|
Published by: Mintel International Group Ltd.
Published: Oct. 1, 2006 - 127 Pages
Table of Contents
- ISSUES IN THE MARKET
- Definition
- ABBREVIATIONS
- MARKET IN BRIEF
- UK own-label leads the way in Europe
- The brands vs own-label debate
- Segmentation provides scope for new product development
- Brands fight their corner
- Twin trends of premium and value
- Consumer trends
- INTERNAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT
- Retailers promote themselves as brands
- Supermarkets lead from the front in healthy eating
- Growing demand for sustainable food
- NPD drives demand for convenience
- Consumers want to spend more money on food, or do they?
- Figure 1: Attitudes towards premium supermarket own-label ranges, May 2006
- BROADER MARKET ENVIRONMENT
- Higher PDI drives consumers towards premium
- Figure 2: Attitudes towards quality, by country, 2005
- Inflation keeps spend on in-home food and drink in check
- Figure 3: UK consumer expenditure on in-home food & drink against total consumer expenditure, 1995 and 2005
- Wider focus on food puts retailers in a position of power
- COMPETITIVE CONTEXT
- Own-label under pressure to innovate
- Non-food growth does not detract from food
- Some challenges to takeaway sector
- STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN THE MARKET
- MARKET VALUE AND FORECAST
- More money per household, less spent on food
- Figure 4: Estimated UK retail sales of own-label food and drink, by value, 2000-11
- Primary reasons for growth
- What does the future hold for own-label?
- Chilled continues to outperform frozen and ambient
- Figure 5: Estimated retail sales of own-label packaged and fresh commodity foods, by value, 2001-06
- Own-label benefits from growth in fresh
- SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
- Brands are fighting back via premium
- A strong performance in chilled
- Figure 6: Estimated retail sales of own-label chilled foods, by value, 2001-06
- Figure 7: Estimated own-label penetration, by selected chilled packaged foods markets, by value, 2001-05
- Chilled meals ready for next stage
- Growth area: ready-to-cook
- Chilled pasta shuts out brands
- Finding growth in chilled pot desserts
- Dominating chilled pizza
- Struggling area: yogurts
- Ambient sales lose their impetus
- Figure 8: Estimated retail sales of own-label ambient foods, 2001-06
- Figure 9: Estimated own-label penetration, by selected ambient packaged grocery markets, by value, 2001- 05
- Biscuits in decline
- Up and coming dried fruits
- Leading brands prove too much for bread
- Little impact on noodles
- Growth area: chocolate confectionery
- Growing share of flat/declining markets?
- Figure 10: Estimated retail sales of own-label frozen foods, by value, 2001-06
- Figure 11: Estimated own-label penetration, by selected frozen foods markets, by value, 2001-05
- Brands come and go in frozen ready meals
- Own-label profits from struggling desserts
- Frozen fish and seafood benefits from category growth
- Shrinking share of frozen pizza
- Instant coffee is a branded domain
- Growth area - Fairtrade
- Figure 12: Estimated own-label penetration of coffee and tea, by value, 2001-05
- Opportunities in healthy drinking
- Smoothies’ branded dominance; how long can it continue?
- Frozen opportunities
- Figure 13: Estimated own-label penetration of selected non-alcoholic drinks categories, by value, 2003-05
- Own-label booze impresses the cheapskates
- Own-label wine: a social no-no?
- Champagne fixture
- MARKET SHARE
- Own-label to brand ratio
- Sacrificing profit for volume?
