|
Published by: Datamonitor
Published: May. 17, 2006 - 160 Pages
Table of Contents
- ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE
- CHAPTER 1 ADDENDUM
- Background
- How will this delay affect antiarrhythmic forecasts moving forward?
- Assumptions for updated forecasts
- Previous market and pipeline forecasts for the antiarrhythmics market (dated May 17, 2006)
- Updated market and pipeline forecasts for the antiarrhythmics market (dated June 23, 2006)
- Implications of the delayed launch of RSD1235 (intravenous formulation)
- Market forecasts and key events
- Summary
- CHAPTER 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Scope of the analysis
- Historical perspective of the antiarrhythmics market
- Size of the antiarrhythmics market in 2005
- Datamonitor insight into the antiarrhythmic market
- At the end of 2005, sales within the antiarrhythmics drug market were in decline. With the main problems of current antiarrhythmic drug therapy surrounding their pro-arrhythmic and toxic side effects, it may be sufficient for developmental compounds to demonstrate equivalent efficacy but superior safety profiles to gain market share from the current genericized treatments.
- By 2015 the global antiarrhythmic market will be worth $3.5 billion, with sales of pipeline products accounting for over two thirds of the market by this time. Cardiome's RSD1235 (intravenous formulation) is predicted to command 27% of the whole market by 2015 on the back of good safety and efficacy data, combined with the involvement of Japanese pharmaceutical giant, Astellas, in the sales and marketing of the product in the US.
- Of the orally active antiarrhythmics currently vying for amiodarone's crown, P&G Pharmaceuticals' Stedicor (azimilide) looks set to win the battle with Sanofi-Aventis' next generation antiarrhythmic Multaq (dronedarone), due to a combination of robust late-stage clinical trial data for Stedicor, particularly from the SHIELD (Shock Inhibition Evaluation with Azimilide) study, and lingering concerns over the relative safety of Multaq.
- Summary
- Key metrics
- CHAPTER 3 PATIENT POTENTIAL
- Normal heart electrical activity
- What do we mean by the term arrhythmia?
- Bradycardia
- Tachycardia
- Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs)
- Ventricular tachycardias
- Other arrhythmias originating in the atria
- Premature supraventricular contraction or premature atrial contraction (PAC)
- Other arrhythmias originating in the ventricle
- Premature ventricular contraction (PVC)
- Pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmia
- Normal cardiac electrical activity vs irregularity
- Non-nodal/fast response action potentials
- Nodal/pacemaker action potentials
- Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation
- Future trends in the incidence and prevalence of AF
- Methodology
- Unmet needs in arrhythmia
- Decreased mortality
- Improved safety
- Improved quality of life (QoL)
- Improved treatment options for patients with underlying co-morbid conditions
- Other unmet needs
- The ideal anti-AF drug!
- CHAPTER 4 PIPELINE OVERVIEW
- Pipeline overview
- Breakdown by development stage
- Breakdown by company
- Breakdown by mechanism
- CHAPTER 5 R&D APPROACH
- Principles of antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy
- Classification of current antiarrhythmics
- Class I antiarrhythmics
- Class II antiarrhythmics
- Class III antiarrhythmics
- Class IV antiarrhythmics
- Classification of pipeline products
- Novel targets for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias
- Potassium channel blockers
- Sodium channel blockers
- Adenosine A1 receptor agonists
- Clinical trial design in arrhythmia
- Comparator therapy
- There is no single gold standard therapy
- Chronic trials
- In-hospital trials
- Clinical trial endpoints in arrhythmia
- Mortality rates
- Efficacy
- Chronic trials
- In-hospital trials
- Safety data
- Cost efficacy
- Patient numbers
- Chronic trials
- In-hospital trials
- Trial length
- Starting points
- Patient selection
- Hybrid therapy trials
- CHAPTER 6 CLASS III ORAL ANTIARRHYTHMICS LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
- Definition of current comparator therapies
- Cordarone (amiodarone)
- Indications
- Side effects
- Amiodarone's efficacy
- Conclusion
- Multaq (dronedarone; SR-33589)
- Drug overview
- Clinical trial data
- Datamonitor comments
- Patient potential
- Marketing factors
- SWOT analysis of dronedarone
- Performance against benchmark criteria
- Forecasts to 2015
- Stedicor (azimilide)
- Drug overview
- Clinical trial data
- ASAP
- ALIVE
- SHIELD
- Ongoing Trials
- A-STAR (Azimilide supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia reduction)
- A-COMET I and II (The azimilide cardioversion maintenance trials)
- Patient potential
- Azimilide in the ICD population
- Azimilide in the AF population
- Marketing factors
- SWOT analysis
- Performance against benchmark criteria
- Forecast to 2015
- CHAPTER 7 CLASS III INTRAVENOUS ANTIARRYHTHMIC LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
- Definition of current comparator therapies
- Corvert (ibutilide)
- Conclusion
- RSD1235 (intravenous formulation)
- Drug overview
- Development history
- Clinical trial data
- Phase I
- Phase II
- Phase III
- Ongoing trials
- Patient potential
