|
Published by: BioPlan Associates, Inc.
Published: Apr. 1, 2008
Table of Contents
- Overview
- Methodology
- CHAPTER 1: Introduction and Discussion
- Introduction
- 1-1 U.S. and World Biopharmaceutical Markets
- 1-2 Continuing Need for Production Improvements and Cost Containment
- CHAPTER 2: Demographics
- Respondents’ Area of Involvement
- Respondents’ Titles
- Respondents’ Facility Locations
- Respondents’ Areas of Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations
- Respondents’ Production Operations, Phase of Development
- CHAPTER 3: Capacity Utilization
- 3-1 Changes in Capacity Utilization (2003-2007)
- 3-2 Capacity Utilization: CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- 3-3 Capacity Utilization: US vs. Western European Manufacturers
- 3-4 Respondents’ Current Total Production Capacity
- Mammalian Cell Culture
- Estimated Bioreactor Capacity Distribution, Biotherapeutic Developers and CMOs
- Microbial Fermentation
- Yeast Production
- Insect Cells
- 3-5 Discussion: Current State of Capacity Utilization
- 3-6 Range of Titres for MAb Production
- 3-7 Discussion
- CHAPTER 4: Current Capacity Constraints
- 4-1 Current Capacity Constraints
- Respondents’ Perception of Capacity Constraints
- Respondents’ Perception of Capacity Constraints, 2003-2007
- Perception of Capacity Constraints in 2007:
- CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Perception of Capacity Constraints in 2007: US vs. European
- Biotherapeutic Developers & CMOs
- 4-2 Expected Capacity Constraints4-7
- Respondents’ Expectations of Capacity Constraints by 2012
- Expected Capacity Constraints by 2012: 2003 to 2007 Data
- Expected Capacity Constraints by 2012:
- CMO vs. Biotherapeutic Developer
- 4-3 Factors Impacting Future Production Capacity
- Factors Creating Future Capacity Constraints
- Factors Creating Future Capacity Constraints:
- CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Factors Creating Capacity Constraints:
- US vs. European Respondents
- 4-4 Key Areas to Address to Avoid Future Capacity Constraints
- Analysis of Areas to Avoid; Changing Perspectives, 2005-2007
- Key Areas to Address to Avoid Capacity Constraints: CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Key Areas to Address to Avoid Capacity Constraints: US vs. European Respondents
- 4-5 Discussion
- CHAPTER 5: Future Capacity Expansions
- 5-1 Planned Future Capacity Expansions
- Planned Future Capacity Expansions, 2008 vs. 2012
- Planned Future Capacity Expansions by 2012, CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Planned Capacity Expansions by 2012: US vs. Western European Manufacturers
- Planned Future Capacity Expansions of >100%
- 5-2 Current Outsourcing, by Production System
- Facilities Currently Outsourcing No Production, 2005-2007
- 5-3 Future Outsourcing
- Biotherapeutic Developers’ Outsourcing, 2012 Projections, by System
- Biotherapeutic Developers’ Outsourcing Some Production in 2012
- 5-4 Critical Outsourcing Issues
- Selecting a CMO: 2007
- Selecting a CMO, 2005-2007
- Difficulty in Finding a CMO with Available Capacity
- 5-5 Discussion: Selecting a CMO
- CHAPTER 6: Disposables and Single-Use Systems in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 6-1 Use of Disposables and Single-Use Systems
- Use of Disposables, 2007 vs. 20066
- Annual Growth Rates for Disposables
- Disposable Use by Stage of Production/Application
- Newly Introduced Disposable Applications
- Downstream Operations that are now 100% Disposable
- Leachables and Extractables
- Use of Disposables: CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- 6-2 Reasons for Increasing Use of Disposables &
- Single-Use Systems
- Reasons for Increased Use of Disposables,
- 2005 through 2007
- Reasons for Increased Use of Disposables,
- 2007 vs. 2006 CMOs vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Single Most Critical Reason for Increasing Use Disposables
- 6-3 Factors Restricting Use of Disposables
- Reasons for Restricting Usage of Disposables
- Reasons for Restricting Expanded Use of Disposables: 2006 vs. 2007
- Reasons for Restricting Expanded Use of Disposables: CMO’s vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Most Critical Reasons for Restricting Use of Disposables
