|
Published by: BioSeeker Group AB
Published: Sep. 14, 2007 - 510+ Pages
Table of Contents
- 1 Executive Summary
- 2 Methodologies
- 3 Table of Contents
- 3.1 List of Tables
- 3.2 List of Boxes
- 4 Big Pharma’s R&D Position and Strategy in Oncology: A Summary
- 4.1 Bristol-Myers Squibb
- 4.2 GlaxoSmithKline
- 4.3 Hoffmann-La Roche
- 4.4 Novartis
- 4.5 Sanofi-Aventis
- 5 Last Five Years of Deals and Alliances in Oncology
- 5.1 Bristol Myers Squibb
- 5.1.1 Discovery and Lead Molecule Improvements
- 5.1.2 Adding Image Analysis to Support Clinical Trials and Early Diagnosis
- 5.1.3 Bladder Cancer and Melanoma Registration Filings are Emminent
- 5.1.4 The Human Kinome and Cell Cycle Inhibitors
- 5.1.5 Strategic Priorities in Pipeline Development Leads to Divestments
- 5.1.6 Erbitux Expansion is Set to Challenge Avastin
- 5.2 GlaxoSmithKline
- 5.2.1 The Biopharmaceutical Strategy at GSK
- 5.2.2 Out Goes Classes of Small Molecule Inhibitors
- 5.2.3 Marketing and Manufacturing Collaborations
- 5.2.4 Patient Selectionfo r GSK’s Targeted Cancer Therapies
- 5.2.5 GSK Taping Into Knowledge Databases
- 5.2.6 Increasing the Oral Bioavailability Cytotoxic Oncology Drugs
- 5.2.7 Oxford University Helps GSK in India
- 5.2.8 GSK is Set to Improve Medical Imaging
- 5.3 Hoffmann-La Roche
- 5.3.1 Roche Builds Center of Excellence for RNAi Therapeutics Discovery
- 5.3.2 A New Delivery Route for Avastin?
- 5.3.3 Improving Antibody Drugs
- 5.3.4 Roche Strengthens Presence in Genomics Research Market
- 5.3.5 Target Validation
- 5.3.6 Drug Discovery Collaborations
- 5.3.7 Marketing
- 5.3.8 Outlicensing
- 5.3.9 Size Doesn’t Matter: Genentech's Goal of Aggressively Pursuing Novel and Innovative Therapies 71
- 5.4 Novartis
- 5.4.1 Novartis Acquisition of Chiron: A Major Biopharmaceutical Investment
- 5.4.2 Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- 5.4.3 Next Generation Oral Topoisomerase Inhibitor and Telomerase Promotors
- 5.4.4 Novartis Sells of World-Wide Rights
- 5.4.5 Biomarker and Proteomics Research
- 5.5 Sanofi-Aventis
- 5.5.1 Target Screening and Validation
- 5.5.2 Biologicals
- 5.5.3 A Short Cut to Success?
