|
Published by: Trimark Publications
Published: Jun. 1, 2009 - 844 Pages
Table of Contents
- Mammography World Markets
- 1 Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 Scope of this Report
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Executive Summary
- 2 Overview of the Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.1.1 Global Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1.2 U.S. Medical Imaging Market
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure
- 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics
- 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals
- 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists
- 2.2.4 Radiologic Services
- 2.2.5 Overview of Medical Imaging Market Segments
- 2.2.6 Market Drivers
- 2.2.6.1 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Procedures among End Users
- 2.2.6.2 Potential of Novel Contrast Agents Development to Drive Imaging Procedure Volumes
- 2.2.6.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Lifecycles and Restricts Spending
- 2.2.7 Market Restraints
- 2.2.8 Market Segments for Medical Imaging
- 2.2.8.1 Discovery
- 2.2.8.2 Clinical Applications
- 2.2.8.3 Clinical Trials
- 2.2.8.4 Outpatient Facilities Best Growth Market
- 2.2.8.5 Diagnostic Imaging Modalities Witness Several Technology Advancements
- 2.2.8.6 Safety and Ergonomics Concerns Drive Technology Growth
- 2.2.8.7 Volumetric Imaging and Post-image Processing Techniques Develop Rapidly
- 2.2.8.8 Increasing Implementation of PACS Pushes Digital Radiography into High Gear
- 2.2.8.9 Future Price Reduction Set to Stimulate Wider Acceptance of DR Systems
- 2.2.8.10 High-performance Imaging Combined with Lower Radiation Doses Spurs Growth of DR
- 2.3 Contrast Media
- 2.3.1 Market Share
- 2.3.2 Market Drivers
- 2.4 Picture Archiving Communications Systems
- 2.4.1 Picture Archiving Communications Systems and Radiology Information Systems
- 2.4.2 Increasing Digitization of Cardiology-Image Storage and Management Creates Market Growth Opportunities
- 2.4.3 Enterprise-Wide Integration Is an Important Area for Future Market Development
- 2.4.4 Competition among Large Companies Intensifies
- 2.4.5 Benefits of This Service
- 2.4.6 Market Sectors
- 2.4.7 Digital Imaging Technology Platforms
- 2.5 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.5.1 A Few Firms Dominate the Industry
- 2.6 Medical Imaging Industry Forecasts
- 2.7 Market Niches and Digitalization
- 2.8 Digital Imaging Techniques
- 2.8.1 Clinical Uses
- 2.8.2 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Devices among End-Users
- 2.8.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Lifecycles and Restricts Spending
- 2.8.4 Current and New Digital Imaging Procedures
- 2.8.5 The Digital Impact on Clinical Imaging Markets
- 2.8.6 Trends in Digital Imaging
- 2.8.7 Enhancing Computed Radiography
- 2.8.8 Digital Radiography vs. Computed Radiography
- 2.8.9 DR Products
- 2.8.10 Vasodilator Perfusion Imaging
- 3 World Mammography Market
- 3.1 Mammography Overview
- 3.2 Market Overview
- 3.2.1 Introduction to Market Overview
- 3.2.2 World Mammography Markets Revenue
- 3.2.3 Mammography Markets by Region
- 3.2.4 Total Market Share
- 3.2.5 Competitive Structure
- 3.3 Market Opportunities
- 3.3.1 Resource Management for Mammography Markets
- 3.3.2 Movement to Higher Reimbursement Rates
- 3.3.3 Market Benchmarks for Increased Mammography Utilization
- 3.4 Market Analysis
- 3.4.1 Strategic Partnerships
- 3.4.2 Long Term Trends
- 3.5 Strategic Outlook
- 3.5.1 Competitive Elements of Mammography Markets
- 3.5.2 Higher Reimbursement Rates
- 3.5.3 Volume Requirements
- 3.5.4 Product Innovation
- 3.5.5 Product Leadership
- 3.5.6 Product Line Strategy
- 3.5.7 Pricing Strategy and Reimbursement
- 3.5.8 Strategic Partnerships
- 3.6 Film-based Mammography Market
- 3.6.1 Market Overview
- 3.6.1.1 Unit and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.1.2 Product Analysis
- 3.6.2 Market Drivers
- 3.6.3 Market Restraints
- 3.6.4 Film-based Mammography Market and Technology Trends
- 3.6.5 U.S. Market for Film-based Screening Systems
- 3.6.5.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.5.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.6.5.3 U.S. Installed Base Analysis
- 3.6.6 European Market for Film-based Mammography Systems
- 3.6.6.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.6.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.6.6.3 Installed Base Analysis
- 3.6.7 Japanese (Pacific Rim) Market for Film-based Mammography Systems
- 3.6.7.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.7.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.6.7.3 Installed Base Analysis
- 3.6.8 Rest of the World Market for Analog Screening Systems
- 3.6.8.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.8.2 Installed Base Analysis
- 3.7 Digital X-ray Mammography Market
- 3.7.1 Digital Mammography Overview
- 3.7.2 Market Overview
- 3.7.3 Product Background
- 3.7.4 Product Description
- 3.7.5 Market Drivers
- 3.7.6 Market Restraints
- 3.7.7 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.7.8 Percentage Breakdown of Revenues by Region
- 3.7.9 Market Share
- 3.7.10 U.S. Market for Digital Mammography Systems
- 3.7.10.1 Unit Sales
- 3.7.10.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.7.10.3 U.S. Installed Base Analysis
- 3.7.11 European Market for Digital Mammography Systems
- 3.7.11.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.7.11.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.7.11.3 Installed Base Analysis
- 3.7.12 Japanese (Pacific Rim) Market for Digital Mammography Systems
- 3.7.12.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 3.7.12.2 Competitive Analysis
- 3.7.12.3 Installed Base Analysis
- 4 Mammography: Growth Regulators
- 4.1 Moderators of Growth
- 4.2 Personnel Acceptance
- 4.3 Key People for Mammography
- 4.4 Key Elements for Mammography
- 4.5 Satellite Facilities
- 4.6 Reimbursement for Mammography
- 5 Business Trends in the Industry
- 5.1 Sector Consolidation
- 5.2 Mammographic Testing Growth Trends
- 5.3 Acquisition, License Agreements, Internal Development and Partnerships
- 5.4 Product Testing Depth in Mammography
- 5.5 Government Regulation
- 5.5.1 U.S. Regulation
- 5.5.1.1 Importing Medical Devices into the U.S.
- 5.5.1.2 Exporting Medical Devices from the U.S.
- 5.5.2 U.K. Regulation
- 5.5.3 E.U. Regulation
- 5.5.4 Japanese Regulation
- 5.6 Increased Market Penetration
- 6 Important Technology Trends
- 6.1 Stereoscopic Digital Mammography (SDM)
- 6.2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- 6.3 Mammography Trends
- 6.4 Computer-Aided Detection (CAD)
- 6.5 Laser Image Development
- 7 Company Profiles
- 7.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corporation
- 7.2 Carestream Health
- 7.3 CMT Medical Systems
- 7.4 Fischer Imaging (Acquired by Hologic)
- 7.5 FujiFilm Medical Systems
- 7.6 General Electric Healthcare
- 7.7 Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.
- 7.8 Hologic Inc.
- 7.9 iCAD, Inc.
- 7.10 Imaging Diagnostic Systems Inc.
- 7.11 Philips Medical Systems
- 7.12 R2 Technology, Inc (Acquired by Hologic)
- 7.13 Scanis Inc.
- 7.14 Sectra Imtec AB
- 7.15 Siemens Healthcare
- 7.16 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 7.17 Vidar Systems Corp.
