|
Revenue Assurance - Identifying Leakage & Implementing SolutionsPublished by: Juniper Research Limited Published: Nov. 1, 2005 - 141 Pages Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Evaluate Current Market Position 3. Identify and Quantify Leakages 4. Identify and Select Solutions 5. Implement Solutions 6. Monitor and Control 7. Critical Success Factors 8. Case Studies 9. Forecasts and RA Profitability 10. Appendices List of Figures List of Tables List of Forecasts Mobile Subscribers Revenue Loss Figures Mobile Data Revenues Revenue Assurance Market Glossary Executive Summary 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 What is Revenue Assurance? 1.1.1 Defining RA 1.1.2 Where do Revenue Leakages Occur? Figure 1: Revenue Assurance Value Chain 1.2 Why is RA becoming increasingly Important? 1.3 Aim of the Report 1.3.1 Purpose 1.3.2 Analysis Framework Figure 2: RA Framework Figure 3: Elements of a RA Programme 1.3.3 Framework Elements 1.3.3.1 Evaluate Current Market Position 1.3.3.2 Identify and Quantify Leakages 1.3.3.3 Identify and Select Solutions 1.3.3.4 Implement Solutions 1.3.3.5 Monitor and Control 1.3.4 Benefits that Operators can Derive from our Holistic Framework 1.3.5 Report Structure 2. EVALUATE CURRENT MARKET POSITION 2.1 Introduction Figure 4: The Environment 2.2 Macro Environment Figure 5: Global Mobile Penetration 2.2.1 Analysing the Region of Operation 2.2.1.1 The US 2.2.1.2 Saturated Markets 2.2.1.3 Emerging Markets 2.3 Economic Cycle & Sector Analysis 2.3.1 Company Economic Cycle 2.3.2 National Economic Cycle 2.3.3 Sector Analysis 2.3.3.1 GSM/3G 2.3.3.2 MVNO 2.3.3.3 Incumbent 2.4 Resources and Capabilities 2.4.1 Infrastructure 2.4.2 Legacy Systems 2.4.3 Knowledge Base 2.4.4 Culture 2.4.5 Company's RA Experience 2.5 RA Positioning Rating Tool Table 1: Rating Guidelines Table 2: Typical Rating Benchmarks for Telco's in Different Markets Figure 6: Typical Spider Chart for a US Telco Figure 7: Typical Spider Chart for a Telco in a Saturated Market Figure 8: Typical Spider Chart for a Telco in an Emerging Market 3. IDENTIFY AND QUANTIFY LEAKAGES 3.1 Revenue Leakages 3.1.1 High Level View of Leakages 3.1.1.1 Why do Leaks Occur? 3.1.1.2 Where do Leaks Occur? 3.1.2 Predicting Leakages Figure 9: Importance of Key Elements of Revenue Loss 3.1.3 Traditional Leakage Areas 3.1.3.1 Fraud 3.1.3.2 Rating 3.1.3.3 Billing 3.1.3.4 Network Management 3.1.3.5 Data Loss 3.1.3.6 Roaming 3.1.3.7 New Product Development and New Service Roll Outs 3.1.4 New Leakage Areas 3.1.4.1 Operator to Operator Fraud 3.1.4.2 Third Party Solutions 3.1.4.3 Settlement 3.1.4.4 Quality of Service 3.1.4.5 Customer Retention 3.1.4.6 Optimised Call Routing 3.1.4.7 Marketing 3.1.4.8 IP Fraud 3.1.4.9 Bulk SMS 3.1.4.10 Premium Rate Calls 3.1.4.11 Mobile Content 3.1.4.12 Migration to New Technologies Table 3: Leaks in 3G/2.5G Networks 3.1.4.13 Industry-wide Consolidation 3.1.4.14 IPv6 3.1.4.15 Convergence and Next Generation Networks 3.2 How to Track and Identify Key Leakages in the Company? Figure 10: RA Value Chain and Key Drivers 3.2.1 Scorecard Table 4: Scoring the Existing Leaks Functions Leakage Areas Key Drivers Relative Importance to Strategy Figure 11: Prioritising Leakages 4. IDENTIFY AND SELECT SOLUTIONS 4.1 Introduction Figure 12: RA Actions 4.2 RA Tools Available on the Market 4.2.1 Reporting Tools 4.2.2 Testing Tools 4.2.3 Analysis Tools 4.3 Identify Solutions 4.3.1 A Simple (Pen and Paper) Approach 4.3.2 Vendors 4.3.2.1 Criterion for Selecting the Right Software/Tool 4.3.2.2 Analysing the Key Services Offered by Vendors 4.3.2.3 Vendor Evaluation Criteria 4.3.2.4 Vendor Pricing Models 4.3.2.5 Vendor Profiles Table 5: Vendors/Product Details 4.3.2.6 Juniper Research's Advice to Vendors 4.3.3 Consultants Table 6: Areas of Expertise of Key RA Consultants 4.3.3.1 Accenture 4.3.3.2 Azure 4.3.3.3 IBM 4.3.3.4 WeDo Consulting: Case Study Figure 13: WeDo Consulting's Approach to RA Figure 14: Integrity Assurance Module Figure 15: WeDo's Revenue Control Module Figure 16: WeDo's Events Control Module 4.3.4 Outsourcing 4.3.4.1 Drivers and Inhibitors of Outsourcing 4.3.5 A Comparison Among Vendor/Consultant/ Outsourcing Options 4.4 New RA Tools Available on the Market 4.4.1 Billing 4.4.1.1 Usage-Based Billing 4.4.1.2 Billing Management 4.4.1.3 Billing System 4.4.2 Collection Mediation 4.4.3 Traffic Rating 4.4.4 Pricing Models 4.4.5 Electronic Bill Payment and Presentation 