- 5.5.4 Aventis Divests Interest
- 5.5.5 Recombine My Molecule
- 6 Competitive R&D Comparison on Oncology Drug Target Level
- 6.1 Target Overview
- 6.2 Head to Head Target Comparison by Molecular Function and Cancer Type
- 6.2.1 Transmembrane Receptor Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity Targets
- 6.2.2 Receptor Activity Targets
- 6.2.3 G-protein Coupled Receptor Activity Targets
- 6.2.4 Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Activity Targets
- 6.2.5 Transcription Factor Activity Targets
- 6.2.6 Transmembrane Receptor Activity Targets
- 6.2.7 Catalytic Activity Targets
- 6.2.8 Cytokine Activity Targets
- 6.2.9 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase Activity Targets
- 6.2.10 Kinase Activity Targets
- 6.2.11 DNA Topoisomerase Activity Targets
- 6.2.12 Growth Factor Activity Targets
- 6.2.13 Ligase Activity Targets
- 6.2.14 Motor Activity Targets
- 6.2.15 Structural Constituent of Cytoskeleton Targets
- 6.2.16 Transporter Activity Targets
- 6.2.17 Targets According to Miscellaneous Molecular Function Groups
- 6.2.18 Unclassified or Unknown Molecular Function of Targets
- 6.3 Drug Targets by Target Localization and Compound Type
- 6.4 Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to Signaling Pathways
- 6.4.1 Alpha6 Beta4 Integrin Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.2 Androgen Receptor Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.3 B Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.4 EGFR1 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.5 Hedgehog Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.6 ID Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.7 IL-1 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.8 IL-2 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.9 IL-3 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.10 IL-4 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.11 IL-5 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.12 IL-6 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.13 IL-9 Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.14 Kit Receptor Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.15 Notch Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.16 T Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.17 TGF-beta Receptor Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.18 TNF-alpha Signaling Pathway
- 6.4.19 Wnt Signaling Pathway
- 7 Drug Compound Type Analysis
- 7.1 Deployment of Biological Based Compounds by Cancer Indications
- 7.2 Deployment of Chemical Based Compounds by Cancer Indications
- 7.3 Deployment of Natural Product Compounds by Cancer Indications
- 8 Drug Development in Oncology by Major Targeted Therapy Areas
- 8.1 Angiogenesis
- 8.2 Antibodies
- 8.3 Apoptosis
- 8.4 Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- 8.5 Vaccines
- 9 Cancer Indication Focus Analysis
- 9.1 Preclinical Stage Pipeline
- 9.2 Phase I Clinical Stage Pipeline
- 9.3 Phase II Clinical Stage Pipeline
- 9.4 Phase III Clinical Stage Pipeline
- 9.5 Drugs Soon to be on the Market
- 9.6 Approved Drugs
- 10 Lung cancer: An Introduction
- 10.1 Current Treatment Strategies
- 10.2 Disease Definition
- 10.3 Etiology & Pathophysiology
- 10.4 Prognosis
- 10.5 Epidemiology
- 11 Progress in Current Lung Cancer Treatment Strategies
- 11.1 Improvements Adding microtubule Inhibitor
- 11.2 Improvement of Disease Related Symptoms in Elderly Patients
- 11.3 Toxicity Profile Favored
- 11.4 A New Formula
- 11.5 Monotherapy?
- 11.6 Failed to Demonstrate a Survival Advantage
- 11.7 Reduction in Mortality Risk
- 12 Key Drug Strategies in Lung Cancer
- 12.1 Apoptosis
- 12.2 Antiangiogenesis and Antivascular Agents