- Marketing Factors
- Performance against benchmark criteria
- SWOT analysis
- Forecast to 2015
- Pulzium (tedisamil)
- Drug overview
- Clinical trial data
- Phase I
- Phase II
- Phase III
- Patient potential
- Marketing Factors
- Performance against benchmark criteria
- SWOT analysis: Tedisamil compared to Flecainide
- Forecast to 2015
- CHAPTER 8 ADENOSINE RECEPTOR AGONIST LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
- Definition of current comparator therapies
- Adenosine
- Tecadenoson (CVT-510)
- Drug overview
- Clinical trial data
- Phase III
- Patient potential
- Marketing factors
- Performance against benchmark criteria
- SWOT analysis
- Forecast to 2015
- CHAPTER 9 OTHER PIPELINE ANTIARRHYTHMICS
- Phase II compounds
- AVE-0118
- Drug overview
- Preclinical data
- Phase II trials
- AZD-7009
- Drug overview
- Phase I trials
- Nibentan
- Drug overview
- Preclinical data
- RSD1235 (oral formulation)
- Drug overview
- Phase I trials
- Phase II trials
- Selodenoson IV
- Drug overview
- Phase II trials
- Preclinical data
- Phase I trials
- SSR-149744
- Preclinical studies
- Clinical trials
- Phase I compounds
- AVE-1231
- PJ-875
- Selodenoson (oral controlled release)
- CHAPTER 10 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIARRHYTHMIC PIPELINE
- Comparative forecasts
- Comparative analysis
- APPENDIX A
- Methodology
- Datamonitor forecast methodology.
- Epidemiology forecasts
- Product forecasts
- Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- Contributing experts
- References
- Report methodology
- APPENDIX B
- About Datamonitor
- About Datamonitor Healthcare
- Datamonitor Healthcare's therapy area capabilities
- About the cardiovascular analysis team
- Key therapy team members
- Dr Allison Fleetwood, Director, Cardiovascular, Diabetes and Women's Health
- Dr Duncan Emerton, Senior Analyst, Cardiovascular (report contact)
- Disclaimer
- List of Tables
- Table 1: Previous US and M5EU forecasted sales for antiarrhythmic pipeline products ($m) and total market value, 2007-15
- Table 2: Updated US and M5EU forecasted sales for antiarrhythmic pipeline products ($m) and total market value, 2007-15
- Table 3: Prevalence estimates for atrial fibrillation, 2005-15
- Table 4: US and M5EU forecasted sales for antiarrhythmic pipeline products ($m), 2007-15
- Figure 9: Electrocardiogram of a single heartbeat
- Table 5: Mechanism of a non-pacemaker cardiac action potential
- Table 6: Prevalence estimates for atrial fibrillation, 2005-15
- Table 7: The antiarrhythmic R&D pipeline, 2006
- Table 8: Distribution of antiarrhythmic drugs by company, 2006
- Table 9: Key Class III antiarrhythmic drugs in late-stage development for cardiac arrhythmia, 2006
- Table 10: Amiodarone: key facts
- Table 11: Results of both AF/AFL and PSVT arms of the four ASAP trials
- Table 12: ALIVE: survival and safety of all and high-risk patients
- Table 13: Key intravenous, multi-factorial antiarrhythmic drugs in late-stage R&D for cardiac arrhythmia, 2006
- Table 14: Conversion of AF to SR in the ACT 1 study
- Table 15: Non-cardiac Adverse Events (0- to 24-hour period)
- Table 16: Key adenosine receptor agonists in late-stage development for cardiac arrhythmia, 2006
- Table 17: TEMPEST: Primary Efficacy Assessment
- Table 18: Other developmental antiarrhythmics, 2006
- Table 19: US and M5EU forecasted sales for antiarrhythmic pipeline products ($m), 2007-15
- Table 20: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for key late-phase pipeline antiarrhythmic products
- Table 21: Datamonitor drug assessment parameters
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Future expansion of the global antiarrhythmics market will be fueled by five new product launches between 2007 and 2010
- Figure 2: Impacts on the global antiarrhythmic market, 2006-2015
- Figure 3: The global antiarrhythmics market 2005 by volume (SU) and sales ($)
- Figure 4: Future expansion of the global antiarrhythmics market will be fueled by five new product launches between 2007 and 2010
- Figure 5: Impacts on the global antiarrhythmic market, 2006-2015
- Figure 6: Electrical activity of the heart-yellow coloring indicates the electrical path
- Figure 7: The relationship between electrical and mechanical events in the cardiac cycle
- Figure 8: Segmentation and inter-relationships of the main types of arrhythmia
- Figure 10: Schematic diagram of an action potential generated by a non-nodal e.g. ventricular muscle cell
- Figure 11: Key unmet needs in the treatment of arrhythmia, 2006
- Figure 12: 2002 guidelines for management of AF in patients with concomitant heart disease
- Figure 13: Pipeline overview of antiarrhythmic drugs, 2006
- Figure 14: Distribution by each phase of development , 2006
- Figure 15: Sanofi-Aventis is developing over a quarter of the pipeline products, 2006
- Figure 16: Breakdown of antiarrhythmic pipeline by mode of action, 2006
- Figure 17: The fast-response action potential
- Figure 18: A ventricular action potential and the effect of Class I drugs
- Figure 19: Global sales decline of the antiarrhythmics market, 2002-05
- Figure 20: DAFNE trial design
- Figure 21: SWOT analysis of dronedarone
- Figure 22: Assessment of dronedarone's performance indicators compared to amiodarone
- Figure 23: US and M5EU sales forecast for Multaq ($m), 2007-15.
