|
Published by: Barnett Educational Services
Published: Jun. 1, 2009 - 319 Pages
Table of Contents
- Section 1: R&D Spending
- Pharmaceuticals
- Trends in Worldwide Pharma and Biotech R&D Expenditures, 2002-2014P (EvaluatePharma)
- Global R&D Spending by World’s Top 500 Pharma and Biotech Companies 2002-2014P (EvaluatePharma).
- R&D Spending by Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies, 1980-2008
- R&D Investments by Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies, 1975-2008
- Industry-wide and Government R&D Spending, 1980-2008
- Biopharmaceutical Industry Investment in Research and Development, 1980-2008
- Biopharmaceutical R&D Expenditure and NIH Budget: 1995-2008
- Will Late-Stage Pipelines Outstrip R&D Budgets—Even at Pfizer?
- Analysis of Top 20 Companies by 2008 Pharma R&D Spend (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 20 Companies by Pharma R&D Spend in 2008 (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 20 Companies by Pharma R&D Spend as a % of Pharmaceutical Revenues 2007 vs. 2008 (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 20: Average R&D Spend per Late-Stage Project in 2008 (EvaluatePharma)
- Total PhRMA R&D as a Percent of Sales, 1985-2008
- Domestic U.S. R&D and R&D Abroad, 1985-2008
- Domestic U.S. Sales and Sales Abroad, 1985-2008
- Growth in Domestic U.S. R&D and R&D Abroad, 1970-2008
- R&D Spending at Top 20 Pharmaceutical Companies in 2008
- With Biotech Buzz, Don’t Forget Small Molecules and Chemistry—Lonza
- Drug Investors Lose Patience
- Various Measures of New Drug/Biologic R&D Productivity, 1993-2008
- Industry R&D Spending per NDA Submission in the U.S., 1993-2008
- Industry R&D Spending per NDA Approval in U.S, 1996-2008
- Industry R&D Spending per NME Submission to FDA, 1995-2008
- Industry R&D Spending per NME Approved in the U.S., 1995-2008
- Global R&D Spending per Global New Active Substance (NAS) Launch, 1995-2008
- Comparative R&D Spending, Sales, and Product Launch Trends Worldwide: A 2009 Analysis
- Breakdown of World Pharma Market—2008 Sales
- Markets of First Launch for 32 NASs Introduced in 2008
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditure Annual Growth Rate, US vs. Europe, 1993-2008
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditure in Europe, the United States, and Japan, 1990-2008
- U.S., European, Canadian, and Asian/Pacific Biotech: Global Activity Measures, 2008
- Clinical Development Budgets Expected to Grow Further, Shift From Preclinical to Clinical
- An Analysis of Pharma and Biotech Industry R&D Spending Growth Through 2009
- Pharma R&D Spending, 2003-2009E: Trailing 12-Month R&D Spending by Top Pharma and Biotech Companies
- Major US Pharmaceutical Revenue and R&D Growth, 1991-2013E
- Industry Shift Toward Specialty Drugs Continues: An Analysis to 2012
- Sales Mix Within Pharma Shifting to Specialty Care, 1992-2012e
- Significant R&D Investment Outside Home Market Associated with Growth: Annual Booz & Company Study
- R&D Spending by Geographic Area, Ethical Pharmaceuticals, PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- Domestic U.S. Scientific, Professional, and Technical R&D Personnel by R&D Function,
- Ethical Pharmaceuticals, 2007
- Domestic R&D by Function, Ethical Pharmaceuticals, PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- Domestic R&D and R&D Abroad for Human-Use and Veterinary-Use Pharmaceuticals,
- PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- Domestic R&D by Origin of Product (Licensed-in vs. Self-originated), PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- Two in Ten New Drugs Recoup Costs—New Study
- U.S. Government (NIH) Funding for Medical/Clinical Research, 1995-2009
- NIH Appropriations, 1995-2009P
- NIH Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Spending, 2003-2008
- Estimates of Funding for Selected Diseases, Conditions, and Research Areas, 2005-2008
- The “Net Innovation Trend” and What It Means for Big Pharmas, Biotechs, and Generics
- Large Cap Pharma Accounted for Two-Thirds of Healthcare Value in 2000
- Biotech and Med Tech Gained at Expense of Pharma in 2008
- The Innovation Curve: Major Pharmaceuticals
- The Innovation Curve: Biotechnology
- The Innovation Curve: Generics
- CBO Estimates on the Follow-on Biologic Effect
- Cancer Treatments, Patients, and Third-Party Payers
- How Virtual R&D Advances Will Reshape the Current R&D Model by 2020
- The Current Research Process
- What the research process might look like when virtual man exists
- What the research process might look like in 2020
- The Current Development Process
- Model Trial
- What the development process might look like in 2020
- What the regulatory process might look like in 2020
- How the R&D cost/revenue curve might look by 2020
- The Truth About Drug Innovation: Thirty-Five Summary Case Histories on Private Sector
- Contributions to Pharmaceutical Science
- Central Private-Sector Scientific Contributions to Thirty-five Drugs/Classes
- An Analysis of Worldwide Prescription and OTC Sales by Technology (2002-2014):
- Biotech vs. Conventional Technology (EvaluatePharma)
- Worldwide Prescription & OTC Sales by Technology, 2002-2014 (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 100 Drug Sales by Technology, 2007-2014 (EvaluatePharma)
- An Analysis of the Sales Potential of New Drugs Approved in 2007 and 2008 (EvaluatePharma)
- FDA Approval Count vs. 5th Year after Launch US Product Sales (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 10 New Molecular Entities in 2008: Ranked on US Consensus Sales in 2013 (EvaluatePharma)
- Top 10 New Molecular Entities in 2007: Ranked on US Consensus Sales in 2012 (EvaluatePharma)
- Growth in Domestic U.S. Sales and Sales Abroad, Ethical Pharmaceuticals, 1970-2008
- Sales by Geographic Area, Ethical Pharmaceuticals, PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- An Analysis of the U.S. Pharma Market: U.S. Prescription Drug Sales in 2008
- Annual Growth Rate of U.S. Prescription Pharmaceutical Market, 1994-2009P
- Top 15 Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Prescription Sales, 2008
- Top 15 U.S. Prescription Products by Sales, 2008
- Top 15 Pharma Companies by U.S. Prescription Sales, 2008
- Estimated $16B in Branded Sales at Risk in 2009—Cowen and Company
- Putting Your Genes on Backwards
- Pharma Behind Networking Equipment and Internet Services Among Most Profitable U.S. Industries
- A New Look at the Global Pharmaceutical Market: North America Sets Pace in 2008 Pharma Sales
- Global Pharma Sales, 1999-2008
- Global Pharmaceutical Sales in 2008 by Region
- Leading Therapy Classes in 2008 Global Pharma Sales
- Global Pharma Sales in 2008—Leading Products
- Pharma Market Growth in Five Key Regions, CAGR 2009-2013
- Top 20 Companies by Worldwide Prescription Drug Sales in 2006/2007 (EvaluatePharma)
- Contribution to Drug Market by Age of Drug
- Percentage Contribution to the Overall Market by Age of Drug, 2002-2012E
- Trends in US Product Lifecycle Length: Drugs vs. Biologics
- Average US Lifecycles for 900 Products in Lehman Universe
- Suddenly, Some Looking to Exit Pharma
- P&G Cites Lower Returns
- Solvay as Well
- Global Biologic Drug/Vaccine Sales to 2012E
- The Future Pharma R&D Model: The New PharmaCo Threat
- Which Therapeutic Categories Are Growing the Fastest?: Global and US Sales Growth of Branded Drugs by Therapeutic Category, 2005-2012E
- Global Drug Sales and Growth Forecasts in Major Therapeutic Areas: 2005-2012E
- US Sales and Growth Forecasts—Major Therapeutic Areas, 2005-2012E
- Therapeutic Categories: Drug Sales as a Percentage of Worldwide Market, 2008 vs. 2013P
- Pharma Companies: Drug Sales as Percentage of Worldwide Market, 2008 vs. 2013P
- The Future of Pharma: Adjusting the Pharma R&D Model
- An Opportunity Map for Pharma R&D
- Large Rx Players Competing for the Same Real Estate
- Assessing Patent Risk: Industry and Company-specific Exposure to Generics, 2008-2014E
- Percentage of Global Sales at Risk of Loss Over Time Through Patent Expiries, 2001-2014E
- Pharma Sales at Risk of Generic Competition in 2009-2013E as a
- Percentage of 2008 Group Economic Sales
- Biomarker Market to $12.8bn by 2012
- U.S. Generic Drug Market Outlook to 2015
- 2008 U.S. Sales of Drugs Losing Patent Protection, 2008-2015
- Percent Sales Vulnerable to Patent Expirations Through 2013: Selected Leading Companies
- Estimates of Generic Erosion at the Top 10 Pharmas, 2008 vs. 2015
- Number of Patented Drugs Declines in 2008
- A Contract Research Organization Industry Size Model to 2015e
- A Conceptual Framework of Outsourced Industry Growth
- BioPharmaceutical Industry Revenue and Year-over-Year Growth, 2003-2015E
- BioPharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending and Year-over-Year Growth, 2003-2015E
- CRO Addressable Market by Phase, 2003-2015e
- Outsourcing Penetration Assumptions, by Phase, 2003-2015E
- CRO Market Size by Phase and YOY Growth, 2003-2015E
- An Analysis of the CRO Market to 2011
- U.S. Biotech Funding, 1999-2008
- Outsourced Drug Development Method, 2005-2011E
- Revenue at Several Leading CROs by Segment
- An Assessment of the CRO Market to 2012
- UBS CRO Market Projections, 2004-2012E
- Percentage of R&D Outsourced, 2003-2013
- How Much Do You Expect Your Outsourcing Spending to Grow Next Year?
