|
Published by: Datamonitor
Published: May. 10, 2006 - 48 Pages
Table of Contents
- DATAMONITOR VIEW
- CATALYST
- SUMMARY
- METHODOLOGY
- OVERVIEW ANALYSIS
- Branding is becoming increasingly important
- There are five key challenges of fundamental importance to all
- Building brand symbolism and trust
- Managing corporate brand
- Managing brand in intermediated markets
- Managing brand during mergers and acquisition
- The challenge of declining returns
- Success will depend upon a number of factors
- Consumer-facing brands must reflect people's lifestyles and aspirations
- Corporate brands must deliver on their promise to act responsibly
- Brands in intermediated markets must appeal to both intermediaries and end customers
- Active brand management is essential to successful mergers and acquisition
- Adapting promotional activities is key to ensuring optimum ROI
- CONSUMER BRANDS MUST REFLECT PEOPLE'S LIFESTYLES AND ASPIRATIONS
- Catalyst
- Summary
- Brands have important symbolic meanings that can be used to build brand equity
- There is a difference between product and brand associations
- The symbolic associations of brands mean that they play an important role in shaping self-concept
- Social identification and image are important brand symbols
- When brands fulfill symbolic functions marketers can build profitability more effectively via premium pricing
- Consumers are becoming increasingly skeptical of brand symbolism conjured via emotional branding ploys
- Symbolic meanings combined with a clear focus on functional benefits create a compelling brand proposition
- Engendering trust should be a primary focus of branding efforts
- Brand trust relates to expectations of the brand's reliability and intentions
- Four different types of trust exist
- Trusted brands form personal connections with consumers and are more likely to be given a second chance
- Trust is most important for brands in markets with little differentiation
- Future brand strategies must alleviate growing consumer skepticism
- Consumers are becoming more fearful, skeptical and distrusting
- Trust perceptions vary by industry and category
- Where consumers perceive risk or trust is low they develop trust-orientated strategies accordingly
- Marketers can leverage the attributes and communication cues that consumers perceive as trustworthy
- CORPORATE BRANDS MUST DELIVER ON THEIR PROMISE TO ACT RESPONSIBLY
- Catalyst
- Summary
- Corporate branding is ideal in commoditized markets
- Branding has been of little importance to utilities compared to other sectors
- Rather than customer empathy, utilities brands originally had regional company focus
- There is a trend to corporate branding in UK energy suppliers, after a period of intense M&A activity
- In supplying a commodity, brand differentiation is difficult
- Enhancing the commodity with a good corporate profile is the most appropriate branding strategy
- Commodity companies cannot hide wholesale activities from their corporate profile
- Companies have environmental and social responsibilities
- Tariff increases and profits on wholesale activities attract bad press
- Commodity companies have the responsibility of ensuring continuity of supply
- Exploiting natural resources may help the bottom line, but it won't help the brand
- Investment in the corporate brand has to focus internally as well as externally
- The company has to act in the manner it promoted through its corporate profile brand
- To act in this manner, internal stakeholders have to be aligned with the brand profile
- All subsidiaries of the company and distant operations should operate under the same principles
- Leading commodity companies are investing internally when developing a corporate profile brand
- The corporate profile can be easily damaged by activities that do not fit with it
- Short-term damage to a corporate profile is difficult to repair
- A profile brand cannot be replaced in the same manner as a family sub-brand
- Bad PR through poor internal activities is the easiest way to damage a profile brand
- BRANDS MUST APPEAL TO BOTH INTERMEDIARIES AND END CUSTOMERS
- Catalyst
- Summary
- The Financial Services market illustrates the challenge of brand in a complex market
- Brand must have no bearing on sales through intermediaries in financial services
- Product providers continue to market their brand to customers and intermediaries
- Brand is important to a high proportion of the target clients of intermediaries
- Clients prefer well-known brands and are more likely to trust providers with strong brands
- Brand is important to a proportion of the target clients of intermediaries
- Intermediaries are largely unaffected by brand promotion
- Providers should focus branding efforts on both end customers and intermediaries
- Advertising focused on IFAs is almost as effective as advertising focused on customers
- Sponsorship and social projects are an important aspect of improving brand perception
- Intermediaries are skeptical of brand promotion without substance
- Providers with a strong brand are seen as reputable and product-focused
- Weaker brands are those which have a poor product and service offering
- Strong brands rely on a combination of values appealing to intermediaries and their clients
- Even in intermediated markets, soft values can be important to brand perception
- Raising visibility among clients through a clear branding strategy is key to maximizing effectiveness
- ACTIVE BRAND MANAGEMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
- Catalyst
- Summary
- Companies must manage their brands to maximise their chances of success
- A company's brand can be a powerful tool
- Merger and acquisition activity has been rife in recent years, which can cause brand problems
- Brand management is therefore essential
- For many companies, the policy of 'accumulate and assimilate' has worked well
- The four largest express players have followed similar strategies
- Two main areas to tackle to minimize disruption: external and internal environments
- Timing and composition of brand transition strategy varies