- 8 Appendices
- 8.1 Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM)
- 8.2 Sources of National Cancer Institute Information
- 8.3 Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers
- 8.4 FDA Rule: State Certification of Mammography Facilities
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Worldwide Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2002-2012
- Figure 2.2: U.S. Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2002-2012
- Figure 2.3: Total Spending on Healthcare in the U.S., 1960-2007
- Figure 2.4: International Per Capita Healthcare Spending by Country, 2006
- Figure 2.5: Number Uninsured and Uninsured Rate in the U.S., 1987-2006
- Figure 2.6: Global Market Share of Contrast Media Markets, 2006
- Figure 2.7: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies, 2006
- Figure 3.1: Worldwide Market for Mammography Systems by Region, 2007
- Figure 3.2: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems by Region, 2007
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2012
- Table 2.2: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2012
- Table 2.3: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products, 2000-2007
- Table 2.4: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000-2050
- Table 2.5: Insured and Uninsured Breakdown in the U.S., 2001-2005
- Table 2.6: Percentage of Population Without Health Insurance in the U.S., 2007
- Table 2.7: Total Number of U.S. Hospitals, 2007
- Table 2.8: U.S. Radiological Images Taken, 1999-2010
- Table 2.9: Global Market Share of Contrast Media Markets, 2006
- Table 2.10: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies, 2006
- Table 2.11: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001 to 2012
- Table 3.1: U.S. Use of Mammography in Women Over 40, 1987-2005
- Table 3.2: Annual Mammography Procedures in the U.S., 2000-2008
- Table 3.3: Annual Mammography Procedures in Europe, 2002-2007
- Table 3.4: Annual Mammography Procedures in Japan, 2002-2007
- Table 3.5: Annual Mammography Procedures in the Rest of the World, 2002-2007
- Table 3.6: Mammography Facts (U.S.), 2005
- Table 3.7: Breast Cancer Survival Rates by Country
- Table 3.8: Surgical Biopsies Performed in the U.S., 2000-2007
- Table 3.9: The Worldwide Mammography Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.10: Worldwide Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.11: Worldwide Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.12: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.13: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market by Region, 2000-2010
- Table 3.14: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.15: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007
- Table 3.16: U.S. Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.17: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.18: European Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.19: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007
- Table 3.20: Japanese Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.21: Japanese Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.22: Japanese Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share
- Table 3.23: ROW Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 3.24: ROW Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.25: Advantages of Digital Mammography
- Table 3.26: Worldwide Digital General Radiography Market, 2000-2012
- Table 3.27: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems Annual Unit Sales 2000-2010
- Table 3.28: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems Dollar Volume
- 2000-2010
- Table 3.29: Worldwide Mammography Digital Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.30: Worldwide Mammography Digital Instrument Market by Region, 2000-2010
- Table 3.31: Share of Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems by Competitor, 2007
- Table 3.32: U.S. Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.33: U.S. Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.34: European Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.35: European Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 3.36: Japanese Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.37: Japanese Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.1: Medicare Reimbursement for Mammography Services, 2007
- Table 6.1: CAD Mammography Systems
- Medical Imaging Markets
- 1 Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 Scope of this Report
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Executive Summary
- 2 Overview of the Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.1.1 World Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1.2 U.S. Medical Imaging Market
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure
- 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics
- 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals
- 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists
- 2.2.4 Radiologic Services
- 2.2.5 Overview of Medical Imaging Market Segments
- 2.2.6 Market Drivers
- 2.2.7 Market Restraints
- 2.2.8 Market Segments for Medical Imaging
- 2.3 Contrast Media
- 2.3.1 Market Share
- 2.3.2 Market Drivers
- 2.4 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems
- 2.4.1 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems and Radiology Information Systems
- 2.4.2 Increasing Digitization of Cardiology Image Storage and Management Creates Market Growth Opportunities
- 2.4.3 Enterprise-Wide Integration is an Important Area for Future Market Development
- 2.4.4 Competition Among Large Companies Intensifies
- 2.4.5 Benefits of This Service
- 2.4.6 Market Sectors
- 2.4.7 Digital Imaging Technology Platforms
- 2.5 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.5.1 A Few Firms Dominate the Industry
- 2.6 Medical Imaging Industry Forecasts
- 2.7 Market Niches and Digitalization
- 2.8 Digital Imaging Techniques
- 2.8.1 Clinical Uses
- 2.8.2 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Devices Among End-Users
- 2.8.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Life Cycles and Restricts Spending
- 2.8.4 Current and New Digital Imaging Procedures
- 2.8.5 The Digital Impact on Clinical Imaging Markets
- 2.8.6 Trends in Digital Imaging
- 2.8.7 Enhancing Computed Radiography
- 2.8.8 Digital Radiography versus Computed Radiography
- 2.8.9 Digital Radiography Products
- 3 Digital Radiography Markets
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Disadvantages of Film Technology
- 3.3 Computed Radiography and Direct-to-Digital Radiography Systems
- 3.4 Digital Radiography Market Trends
- 3.5 Market Segmentation
- 3.6 Digital Radiography Market Drivers
- 3.7 Market Restraints
- 3.8 Radiography Market Forecasts
- 3.8.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 3.9 Competition
- 3.10 X-Ray Film Market Share
- 3.11 Installed Base and Procedure Forecasts
- 3.12 Digital Radiography Technology Platforms
- 3.12.1 Digital Radiography Infrastructure
- 3.12.2 Volume Levels
- 3.12.3 Vendor Choice
- 3.12.4 Computed Radiography versus Digital Radiography
- 3.12.5 Convincing the Administration
- 3.12.6 Vendor/Customer Consultation
- 3.12.7 Enhancing Computed Radiography
- 3.12.8 Digital Radiography Technology
- 3.12.9 Charge-Coupled Devices
- 3.12.10 Computed Radiography
- 3.12.11 Flat-Panel Indirect Detectors
- 3.12.12 Flat-Panel Direct Detectors
- 3.12.13 Fluoroscopy
- 3.12.14 Direct versus Indirect Detection Technology
- 3.12.15 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems
- 3.12.16 PACS Units Versus CCD Units
- 3.12.17 Slot Scan
- 3.12.18 Tiled CCD Arrays
- 3.12.19 Direct Conversion
- 3.13 Types of Digital X-Ray Imaging
- 3.13.1 From Four Components to One
- 3.13.2 The Benefits of Digital X-Ray
- 3.13.3 Image Intensifier/TV Systems
- 3.13.4 CR Technology Platforms
- 3.13.5 Charge-Coupled Devices
- 3.13.6 Scintillator with Photodiode Array
- 3.13.7 Direct Capture Using Flat-Panel Detectors
- 3.14 Digital Radiography Applications
- 3.14.1 Three-Dimensional Imaging
- 3.14.2 Cardiovascular Imaging
- 3.15 Market Factors
- 3.15.1 Portable DR Systems
- 3.15.2 Detector Choices
- 3.15.3 Software and Advanced Applications
- 3.16 Products
- 3.16.1 Agfa
- 3.16.2 Analogic
- 3.16.3 Carestream Health, Inc.
- 3.16.4 Canon Medical Systems
- 3.16.5 Fuji Medical Systems
- 3.16.6 GE Medical Systems
- 3.16.7 Imaging Dynamics
- 3.16.8 InfiMed
- 3.16.9 Konica Minolta Medical Imaging
- 3.16.10 Orex
- 3.16.11 Philips Medical Systems
- 3.16.12 Precise Optics
- 3.16.13 Quantum Medical Imaging
- 3.16.14 Siemens Medical Solutions
- 3.16.15 Shimadzu Medical Systems
- 3.16.16 Toshiba Medical Systems
- 3.16.17 Stallion Technologies
- 3.16.18 Swissray International
- 3.16.19 Trixell SAS
- 3.16.20 Varian Medical Systems
- 3.17 Manufacturers
- 4 Mammography
- 4.1 Mammography Overview
- 4.2 Breast Cancer
- 4.3 Film-based Mammography Market
- 4.3.1 Market Overview
- 4.3.2 Market Drivers
- 4.3.3 Market Restraints
- 4.3.4 Film-based Mammography Market and Technology Trends
- 4.3.5 U.S. Market for Film-based Screening Systems
- 4.3.6 European Market for Film-based Mammography Systems
- 4.4 Digital Mammography
- 4.4.1 Digital Mammography Offers Attractive Operation Costs/Ownership Benefits
- 4.5 Digital versus Standard Mammography
- 4.6 Digital Mammography Markets
- 4.6.1 Structure Unit Sales and Revenue
- 4.6.2 World Mammography Markets Revenue Forecast
- 4.7 World Mammography Markets Revenue
- 4.7.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts
- 4.7.2 Market Share
- 4.7.3 Mammography Placements and Digital Share
- 4.7.4 Competitive Structure
- 4.7.5 New Technologies and Features Essential for Future Growth
- 4.8 Digital X-Ray Mammography Technology Analysis
- 4.8.1 Product Background
- 4.8.2 Market Drivers
- 4.8.3 Market Restraints
- 4.8.4 Technological Solutions
- 4.8.5 Competitive Analysis
- 4.8.6 U.S. Installed Base Analysis
- 4.9 Trends in Digital X-Ray Imaging Markets
- 4.10 Types of Mammography Imaging
- 4.10.1 Stereoscopic Digital Mammography
- 4.10.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 4.10.3 Computer-Aided Detection
- 4.11 Products
- 4.11.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corporation
- 4.11.2 Carestream Health
- 4.11.3 CMT Medical Systems
- 4.11.4 Fischer Medical Technologies
- 4.11.5 Fujifilm Medical Systems
- 4.11.6 GE Medical Systems
- 4.11.7 Hologic
- 4.11.8 Imaging Diagnostic Systems
- 4.11.9 Sectra
- 4.11.10 Shimadzu
- 4.11.11 Siemens
- 4.12 Manufacturers
- 5 Computed Tomography Market
- 5.1 Overview
- 5.2 Market Measurements
- 5.2.1 Market Drivers
- 5.2.2 Market Restraints
- 5.3 CT Market Forecasts
- 5.3.1 U.S. Revenue Forecasts
- 5.3.2 Single-Slice Computed Tomography
- 5.3.3 Multi-slice Computed Tomography
- 5.3.4 U.S. Competitive Structure
- 5.3.5 European Market Revenue Forecasts
- 5.3.6 European Competitive Structure
- 5.4 CT Technology Platforms
- 5.4.1 Fan-Beam
- 5.4.2 Sub-Second Helical Scanners
- 5.4.3 Multi-Slice Scanners
- 5.5 CT Market Trends
- 5.5.1 Market Segmentation
- 5.6 Digital CT Applications
- 5.6.1 Introduction
- 5.6.2 Competitive Analysis
- 5.6.3 Cardiac CT and EBT Scanner Forecasts and Trends
- 5.6.4 Other Applications
- 5.7 Market Factors
- 5.8 Contrast Media
- 5.8.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 5.9 Products
- 5.9.1 Shimadzu Medical Systems
- 5.9.2 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 5.9.3 Siemens
- 5.9.4 GE Healthcare
- 5.9.5 Philips Medical Systems
- 5.9.6 Others
- 5.10 Manufacturers
- 6 Magnetic Resonance Market
- 6.1 MRI Overview
- 6.1.1 Market Segmentation and Definitions: MRI Market
- 6.2 Market Measurements
- 6.2.1 Market Drivers for Open and Closed MRI Segments
- 6.3 Market Restraints for Open and Closed MRI Segments
- 6.4 Market Drivers for Low-/Mid-/High-Field MRI Segments
- 6.5 Market Restraints for Low-/Mid-/High-Field MRI Segments
- 6.6 Revenue Forecasts
- 6.7 Unit Shipment and Installed Base Forecast
- 6.8 Procedure Forecast
- 6.8.1 Breast Imaging
- 6.8.2 Cardiac Imaging
- 6.8.3 Orthopedic Imaging
- 6.8.4 Functional MRI
- 6.8.5 The Angiography Alternative
- 6.8.6 More Directions for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 6.8.7 Buying and Selling MRI Market Dynamics
- 6.9 Competitive Structure: Open and Closed Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 6.10 Competitive Structure: Low-/Mid-/High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 6.11 Market Analysis
- 6.12 Contrast Media
- 6.12.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 6.13 Products
- 6.13.1 Choy Medical Technologies
- 6.13.2 ETS-Lindgren
- 6.13.3 Fonar Corporation
- 6.13.4 Hitachi
- 6.13.5 Machnet BV
- 6.13.6 Mallinckrodt
- 6.13.7 Medis Medical Imaging Systems BV
- 6.13.8 Mednovus, Inc.