- Pharma and Biotech R&D Market Share 2003-2013: Biotech Spending is
- Capturing a Greater Share of R&D Spend
- CRO Market—Revenue Growth by Phase, 2003-2013
- A 2008 Analysis of Outcourcing Metrics
- Percentage of Staffing Outsourced by Phase: CRAs/Monitors
- Percentage of In-House and Outsourced Staff by Phase
- Analysis of Project Elements for Outsourced Clinical Studies
- Project Elements for Outsourced Clinical Studies
- New Global Pharma Outsourcing Market Model to 2011
- CRO Market Opportunity, 2006E-2011E
- CRO Market Opportunity by Stage
- The Goldman Sachs Global R&D Outsourcing Model
- A 2008 Update to the Goldman Sachs Global R&D Outsourcing Model
- Biopharmaceuticals
- Top 100 Biotech Companies by 2008 R&D Spending
- R&D Spending at Selected Leading Biotechnology Companies, 2008A-2013E
- A Third of Biotechs to Disappear in 2009?
- Biotech R&D Spending to 2009E
- Annual Biotechnology R&D Spending, 2004-2009E
- Biologics and Biotech R&D: An Analysis of PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- Biologics and Biotechnology R&D, PhRMA Member Companies, 2007
- mAb Sales Growth to Dwarf Small Molecules
- Biotech and the Short Runway
- The State of Biotech: Key Industry Metrics from BIO, March 2009
- Survival of the Fittest: The Financial Markets and Biotech
- Total Equity Raised by Biotech, 1995-2008
- viii
- An Analysis of Global Biologics/Biotech Market: Worldwide Sales for Top Products and Top Product Classes in 2008
- Top-Selling Categories of Biologic Products, 2008
- Growth Rates of Top-Selling Classes of Biological Products, 2008
- Top 20 Selling Biologic Products Worldwide, 2008
- Follow-on Biologics: Assessments of Impact and Appropriate Exclusivity Period
- Estimates of/Support for Appropriate Data/Market Exclusivity for Biological Products
- Total World Biogenerics Market Potential
- Section 2: Products in Development
- Pharmaceuticals
- Worldwide Drugs in the Pipeline by Therapeutic Category as of February 2009 (IMS Health)
- Top 50 Drug Companies by Number of Drug Products in Development as of February 2009 (IMS Health)
- Top 50 Drug Companies by Number of Drug Products in Development as of March 2009 (Pharmaprojects)
- A Snapshot of the Pharma R&D Pipeline, Number of Projects by Development Phase, 1998-2009
- Worldwide Active R&D Projects in Development by Stage, 1998-2009
- The R&D Pipeline, 1998-2009
- An Analysis of the Drug and Biotech Pipeline by Development Phase, Technology, Therapeutic Category,
- and Strategy (EvaluatePharma), April 2009
- R&D Project Count by Current Phase (EvaluatePharma)
- R&D Project Count by Technology (EvaluatePharma)
- R&D Project Count by Therapy Area (EvaluatePharma)
- R&D Project Count by Strategy, Organic, Licensed (EvaluatePharma)
- An Analysis of New Clinical Trial Starts for Drugs as Measured by Commercial IND Submissions to FDA, 2008
- New FDA-Regulated Clinical Trial Starts for Drugs and Biologics/Biotechs, 1998-2008
- Breakdown of CDER Divisional Workload by INDs Received in 2008
- Segmentation of US Clinical Trial Starts for Drugs by Therapeutic Category, 2006, 2007, and 2008
- Global New Active Substance Product Launches, 2008
- An Analysis of FDA-Regulated Clinical Trial Activity for Drugs as Measured by
- Active INDs at Year-End 2008
- Breakdown of CDER Drug Divisions’ IND Review Workload (Active as of Year-End 2008)
- Segmentation of FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials for Drugs by Therapeutic Category, 2008
- R&D Pipeline Expansion: A 2009 Assessment
- Drugs in Active Development, 1995-2009
- Drug Development by World Status, 1995-2009
- Measures of Pharma Industry’s New Drug Output: NME/NAS Submissions to FDA and EMEA, 1995-2008
- Annual Number of Marketing Applications for New Molecular Entities/New Active Substances
- Filed With the FDA and EMEA, 1995-2008
- Top 20 Most Valuable R&D Projects (Ranked by Net Present Value)
- Drug Approvals Unlikely to Rise for A While—EMEA’s Lonngren
- Valuing Company R&D Pipelines based on NPV Analysis: Top 20 R&D Spenders
- Valuing the R&D Pipeline based on NPV Analysis
- Measures of Diversity and Novelty of Drug Targets in Active R&D Projects
- Target Diversity: Number of Protein Targets Under Study in R&D Projects, 1995-2009
- Percentage of Products Involving “Unproven” Targets, by Phase
- The Innovativeness of the 2008 NME Approvals
- Still Waiting for the Rebound: ICTs vs. “Other” Drugs Approved, 1996-2008
- Active Clinical Drug Development Programs Worldwide by Phase, April 2009
- Number of Active Clinical Development Programs, 2009
- Total Average Number of Active Programs by Year, March 2002-April 2009
- Comparison of Annual Growth Rate—2006 vs. 2007 vs. 2008 vs. 2009
- Top Therapeutic Categories by Number of Projects in Development as of March 2009 (Pharmaprojects)
- Number of Drugs in Preclinical Testing, 1995-2009
- Top Therapeutic Drug Categories Worldwide by Number of Projects in Development as of February 2009
- Drug R&D Projects: Top Ten Areas of Research, 2008
- Growth in the Number of Compounds in Development: A 2009 Assessment
- New Compounds in Various Stages of Development, Indexed, 1995-2008
- Absolute Number of New Compounds in Pharmaceutical Development: January 2007-March 2009
- Pharma/Biotech Pipelines and Unmet Medical Need: A 2008 Analysis
- Unmet Medical Need by Therapeutic Category
- Various Major Pharmas: Focus on Unmet Medical Need by Percentage of Pipeline Projects
- Various Biotechs: Focus on Unmet Medical Need by Percentage of Pipeline Projects
- No R&D “Productivity Hits” in Pfizer/Wyeth Combination—Kindler and Mackay
- Proportion of Top Pharma and Biotech Company Pipelines In-Licensed: A 2009 Assessment
- Leading Pharma Companies by Pipeline Size: Percent of Pipelines In-Licensed
- Selected Leading Biotech Companies by Pipeline Size: Percent of Pipelines In-Licensed
- Number of Companies in Pharma R&D on Rise, 1998-2009
- Where Clinical Research is Heading: Trial Starts Signal Industry’s Direction in Six Key Therapeutic Areas, 2007-2008
- Late-Stage Oncology Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage Oncology Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage Oncology Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Late-Stage Metabolic/Endocrinology Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage Metabolic/Endocrinology Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage Metabolic/Endocrinology Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Late-Stage CNS Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage CNS Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage CNS Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Late-Stage Cardiovascular Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage Cardiovascular Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage Cardiovascular Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Late-Stage Infectious Disease Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage Infectious Disease Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage Infectious Disease Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Late-Stage Autoimmune/Inflammation Trials Initiated, 2007-2008 by Disease and Company
- Late-Stage Autoimmune/Inflammation Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Disease
- Late-Stage Autoimmune/Inflammation Trials Initiated, September 2007-September 2008 by Company (Top 20)
- Waiter, There’s a Medicine in My Salad
- An Analysis of 2008 New Drug Approvals by Company Size
- 91 NDAs Awaiting FDA Approval—Cowen and Company
- International Patenting of Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology: A 2009 Assessment of Top Innovators
- Ranking of Top 20 Pharma/Biotech Patentees, May 2009
- Therapeutic Focus in 2007 Patenting
- High Throughput Screening Looks Ahead
- Comparative Effectiveness Studies, Now de Regueur?