- Premium lines showing growth
- Basic assumptions on own-label
- Figure 14: Agreement with the statements ‘Supermarkets’ own brands are made by the big manufacturers anyway’ and ‘On the whole I think well known brands are better than a shop’s own brands’, 2002-06
- RETAILERS AND SUB-BRANDS
- The own-label brand dynasty
- Tesco
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Sainsbury’s
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Asda
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Morrisons
- Own-label performance
- Somerfield
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Marks & Spencer
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Waitrose
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- The Co-operative Group
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- Iceland
- Own-label performance
- Commitment to health and the environment
- BRAND COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTION
- Overall spend
- Tesco
- Discounters
- Focus on fresh and healthy
- Figure 15: Main monitored media advertising expenditure on own-label food and drink, by major supermarkets, 2001-06
- Figure 16: Main monitored media advertising expenditure on healthy ranges, by major supermarkets, 2001- 06
- CHANNELS TO MARKET
- Figure 17: Source of main grocery shopping, UK, 1998-2005
- The battle for primary shoppers
- Figure 18: Primary shoppers as percentage of all shoppers, 1998-2005
- THE CONSUMER - RELEVANCE OF SUB-BRANDS
- Overall findings
- Importance of sub-brands
- Figure 19: Importance of own-label ranges to shoppers, May 2006
- Popularity of core brands; value, standard and premium
- Figure 20: Importance of value, standard and premium ranges to shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Ethical values
- Figure 21: Importance of organic and fairtrade ranges to shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Waitrose - the wealthy shopper not a healthy shopper?
- Figure 22: Importance of healthy and children’s ranges to shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Doing it for the kids
- Some stereotyping in sub-branding
- Who’s buying what?
- Figure 23: Importance of own-label ranges to shoppers, compared to average, by gender, age and socioeconomic group, May 2006
- THE CONSUMER - SUB-BRAND POSITIONING
- Overall findings
- Own-label ranges bought by shoppers
- Figure 24: Importance of own-label ranges to Tesco shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Figure 25: Importance of own-label ranges to Sainsbury’s shoppers according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Figure 26: Importance of own-label ranges to Asda shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Figure 27: Importance of own-label ranges to Marks & Spencer shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- Figure 28: Importance of own-label ranges to shoppers, according to percentage point above/below average, May 2006
- APPENDIX
- INTRODUCTION
- Consumer research
- ACORN
- Advertising data
- Internal market environment
- Attitudes towards cheapest-on-display products
- Figure 29: COD purchasing behaviour and attitudes towards quality, May 2006
- Figure 30: Purchasing of, and attitudes towards, own-label economy food ranges, May 2006
- Broader market environment
- Figure 31: PDI and consumer expenditure, at current and constant prices, 2001-2011
- Figure 32: UK retail sales of fruit and vegetables, 2000-05
- Who’s innovating?
- Figure 33: Number of new own-label products by category, by top ten retailers, September 2005-06
- Market value and forecast
- Figure 34: Estimated retail sales of own-label packaged foods, by value, 2001-06
- Figure 35: Estimated retail sales of own-label commodity fresh foods, by value, 2001-06
- Figure 36: Estimated UK retail sales of own-label foods, by value, by sector, 2005
- Manufacturer shares
- Figure 37: Estimated retail sales of own-label packaged and fresh commodity foods, by value, 2001-06
- Figure 38: Estimated UK retail sales of own-label foods, by value, by sector, 2001-05
- Chilled ready meals
- Figure 39: UK retail share of chilled ready meals, by retailer, 2001-05
- Chilled pasta
- Figure 40: Leading brand value shares in the chilled pasta market, 2002-04
- Dry pasta
- Figure 41: Leading brand value shares in the dry pasta market, 2002-04
- Chilled pot desserts
- Figure 42: Manufacturer shares of the chilled pot desserts market, 2001-05
- Chilled pizza
- Figure 43: Manufacturer/brand shares of the prepacked chilled pizza market, 2000, 2002 and 2004
- Frozen pizza