- 12.2.1 EGFR and VEGFR as target
- 12.2.2 Immunotherapy
- 13 Competitive Landscape in Lung Cancer Drug Development: The Late Stage Pipeline
- 13.1 Grade 4 Adverse Events
- 13.2 No New Remarks
- 13.3 No Significant Effect on Overall Survival
- 13.4 Bristol Myers Squibb Entered into an Agreement
- 13.5 Many Uncertainties Remain
- 13.6 Development Terminated
- 13.7 Continuing Enrollment
- 13.8 Apoptotic Inducer
- 13.9 Fully-Human Monoclonal Antibody
- 13.10 Eagerly Awaiting Data
- 13.11 Mutations and Response
- 13.12 Statistically and Clinically Significant Survival Advantage
- 13.13 Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody
- 13.14 Shift in the Development Focus
- 13.15 Sensitizer
- 13.16 Treatment in Earlier-Stage Cancer Could be More Effective
- 13.17 Discontinued Radiosensitizer
- 13.18 Improvement in Chemoradiotherapy
- 13.19 Progress on HDAC Inhibitor
- 13.20 Progress Analysis Carboxyamidotriazole
- 13.21
- 13.22 Chemotherapy naïve subjects
- 14 Etiology and Pathophysiology of Melanoma
- 15 Current Melanoma Treatment Strategies
- 15.1 An Overview
- 15.2 Cytotoxic Drugs
- 15.2.1 Dacarbazine
- 15.2.2 Cisplatin
- 15.2.3 Carboplatin
- 15.2.4 Carmustine
- 15.2.5 Melphalan
- 15.2.6 Paclitaxel
- 15.2.7 Tamoxifen
- 15.2.8 Temozolomide
- 15.2.9 Vinblastine/Vinorelbine
- 15.3 Biological treatments
- 15.3.1 Intron A
- 15.3.2 Virulizin
- 15.3.3 Melacine
- 15.3.4 Alfanative (Multiferon)
- 15.3.5 Proleukin or (Macrolin)
- 15.3.6 Enhanzyn
- 15.3.7 M-VAX
- 15.4 Other
- 15.4.1 Ceplene Maxamine
- 16 Key Melanoma Therapy Strategies
- 16.1 Immunotherapy
- 16.2 Anti-angiogenesis
- 16.3 Apoptotic Induction
- 16.4 Gene Therapy
- 17 Current Melanoma Drug Development: Late Stage Pipeline
- 17.1 Immunotherapy
- 17.1.1 Oncophage
- 17.1.2 Canvaxin
- 17.1.3 GMK
- 17.1.4 MDX-010
- 17.1.5 OncoVax
- 17.1.6 ALLOVECTIN-7
- 17.1.7 Peginterferon alfa-2b
- 17.2 Anti-angiogenesis
- 17.2.1 Lenalidomide
- 17.3 Apoptotic Inducers
- 17.3.1 Genasense
- 17.4 Inhibiting Cell Growth
- 17.4.1 Temozolomide
- 18 Current Melanoma Drug Development: Early Stage Pipeline
- 18.1 Immunotherapy
- 18.1.1 INGN 241
- 18.1.2 QS-21
- 18.1.3 Talabostat
- 18.1.4 SB 249553
- 18.1.5 GVAX
- 18.1.6 GV 1001
- 18.1.7 Dexosome
- 18.1.8 Uvidem
- 18.1.9 NY-ESO-1 ISCOMS
- 18.1.10 NOVOVAC-M1
- 18.1.11 Oxxon Vaccine
- 18.1.12 Therion’s Melanoma Vaccine
- 18.1.13 ImmunoVex trimelan
- 18.1.14 OncoVEXGM-CSF
- 18.1.15 Zadaxin
- 18.1.16 Alvac-Mage1/Mage3
- 18.1.17 Iboctadekin
- 18.1.18 ProMune
- 18.1.19 BAY 504798
- 18.1.20 EMD 273063
- 18.2 Antiangiogenesis
- 18.2.1 Sorafenib
- 18.2.2 Vitaxin
- 18.2.3 Avastin
- 18.2.4 PI 88
- 18.3 Apoptotic Inducers
- 18.3.1 Didemnin B
- 18.3.2 KOS 953
- 18.4 Small Molecules Inhibiting Cell Growth
- 18.4.1 Pivanex
- 18.4.2 Karenitecin
- 18.4.3 Lomeguatrib
- 18.4.4 PD 0325901
- 18.4.5 SB 715992
- 18.4.6 INO 1001
- 18.4.7 CP 4055
- 18.5 Other Biological Drugs
- 18.5.1 AP 12009
- 18.5.2 Ecromeximab
- 18.5.3 ILX 651
- 18.5.4 Kahalalide F
- 18.5.5 ABX MA1
- 18.5.6 MJV 101
- 18.5.7 A Russian Melanoma Vaccine
- 18.5.8 Elea Vaccine
- 18.5.9 F 50040
- 19 Appendix 1. Treatment Guide Lines Lung Cancer*
- 19.1 References
- 20 Appendix 2: Selected Company Profiles
- 20.1 Abgenix
- 20.2 Aphton
- 20.3 AstraZeneca
- 20.4 Bristol-Myers Squibb
- 20.5 Eli Lilly
- 20.6 Genentech
- 20.7 Genta
- 20.8 GlaxoSmithKline
- 20.9 ImClone
- 20.10 ISIS Pharmaceuticals
- 20.11 Ligand Pharmaceuticals
- 20.12 OSI Pharmaceuticals
- 20.13 Pfizer
- 20.14 Pharmacyclics
- 20.15 Sanofi- Aventis
- 20.16 Telik
- 21 Appendix 3 Progress profiles on approved drugs
- 21.1 Docetaxel
- 21.2 Vinorelbine
- 21.3 Gemcitabine
- 21.4 Paclitaxel
- 21.5 Pemetrexed
- 21.6 Gefitinib
- 21.7 Erlotinib