- The Emergence and Future of Companion Diagnostics: A 2009 Assessment
- Three Examples of Approved Drugs with Companion Diagostics
- Companion Diagnostic Segments
- Theranostic Drugs and Diagnostics: Currently Marketed Theranostic Drugs by
- ATC Code and Diagnostics Utilized for Theranostic Drugs
- Oncology Theranostic Landscape, 2007
- Pharma and Diagnostic Development Timeline
- New Generation of Personalized Medicine Diagnostics Command Value-Based Pricing
- Pharma and Biotech Company Pipelines: An Assessment of “Replacement Power,” 2008
- Large Pharma Replacement Power: 13 Major Companies
- Large Biotech Replacement Power: 7 Major Companies
- Numbers of mAbs Entering Clinicals Nearly Triple in Last Decade
- Nanomaterials Move to Clinical Trials
- Pipeline Rationalization: A 2009 Analysis
- Announced Pipeline Project Cancellations for Pfizer and Merck, 2007-2008
- A Call for an “Open Innovation” Model
- Pharma/Biotech In-Licensing Trends, 2005-2008
- Major Pharmaceutical and Biotech In-licensing Activity, 2005-2008
- An Assessment of Pharma Industry Pipelines: The Number and Value of Anticipated Launches to 2012e
- Industry Summary: Launches, Peak Sales, and NPV by Year of First Launch, 2002-2012E
- Launch Expectations Over Time: Comparison of Lehman’s 2004-2008 Estimates
- Number of Drugs by Phase of Development, 2002-2008
- Breakdown of R&D Portfolio by Development Stage and Potential Peak Sales, 2006-2008
- Probabilities of Success for Phase 3 Drugs—2005 vs. 2008
- Number of Annual New Drug Launches Projected for 58 Selected Companies in Lehman Universe, 2002-2012e
- Novartis Leverages Molecular Pathways and Biologics to Improve Drug Discovery/Development Productivity
- Novartis Pathways Research: Increasing Numbers of Drug Targets, 2004-2010P
- The DELPhI Model
- Percent of Successfully Transitioned PoC Candidates at Novartis, 2003-05 vs. 2006-07
- What Makes the Novartis Approach Different?
- NMEs Poised to Enter Clinical Trials at Novartis
- Steady Growth of Biologic NMEs, 2004 vs. 2008
- Roche Acquires Genentech and Marches to Further Expand “Innovation Power” and Personalized Medicine Focus
- The Combined Roche and Genentch: The Numbers
- Driving R&D Costs: NMEs in Phase 3 to Double, Key Diagnostics Launches Rising
- The Roche R&D Pipeline, 2006-2008*
- Roche’s Clinical Development Pipeline by Therapeutic Area, February 2009
- Large Pharmas Team Up to Fund Early-Stage Technologies and Platforms
- Building a “New Merck”: The Schering-Plough Merger and Science-based Diversification
- The Combined Merck and Schering-Plough: The Numbers
- Merck/Schering-Plough Mid- and Late-Stage Clinical Pipeline
- Merck’s Cancer Pipeline: Clinical Proof of Concept Targets, 2008-2010
- Merck BioVentures: Aggressive Targets
- AstraZeneca Updates Progress on Strategy to Strengthen its R&D Pipeline
- AstraZeneca’s 2010 Targets for R&D
- The AstraZeneca Pipeline, 2004-2008
- AZ Discovery Productivity, 2002-2008
- AstraZeneca’s NME Clinical Pipeline by Therapeutic Area, January 2009
- AstraZeneca’s Portfolio: Biologic vs. Small Molecules, 2005 vs. 2009
- AstraZeneca’s In-house vs. In-licensed Pipeline, 2005 vs. 2009
- AstraZeneca’s Completed Phase 1 Cycle Times and Volumes
- Pfizer Further Refocuses Pipeline, Prepares for Wyeth Merger
- The Pfizer/Wyeth Merger: By the Numbers
- The Pfizer R&D Pipeline
- The Pfizer Clinical Pipeline: Pre-Merger
- Pfizer Projections on Rebuilding the Phase 3 Portfolio
- The Wyeth Pipeline: Pre-Merger
- Lilly Updates Transformation Effort, Highlights Aggressive Moves to FIPNet and Biotech
- Lilly’s New Drug Launch Goals
- The Lilly R&D Portfolio: Oncology and Non-Oncology Pipeline
- Lilly’s NMEs in Clinical Development, 2000-2011
- GSK Implements New Vision for R&D, Evolves CEDDs Model
- Signs of GSK R&D Productivity
- GSK Therapeutic Area Focus
- Re-personalization of Drug Discovery: GSK’s DPUs
- Bristol-Myers Squibb: Moving the “Next Generation BioPharma Model” Beyond ImClone
- BMS Disease Areas and Unmet Medical Needs
- US NME Approvals by Review Status: BMS vs. Leading Companies, January 2004-October 2008
- String of Pearls: Priority Levels in Key Disease Areas
- String of Pearls: Multiple Integration Approaches
- Total New Drug Approvals Decline, But US Preferred Market for First Launch
- Number of Priority, Standard, and All NCEs Approved, 1984-2007
- Share of NCE Approvals by Location of Original Marketing, 1987-2007
- Taking Out Options: Companies Hedging Their Bets in Some Deals
- The Drug Pipeline and Attrition: A 2009 Assessment
- Why Investigational Candidates Are Dropped, 2000-2008
- Top 10 Most Popular Targets in Drug Development
- Novel Drugs by Phase of Development
- Dearth of New Drugs an Industry Issue, Not an FDA Issue—Lilly’s Paul
- PhRMA’s Medicines in Clinical Development Series
- Analysis of Drugs in Clinical Development for Cancer by Development Status and Indication, 2009
- Analysis of Drugs in Development for Neurological Disorders by Development Status and Indication, 2008
- Analysis of Drugs in Development to Treat Rare Illnesses, 2007
- xi
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Clinical Development to Treat Mental Illnesses, 2008
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Development for Heart Disease and Stroke, 2009
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Clinical Development for Diseases of Aging, 2008
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Development for AIDS and AIDS-Related Illnesses, 2008
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Clinical Development to Treat Pediatric Illnesses, 2007
- Analysis of Drugs in U.S. Clinical Development for Women by Development Status and Indication, 2007
