|
Published by: Mintel International Group Ltd.
Published: Aug. 1, 2009 - 66 Pages
Table of Contents
- Scope and Themes
- What you need to know
- Definition
- Data sources
- Sales data
- Consumer survey data
- Abbreviations and terms
- Abbreviations
- Terms
- Executive Summary
- Ad spend sees substantial decline in 2008, to worsen in 2009
- Print and radio bear brunt of spending cuts
- Branded entertainment offers alternative to traditional TV spots
- Television forced by disruptive technology to reinvent itself
- New DVR features suggest a new way to advertise
- Addressable advertising aims to improve targeting and relevance
- Negative attitudes towards advertising unchanged
- Traditional push advertising reminds but doesn’t convert
- Time-shifted viewing and commercial skipping is a widespread reality
- Quantity of ads is major barrier to more positive perception
- Celebrity endorsements and charity sponsorships
- Newspaper inserts most popular but internet coupons closing ground
- Emerging delivery concepts would find significant consumer base
- Market Size and Forecast
- Aggregate ad spend plummets with little sign of recovery
- Figure 1: U.S. advertising expenditures, at current prices, 2004-14
- Figure 2: U.S. advertising expenditures, at inflation-adjusted prices, 2004-14
- Competitive Context
- Disruptive technologies favor pull over push
- Figure 3: U.S. household penetration of digital video recorders and broadband modems, 2006-09
- Internet not yet established as a tool for push advertising
- DVRs are both friend and foe to marketers
- Networks boost minutes of branded entertainment
- Figure 4: Brand appearances in network TV programming, 2006-08
- Segment Performance
- TV and internet buys show relative strength
- Television buyers wait and see
- Internet valued for conversions not brand building
- Radio and print media bear brunt of cutbacks
- Newspaper struggles despite growth in online readership
- Radio needs innovation to survive
- Magazines prepare for more drastic move online
- Figure 5: U.S. advertising expenditures, by media type, 2007-08
- Market Drivers
- Ad expenditures decline more dramatically than consumer spending
- Figure 6: U.S. media expenditures and consumer spending, 2006-09
- Troubled auto industry accounts for more than a third of decline
- Figure 7: U.S. advertising expenditures, by business sector, 2007-08
- Fewer consumers learning from advertising
- Figure 8: Attitudes toward advertising, May 2004-05-December 2007-08
- Reinvention and innovation needed to reach growth demographics
- Figure 9: U.S. population, by age, 2004-14
- Marketers get comfy with “below the line” campaigns
- Innovation and Innovators
- Network TV integrates marketing into programming
- Addressable advertising makes push more relevant
- Big screen reading devices may give periodicals a second life
- Incentive-based ad model would attract significant base of respondents, particularly under-35s
- Figure 10: Attitudes towards emerging concepts in media and ads: screens outside the home, compensation for viewing ads, and interest in television viewing on cell phones, June 2009
- Figure 11: Attitudes toward emerging concepts in media and ads: screens outside the home, compensation for viewing ads, and interest in television viewing on cell phones, by age, June 2009
- Impact of Advertising Media
- Introduction
- Reach and impact vs. cost: The television conundrum
- Television remains the most powerful media, but costs may favor other formats
- Figure 12: Reach and impact of ads, by media segment, June 2009
- Newspaper and magazines more likely to reach higher earners
- Figure 13: Reach of advertising media, by household income, June 2009
- Ad impact declines significantly after age 35
- Figure 14: Impact of advertising media, by age, June 2009
- Ads educate and remind but less likely to persuade
- Figure 15: Type of effect of each advertising media, June 2009
- Sponsorships more effective with men
- Figure 16: Preference for sponsoring brands, by gender and age, June 2009
- TV Viewing Habits
- Overview
- DVR ownership determined mostly by household income
- Figure 17: DVR ownership, by age and household income, October 2007-December 2008
- Consumers skip commercials and surf internet while watching
- One in five time-shifting all viewing
- Figure 18: Television time-shifting habits, June 2009
