The International Survey of Institutional Digital Repositories

Published by: Primary Research Group

Published: Nov. 1, 2007 - 121 Pages

Table of Contents

SELECT PARTICIPANTS

1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE

2. SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS

Contents of the Digital Repository

Cost of Developing the Repository

Software Procured for Operating the Digital Repository

In-House vs. Open Access to the Digital Repository

Mean Founding Date of the Digital Repository

Use of Content from Pre-Existing Divisional or Departmental Repositories

Types and Brands of Software Used to Operate the Digital Repository

Number of Man Hours of Labor Per Year Needed to Operate the Digital Repository

Purchasing Plans for Repository Software

eNewsletters or RSS feeds to Publicize the Repository

Website Links to Publicize the Repository

Use of Blogs, Brochures and Annual Reports to Publicize the Repository

Number of End Users of the Repository

Downloads from the Digital Repository

Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository

Digital Repository Budgets

Institutional Source of the Labor Required to Operate the Digital Repository

Percentage of Published Works Written by the College/Institution’s Authors Archived in the Digital Repository

Which Departments Contribute To The Digital Repository?

Number of Books, Journal Articles, Articles from Non-Refereed Publications, and Digital Images Held by the Digital Repository

Percentage of Books That Are Full Open Access

Percentage of Books Subject to Page View Limits

Percentage of Repositories that Share Content with Google Books or other Search Engine Book Sites

Financial Impact of the Digital Repository on the Sponsoring Institution

Sources of Funding for the Digital Repository

3. CONTENTS OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

4. INITIAL REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING

5. SOFTWARE AND WEB APPLICATIONS FOR THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

6. MARKETING THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

7. NUMBER OF VISITORS TO AND END USERS OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

8. THE BUDGET OF THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

9. WHO WORKS IN AND RUNS THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY?

10. FACULTY & INSTITUTIONAL ADMINISTRATION COOPERATION WITH THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

11. DEGREE OF OPEN ACCESS TO THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

12. RELATIONS WITH SEARCH ENGINES

13. FUNDING THE DIGITAL REPOSITORY

14. CATALOGING ISSUES

OTHER REPORTS FROM PRIMARY RESEARCH GROUP

List of Tables

Table 1—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms

Table 1—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 1—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by the Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 1—4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Number of Students in the Institution in FTE Terms, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—1: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Books Written by Faculty

Table 3—2: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Books Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—3: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty

Table 3—4: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—5: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—6: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Journal Articles Written by Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—7: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty

Table 3—8: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—9: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—10: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Presentations Made by Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—11: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images

Table 3—12: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—13: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—14: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Digital Images, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—15: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses

Table 3—16: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or These, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—17: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—18: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Dissertations and/or Theses, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—19: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework

Table 3—20: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—21: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—22: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Courses and Coursework, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—23: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records

Table 3—24: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—25: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—26: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have University Records, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—27: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents

Table 3—28: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—29: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—30: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Images of Rare Books or Historical Documents, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—31: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine

Table 3—32: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—33: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—34: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have College Publications such as the Alumni Magazine, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—35: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University

Table 3—36: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—37: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—38: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Patents Issued to Faculty or to the University, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 3—39: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College

Table 3—40: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 3—41: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 3—42: Percentage of the Digital Repositories in the Sample that have Notebooks, Personal Papers and other Materials of Scholarly Interest About Noted Scholars of the College, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 4—1: Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$)

Table 4—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$)*, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending to Initially Develop the Repository and Pay for Preliminary Marketing (in US$)*, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—4: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository

Table 4—5: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—6: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—7: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—8: Percentage of Libraries that Purchased Specialized Software to Develop the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 4—9: Repository Access Restriction Policies

Table 4—10: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—11: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—12: Repository Access Restriction Policies, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 4—13: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository

Table 4—14: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—15: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—16: Participants Advice About Software Issues in Starting A Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 4—17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation

Table 4—18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the Digital Repository has been in Operation, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 4—21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments

Table 4—22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 4—23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 4—24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Content in the Digital Repository that Initially Came from Pre-Existing Content in the Repositories Maintained by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—1: Percentage of Libraries that Use CDWare

Table 5—2: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons

Table 5—3: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—4: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—5: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Commons, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—6: Percentage of Libraries that Use Digital Media Archives

Table 5—7: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool

Table 5—8: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—9: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—10: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use the Software DigiTool, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—11: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DoKS SOftware

Table 5—12: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software

Table 5—13: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—14: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—15: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use DSpace Software, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—16: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software

Table 5—17: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—18: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—19: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use GNU EPrints Software, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—20: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Symposia Software

Table 5—21: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora

Table 5—22: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—23: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—24: Percentage of Survey Participants that Use Fedora, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—25: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified

Table 5—26: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—27: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—28: Percentage of Libraries that Use Other Repository Software not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 5—29: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years?

