US Markets for Minimally Invasive Spine Fusion Technologies

Published by: Millennium Research

Published: Mar. 30, 2007

Table of Contents

LIST OF EXHIBITS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

METHODOLOGY

1.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION DEVICE OVERVIEW

1.1 Anatomy of the Human Spine

1.1.1 Degenerative Spinal Disorders

1.1.2 Deformity Spinal Disorders

1.1.3 Trauma/Tumor Spinal Disorders

1.1.4 Treatment Options

1.1.5 Spinal Fusion

1.2 Thoracolumbar Fusion Devices

1.2.1 Implant Design

1.2.2 Thoracolumbar Pathology

1.3 Interbody Fusion Devices

1.3.1 Implant Design

1.3.2 Implant Material

1.3.3 Surgical Approach

1.3.4 Note on Interbody Fusion Device Classification

2.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION MARKET OVERVIEW

2.1 Market Overview

2.2 Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Definitions

2.3 Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Market Analysis

2.3.1 Procedures

2.3.2 Market Forecast

2.3.3 Market Drivers and Limiters

2.4 Competitive Analysis

2.4.1 Leading Competitors

2.4.2 Other/Emerging Competitors

3.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRADITIONAL THORACOLUMBAR IMPLANT MARKET

3.1 Market Overview

3.2 Market Analysis

4.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

4.1 Market Overview

4.2 Market Analysis

4.2.1 Procedures

4.2.2 Market Forecast

4.2.2.1 By Type

4.2.2.2 By Approach

5.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE ACCESS INSTRUMENTATION MARKET

5.1 Market Overview

5.2 Market Analysis

APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

MRG List of Exhibits

EXECUTIVE SUM MARY

Exhibit ES-1: MI Spinal Fusion Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit ES-2: MI Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, US (US$), 2006 and 2011

Exhibit ES-3: MI IBD Fusion Procedures, by Approach, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit ES-4: MI Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit ES-5: Leading Competitors in the US MI Spinal Fusion Market, US, 2006

CHAPTER 1: MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION DEVICE OVERVIEW

Exhibit 1-1: Roles of the Spinal Column

Exhibit 1-2: Instrumented Spinal Fusion Procedure Classification

Exhibit 1-3: IBD Classification

CHAPTER 2: MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION MARKET OVERVIEW

Exhibit 2-1: MI Spine Fusion Market, by Device, US (US$) 2005-2011(Graphical Format)

Exhibit 2-2: Procedural Definitions

Exhibit 2-3: Market Value Definitions

Exhibit 2-4: MI TL Spinal Fusion Procedures, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit 2-5: MI Spinal Fusion Market, by Device, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Tabular Format)

Exhibit 2-6: Drivers of the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US

Exhibit 2-7: Limiters of the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US

Exhibit 2-8: Leading Competitors in the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US, 2006

Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006

Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)

Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)

Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)

CHAPTER 3: MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRADITIONAL THORACOLUMBAR IMPLANT MARKET

Exhibit 3-1: MI TL Implant Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Graphical Format)

Exhibit 3-2: MI TL Implant Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Tabular Format)

Exhibit 3-3: TL Implant ASPs per Procedure, by Surgery Type, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 3-4: MI TL Implant System ASPs per Procedure, by Number of Levels, US, 2005-2011

CHAPTER 4: MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

Exhibit 4-1: MI IBD Market, by Approach, as a % of Total, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-2: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-3: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-4: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach and Type, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-5: MI Interbody Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach and Type, as a % of Total, US, 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-6: MI IBD Market, by Type and by Approach, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-7: MI IBD Market Growth, by Type and by Approach, US, 2006-2011

Exhibit 4-8: MI TLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-9: MI PLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-10: MI LLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-11: MI ALIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011

Exhibit 4-12: MI IBD Units per Procedure, by Type and Number of Levels, US, 2005-2011

CHAPTER 5: MINIMALLY INVASIVE ACCESS INSTRUMENTATION MARKET

Exhibit 5-1: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011(Graphical Format)

Exhibit 5-2: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011(Tabular Format)

Exhibit 5-3: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Systems, ASP per Procedure, US, 2005-2011

Abstract

Market expansion is being aided by the accepted benefits that MI spinal fusions provide, including reduced hospital stays, shortened recovery times, and minimized tissue damage. Patient demand for MI procedures, better instrumentation, and improved surgeon training and awareness are also contributing to market growth

The US minimally invasive (MI) spinal fusion market—comprises traditional thoracolumbar fusion devices (such as rods, hooks, and screws) and interbody devices (IBDs) used in MI spinal fusions, and MI access instrumentation.

Get Full Details About This Report >>

About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 160,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 600 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.