- Analysis of Drugs and Vaccines in U.S. Clinical Development for Infectious Diseases, 2007
- One Analyst on Big Pharma’s Biotech Aspirations
- Leading Pharmaceutical Company R&D Profiles
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Pfizer
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Merck
- Astellas
- Roche
- Biogen Idec
- Eli Lilly
- Johnson & Johnson
- AstraZeneca
- Bayer Schering Pharma
- Amgen
- Novartis
- Sanofi-aventis
- Abbott
- Development Pipelines of Selected Leading Drug Companies: Number of Products by Stage of Development, March 2009
- Large and Small/Mid-Tier Pharmas Relying on Each Other for Growth
- Origin of New US Drug Approvals, 2000-2006
- A 2008 Analysis of the Mid- and Late-Stage R&D Pipeline: Size, Developer Type, Indications, and Success Rates
- Number of Drugs in Phase 2-Pre-Registration by Developer Type
- Number of Indications per Drug in Phase 2-Pre-Registration by Developer Type for Select Years
- Likelihood of Approval by Phase for Large Company Products
- Likelihood of Approval by Phase for Small Company/Institution Products
- Biopharmaceuticals
- Analysis of Biotechnology Medicines and Vaccines in US Clinical Development by
- Development Status and Therapeutic Category, 2008
- A 2008 Assessment of Gene Therapy trials
- Gene Therapy Trials by Phase, 2008
- Top Medical Conditions Targeted by Gene Therapy Trials
- Biotech Products Facing FDA Action in 2009
- Potential Biotechnology Approvals in 2009
- Biotech Company Development Pipelines: Number of Development Projects by Phase of Development, March 2009
- The Pipeline for Monoclonal Antibodies: A 2009 Assessment
- Therapeutic mAbs in Development by Phase, 1995-2009
- The Number of Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Development by Subtype, 1995-2009
- Trends in the Clinical Development and Approval of Peptides: A 2009 Assessment
- Average annual number of peptide therapeutics entering study during seven time periods
- Therapeutic categories for peptide candidates entering study in three time periods
- Mean clinical and US approval phases for peptide new chemical entities approved after 1992
- M&As Surge in 2008
- Development Project Pipelines for 27 Selected Leading Biotech Companies by
- Therapeutic Categories and Phases, March 2009
- Section 3: Drug Development Costs/Complexity, Development Time, and Success Rates
- Costs/Complexity
- Measures of Clinical Trial Costs, 2006-2008 (TTC)
- Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Clinical Phase, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, 2006-2008
- Mean Patient Reimbursement Per Visit in Clinical Trials, 2006-2008 Mean Patient Reimbursement Per Visit in Clinical Trials by Phase, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Mean Patient Reimbursement Per Visit in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Indexed Measures of Clinical Trial Costs, 2006-2008 (TTC)
- Index of Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Clinical Phase, 2006-2008
- Index of Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Country/Region
- Index of Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, 2006-2008, Phase I-IV
- Mean Site Fees per Clinical Study by Phase, 2006-2008
- Measures of Clinical Trial Costs per Patient, 2006-2008 (TTC)
- Index of Mean Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Clinical Phase, US, 2006-2008
- Index of Mean Phase I Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, US, 2006-2008
- Index of Mean Phase II Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, US, 2006-2008
- Index of Mean Phase III Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, US, 2006-2008
- Index of Mean Phase IV Cost per Patient in Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area, US, 2006-2008
- Measures of Clinical Study Complexity, 2006-2008 (TTC)
- Index of Clinical Study Complexity by Trial Phase, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Index of Clinical Study Complexity by Country/Region, Phase I-IV, 2006-2008
- Index of Clinical Study Complexity by Year, Phase I-IV, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Index of Clinical Study Complexity by Therapeutic Area, Phase I-IV, Worldwide, 2006-2008
- Relative Clinical Study Costs: U.S., Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and Asia
- Relative per Visit Grant Costs in Selected Western European Countries
- Relative per Visit Grant Costs in Selected Eastern European Countries
- Relative per Visit Grant Costs in Various Asian Countries
- Indian vs. U.S. Procedure and Professional Fees
- India Clinical Trials Costs One-Tenth of US Costs?
- Analysis of Overhead Costs for U.S.-based Insititutions Conducting Clinical Trials
- Recent Estimates of the Cost of Developing New Drugs, 2009
- Biomedical Research and Development Price Index, 1980-2013
- Selected Health Care Inflation Data, 1998-2008
- How Scientific Advances and New Drug Approvals Raise the Bar for
- New Clinical Trials and Approvals: An Oncology Case Study
- New Drugs Developed with Standard Regimen: Regulatory and Clinical Hurdles
- are Raised with Each New Approved Regimen
- The Statistical Dilemma
- The Limited Utility of Biomarkers: A 2008 Assessment of Biomarkers in Early Cancer Drug Development
- Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints are Often Confused
- Biomarkers Have Much Appeal in Expediting Cancer Drug Development
- However, Biomarkers Don’t Offer an Easy Solution
- Are Biomarkers Overrated Today? Advocates Counter that Biomarkers Lead to More Effective Early Clinical Trials
- Genes and Disease: The Weakest Link?