- 6.13.9 ONI Medical Systems
- 6.13.10 Philips Medical Systems
- 6.14 Manufacturers
- 7 Ultrasound Market
- 7.1 Ultrasound Market Trends
- 7.1.1 Overview
- 7.1.2 Market Segmentation and Definitions
- 7.1.3 Market Developments
- 7.1.4 Market Drivers
- 7.1.5 Market Restraints
- 7.2 Ultrasound Market Forecasts
- 7.2.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 7.2.2 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 7.2.3 Installed Base Forecast
- 7.2.4 Competitive Structure
- 7.2.5 Market Analysis
- 7.3 Cardiology Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 7.3.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 7.3.2 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 7.3.3 Market Share Analysis
- 7.4 OB/GYN Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 7.5 Radiology Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 7.6 Handheld Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 7.6.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 7.6.2 Market Share Analysis
- 7.7 Contrast Media
- 7.7.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 7.7.2 Market Share Analysis
- 7.8 New Transducer Technology
- 7.9 Intravascular Ultrasound
- 7.10 Products
- 7.10.1 Ardent Sound
- 7.10.2 CIVCO Medical Instruments
- 7.10.3 Fischer Medical Technologies
- 7.10.4 GE Healthcare
- 7.10.5 Medison Co. Ltd.
- 7.10.6 Mindray Co. Ltd.
- 7.10.7 Philips Medical
- 7.10.8 Sea Ridge Software
- 7.10.9 Siemens Medical
- 7.10.10 Sony Medical Products
- 7.10.11 SonoSite Inc.
- 7.10.12 TeraRecon
- 7.10.13 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 7.10.14 U-Systems
- 7.10.15 ZONARE Medical Systems
- 7.11 Manufacturers
- 8 Nuclear Imaging Market
- 8.1 Market Overview
- 8.2 Market Segmentation and Definitions
- 8.3 Market Trends
- 8.4 Market Drivers
- 8.5 Market Restraints
- 8.6 Gamma Camera Market Forecasts
- 8.6.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 8.7 Competition
- 8.8 Market Share
- 8.9 Market Factors
- 8.10 Installed Base and Procedure Forecasts
- 8.11 Gamma Camera Technology Platforms
- 8.11.1 Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- 8.11.2 Attenuation Correction Technology
- 8.11.3 Charge-Coupled Devices
- 8.11.4 Flat-Panel Indirect Detectors
- 8.11.5 Flat-Panel Direct Detectors
- 8.11.6 Fluoroscopy
- 8.11.7 Direct and Indirect Detection Technology
- 8.11.8 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems
- 8.11.9 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems versus Charge-Coupled Devices
- 8.12 Types of Gamma Camera Imaging
- 8.12.1 Image Intensifier/Television Systems
- 8.12.2 Scintillator with Photodiode Array
- 8.13 Gamma Camera Applications
- 8.13.1 Prostate Cancer
- 8.13.2 Scintimammography
- 8.13.3 Cardiovascular Imaging
- 8.14 PET Market
- 8.14.1 Total PET and PET/CT Market Trends
- 8.14.2 Total PET and PET/CT Market Forecasts
- 8.14.3 Stand-Alone PET Market Forecasts
- 8.14.4 PET/CT Market Forecasts
- 8.15 Products
- 8.15.1 Eurorad-Euromedical
- 8.15.2 Gamma Medica
- 8.15.3 GE Medical Systems
- 8.15.4 Mallinckrodt
- 8.15.5 Naviscan PET Systems
- 8.15.6 Philips Medical Systems
- 8.15.7 TeraRecon
- 8.15.8 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 8.15.9 Siemens
- 8.16 Manufacturers
- 9 PACS Markets
- 9.1 PACS Market Trends
- 9.1.1 Market Segmentation and Definitions
- 9.1.2 Overview
- 9.1.3 Market Measurements
- 9.1.4 Market Drivers
- 9.1.5 Market Restraints
- 9.2 PACS Market Forecasts
- 9.2.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 9.2.2 Installed Base and Penetration Forecasts
- 9.2.3 Competitive Structure
- 9.2.4 Market Share Analysis
- 9.3 PACS Software and Services
- 9.4 PACS Hardware Solutions
- 9.4.1 RIS/PACS Revenue Forecasts
- 9.5 Products
- 9.5.1 Carestream Health Inc.
- 9.5.2 Cedara Software
- 9.5.3 DeJarnette Research Systems
- 9.5.4 Dynamic Imaging
- 9.5.5 FujiFilm Medical Systems USA
- 9.5.6 GE Healthcare (RIS/PACS)
- 9.5.7 IMCO Technologies
- 9.5.8 Infinitt North America
- 9.5.9 Intelerad Medical Systems, Inc.
- 9.5.10 Intuitive Imaging Informatics, LLC
- 9.5.11 McKesson Corporation
- 9.5.12 Merge Healthcare
- 9.5.13 MIMvista Corp.
- 9.5.14 NovaRad Corp.
- 9.5.15 Philips Medical Systems (PACS)
- 9.5.16 ODS Medical
- 9.5.17 RamSoft, Inc.
- 9.5.18 Siemens Medical Solutions (RIS/PACS)
- 9.5.19 ScImage
- 9.5.20 Sectra Imtec AB
- 9.5.21 Thinking Systems Corporation
- 9.6 Manufacturers
- 10 Three-Dimensional Imaging Markets
- 10.1 Total 3D Imaging Market Trends
- 10.1.1 Overview
- 10.1.2 Market Drivers
- 10.1.3 Market Restraints
- 10.2 Total 3D Imaging Market Forecasts
- 10.3 Three-Dimensional CT/MRI/Angiography Market Forecasts
- 10.4 Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Market Forecasts
- 10.5 Three-Dimensional Imaging Markets
- 10.6 Manufacturers
- 11 Emerging Technologies and Products
- 11.1 Global Picture Archiving and Communication Systems
- 11.2 Image Processing
- 11.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 11.4 Computed Tomography for Calcium Scoring
- 11.5 Vasodilator Perfusion Imaging
- 11.6 Real-time Three-Dimensional Scanning
- 11.7 Optical Imaging
- 12 Products by Modality
- 12.1 Comparing Modalities
- 12.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 12.3 Computed Tomography
- 12.4 Mammography
- 12.5 Digital Mammography
- 12.6 Positron Emission Tomography
- 12.7 Reimbursement
- 12.8 X-Ray
- 12.9 Vascular X-Ray
- 12.10 Digital Modalities
- 12.11 Digital Benefits
- 13 Market Analysis by Modality
- 13.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 13.1.1 Products
- 13.2 Computed Tomography
- 13.2.1 Products
- 13.3 Nuclear Medicine
- 13.3.1 Products
- 13.4 X-Ray
- 13.4.1 Products
- 13.5 Digital Mammography
- 13.5.1 Products
- 14 Business Trends in the Industry
- 14.1 Sector Consolidation
- 14.2 Medical Imaging Growth Trends
- 14.3 Mergers and Acquisitions
- 14.3.1 Center for Diagnostic Imaging Signs With Medicalis
- 14.3.2 HealthSouth Sells Diagnostic Division to The Gores Group
- 14.3.3 AMICAS Acquires Technology Partners’ Practice Management Software
- 14.3.4 MDS Nordion and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Enter Collaboration
- 14.3.5 NightHawk Radiology Holdings Acquires Teleradiology Diagnostic Service
- 14.3.6 Siemens Acquires German HIS Company
- 14.3.7 Siemens Medical Finalizes Acquisition of Bayer’s Diagnostics Division
- 14.3.8 GE Healthcare Acquires Dynamic Imaging
- 14.3.9 Hologic Acquires BioLucent
- 14.4 Product Testing Depth in Medical Imaging Testing
- 14.5 Government Regulation
- 14.5.1 U.S. Regulation
- 14.5.2 U.K. Regulation
- 14.5.3 E.U. Regulation
- 14.5.4 Japanese Regulation
- 14.6 Increased Market Penetration
- 15 Company Profiles
- 15.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corp.
