Providing market research reports, industry analysis, company profiles and country reports for strategic planning, competitive intelligence, marketing and business research.
Search for Market Research Reports:    

Optimizing Key Opintion Leader Relationships: Best Practices in KOL Management

Published by: Best Practices, LLC

Published: Apr. 1, 2009 - 43 Pages


Table of Contents


RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Research Objective and Methodology

Benchmark Class

Respondent Characteristics

KEY FINDINGS & INSIGHTS

Organizational Structure

Strategies and Tactics

Management Roles, Tools and Activities

Role of MSLs in Managing KOLs

Measuring the Work of MSLs

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Dedication of KOL Management Function

Organizational Responsibility for KOL Management

Optimal KOL Management Organizational Structure

Recent and Planned Changes in KOL Management

“Optimal” KOL Management Model

SEGMENTATION, ALIGNMENT AND USE

KOL Segmentation and Behavior Drivers

KOL Roles Over Product Lifecycle

KOL Structure Should Evolve with the Company

MANAGEMENT ROLES, TOOLS AND ACTIVITIES

Highly Effective Tactics for KOL Management

Highly Important Approaches to KOL Management

Point of Contact for KOL Management

National vs. Regional KOL Contact

Software Used in KOL Management

MSLs Involvement in KOL Management

How KOL Activities are Evaluated

What KOLs Value Most

How KOL Satisfaction is Ensured

How KOL Management is Valued Internally

INNOVATIVE PRACTICES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Recognized Innovative Practices are Uncommon

What Differentiates the Better Companies

Critical Success Factors

Most Difficult Challenges in KOL Management

Emerging Trends

APPENDIX

Additional Quotes

ABOUT BEST PRACTICES, LLC

Abstract

STUDY OVERVIEW

The advocacy of Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) has proven to be among the most effective and critical means of building product awareness in the medical and scientific communities.

Indeed, KOL relationship management itself has emerged as its own business discipline, a necessary and challenging component of brand promotion. As one interviewed director put it, “KOL relationship management has changed very quickly. I’ve found that large companies have difficulty adapting in a timely manner.”

This Best Practices, LLC research examines how leading pharmaceutical companies approach KOL management.

This report identifies the organizational structures, management strategies and tactics, and critical success factors associated with KOL management excellence. Pharma executives can use this benchmarking research to learn best practices in KOL management and discover how they can maximize KOL relationships to benefit their own products and therapies.

KEY FINDINGS
  • Marketing has functional responsibility for KOL Management at 73 percent of companies surveyed.
  • Medical Affairs also shares some responsibility for KOL Management at 61 percent of benchmark partner companies.
  • A majority (59 percent) of respondents reported that Medical Science Liaisons (MSLs) are either moderately or highly involved in KOL development at their companies. Among Top 30 pharma respondents, that figure jumps to 80 percent.
  • More than one-fifth of participant companies report that they have no method for evaluating KOL activities.
KEY TOPICS
  • KOL Segmentation and Behavior Drivers
  • KOL Roles Over Product Lifecycle
  • KOL Management Models
  • Role of Medical Science Liaisons (MSLs) in Managing KOLs
  • Emerging Trends in KOL Management
  • Innovative Practices in KOL Management
  • Critical Success Factors in KOL Management
  • Most Difficult Challenges in KOL Management
KEY METRICS
  • Functional Responsibility for KOL Management
  • Budgetary Responsibility for KOL Management
  • Optimal KOL Management Organizational Structure
  • Highly Effective Tactics for KOL Management
  • National and Regional KOL Contact
  • Level of MSL Involvement in KOL Management
  • KOL Evaluation
  • KOL Involvement Satisfaction
  • How KOL Management is Valued Internally
  • Recent Changes in KOL Management
  • Future Changes in KOL Management
METHODOLOGY

This research involved an online survey of nearly 60 respondents representing 42 different biopharmaceutical companies. In-depth field interviews were also conducted with selected participants. About half of the respondents were from marketing and/or sales departments

INDUSTRIES PROFILED

Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Chemical; Health Care; Media; Manufacturing; High Tech

COMPANIES PROFILED

Abbott Laboratories; URL Pharma; Transoma Medical; Steris Corporation; Spectrum Pharmaceutical; Skila; Rivermark LLC; RBP Chemical Corporation; Promeco SA de CV; Noven Therapeuticals; Nobel Biocare; Lundbeck; Kendle International; Inspire Pharmaceuticals; Impact Communications; Esteve; Becton Dickinson; Anesiva; Vistakon; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Solvay Pharmaceuticals; Shire; Sanofi-Aventis; Pfizer; Novartis; Myriad; Merck; Medrad; Johnson & Johnson; Janssen Cilag Pharmaceutical; Invitrogen; Innovex Global; Genentech; Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc; EMD Serono; Cubist Pharmaceuticals; Covidien; Celgene; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Biogen Idec; Bayer Schering AG; Baxter Healthcare; Amgen; Alcon Laboratories

Get Full Details About This Report >>
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
Buy this Report

Price and Delivery Options

See related reports or call the number above for help from a research specialist.


 

About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 300,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 700 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.

 

© MarketResearch.com 2012