- Where Today’s Clinical Trials Are Being Conducted: A Study of New FDA-Regulated Studies in 2008
- Number of Investigators Signing 1572s Annually for FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials, 1995-2008
- Number of Investigators Signing 1572s in Selected Countries: Year-over-Year Percentage Increase/Decrease
- Number of Investigators Completing 1572s to Participate in FDA-Regulated Clinical Studies by Country in 2008
- Clinical Trials by Region and Phase, 2005-2008 (PAREXEL Consulting)
- Worldwide Clinical Trials, as first entered into ClinicalTrials.gov, in 2008
- Worldwide Clinical Trials First Entered in Each Calendar Year, 2005-2008
- Phase IV Clinical Trials, as first entered into ClincialTrials.gov, in 2008
- Phase III Clinical Trials, as first entered into ClincialTrials.gov, in 2008
- Phase II Clinical Trials, as first entered into ClincialTrials.gov, in 2008
- Phase I Clinical Trials, as first entered into ClincialTrials.gov, in 2008
- Where Are Clinical Trials Being Conducted? Follow the Inspections
- CDER-DSI International Clinical Investigator BIMO Inspections, FY2008
- EMEA GCP Inspections Related to the Centralised Procedure: Total GCP Inspections per Country, 1997-2008
- Site Activation as the Driver to Patient Enrollment: A 2008 Assessment
- Demographics of Clinical Trial Populations: A Look at NIH Trials, 2008
- The Changing Clinical Investigator Landscape: A 2009 Assessment
- Number of Individual Principal Investigators, US-based and Non-US-based
- Global Distribution of Total FDA-Regulated Principal Investigators, 1997-2008
- Snapshot of the FDA-Regulated PI Landscape
- Number of Principal Investigators per Active IND, 1997-2007
- Mean Numbers of Patients per NDA, 1997-2007
- The Case for New Drugs and Better Predictive Biomarkers
- Average Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs: A 2008 Assessment
- Average Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs by Phase
- Mean Phase 1 Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs, by Therapeutic Area, US
- Mean Phase 2 Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs, by Therapeutic Area, US
- Mean Phase 3 Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs, by Therapeutic Area, US
- Mean Phase 4 Per-Patient Clinical Trial Costs, by Therapeutic Area, US
- Average Number of Patients per Trial Site, by Phase and Therapeutic Area: A 2008 Assessment
- Mean Number of Patients per Trial: Phase 1 Studies, by Therapeutic Area
- Mean Number of Patients per Trial: Phase 2 Studies, by Therapeutic Area
- Mean Number of Patients per Trial: Phase 3 Studies, by Therapeutic Area
- Gene-Guided Dosing Not Cost Effective—Study
- A Market Model for EDC in Clinical Trials
- Percentage of Trials Using EDC, Today vs. in Three Years
- Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Market Model, 2006E-2012E
- Health Spending to Consume 17.6% of U.S. Economy in 2009—CMS
- Active Clinical Trials by Phase and Country/Region: A 2008 Analysis
- Clinical Studies Openly Recruiting by Phase and Region
- Number of Clinical Trials Initiated Annually for U.S. Submissions: FDA Estimates
- Analysis of Paying Clinical Study Subjects
- Average Payment to Research Subjects by Phase
- Clinical Trials Move Abroad: Chasing Patients
- Global Patient Recruitment (Patients Enrolled per Site): Five Regions Compared
- Geographic Locale of Active Clinical Investigators, 1997-2007E
- Emerging Clinical Trial Enrollment Benchmarks: Trial Size Statistics for New Drugs Approved in 2008
- Key Clinical Trial Enrollment Statistics for NMEs Approved in 2000-2008
- Clinical Trial Enrollments for Selected NMEs Approved in 2008
- Emerging Clinical Trial Enrollment Benchmarks: Trial Size Statistics for New Drugs Approved in 2007
- Key Clinical Trial Enrollment Statistics for NMEs Approved in 2000-2007
- Clinical Trial Enrollments for Selected NMEs Approved in 2007
- Emerging Clinical Trial Enrollment Benchmarks: Trial Size Statistics for New Drugs Approved in 2006
- Key Clinical Trial Enrollment Statistics for NMEs Approved in 2000-2006
- Clinical Trial Enrollments for Selected NMEs Approved in 2006
- Emerging Clinical Trial Enrollment Benchmarks: Trial Size Statistics for New Drugs Approved in 2005
- Key Clinical Trial Enrollment Statistics for NMEs Approved in 2000-2005
- Clinical Trial Enrollments for Selected NMEs Approved in 2005
- Emerging Clinical Trial Enrollment Benchmarks: Trial Size Statistics for New Drugs Approved in 2004
- Key Clinical Trial Enrollment Statistics for NMEs Approved in 1999-2004
- Clinical Trial Enrollments for Selected NMEs Approved in 2004
- European Clinical Trial Sites Rate Pharma Sponsors
- Top Rated Sponsors in Europe
- Average 2008 Rating for the Typical Sponsor in Europe
- Factors That Could Best Prevent Future Delays
- General Project Management Attributes
- Quality of Staff Professionalism
- Quality of the Grant Payment Process
- New Drug Development Spending and Costs: A 2008 Analysis
- R&D Expenses Regressions
- R&D Expenses by Therapy Area for All Phases
- Patient Recruitment Metrics at Pfizer
- An Analysis of Site Performance within a Clinical Study and its Effect on Cost
- Sample Hypercholesterolemia Study
- Average Across Multiple Sites (enrollments/referrals)
- Average Across Multiple Sites (cost)
- The Effects of Growing Clinical Trial Protocol Complexity: A 2008 Analysis
- Change in Procedures per Protocol, 1995-2005
- Change in Protocol Eligibility Criteria, 1999-02 vs. 2003-06
- Investigative Site Work Burden per Protocol, 1999-2005
- Protocol Design Impact on Study Conduct Cycle Times
- Protocol Design Impact on Patient Recruitment and Retention Rates, 1999-02 vs. 2003-06
- Percent Change in Grant Dollars per Protocol Procedure, 1999-2005
- Study-Related Burdens vs. Compensation for Clinical Trial Sites, 2000-2005
- An Analysis of Ways to Reduce Central Recruitment Costs
- Probability of Randomizing Relative Average
- Price Per Randomized for an Average Study by Recruitment Timeline
- Price per Randomized for an Average Study by FOV Rate
- The FDA Amendments Act of 2007: An Analysis of Possible Effects on Phase 4 Clinical Trials
- and the CRO Market Opportunity
- Lehman Analysis of Drug Approval and Post-marketing Commitment Trends, 1990-2006
- Increase in PMCs Driven by More Conditional Approvals, 1997-2006
- Lehman Analysis of Post-marketing Commitment Protocols, 2004-2007
- Segmentation of US Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Area (TTC)
- Assessing the Cost to Develop a New Biotech Product
- Pre-Approval Cash Outlays and Time Costs per Approved New Biopharmaceutical
- Pre-Approval Cash Outlays per Approved New Molecule
- Pre-Approval Capitalized Cost per Approved New Molecule: Biotech vs. Pharma
- Capitalized Preclinical and Clinical Period Costs per Investigational Biopharmaceutical Compound
- Medical Imaging Emerges in Clinical Trials: A 2007 Assessment
- Size of the Medical Imaging Market, 2004-2009
- The Medical Imaging Market: Analysis of Various Techniques, 2005-2009P
- Estimating the Cost of New Drug Development: Is It Really $802 Million
- Average Out-of-Pocket Clinical Costs for Investigational Compounds
- Average Phase Time and Clinical Capitalized Costs for Investigational Compounds
- Capitalized Preclinical, Clinical, and Total Cost per New Drug, in Millions of 2000 Dollars
- Probability of Market Entry, Durations, and Costs for New Drugs by Firm
- Probability of Market Entry, Durations, and Costs for New Drugs, by Disorder and Primary Indication
- Achieving High Performance in Pharmaceuticals: Reversing the R&D Productivity Decline
- R&D Productivity Challenge: Spend vs. Value (Sales)
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditure, Average R&D Expenditure per NAS and Average ROI
- per NAS—Indexed four 7 year periods 1988-2000
- Clinical Research Offshoring: A Country Attractiveness Index for Clinical Trials
- Number of Studies by Top 12 Pharma Countries by U.S.-Only and Non-U.S. Sites
- Top 12 Pharma Companies as a Percentage of Total Industry Studies
- Top 15 Most Common Locations for Clinical Trials Outside the U.S.: Number of Studies
- Sponsored by Pharmas in Each Country
- Percentages and Numbers of Industry Studies and Offshore Locations
- Overall Country Attractiveness Index
- Overall Patient Availability Score by Country
- Overall Indexed Clinical Trial Costs
- Estimates of Nonclinical Study Costs and Durations
- Clinical and Total R&D Costs by Therapeutic Category
- Mean Clinical Phase Costs for Investigational New Drugs by Therapeutic Category
- Mean Clinical Cost per Approved New Drug by Therapeutic Category
