Providing market research reports, industry analysis, company profiles and country reports for strategic planning, competitive intelligence, marketing and business research.
Search for Market Research Reports:    

The Plastic Surgery Opportunity Index: Capitalizing on Market Gaps

Published by: Valid Results Incorporated

Published: Nov. 30, 2006 - 66 Pages


Table of Contents


Introduction & Report Overview


Abstract

Measurement Objectives

Sample design and distribution

Measurement & Data Collection design

How to read this report


Executive Summary & Key Findings


Detailed Findings


I. Importance of various considerations for plastic surgeons in selecting product preference


a. Important considerations influencing product preferences for plastic surgeons

i. Product quality

ii. Pricing

iii. Innovation

iv. Training / Continuing education

v. Sales reps

vi. Surgeon support / Customer service

vii. Clinical data

viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)

b. Plastic Surgeons ratings of importance considerations

i. Product quality

ii. Pricing

iii. Innovation

iv. Training / Continuing education

v. Sales reps

vi. Surgeon support / Customer service

vii. Clinical data

viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)


II. Awareness & Associations of Plastic Surgery Product Manufacturers


a. Plastic Surgeons Awareness and experience with featured manufacturers

i. Allergan

ii. Bard / Davol

iii. BioForm

iv. Byron Medical

v. Candela

vi. Ethicon

vii. Implantech

viii. Inamed

ix. Integra

x. Medicis

xi. Mentor

xii. Spectrum

xiii. Thermage

xiv. Tyco

b. Top of mind products for featured manufacturers to plastic surgeons

c. For plastic surgeons, which manufacturer comes to mind given the following terms

i. Traditional

ii. Professional

iii. Established

iv. Flexible

v. Up and Coming

vi. Declining

vii. Cutting Edge


III. Plastic Surgeons Perceptions of Manufacturer Performance


a. Which of these companies is the best overall according to plastic surgeons

i. Allergan

ii. Bard / Davol

iii. BioForm

iv. Byron Medical

v. Candela

vi. Ethicon

vii. Implantech

viii. Inamed

ix. Integra

x. Medicis

xi. Mentor

xii. Spectrum

xiii. Thermage

xiv. Tyco

b. Which of these companies is the worst overall according to plastic surgeons

i. Allergan

ii. Bard / Davol

iii. BioForm

iv. Byron Medical

v. Candela

vi. Ethicon

vii. Implantech

viii. Inamed

ix. Integra

x. Medicis

xi. Mentor

xii. Spectrum

xiii. Thermage

xiv. Tyco

c. Manufacturer performance ratings on the following considerations

i. Product quality

ii. Pricing

iii. Innovation

iv. Training / Continuing education

v. Sales reps

vi. Surgeon support / Customer service

vii. Clinical data

viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)

d. Derived positioning ratings by featured manufacturers

e. Derived performance ratings by featured considerations


Conclusions


Recommendations

Suggested Analysis


About the Author / Valid Results



Table of Figures


Figure A-1 Geographical Spread of Respondents


Table 1-1 Considerations Influencing Product Preferences


Table 1-2 Categories of Considerations Influencing Product Preferences


Figure 1-1 Top 3 Important Considerations


Table 1-3 Importance of Considerations


Figure 1-2 90% Confidence Intervals Importance Means


Table 2-1 Company Product Experience


Table 2-2 Allergan - Top of Mind Product


Table 2-3 Bard/Davol Top of Mind Product


Table 2-4 Bioform Medical Top of Mind Product


Table 2-5 Byron Medical Top of Mind Product


Table 2-6 Candela Top of Mind Product


Table 2-7 Ethicon Top of Mind Product


Table 2-8 Implantech Top of Mind Product


Table 2-9 Inamed Top of Mind Product


Table 2-10 Integra Top of Mind Product


Table 2-11 Medicis Top of Mind Product


Table 2-12 Mentor Top of Mind Product


Table 2-13 Spectrum Top of Mind Product


Table 2-14 Thermage Top of Mind Product


Table 2-15 Tyco Top of Mind Product


Figure 2-1 Summary of Manufacturer and Product Associations


Table 2-16 Top of Mind Company


Table 2-17 Top of Mind Company continued


Figure 2-2 Relative Positioning of Various Companies


Table 3-1 Best Companies Overall


Table 3-2 Worst Companies Overall


Figure 3-1 90% Confidence Interval Overall Opinion Mean Ratings


Figure 3-2 90% Confidence Interval Quality Mean Rating

Figure 3-3 90% Confidence Interval Pricing Mean Ratings


Figure 3-4 90% Confidence Interval Innovation Mean Ratings


Figure 3-5 90% Confidence Interval Training/Education Means Ratings


Figure 3-6 90% Confidence Interval Sales Rep Mean Ratings


Figure 3-7 90% Confidence Interval Support Mean Ratings


Figure 3-8 90% Confidence Interval Clinical Data Mean Ratings


Figure 3-9 90% Confidence Interval Business Assistance Mean Ratings


Figure 3-10 90% Overall Value Mean Ratings


Figure 3-11 Allergan Derived Performance


Figure 3-12 Bard/Davol Derived Performance


Figure 3-13 BioForm Derived Performance


Figure 3-14 Byron Derived Performance


Figure 3-15 Candella Derived Performance


Figure 3-16 Ethicon Derived Performance


Figure 3-17 Implantech Derived Performance


Figure 3-18 Inamed Derived Performance


Figure 3-19 Integra Derived Performance


Figure 3-20 Medicis Derived Performance


Figure 3-21 Mentor Derived Performance


Figure 3-22 Spectrum Derived Performance


Figure 3-23 Thermage Derived Performance


Figure 3-24 Tyco Derived Performance


Abstract

The results feature a summary of surgeons’ perceptions regarding the importance of specific features in evaluating manufacturers, as well as the relative performance of featured manufacturers. The analysis includes a multivariate metric to compare the relative positioning of competing manufacturers. Also included is a positioning of competitive manufacturers based on the perceived strength of association with listed qualities.

The results of the data analysis indicate Mentor, Inamed, Ethicon and Allergan are perceived to be superior to the other featured companies. Product efficacy, clinical data and cost are identified as the attributes most important in determining preferences. The relative performance of the companies varies on the featured attributes, as well as their perceived positioning on general considerations. The product surgeons most strongly associate with each featured company is identified, and for some companies the strength of association is much greater.

The information has applicability to advertising, sales, communications, product launches, forecasting, and strategic planning, as well as other business functions.

Methodology and Purpose of this Research

100 American Medical Association (AMA) board certified plastic surgeons were randomly selected from a list of 6300 surgeons to participate in a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) featured on the internet. Upon completion of the SAQ, 20 of the participants were selected to participate in a follow-up depth interview conducted via the telephone.

The purpose of the study is to develop an overview of the perceived positioning of featured companies and the considerations associated with determining a company’s position.

Get Full Details About This Report >>
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
Buy this Report

Price and Delivery Options

See related reports or call the number above for help from a research specialist.


 

About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 160,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 600 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.

 

© MarketResearch.com 2008