- 15.2 Analogic Corp.
- 15.3 Canon
- 15.4 Carestream Health, Inc. (formally Kodak Health Imaging Division)
- 15.5 CMT Medical Technologies
- 15.6 Confirma, Inc.
- 15.7 DALSA
- 15.8 Del Medical Systems
- 15.9 Fischer Imaging
- 15.10 Fonar Corp.
- 15.11 FujiFilm Medical Systems USA
- 15.12 General Electric Healthcare
- 15.13 Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.
- 15.14 Hologic, Inc.
- 15.15 iCAD, Inc.
- 15.16 Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc.
- 15.17 IMIX
- 15.18 InfiMed, Inc.
- 15.19 Medison Co., Ltd.
- 15.20 Philips Medical Systems
- 15.21 Scanis Inc.
- 15.22 Sectra
- 15.23 Schick Technologies, Inc.
- 15.24 Siemens Healthcare
- 15.25 Swissray International
- 15.26 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 15.27 Trixell SAS
- 15.28 Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
- 15.29 Vidar Sytems Corp.
- 16 Appendices
- 16.1 Digital Database for Screening Mammography
- 16.2 Sources of National Cancer Institute Information
- 16.3 Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers
- 16.4 FDA Rule: State Certification of Mammography Facilities
- LIST OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Total Spending on Healthcare in the U.S., 1960-2007
- Figure 2.2: International Healthcare Spending Per Capita Per Country, 2006
- LIST OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2013
- Table 2.2: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2013
- Table 2.3: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products
- Table 2.4: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000-2050
- Table 2.5: Hospital Survey, 2007
- Table 2.6: U.S. Radiological Images Taken, 1999-2010
- Table 2.7: Market Share of Contrast Media Markets, 2006
- Table 2.8: Worldwide Market Share Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies, 2006
- Table 2.9: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001-2013
- Table 3.1: World Market for Digital General Radiography Systems, 2000-2013
- Table 3.2: U.S. Digital Radiography Unit Sales, 2002-2013
- Table 3.3: X-Ray Film Brand Market Segment, U.S. Market Share, 2006
- Table 3.4: Average Examination Times: Cassette-Based Computed Radiography versus Digital Radiography
- Table 3.5: Manufacturers of CCD-Based Digital Radiography Systems
- Table 4.1: U.S. Use of Mammography in Women Over 40, 1987-2005
- Table 4.2: Annual Mammography Procedures in the U.S., 2000-2008
- Table 4.3: Annual Mammography Procedures in Europe, 2002-2007
- Table 4.4: Annual Mammography Procedures in Japan, 2002-2007
- Table 4.5: Annual Mammography Procedures in the Rest of the World, 2002-2007
- Table 4.6: Breast Cancer Survival Rates by Country
- Table 4.7: Surgical Biopsies Performed in the U.S., 2000-2007
- Table 4.8: Worldwide Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.9: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 4.10: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market by Region, 2000-2010
- Table 4.11: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 4.12: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007
- Table 4.13: U.S. Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.14: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 4.15: European Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.16: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007
- Table 4.17: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems, Annual Unit Sales, 2000-2012
- Table 4.18: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems, 2000-2012
- Table 4.19: U.S. Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2012
- Table 4.20: Share of Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems by Competitor, 2007
- Table 4.21: The Worldwide Mammography Instrument Market, 2000-2010
- Table 4.22: Worldwide Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.23: U.S. Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010
- Table 4.24: CAD Mammography Systems
- Table 5.1: U.S. CT Scans per Year, 2001-2010
- Table 5.2: U.S. Market for CT Scanners, 2001-2013
- Table 5.3: U.S. Market for Single-Slice CT Scanners, 2001-2010
- Table 5.4: European Market for CT Scanners, 2006-2013
- Table 5.5: CT Contrast Media Market Size and Growth, 2000-2013
- Table 6.1: U.S. MRI Scans per Year, 2001-2012
- Table 6.2: The High-Field (1T and Up) MRI Market, 2001-2012
- Table 6.3: The Mid-Field (0.5T to 0.9T) MRI Market, 2001-2012
- Table 6.4: The Low-Field (Below 0.5T) MRI Market, 1999-2012
- Table 6.5: Installed Base of Cardiac MRI Units, 1999-2012
- Table 6.6: MRI Contrast Media Market Size and Growth, 2000-2012
- Table 7.1: Worldwide Ultrasound Procedures, 2000-2012
- Table 7.2: Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2000-2012
- Table 7.3: U.S. Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2000-2012
- Table 7.4: Worldwide Cardiology Ultrasound Procedures, 2000-2012
- Table 7.5: Worldwide Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2000-2012
- Table 7.6: U.S. Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2000-2012
- Table 7.7: U.S. Sales of Handheld Ultrasound Equipment, 2000-2012
- Table 7.8: Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Contrast Agents, 1999-2012
- Table 8.1: World Radiopharmaceutical Scans, 2001-2010
- Table 8.2: World Market for Gamma Camera Scans, 2002-2012
- Table 8.3: Worldwide Dollar Sales of PET Imaging Systems, 2004-2012
- Table 8.4: U.S. Dollar Sales of PET Imaging Systems, 2004-2012
- Table 8.5: Unit Sales of PET Imaging Systems, U.S. and Worldwide, 2004-2012
- Table 8.6: Installed Base of PET Imaging Systems, 2004-2012
- Table 8.7: PET Procedure Volume, 2004-2012
- Table 8.8: FDG Sales, 2004-2012
- Table 8.9: Unit Sales of PET Imaging Systems, U.S. and Worldwide, 2004-2012
- Table 8.10: U.S. PET/CT Scanner Market Size and Growth, 2002-2012
- Table 9.1: U.S. Market for PACS, 2004-2012
- Table 9.2: Penetration Rates of PACS in U.S. Hospitals, 2006-2012
- Table 13.1: World Medical Diagnostic Market for MRI Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.2: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for MRI Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.3: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for MRI Systems Less Than 1T, 2002-2012
- Table 13.4: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for MRI Systems More Than 1T, 2002-2012
- Table 13.5: World Medical Diagnostic Market for CT Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.6: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for CT Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.7: World Medical Diagnostic Market for Nuclear Medicine, 2002-2012
- Table 13.8: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for Nuclear Medicine, 2002-2012
- Table 13.9: World Medical Diagnostic Market for X-Ray Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.10: U.S. Medical Diagnostic Market for X-Ray Systems, 2002-2012
- Table 13.11: World Medical Diagnostic Market for Digital X-Ray Systems, 2002-
- Nuclear Cardiology Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Objectives
- 1.2 Scope
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Executive Summary
- 2. Medical Imaging Market Analysis
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure
- 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics
- 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals
- 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists
- 2.2.4 Radiology Services
- 2.2.5 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.2.6 Market Drivers
- 2.2.6.1 Product Enhancements
- 2.2.6.2 Contrast Agents Development
- 2.2.6.3 Innovation
- 2.2.7 Market Restraints
- 2.2.8 Market Segments for Medical Imaging
- 2.2.8.1 Discovery
- 2.2.8.2 Clinical Applications
- 2.2.8.3 Clinical Trials
- 2.2.8.4 Outpatient Facilities
- 2.2.8.5 Technology Advances in Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
- 2.2.8.6 Safety and Ergonomics Concerns
- 2.2.8.7 Volumetric Imaging
- 2.2.8.8 Digital Radiography (DR)
- 2.2.8.9 Contrast Media
- 3. Nuclear Medicine and Nuclear Cardiology Market
- 3.1 Medical Imaging Industry Forecasts
- 3.2 Hardware Companies (Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation)
- 3.3 Software Companies (Image Processing and PACS)
- 3.4 Radiopharmaceuticals and Pharmaceuticals Companies
- 3.5 Ancillary Products Companies
- 3.6 Service and Support Companies
- 3.7 Nuclear Cardiology Market
- 3.8 Hardware (PET, SPECT and Hybrids)
- 3.8.1 Scanner Investment: Not Just a Cardiology Market
- 3.8.1.1 Impact of Alzheimer’s Reimbursement
- 3.8.2 Sales Trends for PET Scanners
- 3.8.3 Market Consolidation in the U.S.
