|
Published by: Datamonitor
Published: Apr. 1, 2009 - 157 Pages
Table of Contents
- ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE
- About the cardiovascular analysis team
- CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Objective of the analysis
- Datamonitor Key insights
- Related reports
- CHAPTER 2 MARKET POSITIONING
- Market targeting
- Multiple brand applications across a therapy area
- Sanofi-Aventis
- Novartis
- Defined therapy area
- Novo Nordisk
- Niche indications
- Staggered launch and indication expansion
- Orphan indications
- Drug support
- Patient and physician support
- Diagnostics
- Involvement in the generics industry
- No involvement
- Marketing of generic versions of own brands
- Full generics portfolio with branded development
- Specialized generics
- Launch position
- First to market
- Januvia (sitagliptin)
- Mevacor (lovastatin)
- Best-in-class
- Norvasc (amlodipine)
- Effient (prasugrel)
- Me-too
- Diovan (valsartan)
- Niche in primary care
- Bystolic (nebivolol)
- Entry in genetic indication before expansion into primary care
- Mipomersen
- CHAPTER 3 DRUG DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
- Regulatory approval
- Cardiovascular endpoints
- Regulatory authority divergence
- FDA prescription drug user fee deadline
- Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy
- Portfolio focus
- Non-insulin antidiabetics
- Therapy replacement
- Market entrants
- Pipeline sourcing
- In-house development
- Novo Nordisk
- Abbott
- Licensing and co-development
- Big Pharma - Big Pharma
- Big Pharma - small originator
- Outsourcing discovery
- Company purchase
- Mega-merger
- Technology and pipeline acquisition
- Small add-on
- Development strategies
- Expertise and intellectual property
- Probiodrug
- Sirtris
- Drug repositioning
- CombinatoRx
- Pfizer
- Spin-outs
- Speedel
- Esperion
- Biotech
- Exit
- CHAPTER 4 PRE- AND POST-LAUNCH STRATEGIES
- Defensive strategies
- Intellectual property
- Patenting strategies
- Patent extensions
- Marketing exclusivity
- Pediatric extensions
- Competition obstruction
- Market positioning
- Primary indication
- Clinical viability
- Commercial viability
- Differentiation
- Clinical efficacy
- Side-effect profile
- Method of delivery
- Pricing and reimbursement
- Dangers of differentiation
- Indication expansion
- Related indications
- Heart failure
- Diabetic populations
- Market expansion
- AstraZeneca, Crestor and JUPITER
- Lifecycle management
- Derivatives
- Plavix
- Lipitor
- Reformulations
- Tricor
- Long-acting beta blockers
- Byetta LAR
- Long-acting oral antidiabetics
- Fixed dose combinations
- Franchise development
- Franchise expansion
- Co-ordinated drug differentiation
- GALAXY program
- CHAPTER 5 PRE- AND POST-PATENT EXPIRY STRATEGIES
- Revenue maximization
- Last marketing push
- Beta blockers
- Calcium channel blockers
- Price manipulation
- Zocor
- Norvasc
- Own-brand generics
- Greenstone and amlodipine
- Rx-to-OTC switching
- Xenical and Alli
- Mevacor
- Generic entry
- Paragraph IV abbreviated new drug application
- Generic simvastatin
- Authorized generics
- At-risk generic launch
- Lotrel
- Market expansion
- US
- Italy
- France
- Generic quality
- CHAPTER 6 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY 'ETHICS'
- Clinical development
- Clinical trial design to maximize perceived efficacy
- Tekturna
- Effient
- Suppression of negative clinical data
- Vytorin
- Influencing the roster of the FDA Advisory Committee
- Effient
- Independent publication of safety concerns
- Dr Steve Nissen and Avandia
- Exerting pressure on critics
- GlaxoSmithKline and Avandia
- Influencing physicians
- Commercial practices
- Dose availability restriction
- Pfizer and sildenafil
- Anti-trust practices
- Abbott
- Co-development partnership
- Pfizer and Nektar
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- General References
- Datamonitor Reports
- APPENDIX
- Report methodology
- About Datamonitor
- About Datamonitor Healthcare
- About the cardiovascular analysis team
- Disclaimer
- List of Tables
- Table 1: Sanofi-Aventis's cardiovascular and metabolic branded products, 1960s-2009
- Table 2: Novartis's hypertension brands, 1978-2009
- Table 3: Novartis's hypertension development pipeline, 2009
- Table 4: Novartis's cardiovascular and metabolic branded products (excluding hypertension)
- Table 5: Novo Nordisk's insulin portfolio, 1987-2009
- Table 6: US approvals for Avastin, 2004-2009
- Table 7: Indications in development for oral antithrombotics, 2009
- Table 8: Comparison of lead molecules in the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor class, 2009
- Table 9: Comparison of leading molecules in the statin class, 2000
- Table 10: Efficacy comparison of calcium channel antagonists
- Table 11: Clinical efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers
- Table 12: US-approved angiotensin receptor blocker indications, 2009
- Table 13: Efficacy comparison of leading US beta blockers
- Table 14: Regulatory divergence for cardiovascular agents in Europe and the US
- Table 15: New drug applications and missed fee deadlines
- Table 16: GlaxoSmithKline's non-insulin antidiabetic development pipeline, 2002-08
- Table 17: Takeda's non-insulin antidiabetic development pipeline, 2002-08
- Table 18: Merck & Co's non-insulin antidiabetic development pipeline, 2002-08
- Table 19: Novartis's non-insulin antidiabetic development pipeline, 2002-08
- Table 20: Januvia (sitagliptin) development timescale, 2001-06
- Table 21: Galvus (vildagliptin) development timescale, 1996-2008
- Table 22: Abbott's cardiovascular and metabolic marketed products and late-stage development candidates, 2009
- Table 23: Portfolio complementarities between Sanofi-Synthelabo and Aventis
- Table 24: Filed Orange Book patents for Lipitor (atorvastatin; Pfizer), 2009