- The Price of Innovation: New Estimates on Drug Development Costs
- Average Out-of-Pocket Clinical Period Costs for Investigational Compounds
- Average Phase Times and Clinical Period Capitalized Costs for Investigational Compounds
- Trends in Capitalized Preclinical, Clinical, and Total Cost per Approved New Drug
- Compound Annual Growth Rates in Out-of-Pocket and Capitalized Inflation-adjusted Cost per Approved New Drug
- Out-of-Pocket Clinical Period Phase Costs for Approved Compounds
- Out-of-Pocket and Capitalized Total Cost per Approved New Drug for New Drugs
- and for Improvements to Existing Drugs
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development Estimate of Cost to Develop a New Drug
- Total Mean Costs to Develop a New Drug
- The Phase I Clinical Study Market: A 2007 Assessment
- Phase I Still Stands Out: Projected Spending by Phase (U.S. $ in billions)
- The Phase IIIb/IV Market: A 2006 Assessment
- Spending on Various Drug Development Phases, 2005-2009p
- The Central Laboratory Market: A 2006 Assessment
- Projected Central Laboratory Market, 2004-2009
- 2005 Revenue from Companies with Central Laboratory Services
- Clinical Trial Laboratory Services Market Share
- Development Time
- Analysis of U.S. New Drug Development Process by Average Time to
- Complete Each Phase of Product Development, 2009
- New Drug Clinical and Approval Times; A 2008 Assessment
- Clinical and Approval Times, 1984-2007
- Clinical Phases for Priority and Standard NCEs Approved 1984-2007
- Clinical Phases for NCE Approved 1999-2007 by Therapeutic Area
- Clinical and Approval Times by Therapeutic Class, 2005-2007
- The FDA’s Fast Track Program: A 2008 Assessment
- Clinical and Approval Phases for Fast Track New Chemical and Biological Entities, Fast Track vs. All Drugs
- Therapeutic Categories of Drugs Obtaining Fast Track Designations, 1998-2007
- Reasons for Terminating Fast Track Candidates, 1998-2002 vs. 2003-2007
- Phase Transition Probabilities for Fast Track Candidates, 1998-02 and 2003-07
- Clinical Trial Cycle Times: Planned Timelines vs. Actuals
- Percentages of Planned Timelines That Trials Exceeded by Phase
- The FDA on Study Initiation Delays
- The Factors Associated with Multiple FDA Review Cycles and Approval Phase Times: A 2009 Study
- Mean US Approval Phase Times by Number of Review Cycles for NDA/BLAs Submitted FY1996-2006
- Total Approval Phase for Drugs with NDAs or BLAs Submitted FY1996-FY2006
- Number of FDA Review Cycles for Approved Drugs by Therapeutic Class
- Distribution of FDA Review Cycles for Approved Drugs by
- Priority Rating for NDA/BLAs Submitted FY1996-FY2006
- Percent of Single-Cycle Approvals for Products by Regulatory Characteristic
- and FDA-Sponsor Interaction for NDA/BLAs Submitted FY1996-FY2006
- Mean Total FDA Review and Sponsor Response Times and Shares for NDAs
- and BLAs Submitted FY1996-FY2006
- New Drug Development Times: A 2007 Analysis
- Mean Clinical and Approval Times: 1994-2006
- Mean Clinical and Approval Phase Lengths by Therapeutic Class, 2002-2006
- Cancer Therapy Development Times vs. Other Drugs: A 2007 Study
- Clinical and FDA Approval Phases for New Cancer Therapeutics
- The FDA’s Fast Track Program: Effect on Review Time and Approval Success
- Number and Total Approval Time (in months) of Approved NDAs and BLAs, by Fiscal Year
- of Submission, and by Review Procedure
- Delays in Study Enrollment Timelines: A 2007 Assessment
- Distribution of Delays in US Site Enrollment Timelines
- Distribution of Delays in Site Enrollment Globally: US, Europe, Latin America, and Asia Pacific
- Factor Most Often Causing Study Delays
- The Speed Demons of Drug Development: Achieving Revenue Gains and Cost Savings
- Fastest Development Companies: Median Clinical Development and Regulatory Cycle Times, 2000-2005
- Median Time from IND Filing to NDA Approval for Nine Therapeutic Areas, 2000-2005
- Median Clinical Development Time and Regulatory Cycle Times: All Companies vs. Fastest 10 Companies
- Standard Deviations and Coefficients of Variation for Drugs Approved Between 2000 and 2005
- Fastest vs. Slowest Firms: Percentage of Terminated Projects by Phase, 1994-2005
- Drugs of Fastest vs. Slowest Companies: Comparative Development and
- Regulatory Cycle Times and Revenue Advantage, 2000-2005
- Biopharmaceutical Development Times: A 2007 Analysis
- Mean Biopharmaceutical Development Times: Clinical Phase, Approval Phase,
- and Total Phase Lengths, 1982-2006
- Development Times for Biotech vs. Drug Products: A 2006 Study
- Clinical Development and Approval Times: Biopharmaceuticals vs. Drugs
- Time Consumed by Various Clinical Trial Activities
- Study Sites’ Perceptions on Reasons for Study Delays
- Factor Most Often Causing Clinical Study Delays
- Clinical and Approval Timelines for Drugs Approved 1984-2004
- Clinical and Approval Phases for New Drugs, 1984-2004
- Mean Clinical Phase Times for Priority and Standard NCEs Approved, 1984-2004
- Mean FDA Approval Times for Standard and Priority NCEs, 1984-2004
- Mean Clinical Phase Times for NCEs Approved by Therapeutic Area, 1996-2004
- Mean Clinical and Approval Phase Lengths by Therapeutic Class, 2002-2004
- Share of NCE Approvals by Location of Original Marketing, 1987-2004
- Number of NCE Approvals, 1984-2004
- Are Development Times for Pharmaceutical Companies Increasing or Decreasing?
- Sample of Development Times for 25 Drugs
- Pharmaceutical Development Times, by Category
- Total Post-IND Development Period, Clinical Trial Period, and
- Regulatory Review Periods, by Year of NDA Approval, 1992-2001
- Total Post-IND Development Period, Clinical Trial Period, and
- Regulatory Review Period, by Year of IND Filing, 1985-1995
- The New Drug Approvals of 1999, 2000, and 2001: Drug Development Trends a Decade After Passage of PDUFA
- Mean NCE Clinical, Approval, and Total Phase Lengths for NCEs Approved in 1999, 2000, and 2001
- Median Clinical and Approval Phases for New Chemical Entity Approvals in 1999, 2000, and 2001
- Mean Clinical and Approval Phases in Years for NCEs Approved in Each of Last Six Three-Year Periods
- Mean Clinical and Approval Phases for NCEs Grouped by Therapeutic Classes
- Mean Clinical Phases in Years for NCEs Grouped by Therapeutic Class in Each of
- the Last Three-Year Periods
- Mean Clinical, Approval, and Total Phases in Years for NCEs Approved in 1999
- and Designated as Accelerated Approval, Fast Track Approval, or Both, Compared
- with Those for All Other NCEs and with Orphan Approvals
- Percentage of NCEs First Approved in the United States and Those with Various
- Periods of Prior Foreign Marketing
- Percentage of NCEs First Approved in the United States, and Those with One or
- More Years of Prior Foreign Marketing, in Each of the Last Five Three-Year Periods
- Success Rates
- R&D Attrition Rates: Commonly Cited and Emerging Benchmarks
- Analysis of Reported Reasons for Drug Discontinuations, 2000-2008
- Reported reasons for drug discontinuations, 2000-2008
- The Drug Pipeline and Attrition: A 2009 Assessment
- Why Investigational Candidates are Dropped, 2000-2008
- Why Lehman Sees Phase 3 Success Rates Falling
- Probabilities of Success for Phase 3 Drugs—2005 vs. 2008
- Is Phase 2 “Choking” Drug Development?
- Attrition Rates and Transition Probabilities for Fast Track Drugs: A 2008 Assessment
- Reasons for Terminating Fast Track Candidates, 1998-2002 vs. 2003-2007
- Phase Transition Probabilities for Fast Track Candidates, 1998-02 and 2003-07
- Understanding Human Disease the Key in Attrition Rate
- A 2008 Analysis of Approval Success Rates by Product Type and Novelty
- NME Success Rates by Compound Type, 1997-2007
- NME Success Rates by Target Type, 1997-2007
- Product Type and Target Novelty, 1997-2008
- NME Success Rates by Compound Type, 2002-2007
- NME Success Rates by Target Type, 2002-2007
- Product Type and Target Novelty, 2002-2007
- A 2008 Analysis of the Mid- and Late-Stage R&D Pipeline: Size, Developer Type, Indications, and Success Rates
- Number of Drugs in Phase 2-Pre-Registration by Developer Type, 1997-2007
- Number of Indications per Drug in Phase 2-Pre-Registration by Developer Type for Select Years, 1997-2007
- Likelihood of Approval by Phase for Large Company Products, 2000-2007
- Likelihood of Approval by Phase for Small Company/Institution Products
- The Pipeline and the New Realities of Drug Development
- Emerging Success Rates for New Cancer Therapies, 1990-2006
- New Cancer Therapeutics and Vaccines Entering Clinical Study, 1993-2006
- Clinical Phase Transition Probabilities for Cancer Therapeutic Candidates
- A Jump in Cancer R&D Success Rates?