- 3.8.4 Learning Curve Impact for PET
- 3.8.5 Hardware Market Trends
- 3.9 Software (PACS and RIS)
- 3.10 Radiopharmaceuticals
- 3.10.1 Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals
- 3.10.2 Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals
- 4. Products Analysis
- 4.1 Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation
- 4.1.1 PET Scan
- 4.1.2 SPECT Scan
- 4.1.2.1 Heart Imaging
- 4.1.3 PET Versus SPECT
- 4.1.4 Hybrid Technology
- 4.2 Image Processing: PACS
- 4.2.1 PACS and Nuclear Medicine
- 4.2.2 Difficulties in Making PACS Work with Nuclear Medicine
- 4.2.1.2 3-D and Quantitative Analysis
- 4.2.1.5 Small Market Opportunities
- 4.3 Radiopharmaceuticals and Pharmaceuticals
- 4.3.1 Introduction
- 4.3.2 Background
- 4.3.3 Areas of Current Interest
- 5. Regulations, Reimbursements and Other Issues
- 5.1 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- 5.1.1 FDA Guidance
- 5.1.2 FDA Nuclear Medicine Coalition
- 5.2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
- 5.2.1 What NRC Regulates
- 5.2.2 How NRC Regulates
- 5.2.3 Related Information
- 5.3 Memorandum of Understanding between NRC and FDA
- 5.3.1 Authorities and Regulatory Programs
- 5.4 Current NRC Issues and Actions
- 5.4.1 Meetings
- 5.4.2 Program and Policy Issues
- 5.4.3 Recently Issued Significant Enforcement Actions
- 5.4.3.1 Stark II Regulations
- 5.4.3.2 Recent Impact of Stark II Regulations
- 5.4.3.3 Reimbursement
- 6. Business Affairs (Mergers, Acquisitions and Partnerships)
- 6.1 Recent Corporate Partnerships and Mergers
- 6.2 Recent Industry Activity
- 6.3 Product Launches and Developments
- 7. Technology Trends
- 7.1 Hardware (Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation)
- 7.2 Software (PACS)
- 7.2.1 Problems Interfacing PACS and NM
- 7.2.2 SNM and IHE
- 7.2.3 IHE Nuclear Medicine Profile
- 7.2.4 What Next?
- 7.2.5 Optimal Patient Care
- 7.2.6 Four Steps to Standards Adoption
- 7.2.7 Technical Framework: Business with Technology
- 7.2.8 Leading by Example
- 7.2.9 IHE and Electronic Health Record (EHR)
- 7.3 Radiopharmaceuticals and Pharmaceuticals
- 7.3.1 Market Share
- 7.3.2 Contrast Media Market Drivers
- 7.3.3 Contrast Media Market Sector Overview
- 7.3.4 Contrast Media Market Analysis
- 7.3.5 Growth Prospects for Contrast Media
- 7.4 Market Sector Analysis
- 7.5 Leading Companies in General Medical Imaging
- 8. Company Profiles
- 8.1 Hardware (Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation)
- 8.1.1 AccuSync Medical Research
- 8.1.2 Bristol-Myers Squibb (Medical Imaging)
- 8.1.3 Capintec
- 8.1.4 CardiArc
- 8.1.5 Cardinal Health (Cardiology Solutions)
- 8.1.6 Digirad
- 8.1.7 GE Healthcare
- 8.1.8 GVI Medical Devices
- 8.1.9 Hitachi Medical Systems America
- 8.1.10 IS2 Medical Systems
- 8.1.11 Mediso
- 8.1.12 Philips Medical
- 8.1.13 Positron
- 8.1.14 Siemens Medical
- 8.1.15 Spectrum Dynamics
- 8.2 Software (Image Processing and PACS)
- 8.2.1 Heartlab
- 8.2.2 Hermes Medical Solutions
- 8.2.3 INVIA
- 8.2.4 McKesson
- 8.2.5 MedImage
- 8.2.6 MIMvista
- 8.2.7 Numa
- 8.2.8 ProSolv Cardiovascular
- 8.2.9 Scientific Imaging
- 8.2.10 Segami Corporation
- 8.2.11 Syntermed
- 8.2.12 Thinking Systems Corporation
- 8.2.13 UltraSPECT
- 8.2.14 Witt Biomedical Corporation
- 8.3 Radiopharmaceuticals and Pharmaceuticals
- 8.3.1 Astellas Pharma U.S.
- 8.3.2 Bracco Diagnostics
- 8.3.3 Isotope Products Laboratories
- 8.3.4 Izotop: Institute of Isotopes
- 8.3.5 Mallinckrodt
- 8.3.6 Merck
- 8.3.7 NuView Radiopharmaceuticals
- 8.3.8 Pfizer
- 8.3.9 Tyco Healthcare
- 8.4 Ancillary Products
- 8.4.1 CNMTStore.com
- 8.4.2 Data Spectrum Corporation
- 8.4.3 Daxor Corporation
- 8.4.4 Ivy Biomedical Systems
- 8.4.5 MarCal Medical
- 8.5 Service and Support
- 8.5.1 BC Technical
- 8.5.2 Diagnostix Plus
- 8.5.3 MedAxiom
- 8.5.4 MediNuclear Corporation (MNC)
- 8.5.5 MEDX
- 8.5.6 Pinestar Technology
- 8.5.7 Technology Imaging Services
- 8.6 Other Business Opportunities
- 9. Other Elements of Nuclear Medicine Industry
- 9.1 Nuclear Medicine: Guidelines, Certification and Societies
- 9.1.1 American College of Radiology (ACR)
- 9.1.2 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC)
- 9.1.3 Associates in Medical Physics (AMP)
- 9.1.4 Certification Board of Nuclear Cardiology (CBNC)
- 9.1.5 ICANL
- 9.1.6 IHE
- 9.1.7 ISO
- 9.1.8 MedPage Today
- 9.1.9 Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board (NMTCB)
- 9.1.10 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT)
- 9.1.11 Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM)
- 9.2 Nuclear Medicine: Publications
- 9.2.1 Elsevier
- 9.2.2 HRA Research
- 9.2.3 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 3.1: U.S. Nuclear Imaging Procedures
- Figure 3.2: Digirad--Growth of Nuclear Imaging Procedures, 2004-2006
- Figure 4.1: Nuclear Imaging
- Figure 4.2: PET Scan
- Figure 4.3: SPECT Scan
- Figure 4.4: PET-CT Scan
- Figure 4.5: SPECT-CT Scan
- Figure 7.1: IHE Technical Framework
- Figure 7.2: IHE Framework Organization
- Figure 7.3: IHE Actors and Transactions
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 2.2: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 2.3: U.S. Health Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP, 2000-2010
- Table 2.4: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products
- Table 2.5: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000-2050
- Table 2.6: Hospital Survey
- Table 2.7: Percent Change in Volume of Examinations per Imaging Modality, 1993-2004
- Table 2.8: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging Companies
- Table 2.9: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001 to 2010
- Table 2.10: Data Sources for Nuclear Medicine Professionals and Facilities
- Table 7.1: Market Share of Contrast Media Players
- Table 7.2: Contrast Media Market Growth, 2003-2010
- Table 7.3: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001-2010
- Table 8.1: Astellas Alliances
- Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS)
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About This Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2. The Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure
- 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics
- 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals
- 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists
- 2.2.4 Radiology Services
- 2.2.5 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.2.6 Market Drivers
- 2.2.6.1 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Procedures Among End-Users
- 2.2.6.2 Potential of Novel Contrast Agents Development to Drive Imaging Procedure Volumes
- 2.2.6.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Lifecycles and Restricts Spending
- 2.2.7 Market Restraints
- 2.2.8 Market Aspects
- 2.2.8.1 Molecular Imaging
- 2.2.8.2 Outpatient Facilities are the Best Growth Market
- 2.2.8.3 Diagnostic Imaging Modalities Witness Several Technology Advancements
- 2.2.8.4 Safety and Ergonomics Concerns Drive Technology Growth
- 2.2.8.5 Volumetric Imaging and Post-Image Processing Techniques Develop Rapidly
- 2.2.8.6 Increasing Implementation of PACS Units Pushes Digital Radiography into High Gear
- 2.2.8.7 Future Price Reduction Set to Stimulate Wider Acceptance of DR Systems
- 2.2.8.8 High-Performance Imaging Combined with Lower Radiation Doses Spurs DR Growth
- 2.3 Market Sector Analysis
- 2.3.1 Competition
- 2.3.2 Penetration Rates of PACS
- 3. PACS Market
- 3.1 PACS Technology
- 3.1.1 PACS History
- 3.1.1.1 In the Beginning
- 3.1.1.2 PACS Pioneers
- 3.1.1.3 Early Efforts
- 3.1.1.4 Early PACS Efforts
- 3.1.1.5 DICOM Begins
- 3.1.1.6 Filmless
- 3.1.1.7 Today and Tomorrow
- 3.1.2 Image Acquisition
- 3.1.3 Distribution and Communication
- 3.1.4 Archiving
- 3.1.5 Servers
- 3.1.6 Image Display Systems
- 3.1.7 PACS Drivers
- 3.1.8 Barriers
- 3.2 PACS Vendors
- 3.3 Leading PACS Vendors
- 3.4 PACS Societies
- 3.5 PACS Forecasts
- 3.6 Market Dynamics
- 3.6.1 Market Challenges
- 3.6.2 Integrating Imaging Systems
- 3.6.3 Lack of Funding can Stall Introduction of PACS
- 3.6.4 Determining and Defining the Return on Investment (ROI) of PACS Solutions
- 3.6.5 Effective PACS Training
- 3.6.6 PACS Outside the Radiology Department and the Hospital
- 3.6.7 Development of Web-based and GUI PACS Solutions
- 3.6.8 How Much is Enough Storage?
- 3.6.9 Information Lifecycle Management (ILM)
- 3.6.9.1 The Process
- 3.6.9.2 Automation
- 3.6.9.3 Simplified Disaster Recovery
- 3.6.9.4 Better Backups
- 3.6.9.5 Solving the problem
- 3.6.10 Always Online PACS
- 3.6.11 Cost of Electronic Storage and Data Transfer Decreasing (Moore’s Law)
- 3.6.12 Hospital CEOs and PACS
- 3.6.13 PACS and RIS Integration Benefits
- 3.6.13.1 Brokered Versus Integrated RIS/PACS
- 3.6.14 The Healthcare Leadership Council Congressional Recommendations
- 3.6.15 Deployment of Filmless Environments Attracting the Best Recruits
- 3.6.15.1 Planning for Migration from One PACS to Another?