Table 5—30: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years? Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 5—31: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 5—32: Will the Institution Purchase Initial or Additional Digital Repository Software Within the Next Two Years? Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—1: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository

Table 6—2: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—3: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—4: Percentage of Survey Participants that have an email newsletter or RSS feed to which they regularly sends announcements of new additions and other news from the depository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—5: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website

Table 6—6: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—7: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—8: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the Library Website, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—9: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website*

Table 6—10: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—11: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—12: Percentage of Repositories that have a Link on the College Website Apart from the Link to the College Library Website, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—13: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository

Table 6—14: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—15: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Bog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—16: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Blog Specifically for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—17: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository

Table 6—18: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—19: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—20: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Promotional Brochure for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6—21: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository

Table 6—22: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 6—23: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6—24: Percentage of Survey Participants that have a Published Annual Report for the Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US)

Table 6-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), , Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 6-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 6-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending on Marketing the Digital Repository in the Past Year (in $ US), Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 7—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year

Table 7—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 7—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 7—4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Visitors to the Repository Website in the Past Year, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 7—5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution

Table 7—6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 7—7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Visitors to the Repository Who Are Connected to the Repository Host Institution, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 7—8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository

Table 7—9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 7—10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Annual Downloads from the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 7—11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository

Table 7—12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 7—13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Annual Growth Rate in the Use of the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 8—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library (in $ US)

Table 8—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository (in $ US)

Table 8—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget of the Digital Repository Allocated by the Library, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository (in $ US)

Table 9—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Library Personnel

Table 9—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Library Personnel, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 9—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byLibrary Personnel, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 9—4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by the Library, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 9—5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library

Table 9—6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 9—7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byAcademic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 9—8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Academic Departments Not Connected to the Library, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 9—9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments

Table 9—10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 9—11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 9—12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor to Run the Repository Supplied by Information Technology-Oriented Administrative Departments, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 9—13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Other Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified

Table 9—14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byOther Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 9—15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied by Other Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 9—16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Required to Run the Repository Supplied byOther Administrative Entities Not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository

Table 10—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository

Table 10—6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles Published by the Institution’s Faculty or other Personnel that are Archived in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—9: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences

Table 10—10: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—11: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—12: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Medical & Biological Sciences, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—13: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry

Table 10—14: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—15: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—16: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Chemistry, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—17: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics

Table 10—18: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—19: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—20: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Physics, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—21: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature

Table 10—22: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—23: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—24: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Literature, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—25: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music

Table 10—26: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—27: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—28: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Art, Architecture & Music, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—29: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics

Table 10—30: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—31: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—32: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Economics, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—33: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology

Table 10—34: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—35: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—36: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Psychology, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—37: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology

Table 10—38: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—39: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—40: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Anthropology, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—41: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law

Table 10—42: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—43: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—44: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Law, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—45: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams

Table 10—46: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—47: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—48: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College Sports Teams, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—49: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums

Table 10—50: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—51: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—52: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: College/University Museums, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—53: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution

Table 10—54: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—55: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—56: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: Research Institutes Associated with the Institution, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—57: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement

Table 10—58: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—59: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—60: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Office of Institutional Advancement, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—61: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office

Table 10—62: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—63: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—64: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Alumni Affairs Office, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—65: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office

Table 10—66: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—67: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—68: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Admissions Office, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 10—69: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper

Table 10—70: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 10—71: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 10—72: Rating of Contributors to the Digital Repository: The College Newspaper, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository

Table 11—2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Books in the Digital Repository Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository

Table 11—6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines

Table 11—10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Articles in the Digital Repository from Non-Refereed Publications such as Newspapers & Magazines, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository

Table 11—14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Digital Images of Works of Art in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication

Table 11—18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access Prior to or Upon Publication, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less

Table 11—22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—24: Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of One Year or Less, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year

Table 11—26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year , Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Full Open Access After a Waiting Period of More than One Year, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—29: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access

Table 11—30: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 11—31: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—32: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—33: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits

Table 11—34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository that are Open Access Subject to Page View Limits, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions

Table 11—37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of

Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Journal Articles in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to a Specified Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Type of College or

Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 11—39: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access

Table 11—40: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository that can be Described as Full Open Access, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—41: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Subjected to a Page View Limit

Table 11—42: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Books in the Digital Repository that are Subjected to a Page View Limit, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 11—43: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to an Institution or Set of Institutions

Table 11—44: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Books in the Digital Repository to Which Access is Restricted to those Individuals Connected to an Institution or Set of Institutions, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of

Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 12—1: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books

Table 12—2: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 12—3: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 12—4: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Google Books, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 12—5: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo

Table 12—6: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 12—7: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 12—8: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Yahoo, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 12—9: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN

Table 12—10: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 12—11: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 12—12: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with MSN, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 12—13: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited

Table 12—14: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 12—15: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 12—16: Percentage of Digital Repositories in the Sample that Share their Content with Any Other Search Engine Not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 13- 1: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository

Table 13- 2: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 13- 3: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to perate the Digital Repository

Table 13- 4: Assessment of the Financial Impact of the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 13- 5: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository

Table 13- 6: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 13- 7: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 13- 8: Funding Sources for the Institutional Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 13- 9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Spending of Grant Money by the Repository, Subset of Institutions that Receive Grant Money for the Repository, in $US

Table 13- 10: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work

Table 13- 11: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 13- 12: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 13- 13: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 13- 14: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work

Table 13- 15: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 13- 16: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 13- 17: Percentage Of Information-Technology Oriented Administrative Departments in the Sample That Support The Digital Repository With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table 13- 18: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work

Table 13- 19: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table 13- 20: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table 13- 21: Percentage Of Digital Repositories Supported by Non-Library Related Academic Departments With Operational Funds Or Significant Donated Man Hours Of Work, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Table14- 1: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository

Table14- 2: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by The Country or Region of Location of the Repository

Table14- 3: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Number of Man Hours of Labor Required Annually to Operate the Digital Repository

Table14- 4: Level of Library Cataloging of Works in the Digital Repository, Broken Out by Type of College or Institution Sponsoring the Repository

Abstract

About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 160,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 600 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.