- FDA Approvals and Phase III Failures: Pharma vs. Biotech
- Attrition Rates in Drug Development Phases
- An Analysis of Late-Stage Success Rates: Biotech Products versus Pharmaceuticals
- Success Rates of Late-Stage Clinical Trials in Biotechnology, 1995-2006
- FDA Actions on Biotechnology Product Applications by Nature of Action, 1995-2006
- Probability of Success to Market for New Active Substances by Origin: Self-Originated vs. Licensed-in
- Kola on Emerging Attrition Rate Trends, 2007
- Estimates of Drug Success Rates: Unprecedented vs. Precedented Molecules
- Drug Success Rates: Unprecedented vs. Precedented Molecules
- Comparative Success Rates for Biotech vs. Drug Products: A 2006 Study
- Transition Probabilities for Clinical Phases: Biopharmaceuticals vs. Drugs
- Fastest Pharma Firms Kill Development Projects Sooner
- Fastest vs. Slowest Firms: Percentage of Terminated Projects by Phase, 1994-2005
- FDA Approval Standards Uncertain—Hassan
- New Drug Success Rates at Top 10 Pharma Companies: A 2006 Study
- Phase Transition Probabilities for Self-Originated Drugs of Leading Firms
- Phase Transition Probabilities by Therapeutic Class for Relatively High Success Rate Classes
- Phase Transition Probabilities by Therapeutic Class for Relatively Low Success Rate Classes
- Clinical Approval Success Rates by Therapeutic Class
- Success to Market Rates for New Active Substances: Comparison of Chemical Entities and Biotech Products
- Probability of Success to Market for New Active Substances: Comparison of Therapeutic Areas
- Can the Pharmaceutical Industry Reduce Attrition Rates?
- Success Rates by Therapeutic Area
- Success Rates from First-in-Man to Registration
- Success Rates by Stage of Development
- Reasons for Attrition
- Section 4: Regulatory/FDA Statistics
- INDs
- Number of IND Submissions, 1982-2008
- Breakdown of Drug Divisions’ Active IND Review Workload as of Year-End 2008
- Concerns Over Heart Risks Biggest Recent Shift in Drug Reviews—Jenkins
- Breakdown of CDER Divisions’ Workload by INDs Received in 2008
- CDER Holds on Commercial IND Submissions, 1990-2008
- Clinical Holds on Commercial IND Submissions by Division, 2008
- NDAs
- Number of NDAs Pending at the Close of the Calendar Year, 1983-2008
- Breakdown of Drug Divisions’ Pending NDA Review Workload, Year-End 2008
- Breakdown of Drug Divisions’ Workload by NDAs Received in Fiscal Year 2008
- Breakdown of Divisions’ Workload by Pending NDA Supplements, Year-End 2008
- CDER Refusal-to-File (RTF) Actions by Year, 1994-2008
- Key Drug Submission and Approval Statistics, 1993-2008
- Number of NME Approvals and Approval Times, 1984-2008
- NME Review Time Ranges, 1995-2008
- Priority/Standard NME Review Gap, 1995-2008 (in months)
- Median Approval Times for All NMEs by Calendar Year, 1986-2008
- Average NME Review Times in Months by CDER Division, 2005-2008
- Average NME Review Times in Months by CDER Division, 1993-2004
- How Are FDA’s Missed PDUFA Goals Affecting Drug Review Outcomes?
- Missed CDER Review Goals and Ultimate Review Outcomes for NDA/BLAs and Efficacy Supplements
- Mean and Median Total Time to Approval and FDA Review Time for NDAs and NMEs by
- Priority/Standard Classification for Calendar Year 2008
- A 2009 Analysis of CDER First-Cycle Approval Rates for NDAs, FY2006-FY2008
- And Now Someone Who Thinks the FDA Overstaffed
- Number of NDAs and NMEs Approved by Year, 1983-2008
- NMEs Approved Based on Therapeutic Potential, 1985-2008
- Percent of All Approved NDAs Receiving Priority Review Status, 1994-2008
- CDER’s Priority NME Approvals by Class of Drug, 1994-2008
- An Analysis of Review Cycles to Approval for New Drugs
- Summary Cycle to Approval Statistics for 2005-, 2006-, 2007-, and 2008-Approved NMEs
- Distribution of Review Cycles to Approval, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005
- Benchmarking the Review Cycles for NMEs Approved in 2008
- Average Cycle Times for Approved NMEs, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008
- Mean Review Cycle Times for Approved Priority/Standard NDAs in the FY2000-FY2006 Submission Cohorts
- A Closer Look at the FDA’s 50 Fastest Drug Approvals, 1963-2008
- A Comparison of FDA vs. EMEA Drug Approval Times, 2000-2005
- Mean Approval Times for New Substances Approved by EMEA and FDA, 2000-2005
- Time from Approval in First Market to Approval in Second Market
- EU vs. US Approval Time for Orphan Drugs
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2008: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2007: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2006: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2005: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2004: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2003: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2002: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2001: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 2000: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1999: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1998: NDA Review Times by Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1997: NDA Review Time for Each Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1996: NDA Review Time for Each Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1995: NDA Review Time for Each Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1994: NDA Review Time for Each Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1993: NDA Review Time for Each Drug
- U.S. New Drug Approvals of 1990, 1991, and 1992: NDA Review Times for Each Drug
- An Analysis of the Factors Associated with First-Cycle Approvals: A 2008 Update
- Approval Rate vs. Novelty and Indication
- First-Cycle Approval Rate by Application Type
- Effect of Pre-NDA/BLA Meetings and Timing on Approval Rate for FY2005-FY2007 Cohort
- Major Deficiencies Cited in First Action Letter of Multi-Cycle Applications
- by Category for FY2002-FY2007 Cohort
- Single-Cycle Approval Rates by Sponsor Experience
- Approval Rate vs. Sponsor Type and Origin
- An Analysis of FDA’s Fast Track Initiative, 2008
- Industry’s Fast Track Designation Requests to CDER, FY1999-FY2007
- CDER’s Fast Track Program Activity
- CBER’s Fast Track Program Activity
- Remembering the Good Old Delays
- Postmarketing Study Commitment Trends for New Drugs: An Analysis of NMEs Approved in 2008
- Percent of NMEs Approved with Postmarketing Commitments, 2001-2008
- New Postapproval Requirements Less Harmful to Pharma R&D Than New Preapproval Burdens—Analysis
- Postmarketing Study Requirement Trends in the U.S., Europe, and Japan: A 2008 Assessment
- Average Number of PMCs per Approval by Region
- Types of Postmarketing Studies Requested
- Timing of Agreement between Sponsor and Regulatory Agency on Nature and Design of Studies
- Safety-Based Drug Marketing Withdrawals in the United States, 1980-2008
- CDER Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals: Pre-PDUFA vs. PDUFA Era, 1971-2007
- Drugs Cleared Under New User-Fee Review Deadlines More Likely to Present Safety Issues?