- Most Critical Reasons for Restricting Use of Disposables: US vs. European Respondents
- 6-4 Current Spending on Disposable Systems
- Spending on Disposable Systems, 2006-2007
- Current Spending on Disposables: CMO’s vs. Biotherapeutic
- Developers
- Growth in Spending on Disposable Systems, 2006-2007
- Budget Increase for Disposable and Single use Components in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 6-5 Scale of Use of Disposables
- Switching from Disposables in Late Stage Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 6-6 Satisfaction with Vendors of Disposable and Single Use
- Components for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 6-7 Discussion
- CHAPTER 7: Downstream Purification
- 7-1 Impact of Downstream Processing on Capacity
- Impact of Downstream Processing on Capacity, US vs. Western European Biomanufacturers
- Impact of Downstream Processing on Capacity, Biopharmaceutical Developers vs. CMOs
- 7-2 Specific Purification Step Constraints
- Specific Purification Step Constraints, US vs. Western European Biomanufacturers
- 7-3 Downstream Purification Issues Facing the Industry Today
- 7-4 Areas Where Major Improvements will Occur in
- Downstream Processing
- Membrane Technology: Opinions
- Moving Bed Technology: Opinions
- 7-5 Problem Areas in Downstream Operations
- 7-6 Microfiltration Problems in Biopharmaceutical
- Downstream Processing
- 7-7 Discussion
- CHAPTER 8: Quality Issues, Batch Failures, and PAT in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Introduction
- 8-1 Process Analytical Technology
- 8-2 Hurdles to Implementing Process Analytical Technology
- 8-3 Batch Failure Frequency in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 8-4 Primary Cause of Batch Failures, Percentages in
- Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 8-5 Quality Problems Traced to Vendors in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- CHAPTER 9: Hiring, Employment Growth, and Training in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Introduction
- 9-1 Hiring in 2008
- 9-2 Hiring in 2012
- 9-3 Formal Education Requirements in Biopharmaceutical Workforce
- Level of Biopharmaceutical Workforce Education, 2006 vs. 2011 Estimate
- 9-4 Training in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Additional Training Needed
- 9-5 Discussion
- CHAPTER 10: Suppliers to Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing and Life Sciences
- Introduction
- 10-1 Demographics
- Areas of Involvement
- Location of Vendor Sales
- Respondents’ Primary Job
- 10-2 Growth Rate of Sales by Suppliers
- Average Industry Growth Rate, Distribution
- Average Industry Growth Rate, By Segment
- Industry Growth Rate, 2006 vs. 2007
- 10-3 Discussion: Industry Growth Rates
- 10-4 Supplier Issues
- Problems Faced by Suppliers
- Problems Faced by Vendors’ Clients
- 10-5 Discussion: Supplier Issues
- 10-6 Sales Staff Training
- Days of Training Provided
- Areas Where More Training Needed, Sales Staff vs. All Staff
- 10-7 Vendor Business Longevity
- Figures and Tables
- Fig. 1.1 Current Worldwide Pipeline, Large Molecules, 2008
- Fig. 2.1 Area of Involvement in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Fig. 2.2 Respondents’ Job Responsibilities
- Fig. 2.3 Facility Location
- Fig. 2.4 Facility Location, by Region
- Fig. 2.5 Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems
- Fig. 2.6 Phase of Development
- Fig. 3.1 Capacity Utilization 2003-2007
- Fig. 3.2 Capacity Utilization, CAGR 2003-2007
- Fig. 3.3 Capacity Utilization, by System, Comparing CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 3.4 Capacity Utilization, by System, Comparing US vs Western European Biomanufacturers
- Fig. 3.5 Current Production Capacity Distribution, Mammalian Cell Culture
- Fig. 3.6 Estimated Bioreactor Capacity Distribution, by Biotherapeutic Developer (2006 vs 2010)
- Fig 3.7 Estimated Bioreactor Capacity Distribution, by Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMO), 2006 vs 2010
- Fig. 3.8 Current Production Capacity Distribution, Microbial Fermentation
- Fig. 3.9 Current Production Capacity Distribution, Yeast Systems
- Fig. 3.10 Current Production Capacity Distribution, Insect Systems
- Fig 3.14 Range of Titers Being Obtained in MAb Production, Commercial vs Late-stage Clinical Scale Production