- 3.6.15.2 Critical Success Factors as Seen by the Referring Physicians
- 3.6.15.3 Connecting PACS to Results: Text and Images Together
- 3.6.15.4 ROI on PACS and RIS
- 3.6.15.5 Advantages of Outsourcing Digital Storage Rather than Implementing an Archive in House
- 3.6.15.6 Special Considerations in PACS for Extensive Remote or Outsourced Image Reading
- 3.6.15.7 Enhancing Workflow to Optimize Service to Emergency Medicine
- 3.6.15.8 Customer Support for PACS: Guidelines
- 3.6.15.9 RIS/PACS Target Outcomes and Benefit Realization
- 3.6.15.10 How PACS Helps Radiology Deal with CR?
- 3.6.15.11 Interfaced, Integrated and Unified PACS
- 3.7 PACS Usage
- 3.8 Purchase Options
- 3.8.1 Turnkey
- 3.8.2 Software-only PACS (Best of Breed/Unbundled Solutions)
- 3.8.3 Web-based PACS
- 3.8.4 Application Service Provider
- 3.9 Telemedicine/Teleradiology
- 3.9.1 Opportunities
- 3.9.1.1 Civilian
- 3.9.1.2 Military
- 3.10 Software (Image Processing, PACS, etc.) Companies
- 3.11 Software (PACS and RIS)
- 4. Regulations and Standards
- 4.1 HIPAA
- 4.1.1 Title I: Healthcare Access, Portability and Renewability
- 4.1.2 Title II: Preventing Healthcare Fraud and Abuse, Administrative Simplification and Medical Liability Reform
- 4.1.2.1 The Privacy Rule
- 4.1.2.2 The Transactions and Code Sets Rule
- 4.1.2.3 The Security Rule
- 4.1.2.4 The Unique Identifiers Rule (National Provider Identifier)
- 4.1.2.5 The Enforcement Rule
- 4.2 DICOM
- 4.2.1 History
- 4.2.2 DICOM Data Format
- 4.2.3 DICOM Services
- 4.2.3.1 Store
- 4.2.3.2 Storage Commitment
- 4.2.3.3 Query/Retrieve
- 4.2.3.4 Modality Worklist
- 4.2.3.5 Modality Performed Procedure Step
- 4.2.3.6 Printing
- 4.2.3.7 Off-line Media (DICOM Files)
- 4.2.4 Application Areas
- 4.3 HL7
- 4.3.1 What Does the Name HL7 Mean?
- 4.3.2 Why HL7?
- 4.3.3 How is HL7 Organized?
- 4.3.4 New and Ongoing Initiatives
- 4.3.4.1 HIPAA
- 4.3.4.2 The Reference Information Model (RIM)
- 4.4 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium
- 4.5 The IHE
- 4.6 Optimal Patient Care
- 4.7 The Four Steps of the Process
- 4.8 The Technical Framework—Business and Technology Together
- 4.9 Leading by Example
- 4.10 IHE and the EHR
- 4.11 Nuclear Medicine Special Issues
- 4.11.1 SNM and the IHE
- 4.11.2 Problems interfacing PACS and NM
- 4.11.3 The IHE Nuclear Medicine Profile
- 4.11.4 The Next Step
- 4.12 Government Healthcare Initiatives Creates Opportunities for PACS Vendors
- 5. Technology Trends
- 5.1 Content-based Image Retrieval (CBIR)
- 5.2 Digital Dashboard
- 5.3 Digital Dashboard Example: PACSPulse
- 5.4 Paperless Workflow in PACS
- 5.5 Process and Workflow Example for RIS PACS Integration
- 5.6 Process and Workflow Example for High Speed CT
- 6. Company Profiles
- 6.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corp.
- 6.2 Canon
- 6.3 Carestream Health, Inc. (Formerly Kodak Health Imaging Division)
- 6.4 Cerner Corporation
- 6.5 DR Systems
- 6.6 Dynamic Imaging
- 6.7 Emageon
- 6.8 FujiFilm Medical Systems USA
- 6.9 GE Healthcare (RIS/PACS)
- 6.10 Hitachi Medical Systems America
- 6.11 IBM (PACS)
- 6.12 IMCO Technologies
- 6.13 Intelerad Medical System
- 6.14 McKesson Corporation
- 6.15 Merge Healthcare (Acquired eMed Technologies)
- 6.16 Philips Medical Systems (PACS)
- 6.17 ScImage
- 6.18 Siemens Medical Solutions (RIS/PACS)
- 6.19 SmartPACS (Newly Renamed to Infinitt)
- 6.20 Thinking Systems Corporation
- 7. Manufacturers
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Total Spending on Healthcare in the U.S., 1960-2007
- Figure 2.2: International Per Capita Healthcare Spending by Country, 2006
- Figure 3.1: Representative PACS Architecture
- Figure 3.2: PACS Facilities Shown by Number of Exams/Procedures Performed Per Year
- Figure 3.3: Modalities Offered by PACS Facilities
- Figure 3.4: US Facilities with PACS
- Figure 3.5: PACS Installation Duration
- Figure 3.6: Number of Vendors Evaluated
- Figure 3.7 Ranking of PACS Evaluation Factors
- Figure 3.8 PACS Features Considered in Evaluating PACS
- Figure 3.9 PACS Vendor Aspects Considered in Evaluating PACS
- Figure 3.10: Number of Service Calls
- Figure 3.11: PACS Satisfaction
- Figure 3.12: Vendor’s US Market Share
- Figure 4.1: IHE Technical Framework
- Figure 4.2: IHE Framework Organization
- Figure 5.1: Digital Dashboard
- Figure 5.2: PACSPulse Architecture
- Figure 5.3: The Usage and Performance Dashboard
- Figure 5.4: Paper Versus Paperless PACS Workflow
- Figure 5.5: PACS Workflow Example for a CT System
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 2.2: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 2.3: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products, 2000-2007
- Table 2.4: Total Number of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000-2050
- Table 2.5: Hospital Survey
- Table 2.6: Percent Change in Volume of Examinations Per Imaging Modality between 1993 and 2004
- Table 2.7: Worldwide Market Share Medical Imaging Companies
- Table 2.8: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001-2010
- Table 2.9: Penetration Rates of PACS in U.S. Hospitals, 2006-2012
- Table 3.1: List of Vendors
- Table 3.2: U.S. Market for PACS, 2004-2012
- Table 3.3: Worldwide and Regional Markets for PACS, 2004-2012
- Table 3.4: European PACS Expenditures, 2004-2012
- Table 3.5: ECRI Criteria for PACS Evaluation
- Table 3.6: Healthcare Leadership Council
- Table 3.7: Healthcare Leadership Council Summary of HIT Benefits
- Table 3.8: PACS Placements by Facility Type
- Table 3.9: Vendor’s US Market Share
- Table 4.1: IHE Actors and Transactions
- Table 5.1: The Usage and Performance Dashboard
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Markets
- 1 Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 Scope of this Report
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Executive Summary
- 2 Overview of the Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure
- 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics
- 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals
- 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists
- 2.2.4 Radiologic Services
- 2.2.5 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.2.6 Medical Imaging Market Drivers
- 2.2.7 Market Restraints
- 2.2.8 Market Segments for PET Imaging
- 2.2.9 Key Players in the PET Imaging Segment
- 2.2.10 Medical Imaging Sector Analysis
- 2.3 Structure and Use of PET Imaging
- 2.3.1 Functional Imaging versus Anatomic Imaging
- 2.3.2 Functional Imaging Using Single-Photon Imaging (SPECT)
- 2.3.3 PET in Clinical Use
- 2.3.4 PET Sensitivity
- 2.3.5 Therapeutic Uses of PET
- 2.3.6 PET/CT
- 2.3.7 The Future of PET in Cancer Imaging
- 2.3.8 PET Reimbursement
- 2.4 Radiopharmaceutical Imaging
- 2.4.1 Cardinal Health Acquires PET Radiopharmaceutical Production Facilities
- 2.4.2 GE Healthcare Launches New Platform for Automated Synthesis of PET Radiopharmaceuticals
- 2.4.3 Siemens Medical PETNET Radiopharmacy
- 2.4.4 Future Growth of PET Imaging Procedures
- 2.4.5 Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals: Market Analysis and Future Prospects
- 2.4.6 New Radiopharmaceutical Applications
- 3 PET Market
- 3.1 Market Size
- 3.2 Total PET and PET/CT Market Trends
- 3.2.1 Market Segmentation and Definitions
- 3.2.2 Overview
- 3.2.3 Market Measurements
- 3.2.4 Market Drivers
- 3.2.5 Market Restraints
- 3.2.6 Future Needs for Market Development
- 3.2.7 Clinical Usages
- 3.3 Total PET and PET/CT Market Forecasts
- 3.3.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 3.3.2 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 3.3.3 Procedure Forecast
- 3.3.4 Competitive Structure
- 3.3.5 Market Share Analysis
- 3.3.6 Future Directions for PET
- 3.3.7 New PET Technology Platforms
- 3.4 SPECT Market Forecasts
- 3.5 Stand-Alone PET Market Forecasts
- 3.5.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 3.5.2 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 3.5.3 Market Share Analysis
- 3.6 PET/CT Market Forecasts
- 3.6.1 PET/CT Revenue Forecasts
- 3.6.2 PET/CT Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 3.6.3 PET/CT Market Share Analysis
- 3.7 Products
- 3.7.1 Gamma Medica
- 3.7.2 Mallinckrodt
- 3.7.3 Naviscan PET Systems
- 3.7.4 Siemens Medical
- 3.7.5 TeraRecon
- 3.7.6 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 3.7.7 CTI Molecular Imaging Inc.