- Figure 19: Television multi-tasking and non-DVR based ad avoidance techniques, June 2009
- Youngest respondents 18-24 most likely targets for online campaign tie-ins
- Figure 20: Television time-shifting habits, by age, June 2009
- Figure 21: Television multi-tasking and non-dvr based ad avoidance techniques, by age, June 2009
- Higher earners more likely to record
- Figure 22: Television time-shifting habits, by household income, June 2009
- DVRs reduce the power of push but let consumers pull
- Figure 23: Ad avoidance, ad selection, and voluntary ad viewing via DVRs, June 2009
- Family-aged respondents harder to reach with traditional TV ads
- Figure 24: Ad avoidance, ad selection, and voluntary ad viewing via DVRs, by age, June 2009
- Large household respondents more open to on-demand ads
- Figure 25: Ad avoidance, ad selection, and voluntary ad viewing via DVRs, by presence children in the household, June 2009
- Receptivity to TV Advertising
- Reducing quantity and block/filter can increase receptiveness
- Figure 26: Enjoyment of TV ads and interest in new TV ad viewing models, June 2009
- Active 25-34-year-olds most value ability to choose
- Figure 27: Enjoyment of TV ads and interest in new TV ad viewing models, by age, June 2009
- Celebrity Endorsements
- Cost remains primary barrier to membership
- Figure 28: Impact of celebrity endorsements, June 2009
- Celebrity impact strongest among under-35s
- Figure 29: Impact of celebrity endorsements, by age, June 2009
- Charitable Causes
- Charity sponsorship justifies premium pricing for a small minority
- Figure 30: Impact of charity sponsorships, June 2009
- Under-35s more likely to pay more for charity sponsors’ products
- Figure 31: Impact of charity sponsorships, by age, June 2009
- Higher earners more likely to pay premium for good causes
- Figure 32: Impact of charity sponsorships, by household income, June 2009
- Coupons
- New media coupons still second to newspaper inserts
- Figure 33: Coupon usage, by type of media, June 2009
- Internet/e-mail promotions close the gap with newspaper among under-35s
- Figure 34: Coupon usage, by type of media and age, June 2009
- Higher earners find coupons in more places
- Figure 35: Coupon usage, by type of media and household income, June 2009
- Family demographic more likely to find coupons in new media
- Figure 36: Coupon usage, by type of media and presence of children in the household, June 2009
- The Impact of Race and Hispanic Origin
- Blacks aged over 45 least likely to tune out
- Figure 37: Television time-shifting habits, by race/Hispanic origin and age, June 2009
- Black DVR owners least likely to skip commercials
- Figure 38: Ad avoidance, selection, and voluntary viewership via DVR, by race/Hispanic origin and age, June 2009
- Blacks most likely to enjoy television commercials
- Figure 39: Enjoyment of TV ads and interest in new viewership models, by race/Hispanic origin and age, June 2009
- Blacks most likely to view celebrity spokesmen favorably
- Figure 40: Impact of celebrity endorsements, by race/Hispanic origin and age, June 2009
- Asian demographic ideal for online video ads
- Figure 41: Television time-shifting habits, by race/Hispanic origin, June 2009
- APPENDIX: OTHER USEFUL CONSUMER TABLES
- High-income households skipping away from ads
- Figure 42: Ad avoidance, selection, and voluntary viewership via DVR, by household income, June 2009
- Households with kids like ads more
- Figure 43: Enjoyment of tv ads and interest in new viewership models, by presence of children in the household, June 2009
- APPENDIX: TRADE ASSOCIATIONS
AbstractThe integration of brands into original programming (i.e. branded entertainment) is an effective way to circumvent negative consumer attitudes toward advertising. It may also be a sign of a general movement of push advertising moving from being information-based toward being entertainment-based. In the Fall 2008 Experian Simmons NCS, 46% of respondents say that ads help them learn about products, compared to 53% in Spring 2005.
As advertising formats continue to evolve, it is not difficult to imagine a paradigm in which the purpose of push ads (e.g. traditional media spots) is to entertain and imbue a brand with positive connotations, while the purpose of pull ads (e.g. search engine, product home pages) is to inform consumers and convert interest into purchase.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|