- Fig. 4.1 Capacity Constraint, by Stage of Production
- Fig. 4.2 Capacity Constraint, 2003 vs 2007
- Fig. 4.3 Capacity Constraint, Biotherapeutic Developers vs CMOs
- Fig. 4.4 Capacity Constraints, US vs. Europe
- Fig. 4.5 Expectations of Capacity Constraints by 2012
- Fig. 4.6 Five-year Projections for Capacity Constraints: 2003-2007
- Fig. 4.7 Five-year Projections for Capacity Constraints: Biotherapeutic Developers vs. CMOs
- Fig. 4.8 Factors Creating Future Capacity Constraints
- Fig. 4.9 Factors Creating Future Capacity Constraints, CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 4.10 Factors Creating Future Capacity Constraints, US vs Western European Biomanufacturers
- Fig. 4-11 Key Areas to Address to Avoid Capacity Constraints
- Fig. 4-12 Key Areas to Address to Avoid Capacity Constraints, 2005-2007
- Fig. 4.13 Key Areas to Avoid Capacity Constraints, CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 4.14 Key Areas to Avoid Capacity Constraints, US vs W. European Biomanufactures
- Fig. 5.1 Industry Average Planned Production Increase by 2012
- Fig. 5.2 Planned Future Capacity Expansion: 5-year Estimates, 2008 through 2012
- Fig. 5.3 Planned Future Capacity Expansion: 5-year Estimates, 2008 through 2012; Biotherapeutic Developers vs CMOs
- Fig. 5.4 Planned Future Capacity Expansion: 5-year Estimates, 2008 through 2012; US vs Western Europe
- Fig. 5.5 Percent of Respondents Projecting Production Increases of over 100% by 2012
- Fig. 5.6 Current Percentage Production Outsourced by System, 2007
- Fig. 5.7 Percent Biotherapeutic Developers Outsourcing NO production, 2007 vs 2006 vs 2005
- Fig. 5.8 Future Outsourcing: Percent Production Outsourced in 2012, by System
- Fig. 5.9 Five-year Projections: Percent Biotherapeutic Developers Planning to Outsource at Least Some Production, 2012 vs 2011
- Fig. 5.10 Issues of Greatest Importance when Considering Outsourcing Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Fig. 5.11 Critical Issues When Selecting a CMO, 2005-2007
- Fig. 5.12 Difficulties in Finding CMOs with Available Capacity
- Fig. 6.1 Usage of Disposables in Biomanufacturing, Any Stage, 2005-2007
- Fig. 6.2 Disposables’ Increased Market Penetration: Percentage Point Market Gain, 2006-2007
- Fig. 6.3 Usage of Disposables in Biomanufacturing, by Stage of Manufacturing, Early R&D through Commercial Production
- Fig. 6.4 Newly Introduced Disposables, Past 12 Months
- Fig. 6.5 Percent of Respondents where Downstream Operations are 100% Disposable, by Application
- Fig. 6.6 Perceptions and Opinions on Leachables and Extractables: Testing, Validation, Costs
- Fig. 6.7 Usage of Disposables in Biomanufacturing, CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 6.8 Reasons for Increasing Use of Disposable System Components
- Fig. 6.9 Reasons for Increasing Use of Disposable System Components, 2005-2007
- Fig. 6.10 Reasons for Increasing Use of Disposable System Components, CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 6.11 Most Critical Reason for Increasing Use of Disposables
- Fig. 6.12 Reasons for Restricting Use of Disposables
- Fig. 6.13 Reasons for Restricting Use of Disposables: 2006 vs 2007
- Fig. 6.14 Reasons for Restricting Use of Disposables: CMOs vs Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 6.15 Most Critical Reason for Not Increasing Use of Disposables
- Fig. 6.16 Most Critical Reasons for Not Increasing Use of Disposables: US vs Western Europe
- Fig. 6.17 Average Spending on Single-use Disposable System Components
- Fig. 6.18 Average Spending on Disposable System Components: 2006 vs 2007
- Fig. 6.19 Average Spending on Disposable System Components: CMO’s vs. Biotherapeutic Developers
- Fig. 6.20 Annual Growth Rate in Spending on Disposable System Components
- Fig. 6.21 Expected Budgetary Increases for Disposables Over Next 12 Months
- Fig. 6.22 Rejecting Disposable Devices, Based on Scale of Production
- Fig 6.23 Switching from Disposables to Fixed Systems in Late-stage Biomanufacturing
- Fig. 6.24 Satisfaction with Vendors of Disposables for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Fig. 7.1 Impact of Downstream Processing on Overall Capacity