- 3.7.8 GE Healthcare
- 3.7.9 Philips Medical Systems
- 3.7.10 MedImage Inc.
- 4 PET/CT
- 4.1 Strengths of CT and PET Scanning
- 4.2 Combining CT’s Strengths with PET Scanning
- 4.3 Nuclear Medicine Safety Protocols
- 4.4 PET Safety Protocols
- 4.4.1 Radiation Safety
- 4.4.2 Appropriate Shielding
- 4.4.3 Radioactive Package Protocols
- 4.5 Regulatory Requirements
- 4.6 PET and SPECT Tracers
- 4.6.1 FDG Centers
- 4.7 PET Imaging
- 4.8 PET and Cancer Staging
- 4.9 PET/CT Reimbursement
- 5 Hybrid Technology: PET/CT and SPECT/CT
- 5.1 PET/CT
- 5.2 SPECT/CT
- 5.2.1 Blending of Technology Platforms
- 5.2.2 SPECT vs. PET
- 6 SPECT and SPECT/CT
- 6.1 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
- 6.1.1 SPECT Imaging
- 6.1.2 SPECT Instrumentation
- 6.1.3 SPECT Market
- 6.2 SPECT/CT
- 6.2.1 Differences between PET and SPECT
- 6.3 Potential Applications of SPECT/CT
- 6.3.1 SPECT/CT in Cardiology
- 6.3.2 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- 6.3.3 Functional Brain Imaging
- 6.3.4 SPECT/CT in General Nuclear Medicine
- 6.3.5 SPECT/CT in Neurology
- 6.3.6 Oncology Applications
- 6.4 New Technology Platforms: SPECT
- 6.4.1 Future Growth
- 7 Clinical PET/CT for Oncology Applications
- 7.1 Pulmonary Nodules
- 7.2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- 7.3 Melanoma
- 7.4 Lymphoma
- 7.5 Colorectal Cancer
- 7.6 Head and Neck Cancer
- 7.7 Esophageal Cancer
- 7.8 Breast Cancer
- 7.9 Brain Cancer
- 7.10 Prostate Cancer
- 7.11 Ovarian Cancer
- 7.12 Cervical Cancer
- 7.13 Testicular Cancer
- 7.14 Thyroid Cancer
- 7.15 Pancreatic Cancer
- 7.16 Trends in Clinical Use of PET/CT
- 7.17 Development of PET/MRI
- 8 Company Listings
- Appendix 1. Radiopharmaceutical Diagnostic Imaging Agent Codes and PET Scan Services
- LIST OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001 to 2010
- Table 2.2: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001 to 2010
- Table 2.3: U.S. Healthcare Expenditures, 1999 to 2010
- Table 2.4: U.S. Health Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP, 1999 to 2010
- Table 2.5: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products
- Table 2.6: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000 to 2050
- Table 2.7: Hospital Survey
- Table 2.8: U.S. Radiological Images Taken, 1999 to 2010
- Table 2.9: Worldwide Market Share Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies
- Table 2.10: U.S. Nuclear Medicine Procedures, 2002 to 2010
- Table 2.11: PET Radioisotopes
- Table 3.1: Type of Imaging Offered by Facility
- Table 3.2: PET Procedures by Type
- Table 3.3: PET Patient Studies Performed in U.S.
- Table 3.4: Worldwide Dollar Sales of PET Imaging Systems, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.5: U.S. Dollar Sales of PET Imaging Systems, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.6: Average Selling Price for PET, U.S. and Worldwide, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.7: Unit Sales of PET Imaging Systems, U.S. and Worldwide, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.8: Installed Base of PET Imaging Systems, U.S., 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.9: PET Procedure Volume, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.10: FDG Sales, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.11: SPECT Procedure Volume, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.12: U.S. SPECT Scanner Market Size and Growth, 2002 to 2010
- Table 3.13: U.S. Stand-Alone PET Scanner Market Size and Growth, 2004 to 2011
- Table 3.14: U.S. PET/CT Scanner Market Size and Growth, 2002 to 2010
- Table 4.1: PET Applications Approved for Reimbursement by CMS
- Table 5.1: SPECT and PET Hybrid Sales Percentages
Ultrasound Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 Scope of the Report
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Executive Summary
- 2. Overview of the Medical Imaging Market
- 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size
- 2.2 Medical Imaging Industry Profile
- 2.2.1 Healthcare Delivery System Profile
- 2.2.2 Radiologists
- 2.2.3 Radiologic Services
- 2.2.4 Medical-Image Market Drivers and Restraints
- 2.2.5 Medical Imaging Market Segments
- 2.2.6 Contrast Media
- 2.2.7 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems
- 2.2.8 Picture Archiving and Communication Systems and Radiology Information Systems
- 2.2.9 Medical Imaging Companies
- 2.2.10 Significant Ultrasound Companies
- 2.2.11 Medical Imaging Industry Forecasts
- 2.3 Market Niches and Digitalization
- 2.4 Digital Imaging Techniques
- 2.4.1 Clinical Uses
- 2.5 Current and New Digital Imaging Procedures
- 2.6 The Digital Impact on Clinical Imaging Markets
- 2.7 Trends in Digital Imaging
- 2.8 Enhancing Computed Radiography
- 2.9 Digital Radiography vs. Computed Radiography
- 2.10 DR Products
- 2.11 Vasodilator Perfusion Imaging
- 3. Ultrasound Market
- 3.1.1 Overview of Ultrasound Market Segments
- 3.1.2 Increase in Application Areas Stirs Demand
- 3.2 Ultrasound Market Trends
- 3.2.1 Market Segmentation and Definitions
- 3.2.2 Ultrasonography Is of Great Value in Other Obstetric Conditions such as:
- 3.2.3 Overview
- 3.2.4 Market Developments
- 3.2.5 Market Drivers
- 3.2.6 Market Restraints
- 3.3 Ultrasound Market Forecasts
- 3.3.1 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 3.3.2 Installed-Base Forecast
- 3.3.3 Competitive Structure
- 3.3.4 Market Analysis
- 3.4 Cardiology Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 3.4.1 Unit Shipment Forecasts
- 3.4.2 Market Share Analysis
- 3.5 OB/GYN Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 3.6 Radiology Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 3.7 Hand-Carried Ultrasound Segment Forecasts
- 3.7.1 Market Share Analysis
- 3.7.2 Portable Ultrasound Equipment Displays Rapid Growth
- 3.8 Contrast Media
- 3.8.1 Market Share Analysis
- 3.8.2 Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Microbubbles
- 3.8.3 Targeting Microbubbles
- 3.8.4 How Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Works
- 3.8.5 Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- 3.9 Products
- 3.9.1 The Acquisition Decision
- 3.9.2 Ardent Sound
- 3.9.3 ALOKA, Ltd.
- 3.9.4 B-K Medical
- 3.9.5 CIVCO Medical Solutions
- 3.9.6 Esaote Group Company
- 3.9.7 Fischer Medical Technologies
- 3.9.8 GE Healthcare
- 3.9.9 Hitachi Medical Systems America
- 3.9.10 Medison Co., Ltd.
- 3.9.11 MEDRAD
- 3.9.12 Mindray Co., Ltd.
- 3.9.13 Philips Medical
- 3.9.14 Sea Ridge Software
- 3.9.15 Siemens Medical
- 3.9.16 SonoSite
- 3.9.17 Sony Medical Products
- 3.9.18 TeraRecon
- 3.9.19 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 3.9.20 U-Systems
- 3.9.21 Zonare Medical Systems
- 3.10 Manufacturers
- 3.11 New Transducer Technology
- 3.12 Ultrasound Product Introductions to the Market
- 4. Three- and Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography Markets
- 4.1 Total 3D Imaging Market Trends
- 4.1.1 Overview
- 4.1.2 Market Drivers
- 4.1.3 Market Restraints
- 4.2 Total 3D Imaging Market Forecasts
- 4.3 Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Market Forecasts
- 4.4 Three-Dimensional Imaging Markets
- 4.5.1 Echocardiography: The Largest Growth Area
- 4.5.2 Real-Time Color Doppler System
- 4.6 Manufacturers
- 5. Business Trends in the Industry
- 5.1 Sector Consolidation
- 5.2 Medical Imaging Growth Trends
- 5.3 Acquisition, License Agreements, Internal Development and Partnerships
- 5.4 Mergers and Acquisitions
- 5.4.1 Center for Diagnostic Imaging Signs With Medicalis
- 5.4.2 HealthSouth Sells Diagnostic Division to The Gores Group
- 5.4.3 AMICAS Acquires Technology Partners’ Practice-Management Software
- 5.4.4 MDS Nordion and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Enter Collaboration
- 5.4.5 NightHawk Radiology Holdings Acquired Teleradiology Diagnostic Service
- 5.4.6 Onex Acquires Kodak’s Health Group
- 5.4.7 Successor to Kodak’s Health Group To Be Called “Carestream Health”
- 5.4.8 Siemens Acquires German HIS Company
- 5.4.9 Siemens Medical Finalizes Acquisition of Bayer’s Diagnostics Division
- 5.5 Product Testing Depth in Medical-Imaging Testing
- 5.6 Government Regulation
- 5.6.1 U.S. Regulation
- 5.6.2 U.K. Regulation
- 5.6.3 E.U. Regulation
- 5.6.4 Japanese Regulation
- 5.7 Increased Market Penetration
- 5.8 Partnerships
- 6. Company Profiles
- 6.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corp. Heartlab
- 6.3 Analogic Corp.
