical Trials
- 3.1.1 Cellulite Reduction Clinical Trials
- 3.1.2 Skin Tightening Clinical Trials
- 3.1.3 Fat Reduction Clinical Trials
- 3.1.4 Gastric Banding Clinical Trials
- 3.2 Ongoing Clinical Trials
- 3.2.1 Cellulite Reduction, Skin Tightening, and Fat Reduction Clinical Trials
- 3.2.2 Gastric Banding Clinical Trials
- 4.0 BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
- 4.1 Overview
- 4.1.1 Competitive Snapshot
- 4.1.2 Detailed Competitive Landscape
- 4.1.3 Market Shares
- 4.1.4 Recent Events
- 4.2 Cellulite Reduction Device Market
- 4.2.1 Competitive Snapshot
- 4.2.2 Detailed Competitive Landscape
- 4.3 Skin Tightening Device Market
- 4.3.1 Competitive Snapshot
- 4.3.2 Detailed Competitive Landscape
- 4.4 Fat Reduction Device Market
- 4.4.1 Competitive Snapshot
- 4.4.2 Detailed Competitive Landscape
- 4.5 Gastric Band Market
- 4.5.1 Competitive Snapshot
- 4.5.2 Detailed Competitive Landscape
- 5.0 MARKET OUTLOOK
- 5.1 Overview
- 5.1.1 Market Snapshot
- 5.1.2 Detailed Market Overview
- 5.2 Cellulite Reduction Device Market
- 5.2.1 Market Snapshot
- 5.2.2 Detailed Market Overview
- 5.3 Skin Tightening Device Market
- 5.3.1 Market Snapshot
- 5.3.2 Detailed Market Overview
- 5.4 Fat Reduction Device Market
- 5.4.1 Market Snapshot
- 5.4.2 Detailed Market Overview
- 5.4.2.1 Fat Reduction Capital Equipment Market
- Power-Assisted Liposuction Device Market
- Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Device Market
- Laser-Assisted Liposuction Device Market
- Noninvasive Laser, Light, and Energy Fat Reduction Device Market
- 5.4.2.2 Traditional Capital Equipment and Consumable Equipment Markets
- Suction-Assisted Liposuction Device Market
- 5.5 Gastric Band Market
- 5.5.1 Market Snapshot
- 5.5.2 Detailed Market Overview
- APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY
- APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
- APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY
- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 1: Body Contouring Device Market Landscape, US (US$), 2011 and 2016
- Table 2: Body Contouring Device Market Leaders, by Product Type and Revenue, US, 2011
- Table 3: Most Promising Emerging Technologies in the Body Contouring Device Market, US, 2011–2016
- Table 4: Expected Key Events in the Body Contouring Device Market, US, 2012–2016
- Table 5: Factors Impacting the Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011–2016
- Table 6: Companies Mentioned in This Report
- Table 7: Key Report Updates, 2012
- 1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE
- Table 8: Body Contouring Procedures, US
- Table 9: Competing Treatments, US
- Table 10: Emerging Competing Treatments in Development, US, 2011–2016
- Table 11: Key Health and Economic Indicators, US, 2011
- 2.0 PRODUCTS
- Table 12: Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, US
- Table 13: Cellulite Reduction Device Functions, by Product Subtype
- Table 14: Advantages and Disadvantages of Cellulite Reduction Devices, by Product Subtype
- Table 15: Emerging Products in Development for the Cellulite Reduction Device Market, US, 2011–2016
- Table 16: Skin Tightening Device Functions, by Technique
- Table 17: Emerging Products in Skin Tightening Device Market, US, 2011–2016
- Table 18: Fat Reduction Device Functions, by Base & Components and Product Type
- Table 19: Fat Reduction Device Functions, by Procedure Type
- Table 20: Advantages and Disadvantages of Fat Reduction Devices, by Procedure Type
- Table 21: Emerging Products in Development for the Fat Reduction Market, US, 2011–2016
- Table 22: Gastric Band Functions, by Base & Components
- 3.0 CLINICAL TRIALS
- Table 23: Summary of a Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial
- Table 24: Summary of a Pilot Study of the Efficacy of a 1,064 and 1,320 nm Sequentially Firing Nd:YAG Laser Device for Lipolysis and Skin Tightening
- Table 25: Summary of a Prospective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAP-BAND) for Treatment of Morbid Obesity
- Table 26: Summary of an Evaluation of the Effect of the Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) as Applied to Body Contouring of the Waist and Hips on Fat Emulsification Pilot Study
- Table 27: Summary of a Study to Evaluate a Noninvasive Cooling Device to Determine if Cold Exposure Will Consistently Result in a Reduction of Subcutaneous Fat
- Table 28: Summary of the Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the Apollo System for Treatment of Wrinkles and Rhytides Trial
- Table 29: Summary of the Effectiveness and Safety Study of LAP-BAND Treatment for Obese Adolescents
- Table 30: Summary of the Effectiveness and Safety Study of LAP-BAND Treatment in Subjects With BMI >/= 30 kg/m2 and < 40 kg/m2
- Table 31: Summary of the HERO Study
- Table 32: Summary of the 5 Year Post-Approval Study with the REALIZE Adjustable Gastric Band
- Table 33: Summary of a Study of Clinical Outcomes of the REALIZE Adjustable Gastric Band-C
- 4.0 BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
- Table 34: Leading Competitors in the Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
- Table 35: Recent Events in the Body Contouring Device Market, US, 2011 5.0 MARKET OUTLOOK
- Figure 2: Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011 and 2016
- Table 36: Factors Impacting the Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011–2016
- Table 37: Body Contouring Device Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010–2016
- Table 38: Body Contouring Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 39: Body Contouring Capital Equipment Installed Base, by Product Type, US, 2010–2016
- Figure 3: Cellulite Reduction Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 40: Cellulite Reduction Device Market, by Product Subtype (US$), US, 2010–2016
- Table 41: Class I Device Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 42: Class II and Class II OTC Device Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Figure 4: Skin Tightening Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 43: Skin Tightening Device Market, by Product Subtype (US$), US, 2010–2016
- Table 44: Skin Tightening Handpiece Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 45: Skin Tightening Disposable Tip Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Figure 5: Fat Reduction Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 46: Fat Reduction Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010–2016
- Table 47: Fat Reduction Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 48: PAL Device Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 49: UAL Device Market, by Contract Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 50: UAL Device Market Growth, by Contract Type, US, 2011–2016
- Table 51: LAL Device Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 52: Noninvasive Laser, Light, and Energy Fat Reduction Device Market, by Contract Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 53: Noninvasive Laser, Light, and Energy Fat Reduction Device Market Growth, by Contract Type, US, 2011–2016
- Table 54: Traditional Capital Equipment Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 55: Traditional Capital Equipment Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011–2016
- Table 56: Consumable Equipment Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 57: Consumable Equipment Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011–2016
- Figure 6: Gastric Band Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- Table 58: Gastric Band Market, US (US$), 2010–2016
- APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY
- APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
- MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
- APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY
AbstractThe US market for body contouring devices has experienced growth over the past years and will continue to grow steadily due to increasing obesity rates and growing aesthetic consciousness in the US. Greater media exposure of body contouring treatments will also contribute to growth in this market because patients will be more aware of the various treatment options available. While the high cost of these procedures will limit expansion of the market somewhat, growing patient interest in minimally invasive treatments and the aforementioned rising obesity rates will offset the effects of the difficult economic climate and allow for moderate market expansion through 2016.
Get full details about this report >>
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|