- 22 Appendix 4: Treatment Guide Lines Melanoma
- 23 Disclaimer
- 24 Drug Index
- 25 Company Index
- List of Tables
- Table 1: How to Navigate the Report
- Table 2: Number of Pursued Oncology Drugs Targets by Company
- Table 3: Pursued Oncology Drugs Targets by Molecular Function
- Table 4: Drug Target Expression Profiles in Humans
- Table 5: Identified Targets By Cancer Indications
- Table 6: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Transmembrane Receptor Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity Targets
- Table 7: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Receptor Activity Targets
- Table 8: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with G-protein Coupled Receptor Activity
- Table 9: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Activity
- Table 10: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Transcription Factor Activity Targets
- Table 11: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Transmembrane Receptor Activity Targets
- Table 12: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Catalytic Activity Targets
- Table 13: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Cytokine Activity Targets
- Table 14: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Protein-Tyrosine Kinase Activity Targets
- Table 15: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Kinase Activity Targets
- Table 16: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with DNA Topoisomerase Activity Targets
- Table 17: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Growth Factor Activity Targets
- Table 18: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Ligase Activity Targets
- Table 19: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Motor Activity Targets
- Table 20: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Structural Constituent of Cytoskeleton Targets
- Table 21: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Transporter Activity Targets
- Table 22: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Targets According to Miscellaneous Molecular Function Groups
- Table 23: Head to Head Comparison of Drugs with Unclassified or Unknown Molecular Function Targets
- Table 24: Drug Target Comparison by Target Localization and Compound Type
- Table 25: Targeting Signaling Pathways: An Overview
- Table 26: Targeted Signaling Pathway Profiles of Big Pharma
- Table 27: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Alpha6 Beta4 Integrin Signaling Pathway
- Table 28: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Androgen Receptor Signaling Pathway
- Table 29: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the B Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway
- Table 30: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the EGFR1 Signaling Pathway
- Table 31: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Hedgehog Signaling Pathway
- Table 32: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the ID Signaling Pathway
- Table 33: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the IL-1 Signaling Pathway
- Table 34: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the IL-3 Signaling Pathway
- Table 35: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the IL-4 Signaling Pathway
- Table 36: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the IL-5 Signaling Pathway
- Table 37: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the IL-6 Signaling Pathway
- Table 38: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Kit Receptor Signaling Pathway
- Table 39: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Notch Signaling Pathway
- Table 40: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the T Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway
- Table 41: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the TGF-beta Receptor Signaling Pathway
- Table 42: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the TNF-alpha Signaling Pathway
- Table 43: Targets, Drugs and Cancer Indications Linked to the Wnt Signaling Pathway
- Table 44: Deployment of Biological Based Compounds by Cancer Indications
- Table 45: Deployment of Chemical Based Compounds by Cancer Indications
- Table 46: Deployment of Natural Product Based Compounds by Cancer Indications
- Table 47: Comparative Presentation of Targeted Therapy Areas in Oncology
- Table 48: The Angiogenesis Pipeline by Cancer Type and Developmental Stage
- Table 49: The Antibody Pipeline by Cancer Type and Developmental Stage
- Table 50: The Apoptosis Pipeline by Cancer Type and Developmental Stage
- Table 51: The Protein Kinase Inhibitor Pipeline by Cancer Type and Developmental Stage
- Table 52: The Cancer Vaccine Pipeline by Cancer Type and Developmental Stage
- Table 53: Summary of Big Pharma’s Preclinical Stage Pipeline
- Table 54: Preclinical Stage Pipeline by Cancer Indications
- Table 55: Summary of Big Pharma’s Phase I Clinical Stage Pipeline
- Table 56: : Phase I Clinical Stage Pipeline by Cancer Indications
- Table 57: Summary of Big Pharma’s Phase II Clinical Stage Pipeline
- Table 58: Phase II Clinical Stage Pipeline by Cancer Indications
- Table 59: Summary of Big Pharma’s Phase III Clinical Stage Pipeline
- Table 60: Phase III Clinical Stage Pipeline by Cancer Indications
- Table 61: Oncology Drugs Soon to be on the Market
- Table 62: Summary of Big Pharma’s Approved Oncology Drugs
- Table 63: Approved Drugs by Cancer Indications
- Table 64: Chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment of NSCLC
- Table 65. Near Term Approved Drugs for the Treatment of NSCLC
- Table 66: Chemotherapy Drugs off Patent
- Table 67 Generalized Illustration, Depicting the Key Elements Involved in the Apoptotic Pathways. . 271
- Table 68 VTA agents under development
- Table 69 EGFR or VEGFR inhibitors
- Table 70: FMS-like tyrosine kinases and their Synonyms
- Table 71: Fms-related Tyrosine Kinase Targets in Development
- Table 72: Protein Kinase Targets in Clinical Trials for Lung Cancer
- Table 73 Cancer immunotherapy strategies
- Table 74 Recently presented studies Lapatinib
- Table 75 Recently presented studies ZD-6474
- Table 76 Recently presented studies vinflunine
- Table 77 Recently presented studies Panitumumab
- Table 78 Recently presented studies Genasense
- Table 79 Recently presented studies cetuximab
- Table 80 Recently presented studies bevacizumab
- Table 81 Recently presented studies bexarotene
- Table 82 Recently presented studies Xcytrin
- Table 83: Critical Risk Factors for Development of Melanoma
- Table 84: Definition and Description of Stages of Melanoma
- Table 85: Prognosis of the 4 Stages of Malignant Melanoma
- Table 86: Current Cytotoxic Drugs for the Treatment of Melanoma
- Table 87: Progress Profile Dacarbazine
- Table 88: Progress Profile Cisplatin
- Table 89: Progress Profile Carboplatin
- Table 90: Progress Profile Carmustine
- Table 91: Progress Profile Melphalan
- Table 92: Progress Profile Paclitaxel
- Table 93: Progress Profile Tamoxifen
- Table 94: Progress Profile Temozolomide
- Table 95: Progress Profile Vinblastine/Vinorelbine
- Table 96: Progress Profile Interferon alfa-2b
- Table 97: Development Milestones- Virulizin
- Table 98: Development Milestones - Melacine
- Table 99: Development Milestones - Alfanative
- Table 100: Development Milestones - Proleukin
- Table 101: Deployed Strategies for Blocking Angiogenesis
- Table 102: Phase III Randomized Studies of Melanoma Vaccines.