- Table 25: Head-to-head statin trials for Crestor (rosuvastatin)
- Table 26: Head-to-head statin trials for Vytorin (ezetimibe + simvastatin)
- Table 27: Clinical efficacy and side-effect profiles of common oral non-insulin antidiabetics
- Table 28: Relative success of late-stage pipeline direct thrombin inhibitors in the seven major markets
- Table 29: Insurance reimbursement levels of angiotensin receptor blockers in selected California insurance plans
- Table 30: History of Tricor lifecycle management, 1998-2005
- Table 31: AstraZeneca's GALAXY clinical trial program for Crestor
- Table 32: Indexed volume (Standard Units) and value ($m) sales of beta blockers in the US, 2004-06
- Table 33: Indexed volume (Standard Units) and value ($m) calcium channel blockers in the US, 2004-06
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Pros and cons of targeted marketing strategies in the cardiovascular arena
- Figure 2: Involvement in the generics industry by some leading pharmaceutical companies, 2009
- Figure 3: Clinical evidence frequently benefits follow-on therapies
- Figure 4: Indexed revenues of the Januvia franchise in diabetes in the US ($), 2006-08
- Figure 5: Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor forecast revenues in the seven major markets, 2007-2017
- Figure 6: Indexed volume sales (standard units) of statins in the US, 1999-2001
- Figure 7: Division of the US calcium channel antagonist market, 1999
- Figure 8: Forecast impact of Effient on clopidogrel units sold (SU) in the 5EU
- Figure 9: US angiotensin receptor blocker market split by units sold (SU), 2007
- Figure 10: Forecast Bystolic revenues in the US, 2007-2017
- Figure 11: Development timeline for Januvia and Galvus, 1995-2008
- Figure 12: Drug repositioning as a means to streamline development
- Figure 13: Data exclusivity mechanism for pharmaceutical products in the European Union, 2004
- Figure 14: Revenue forecasts for the leading direct thrombin inhibitors, 2007-2017
- Figure 15: Lipitor market penetration in Germany and the UK, 2007
- Figure 16: Angiotensin receptor blocker US market share ($), 2007
- Figure 17: Vytorin revenues in the US, 2007-08
- Figure 18: Plavix revenues in the US, 2005-08
- Figure 19: Toprol-XL revenues in the US, 2007-08
- Figure 20: Coreg franchise revenues in the US, 2007-08
- Figure 21: Forecast revenues for Byetta and Byetta LAR in the seven major markets, 2007-2017
- Figure 22: US revenue distribution between the free agent and fixed dose combinations in angiotensin receptor blockers, 2007
- Figure 23: Impact of thiazolidinedione FDCs in the US and 5EU, 2007
- Figure 24: Impact of potential link with myocardial infarction on the Avandia franchise revenues in the US, 2007-08
- Figure 25: Impact of potential link with myocardial infarction on the Avandia franchise revenues in the 5EU, 2007-08
- Figure 26: Revenues of Novo Nordisk's insulin analogs in the seven major markets, 2007
- Figure 27: Pricing of simvastatin in the US, 2005-Q2 08
- Figure 28: Simvastatin market share in the US, Q1-Q3 2006
- Figure 29: Pricing of amlodipine in the US, 2006-Q2 2008
- Figure 30: Amlodipine market share in the US, 2006-Q2 2008
- Figure 31: Indexed volume (Standard Units) sales of amlodipine in the US, 2005-Q2 2007
- Figure 32: Indexed Rx and OTC revenues of orlistat in the US, 2007-Q2 2008
- Figure 33: Indexed volume (Standard Units) sales of simvastatin in the US, 2005-Q2 2008
- Figure 34: Impact of Teva's US at-risk launch of benazepril + amlodipine, 2007- Q2 2008
- Figure 35: Expansion of the US simvastatin market following patent expiry, Q1 2005-Q2 2008
- Figure 36: Reversal of the decline of the US pravastatin market following patent expiry, Q3 2003-Q1 2008
- Figure 37: Expansion of the simvastatin market in Italy following patent expiry, Q1 2005-Q2 2008
- Figure 38: Expansion of the simvastatin market in France following patent expiry, Q3 2004-Q2 2008
AbstractIntroduction
Datamonitor expects commercial strategies in the cardiovascular and metabolic markets to become increasingly important as the markets mature. The report details strategies used by pharmaceutical companies to capture market share, to differentiate brands from the competition, for revenue maximization and for the defense of brand revenues from generic competition.
Scope- Analysis of company and brand marketing positioning
- Analysis of methods employed to bolster R&D pipelines
- Analysis of the methods used to achieve brand differentiation and revenue maximization.
Highlights
To maximize the effectiveness of their sales forces, pharma companies can adopt a number of approaches to position their teams within a therapy area. These approaches can range from covering the whole of a therapy area, targeting a suite of products within one disease, to the highly specialized development of niche products for orphan indications
Pharmaceutical companies can focus their portfolios by either choosing a broad 'shots-on-goal' approach, or opting for a narrower strategy focusing on a single drug class.
Despite in-house drug development remaining the core option for drug companies to stock their development pipelines, the distribution of marketed drugs sourced internally or externally (merger and acquisition, in-licensing and co-development) varies greatly between the leading companies in the cardiovascular and metabolic markets
Reasons to Purchase- Understand key company positioning strategies
- Identify optimal R&D strategies
- Identify effective methods for restricting the impact of generics following patent expiry
Please note: this is delivered as a Zip file.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|
|
About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 250,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 650 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.
© MarketResearch.com 2009
|