- 6.4 Biosound Esaote
- 6.5 Boston Scientific
- 6.6 B-K Medical
- 6.7 GE Healthcare
- 6.8 Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.
- 6.9 Hologic, Inc.
- 6.10 Medison Co., Ltd.
- 6.11 MEDRAD, Inc. (U.S.)
- 6.12 Philips Medical Systems
- 6.13 Siemens Medical Solutions
- 6.14 SonoSite, Inc. (U.S.)
- 6.15 Toshiba America Medical Systems
- 6.16 Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: U.S. Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2003 to 2012
- Figure 2.2: Worldwide Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2002 to 2011
- Figure 2.3: Global Market Share of Contrast Media Markets
- Figure 2.4: Global Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies
- Figure 3.1: Annual Increase in Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2001 to 2010
- Figure 3.2: Annual Increase U.S. Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2001 to 2010
- Figure 3.3: Annual Increase in Worldwide Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2001 to 2010
- Figure 3.4: U.S. Annual Increase in Worldwide Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2001 to 2010
- Figure 3.5: Annual Increase in U.S. Sales of Handheld Ultrasound Equipment, 2001 to 2010
- Figure 3.6: Annual Increase in Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Contrast Agents, 2000 to 2010
- LIST OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001 to 2012
- Table 2.2: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001 to 2012
- Table 2.3: U.S. Healthcare Expenditures
- Table 2.4: U.S. Health Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP, 1998 to 2010
- Table 2.5: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products
- Table 2.6: Comparison of Spending on Health by Country
- Table 2.7: Spending on Health by Country
- Table 2.8: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000 to 2050
- Table 2.9: Percent Change in Volume of Examinations per Imaging Modality: 1996 to 2006
- Table 2.10: Market Share of Contrast Media Markets
- Table 2.11: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies
- Table 2.12: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001 to 2012
- Table 3.1: Ultrasonography Comparison: U.S. vs. Europe
- Table 3.2: Worldwide Ultrasound Procedures, 2000 to 2010
- Table 3.3: Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2010
- Table 3.4: U.S. Sales of Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2010
- Table 3.5: Worldwide Cardiology Ultrasound Procedures
- Table 3.6: Worldwide Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2010
- Table 3.7: U.S. Sales of Cardiology Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2010
- Table 3.8: Worldwide Sales of Handheld Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2012
- Table 3.9: U.S. Sales of Handheld Ultrasound Equipment, 2000 to 2012
- Table 3.10: Worldwide Sales of Ultrasound Contrast Agents, 1999 to
AbstractThe Medical Imaging Bundle includes the following reports at a 15% discount off the individual reports being purchased separately:
- Mammography World Markets.
- Medical Imaging Markets.
- Nuclear Cardiology Markets.
- Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS).
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Markets.
- Ultrasound Markets
Mammography World Markets
The women's mammography segment is poised for a major new phase of growth fueled by the availability of new technology coming out of the computer and digital areas and the higher interest of individual patients and general healthcare consumers to take charge of their own health status. Continuous improvements in technology are resulting in a growing number of new imaging diagnostic tests that combine high levels of accuracy with rapid, easy-to-use product formats. Digital mammography is driving more screening programs. The emphasis in this TriMark Publications report is on those companies and products that are actively developing and marketing clinical laboratory instrumentation and reagents and supplies for performing diagnostic tests on conditions specifically related to women's health. This study concentrates on the mammography market segment in large worldwide markets such as the U.S., Japan and Europe. Certain areas that are not covered include what is generally characterized as digital imaging techniques instruments and reagents, PACS or other data storage methods, or other medical imaging technologies, although many of the instruments, reagents and techniques in the mammography market segment are intimately associated with these broader areas. Specialty areas in medical imaging are touched upon, since these segments are frequently a part of the overall analytical focus of companies marketing general mammography equipment. However, no effort is made to quantify the size of this broader market.
Medical Imaging Markets
There will be a steady increase in demand for medical imaging services, along with pressures to improve the quality of healthcare delivered in the home and to lower its cost. The medical imaging segments are poised for a major new phase of growth fueled by the availability of new technology coming out of the computer and digital information technology segment, and the higher interest of individual older baby boom patients and general healthcare consumers to monitor health status. Continuous improvements in technology are resulting in a growing number of new imaging tests that combine high levels of accuracy with rapid, easy-to-use product formats. Digital mammography is driving more screening programs. The purpose of this TriMark Publications report is to describe the specific market segment of the diagnostics market sector called medical imaging. This sector includes all of the generally-accepted imaging activities that are currently used today, including X-ray and radiography, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, gamma camera market, computed tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) scans. It examines these clinical measurement devices and their reagents and supplies as used in hospitals, clinics and doctor's offices. It also includes associated market segments like picture archiving and communications system (PACS) markets, cardiology imaging markets, three-dimensional (3D) imaging markets and other emerging technologies.
Nuclear Cardiology Markets
The purpose of this TriMark Publications report is to analyze and describe the nuclear cardiology market segments in the U.S. and worldwide. It examines the measurement devices that are utilized by physicians to diagnose and monitor heart diseases. This study also discusses key products in nuclear cardiology and examines the trends that are stimulating this market. It includes a survey of all major companies actively engaged in marketing, manufacturing or developing nuclear cardiological instrumentation, with each company discussed in depth. The main objectives of this analysis are to: 1) identify viable technology drivers through a comprehensive look at platform technologies for nuclear cardiology testing; 2) obtain a complete understanding of the individual nuclear cardiology testing platforms from their basic principles to their clinical applications; 3) discover feasible market opportunities by identifying high-growth applications in different clinical diagnostic areas; 4) focus on global industry developments through an in-depth analysis of the major world markets for nuclear cardiology technology, including growth forecasts; and 5) present market figures related to the current value of nuclear cardiology, market projections, market share, key players, and sector growth rates.
Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS)
During the past 35 years, ultrasound and nuclear medicine were introduced into clinical medicine, computed tomography (CT) revolutionized diagnostic procedures and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerged, bringing new diagnostic information at the cellular level. X-ray morphed from analog films to digital, and virtually all medical images became "soft" files on the electronic networks. As imaging departments in healthcare facilities have migrated from film to digital, the display and storage systems have had to migrate too. These new digital imaging storage and display systems are called picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). Most PACSs handle images from various medical imaging instruments, including ultrasound, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET), CT, endoscopy, mammograms, etc. The focus of this TriMark Publications report is to analyze and describe the PACS market segments. PACS market penetration in the U.S. healthcare space has been significant, at almost 90%. A PACS network typically consists of a central server that stores a database containing the images connected to one or more clients via a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) that provides or utilizes the images. More and more PACS utilize Internet-based technologies as their means of communication. This allows remote viewing and diagnosis with implications for both civilian and military healthcare facilities. Since radiology departments dominate the production of images, interconnections with radiology information systems (RIS) are also looked at in this study.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Markets
The medical imaging segments are poised for a major new phase of growth fueled by the availability of new technology coming out of the computer and digital information technology segment. Continuous improvements in technology are resulting in a growing number of new imaging tests that combine high levels of accuracy with rapid, easy-to-use product formats. Part of that medical imaging improvement is coming from positron emission tomography (PET). PET is a scanning technique used in combination with small amounts of radio-labeled compounds to visualize the anatomy and function of the brain. The purpose of this TriMark Publications report is to describe the specific market segment of the diagnostics medical imaging market called PET scanning. This sector includes all of the generally accepted imaging activities that are currently used in PET, including equipment for PET, PET/CT, SPECT and the use of radiopharmaceuticals for imaging. It examines these clinical measurement devices and their reagents and supplies as used in hospitals and clinics. It also reviews associated clinical market segments in which PET scanning has taken a prominent role including cancer treatment, cardiology and neurology imaging markets.
Ultrasound Markets
During the past 35 years, ultrasound and nuclear medicine were introduced into clinical medicine, computed tomography (CT) revolutionized diagnostic procedures and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerged, bringing new diagnostic information at the cellular level. X-ray morphed from analog films to digital, and virtually all medical images became "soft" files on the electronic superhighway. This TriMark Publications report describes the increasingly diversified market segment of the diagnostics market sector called ultrasonography or, more commonly, ultrasound. This sector currently includes prenatal ultrasonography, cardiac and cardiology-imaging ultrasound, and increasingly portable or handheld ultrasound, which some believe may partly to fully replace the ubiquitous use of stethoscopes over time. Emerging market segments such as three-dimensional (3D) and now four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound are also examined.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|