- Fig. 7.2 Impact of Downstream Processing on Overall Capacity, US vs Western European Biomanufacturers
- Fig. 7.3 Impact of Downstream Processing on Overall Capacity, Biopharmaceutical Developers vs CMOs
- Fig. 7.4 Impact of Purification Steps on Overall Capacity
- Fig. 7.5 Impact of Purification Steps on Overall Capacity: US vs Western European Biomanufacturers
- Fig. 7.6 Downstream Purification Issues Affecting Biopharmaceutical Production
- Fig. 7.7 Areas Where Major Improvements in Purification Processes May Occur in the Next Five Years (2012)
- Fig. 7.8 Problem Areas in Downstream Operations
- Fig 7.9 Problems Involving Microfiltration Steps in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Fig. 8.1 Implementation of Process Analytical Technology (PAT): New vs Existing Biomanufacturing Processes
- Fig. 8.2 Hurdles Hindering Implementation of PAT
- Fig. 8.3 Batch Failure Frequency
- Fig. 8.4 Primary Causes of Batch Failures, by Facility Capacity
- Fig. 8.5 Quality Problems Traced to Vendors
- Fig. 9.1 New Hires in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing, 2008
- Fig. 9.2 New Hires in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing, 2012
- Fig. 9.3 Comparison of Percent of Workforce with Specific Education Levels (2006 Data)
- Fig. 9.4 Training Time for New Operations/Manufacturing Employees
- Fig. 9.5 Areas Where “Very high” or “High” Need for Additional Training is Require
- Fig. 10.1 Primary Products or Services Area
- Fig. 10.2 Geographic Locations in which Vendors Currently Actively Sell Products or Services
- Fig. 10.3 Respondents’ Primary Job Function
- Fig. 10.4 Biopharmaceutical Supply Market Segment Sales Growth
- Fig. 10.5 Average Industry Growth Rate, By Segment
- Fig. 10.6 Supplier Segment Growth Rate, 2006 vs. 2007
- Fig. 10.7 Problems Faced by Suppliers to Biopharmaceutical Manufacturers and CMOs
- Fig. 10.8 Days of Sales Staff Training Provided
- Fig. 10.9 Areas Where Training May Help Sales Staff Perform Better
- Fig. 10.10 Vendor Business Longevity
- Tables
- Table 1.1 Biologics (Large Molecule), Worldwide, through February 2008
- Table 1.2 Summary All Therapeutics vs Biologics (Large Molecule), Worldwide, through February 2008
- Table 1.3 Worldwide Pipeline, Large Molecules, by Therapeutic Area, 2008
- Table 1.4 Worldwide Biopharmaceutical Revenue by Product Class
- Table 1.5 Biopharmaceutical Blockbusters: >$1 billion revenue in 2006, and Expression Systems/Host Cells
- Table 1.6 Biopharmaceutical World Markets - Products and Revenue, by Class
AbstractThis report is the fifth in our annual evaluations of the state of the biopharmaceutical manufacturing industry. The strength of the methodology remains in its breadth of coverage, which yields a composite view from the respondents closest to the industry. This year, BioPlan Associates, Inc. surveyed 434 responsible individuals at biopharmaceutical manufacturers and contract manufacturing organizations in 39 countries around the world. The survey methodology also, separately, provided data from an additional 126 direct suppliers of materials, services and equipment to this industry segment. Using a web-based survey tool, we obtained and evaluated information regarding respondents' current capacity, production, novel technology adoption, human resources, and outsourcing issues. We assessed respondents' projected reasons for bottlenecks, and their perception of how these bottlenecks might be resolved. This year, we brought in experts from the industry to provide in-depth analysis of the events shaping the past year, and the trends that will shape biopharmaceutical manufacturing in 2008-2013.
Our subject matter experts include:
Eileen Bartholomew, Senior Consultant, PharmaBioSource, Inc. Geoff Hodge, Vice President, Technology, Xcellerex Beth H. Junker, PhD, Senior Director, Bioprocess Research and Development, Merck Research Laboratories Vladimir Kostyukovsky, Senior Director, Manufacturing, Artisan Pharma Inc. Sean P. McKee, Senior Consultant, PharmaBioSource, Inc. Mark J. Stramaglia, Senior Product Manager, Invitrogen Corporation Scott Wheelwright, President and Founder, Strategic Manufacturing Worldwide William B. Wiederseim, President & CEO, PharmaBioSource, Inc.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|