- Figure 24: SVA4 - a typical ASAP trial design
- Figure 25: ALIVE trial design
- Figure 26: SWOT analysis of Stedicor
- Figure 27: Assessment of azimilide's performance indicators
- Figure 28: US and M5EU sales forecast for Stedicor ($m), 2007-15
- Figure 29: CRAFT trial design
- Figure 30: Assessment of RSD1235's performance indicators compared to Ibutilide
- Figure 31: SWOT analysis of RSD1235
- Figure 32: Sales forecast for RSD1235 IV in the US and EU markets, 2007-15
- Figure 33: IV tedisamil trial design
- Figure 34: Assessment of Tedisamil's performance indicators compared to Flecainide
- Figure 35: Tedisamil SWOT analysis
- Figure 36: Sales forecast for Tedisamil in the US and EU markets, 2009-15
- Figure 37: TEMPEST trial design
- Figure 38: Assessment of Tecadenoson performance indicators compared to adenosine
- Figure 39: SWOT analysis of tecadenoson
- Figure 40: Sales forecast for Tecadenoson in the US and EU markets, 2010-15
- Figure 41: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for key late-stage antihypertensive pipeline products
- Figure 42: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for key late-stage antiarrhythmic products
- Figure 43: Example of Datamonitor drug assessment scorecard
- Figure 44: Example of Datamonitor drug assessment graph
AbstractIntroduction
Datamonitor believes that RSD1235 (iv) has the potential to have a significant impact on the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In addition, P&G's Stedicor and Sanofi-Aventis' Multaq also offer advances on current treatments, with improvements in efficacy and safety therein.
Scope of this report
- Evaluation of patient potential for developmental antiarrhythmics over the period 2006-2015
- Scrutiny of key impacts on the R&D approach and cost, evaluation of optimal clinical trial end points and identification of suitable comparators
- Evaluation of key players in the arrhthymics market and opposing company approaches to development and commercialization
- Analysis of key antiarrhymic drugs in development and their ability to satisfy major unmet needs and compete with existing agents
Research and analysis highlights
2005 saw sales in the antiarrhythmics drug market decline. With key problems of current antiarrhythmic drug therapy surrounding their pro-arrhythmic and toxic side effects, it may be sufficient for developmental compounds to demonstrate equivalent efficacy but superior safety profiles to gain market share from the current genericized treatments.
By 2015 the global antiarrhythmic market will be worth $3.5 billion, with sales of pipeline products accounting for over two thirds of the market by this time. RSD1235 (iv) is predicted to command 27% of the whole market by 2015 on the back of good trial data and the involvement of Astellas in the promotion of the product in the US.
P&G Pharma's Stedicor (azimilide) looks set to become the most successful orally active antiarrhythmic due to a combination of robust late-stage clinical trial data for Stedicor, particularly from the SHIELD (Shock Inhibition Evaluation with Azimilide) study, and lingering concerns over the relative safety of Sanofi-Aventis' Multaq (dronedarone).
Key reasons to read this report
- Explore physician attitudes to the newer antiarrhythmic drugs, and the threats faced by existing and developmental products
- Predict future market leaders using our independent sales forecasts for products in late stage development in both existing and novel classes
- Identify early stage antiarrhythmic compounds with high potential being developed by companies seeking a marketing partner
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|