- Orphan Drug Activity Continues to Hover Near Record Levels
- Orphan Drug Designation and Approval Statistics, 1990-2008
- Prevalence of Orphan Drugs in CDER’s NME Approvals, 2001-2008
- NDAs Approved Under CDER’s Accelerated Approval Program, 1992-December 2008 Biologics
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2008
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2008
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2008
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2007
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2007
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2007
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2006
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2006
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2006
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2005
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2005
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2005
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2004
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2004
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2004
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2003
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2003
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2003
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2002
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2002
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2002
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2001
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2001
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2001
- Summary of CBER Actions in 2000
- Key CBER Review Statistics for 2000
- CBER’s New Biological Product Approvals for 2000
- Orphan Drugs
- Orphan Drug Designation and Approval Statistics, 1990-2008
- Cumulative Growth of Orphan Drugs, 1984-2008
- Orphan Drug Approval Times vs. Approval Times of Other Drugs, 1993-2008
- Orphan Drug and Biologic Approvals, 1993-2008
- Orphan Drug and Biologic Approvals in 1990, 1991, and 1992
- Over-the-Counter Drugs
- Rate of Rx-to-OTC Switches per Year, 1951-2008
- Generic Drugs
- Generic Drug Approval Times: Median Time to Approval 1993 to 2008
- Pending ANDAs Continue to Surge at FDA, 2000-2008
- Mean and Median ANDA/AADA Review Times, 1995-2008
- Annual ANDA and AADA Submission and Approval Statistics, 1995-2008
- CDER Clinical Site Inspection Results, FY1997-FY2008
- CDER Clinical Investigator Inspections, FY92-FY2008
- Clinical Investigator Deficiency Categories, FY2008
- Clinical Investigator Inspections Final Classification, FY2008
- Clinical Investigator Deficiencies-CDER, FY2008 Final Classification of OAI
- Section 5: International Statistics
- European Union
- R&D Spending in Europe’s Pharmaceutical Industry, 1980-2008
- Pharmaceutical R&D Spending Within EFPIA Countries, 1990-2007
- Mean EMEA Review Time for Human Drugs Submitted Under the EC’s Centralized Procedure, 2007
- Mean EMEA Processing Time for Human Medicinal Products, 1997-2007
- Mean Processing Times for Key Stages of Centralized Process, 1996-2007
- Cancer, Anti-Infective, and Neurology Drugs Dominate New Centralized Submissions to EMEA in 2007
- Marketing Authorization Applications Rise to Record Levels at the EMEA
- Marketing Authorization Applications Undergoing Initial Evaluation, 2000-2007
- CPMP Initial Evaluation Opinions and Sponsor Withdrawals for New Medicines, 2000-2007
- An Analysis of the Mutual Recognition Procedure, 2007
- NICE’s Value Assessments to Be Studied
- The Current State of Pharmaceutical Innovation in Europe: A 2008 Assessment
- Percentage of Products in Development Considered to Have a Novel Mode of Action, 2001 vs. 2006
- Proportion of Total Global R&D by Therapeutic Area, 2004 vs. 2006
- New Drug Reviews at the FDA and EMEA: A 2008 FDA Analysis
- Divergent Review Outcomes in EU and USA, 1995-2007
- Comparison of New Molecular Entity Outcomes for FDA and EMEA
- New Molecular Entities Having Outcomes in Both FDA and EMEA
- The Challenges Faced by the Pharma Industry in the EU
- United Kingdom
- The MHRA’s Clinical Trials Work (by CTA submissions), 2004-2008
- MHRA’s New Active Substances Assessed and Mean Assessment Times, 1993-2008
- Japan
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures in Japan, 1985-2007 (in bill. Yen)
- Annual Number of New Chemical Entities Approved in Japan, 1983-2007
- Number of INDs for Investigational New Drugs Submitted in Japan, 1990-2007
- Success Rates of New Drug Development in Japan, 2002-2007
- R&D Expenditures of 20 Leading Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, 2004-2007
- Number of Prescription Drug Manufacture and Import Approvals Granted in Japan, 1985-2007
- Median NDA Approval Times in Japan by Year of Submission, 1996-2006
- Median Development Times for NMEs in Japan, 2000-2007
- Number of Drugs in Development in Japan by Pipeline Stage and Disease/Therapeutic Category, 2009
- Drug Lag Stubborn in Japan
- Canada
- Canadian Drugs Directorate New Active Substance (NAS) Approval Times, 1995-2008
- R&D Spending by Canadian Drug (Rx&D Member) Companies, 1984-2007
- New Drug Submission (NDS) Approval Times in Canada, 1997-2008
- Germany
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures by German Drug Industry, 1999-2007
- Number of New Chemical Entities Approved in Germany, 1988-2007
- The VFA Assesses the German Pharmaceutical Environment
- Global
- Comparative R&D Spending, Sales, and Product Launch Trends Worldwide: A 2009 Analysis
- Breakdown of World Pharma Market—2008 Sales
- Markets of First Launch for 32 New Active Substances Introduced in 2008
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditure Annual Growth Rate, US vs. Europe, 1993-2008
- Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditure in Europe, the United States, and Japan, 1990-2008
- U.S., European, Asian Pacific, and Canadian Biotech: Global Activity Measures, 2008
- The High Cost of Price Controls
- Trends in Worldwide Pharma and Biotech R&D Expenditures, 2002-2014P
- Global R&D Spending by World’s Top 500 Pharma & Biotech Companies, 2002-2014
- Trends in Worldwide R&D Expenditure, 1993-2008P
- Global New Active Substance Product Launches, 2008
- Latin America
- Global Clinical Trials: A Focus on Latin America
- Number of Clinical Studies in Latin American Countries and Selected Other Emerging Countries
- Growth in Clinical Trials for Selected Major and Emerging Countries and Regions, 2005 to 2008
- Selected Countries Participating in Phase II Clinical Trials, 1999-2008
- Selected Countries Participating in Phase III Clinical Trials, 1999-2008
- Central and Eastern Europe
- Central and Eastern Europe’s Participation in Global Clinical Trials: A 2008 Assessment
- Growth in Emerging Markets, 2002-2007
- CEE Investigators Increase Participation in Global Studies, 2003-2007
- Proportion of Trials in Various CEE Countries, 2002-2007
- Russia Sets Sights on Russian Drug Market
- Clinical Trial Starts Rebound in Russia
- Asia
- India’s Proportion of Clinical Trials to Double, 2007-2012—RNCOS
- Pharma Outsourcing in Asia: A 2008 Assessment of Key Dimensions in Various Countries
- Framework for evaluating outsourcing destinations
- Outsourcing Index—ranking of Asian territories across all factors
- India’s Clinical Trial Market to Comprise 15% of Global Share by 2010—KPMG
AbstractPAREXEL's Bio/Pharmaceutical R&D Statistical Sourcebook 2009/2010 is the leading resource for statistics, trends, and proprietary market intelligence and analysis on the biopharmaceutical industry. Supported by thousands of graphs, illustrations, and analysis, the Sourcebook provides the latest intelligence on every aspect of biopharmaceutical development - from product discovery, to R&D performance and productivity, to time-to-market trends.
With key analysis and contributions from leading consultancies and experts, the sourcebook provides real-world data and analysis, including:
New proprietary analysis on US clinical trial starts, segmented by therapeutic category, as well as overall active clinical trials
Emerging data on worldwide and company-specific R&D pipelines and product launch trends
An all-new and comprehensive analysis of clinical research off-shoring revealing which pharma companies are now locating their new clinical trials overseas
New analysis on emerging trends in pharma and biotech licensing deals and other partnerships critical to industry's efforts
Drug approval statistics compiled from FDA, EMEA, and other regulatory agencies
New global R&D spending trends and other international R&D data from key markets
International statistics on drug development output and much more!
PAREXEL's Bio/Pharmaceutical R&D Statistical Sourcebook 2009/2010 is a must-have resource for the drug development industry. It is an invaluable resource for executives and managers working in the pharma and biotech industries. The Sourcebook puts real-world data sets at your fingertips for presentations, reports, business development efforts, strategic meetings, and critical decision-making analyses.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|