- Figure 44: Manufacturer/brand shares of the frozen pizza market, 2000, 2002 and 2004
- Yogurt and yogurt drinks
- Figure 45: Manufacturers’ value shares in the UK yogurt and yogurt drink market (retail sales), 2001-05
- Dried fruit
- Figure 46: Manufacturers’ value shares in the dried fruits market, by brand, 2001-05
- Bread
- Figure 47: Brand shares of plant bread, by value, 2002 and 2004
- Chocolate confectionery
- Figure 48: Manufacturers’ value shares in the UK chocolate market (retail sales), 2001-05
- Sweet biscuits
- Figure 49: Manufacturers' branded shares of the UK retail sweet biscuit market, 2001-05
- Frozen ready meals
- Figure 50: Manufacturers’ share of the UK frozen ready meal market, by value, 2001-05
- Frozen desserts
- Figure 51: Manufacturers’ branded shares in the frozen desserts market, 2001-05
- Coffee
- Figure 52: Market share of instant coffee, by producer, by value, 2003 and 2005
- Figure 53: Market share of ground coffee, by producer, by value, 2003 and 2005
- Tea
- Figure 54: Market share of tea, by producer, by value, 2002 and 2004
- Smoothies
- Figure 55: Brand manufacturers’ share of the smoothies market, 2001-06
- Wine
- Figure 56: UK leading wine brands, by volume and value, 2004
- Figure 57: Estimated brand shares in the total champagne market, by value, 2001-05
- Figure 58: Estimated brand shares in the UK sparkling wine market, by volume, off-trade, 2001-05
- Whisky
- Figure 59: Selected UK whisky brands, by volume and value, 2005
- Figure 60: UK brandy brand shares, by value, 2000-04
- Figure 61: UK vodka brand shares, by value, 2000-04
- Figure 62: UK gin brand shares, by value, 2000-04
- Channels to market
- Figure 63: Food and drink retailers’ sales, 2002-05
- Consumer 1 - Detailed demographics
- Figure 64: Importance of own-label ranges to shoppers, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Figure 65: Importance of own-label ranges to shoppers, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Consumer 2 - Detailed Demographics
- Figure 66: Reasons why you choose own-label over brands, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Figure 67: Reasons why you choose own-label over brands, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Nets
- Figure 68: Reasons why you choose own-label over brands, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Figure 69: Reasons why you choose own-label over brands, May 2006
- Reasons why you choose brands over own-label
- Figure 70: Reasons why you choose brands over own-label, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Figure 71: Reasons why you choose brands over own-label, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Attitude nets
- Figure 72: Netted reasons why you choose brands over own-label, by gender, age, social grade, marital status, age of own children, Mintel’s Special Groups, working status, tenure, region, ACORN group, technology users, Internet usage, commercial TV viewing, supermarket usage, household size, car ownership, lifestage, May 2006
- Figure 73: Netted reasons why you choose brands over own-label, by supermarket usage, May 2006
- Figure 74: Netted reasons why you choose brands over own-label, by type of sub-brand, May 2006
- Correlation analysis
- Figure 75: Correlation of own-label sub-brands by retailer, May 2006
- Figure 76: Correlation of own-label sub-brands by retailer, May 2006
- Cross-analyses
- Figure 77: Cross-analysis of own-label ranges by reasons why you choose own-label over brands, May 2006
- Figure 78: Cross-analysis of own-label ranges by reasons why you choose brands over own-label, May 2006
- Figure 79: Cross-analysis of own-label ranges by reasons why you choose brands over own-label, May 2006
- Figure 80: Cross-analysis of own-label ranges by reasons why you choose brands over own-label, May 2006
- Premium foods
- Figure 81: Foods consumers would consider paying a higher price for, May 2006
- APPENDIX: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
AbstractIt is possible that own-label food and drink has reached saturation point. This report examines whether there is scope for development beyond ready meals and convenience food, for it is undoubtedly in these areas that the sector has thrived. Supermarket convenience food is the first port-of-call for busy mums and the UK has been the busiest market in Europe in terms of NPD in this area in recent years.
Is it set to continue? And what other lifestyle trends and occasions can find a response from the retailers?
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|