- However, there are some common general steps that integrators take to maximize a successful transition
- DHL/Airborne case shows that detailed planning is key
- Acquisition of Airborne Express was a good strategic move for DHL
- Detailed plan drawn up and implemented for all elements affecting brand
- Advertising key in communicating to customers and employees
- Presentations to stakeholders were also key
- But there have still been problems with the transition
- UPS/Overnite case offers further pointers to best practice
- Overall, integrators have been successful in managing their brand during M&A activity
- DHL re-branding shows that communication is key
- Action required by Deutsche Post due to multiple brands
- Five elements to integrating separate business units into one brand, with communication being key
- New color scheme helped quickly establish the new brand
- DHL brand management process has continued and evolved
- While brand management can yield problems, there are five steps to maximize the benefits
- Serious problems are created by not managing the brand
- Definite benefits can be yielded through brand management
- There are five steps to help decrease the chances of damaging the brand
- BRAND MANAGERS MUST OPTIMIZE ROI IN A MARKET WITH DECLINING RETURNS
- Catalyst
- Summary
- Pharmaceutical branding has traditionally led to considerable returns
- Intense advertising activity has led to pharmaceutical brand recognition, rapid uptake and blockbuster sales
- Brand awareness is a key tool for protecting against new competition
- Unique selling points can be key to brand success
- ROI has been declining as new advertising regulations and media have been created
- Increased use of alternative media has reduced the value of traditional pharmaceutical marketing campaigns
- Physician detailing has become less effective
- The new PhRMA guiding principles for DTC advertising have led to significant changes in marketing
- Several companies took the new DTC guidelines a step further
- Cost constraints will further reduce ROI
- The lack of direct-to-consumer advertising in Europe has led to patients preferring face-to-face contact
- Physicians are a more suitable target for branding in Europe
- Generic substitution is mandatory in many European countries, leading to a limited ROI on marketing
- The future of pharmaceutical branding is uncertain
- Drug safety scares have led to negative associations with some household pharmaceutical brands
- In the future brand will have less influence over prescription choice than in the community
- Companies will have to adjust their measurement of marketing effectiveness
- APPENDIX
- Definitions
- Brand
- Further reading
- Ask the analyst
- List of Tables
- Table 1: The percentage of consumers who consider various financial, automotive, utilities and packaged goods variables to be trustworthy, 2004
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Consumer value brands that reflect their attitudes and values on life
- Figure 2: Preference for customization is influenced by the growing importance of identity building consumption
- Figure 3: Brand must combine symbolic and functional positioning to create perceived differentiation
- Figure 4: Trust can build brand loyalty and equity which provides a wide range of marketing benefits
- Figure 5: Both consumer and industry opinion perceive that prior experience and endorsement from professional bodies are the most influential factors in (re)gaining consumer trust
- Figure 6: UK utility retail and corporate brands
- Figure 7: Brand affects clients more than intermediaries, and is most likely to influence financially uncertain clients
- Figure 8: Advertising is the most effective method of strengthening brand perception
- Figure 9: Financial advisers say provider offerings and performance are key brand values
- Figure 10: Distinctive Integrator Colours Minimizes Brand Confusion
- Figure 11: DHL's advertising for the Airborne acquisition
- Figure 12: DHL Brand Integration
- Figure 13: DHL's "Yellow Offensive"
- Figure 14: Viagra accounted for almost a third of total PDE5 inhibitor sales in 2005
- Figure 15: The 'purple pill' - AstraZeneca's branding for Prilosec and Nexium has been key to the franchise's success
- Figure 16: Patients in Europe prefer to receive drug and disease information through face-to-face contact rather than via the media or brochures
- Figure 17: An average of 91% of promotional spend in the EU is for physician detailing while in the US this accounts for 52
AbstractIntroduction
Branding is becoming ever more important as companies face an increasingly global and competitive marketplace. But what should companies be focusing on when managing this key intangible asset? This report provides in-depth analysis of the key challenges of branding and how companies can respond effectively.
Scope of this report
- Covers the key challenges facing brand strategists, with case studies of how particular industries have been affected.
- Each case study's conclusions are applicable to all industries looking for best practice ideas.
- Industries covered include consumer markets, utilities, financial services, logistics and healthcare.
Research and analysis highlights
There are two important insights into managing brand through mergers and acquisitions successfully. Firstly, serious problems can be created by not actively managing the brand through such developments, which can cause brand equity to suffer. Secondly, ongoing communication to all parts of the value chain is essential.
For intermediaries, the quality and range of products is far more important than brand when assessing providers. Nevertheless, providers should look to appeal to both intermediaries and end customers, by looking to offer a high level of service and wide product portfolio, as well as build up a reputation for trust, leadership and social values.
Key reasons to read this report
- Understand the main challenges of branding and how your company can respond.
- Learn from the experiences that other industries have gone through to improve your branding strategy.
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|