- Table 103: Tumor antigen based vaccines
- Table 104: In vivo Gene Therapy
- Table 105: Cell Therapy Based Platform in Pipeline as Potential Treatment of Melanoma
- Table 106: Ex vivo gene therapy loading of antigen presenting cells
- Table 107: Overview of Immunostimulants in Development based on Type
- Table 108: Overview of Immuno-Biologicals
- Table 109: Overview of Gene Therapy Drugs for Immunostimulation
- Table 110: MDX-010’s Collaborative History and Landscape
- Table 111: Anti-angiogenisis Drugs under Development
- Table 112: Overview Apoptopic Inducer Drugs
- Table 113: Overview of Small Molecule Drugs
- Table 114:Selected Regulatory Progress of Sorafenib
- Table 115: Selected Regulatory Progress of Didemin B
- Table 116: Overview of Various Biological Drugs in Development for Melanoma
- List of Boxes
- Box 1: Quick facts on Docetaxel
- Box 2: Scientific Data on Docetaxel
- Box 3: Quick Facts - Vinorelbine
- Box 4: Scientific Data on Vinorelbine
- Box 5: Quick Facts - Gemcitabine
- Box 6: Scientific Data on gemcitabine
- Box 7: Quick Facts - pemetrexed
- Box 8: Scientific Data on Pemetrexed
- Box 9: Quick Facts - Gefitinib
- Box 10: Scientific Data on Gefitinib
- Box 11: Quick Facts - Erlotinib
- Box 12: Quick Facts - Enhanzyn
- Box 13: Quick Facts - M-VAX
- Box 14: M-VAX - Business & Market Bakground
- Box 15: Mechanisms which Tumor Cells use to Evade an Immune Reaction
- Box 16: Introgen’s INGN 241 Shows Vaccine Properties
- Box 17: Quick Facts - Oncophage
- Box 18: Oncophage - Designation and Status
- Box 19: Quick Facts - Canvaxin
- Box 20: Canvaxin - Designation and Status
- Box 21: CancerVax Milestone payment
- Box 22: Quick Facts - GM2-KLH Vaccine
- Box 23: Progenics Reaquires Rights to Vaccine
- Box 24: Completed Melanoma Phase III trials
- Box 25: Quick Facts - MDX-010
- Box 26: Quick Facts -OncoVax
- Box 27: Quick Facts - ALLOVECTIN-7
- Box 28: Quick Facts - Peginterferon alfa-2b
- Box 29: Introgen’s INGN 241 Shows Anti-angiogenesis Properties
- Box 30: Quick Facts - Lenalidomide
- Box 31: Quick Facts - Oblimersen
- Box 32: Quick Facts - Temozomide
- Box 33: Molecular Pathways Underlying the Activity of Temozolomide’s Anti-Cancer Therapy
- Box 34: Regulatory Progress
- Box 35: Quick Facts - INGN 241
- Box 36: Molecular Pathways Underlying Activity of Introgen's INGN 241 Anti-Cancer Therapy
- Box 37: Quick Facts - QS-21
- Box 38: Quick Facts - Talabostat
- Box 39: Quick Facts - SB 249553
- Box 40: Quick Facts - GVAX
- Box 41: Agreement Japan Tobacco and Cell Genesys
- Box 42: Predicted launch of GVAX
- Box 43: Quick Facts - GV 1001
- Box 44: Quick Facts - Dexosome
- Box 45: Important Milestones and License Fees
- Box 46: Quick Facts - Uvidem
- Box 47: Agreements Between Sanofi-Aventis and IDM
- Box 48: Quick Facts - NY-ESO-1 ISCOMS
- Box 49: NY-ESO-1 and ISCOMATRIX
- Box 50: Quick Facts - NovoVac-M1
- Box 51: Quick Facts - Oxxon vaccine
- Box 52: Quick Facts - Therion’s Melanoma Vaccine
- Box 53: Quick Facts - ImmunoVEX trimelan
- Box 54: Quick Facts - OncoVEX GM-CSF
- Box 55: Quick Facts - ZADAXIN
- Box 56: Developmental History Thymosin alpha1
- Box 57: Quick Facts - Alvac-Mage1/Mage3
- Box 58: Quick Facts - iboctadekin
- Box 59: Quick Facts - PF-3512676
- Box 60: Quick Facts - BAY-504798
- Box 61: Quick Facts - EMD-273063
- Box 62: Quick Facts - Sorefenib
- Box 63: Quick Facts - Vitaxin
- Box 64: Quick Facts . Bevacizumab
- Box 65: Quick Facts - PI88
- Box 66: Quick Facts - Didemnin B
- Box 67: Quick Facts - KOS 953
- Box 68: Quick Facts - Pivanex
- Box 69: Quick Facts - Karenitecin
- Box 70: Company Statement
- Box 71: Quick Facts - Lomeguatrib
- Box 72: Quick Facts - PD 0325901
- Box 73: Quick Facts - SB 715992
- Box 74: Quick Facts - INO 1001
- Box 75: Quick Facts - CP 4055
- Box 76: Quick Facts - AP 12009
- Box 77: Quick Facts - Ecromeximab
- Box 78: Quick Facts - ILX 651
- Box 79: Quick Facts - Kahalalide F
- Box 80: Quick Facts - ABX MA1
- Box 81: Quick Facts - MJV 101
- Box 82: Quick Facts - Russian Melanoma Vaccine
- Box 83: Quick Facts - N-Acetyl-GM3 ganglioside
- Box 84: Quick Facts - F 50040
- Box 85: KpOmpA Technology
AbstractExecutive Summary This is the report for professionals interested to grasp big pharma’s R&D strategy in oncology and at the same time have an extensive R&D overview of the lung cancer and melanoma field. This extensive 510+ pages report compiles and analyzes Deals and alliances, Drug targets, Compound types, Targeted therapy areas, and Selection of cancer indications among the five major pharmaceutical companies in the oncology arena: Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis. Between them and together with their respective partners they have more than 250 drugs for the treatment of cancer. In other words, their collective R&D capacity and presence is solid enough to set trends for the entire field of oncology drug development. Beyond trends, all five are fiercely defining their competitive edge and advantage in oncology and that is what this report is about.
The collective force of the above research and analysis ’decodes’ these five big pharma R&D efforts into strategy revealing and gap filing presentations. Enough to fuel and sustain comparative benchmarking, peer group surveillance, and partnership decisions.
The report further give an in depth analysis in two important key oncology areas; Lung- and Melanoma cancer. And provide a framework but also a careful identification and evaluation of drug candidates, technologies and competitors. Decoding Big Pharma’s R&D Strategy in Oncology in numbers: - Includes references to more than 250 drugs and 600 clinical/preclinical trials
- Addresses the competitive situation on more than 80 different cancer indications, including supportive care indications
- Special focus on Angiogenesis-, Antibody-, Apoptosis-, Protein kinase inhibitor- and Vaccine drugs for the treatment of cancer
- The included competitive landscape between the five big pharma includes more than 200 companies related to cancer drug development
- Last five years of deals and alliances in oncology, including almost a hundred different key deals and alliances
- Target analysis of 119 drug targets in oncology, including molecular function of target, target localization, type of compound for targeting, targets affecting signaling pathways etc
- Drug compound analysis by cancer indications
The risk of malignant melanoma has more than doubled in the past decade. The incidence of melanoma is rising faster than that of any other cancer. This in-depth analysis of the progress of melanoma R&D and current treatment strategies is one of the most extensive reports available in this field. No less than 68 approved drugs and drug candidates have been studied. Progress profiles and structured information will allow you to pin-point your knowledge-base in a most cost-effective way. New interesting phase III studies have been initiated. By gathering information around most drugs under development for melanoma and specially the late stage pipeline it has been clear that four major therapeutic strategies generated the most interesting data.
Lung cancer is the third most common malignant disease and the first leading cause of cancer death in the western world. Yet platinum agent constitutes the current mainstay of front-line metastatic lung cancer treatment. There are currently two platinum-based compounds that are marketed and clinically used worldwide as treatment for NSCLC: cisplatin and carboplatin. These two drugs are combined with paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine to build the first-line treatment options. Several different studies have been comparing or are comparing differ combinations of these drugs. Lately gefitinib, pemetrexed and erlotinib have entered the market and are initially used in second or third-line treatments. In this report we are not only describing the progress of different combinations of approved drugs but as well the progress of 21 late stage drug candidates are described and analyzed. Progress profiles and structured information will allow you to pin-point your knowledge-base in a most cost-effective way. By gathering information around most drugs under development for lung cancer and specially the late stage pipeline it is has been clear that four major therapeutic strategies generated most interesting data. With this report you will be able to track down and foresee activities associated with the development of new treatments for lung cancer. According to market analytical studies, the NSCLC drug market is predicted to exceed $4 billion between 2010 and 2015. Chemotherapy drugs will experience generic erosion and three major chemotherapy drugs go off patent before 2012; Aventis’ Taxotere (docetaxel), Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Paraplatin (carboplatin) and Eli Lilly’s Gemzar (gemcitabine).
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|