4.4.6 Billing Software 4.4.7 Rating Engine 4.4.8 Internet Billing Platform 4.5 Selecting Solutions Figure 17: Impact of Cost vs. Revenue Table 7: RA Issues, Solutions and Vendors 5. IMPLEMENT SOLUTIONS 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Define Clearly the Programme's Scope and Objectives 5.2.1 Scope 5.2.2 Objectives 5.3 Getting Top level Management Approval 5.3.1 Underline the Easy Wins 5.3.2 Emphasis on Bottom Line 5.3.3 Involve CFO 5.3.4 Demonstrate High Return on Investment (ROI) 5.3.5 Sarbanes-Oxley 5.4 First Cycle: Quick Wins and Low Hanging Fruits 5.5 Second Cycle: Medium to Long-term Leakages 5.6 Long-term RA Strategy Figure 18: Time Frames for RA Programme 6. MONITOR AND CONTROL 6.1 Introduction 6.1.1 Regular Cleaning Cycle Figure 19: RA Performance Scorecard 6.1.2 Conduct Internal Analysis 6.1.3 Day-to-Day Processes 7. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS 7.1 Ensuring Success from RA Programme 7.1.1 Identifying the Key Strategies and Developing a Solid Business Case 7.1.1.1 Identifying the Key Strategic Objectives 7.1.1.2 Cost Benefit Analysis and Business Case Development Figure 20: Cost Benefit Analysis 7.1.2 Senior Level Buy-in/Support 7.1.3 Set-Up Dedicated Internal RA Team 7.1.4 Allocating P&L Responsibility to RA Departments 7.1.5 Ensuring Disparate Functional Areas Work Together 7.1.6 Effective Communication Within and Outside the Organisation 7.1.7 Ensuring QoS 7.1.8 Setting-up Appropriate Time Frames for each Phase of the Programme Figure 21: Time Frames for RA Programme 7.1.9 Training 7.1.10 Developing a Culture that Values RA 8. CASE STUDIES 8.1 KPN, Netherlands Figure 22: Components in KPN's Network 8.1.1 Scope of Project 8.1.2 Project Deliverables 8.1.2.1 Technical Level 8.1.2.2 Application Level 8.1.2.3 Detect and Correct Level 8.1.2.4 Organisation and Process Level 8.1.2.5 Operational level 8.1.3 KPN's Approach to RA: A Three Phase Approach Figure 23: KPN's Approach to RA 8.1.4 Critical Success Factors for KPN's RA Programme 8.2 Optimus, Portugal 8.2.1 Optimus' Revenue Leakages 8.2.2 The End-to-End Solution Figure 24: Architecture of Optimus RA System 8.2.3 Ongoing Developments 8.2.4 Advice from Optimus' IT Billing & RA Manager 8.3 Western European Operator 8.4 Best Practice Case Studies 8.4.1 SMS Prepaid Top-Up 8.4.2 Subscriber Refunds 8.4.3 Interconnect Partnerships and Settlement Assurance 8.4.4 Business Requirements Acceptance Testing 9. FORECASTS AND RA PROFITABILITY 9.1 Maximising Profits and Revenues 9.1.1 Figures and Facts about Revenue Leakages Figure 25: % Companies within Revenue Leakage Range Table 8: Companies within Revenue Leakage Range 9.1.2 How Revenue Leakages Affect Operators? Figure 26: Mobile Subscriber Growth Worldwide (m) (2005-2010) Figure 27: Total Global Revenue Loss ($m) Forecast (2005-2010) 9.1.3 Is RA Worth it? Figure 28: Global Revenue Loss (%) of Total Revenue (2002-2004) Table 9: Global Revenue Loss (%) of Total Revenue (2002-2004) 9.1.4 Revenue Recovery Opportunity Figure 29: Revenue Recovery Opportunities as Predicted by Key Players in RA Market Table 10: Revenue Recovery Opportunities (%) as Predicted by Key Players in RA Market Figure 30: Percentage of Revenue Recovered by Successive Projects Figure 31: Revenue Recovery Illustrative by Project 9.1.5 Differences in Revenue Leakage by Region Figure 32: % Revenue Loss of Total Revenue by Market (2005) Figure 33: Average and Acceptable Loss Table 11: Average and Acceptable Loss 9.1.6 Differences in Revenue Leakages by Operator Type Figure 34: Acceptable Revenue Loss (%) by Operator Type Table 12: Acceptable Revenue Loss (%) by Operator Type Figure 35: Mobile and Average Operator Revenue Losses (%) (2002-2010) Table 13: Global Mobile and Average Operator Revenue Losses (%) (2002-2010) Figure 36: Global Mobile Data Revenues ($m) (2004-2010) Table 14: Global Mobile Data Revenues ($m) (2004-2010) Figure 37: Expected and Realised Global Data Revenues (2004-2010) ($m) Table 15: Expected and Realised Global Data Revenues (2004-2010) ($m) 9.1.7 Forecasts 9.1.7.1 Global Market for RA Figure 38: Potential RA Market Value ($m) for Vendors/Consultants (2004/2010) Table 16: RA Market Opportunity for Vendors ($m) (2004/2010) Figure 39: Global Market for RA and Mediation ($m) (2003-2010) Table 17: Global Market for RA and Mediation ($m) (2003-2010) Figure 40: Operator Approach to RA (2004/2008) 9.1.7.2 RA Market Segmentation by Region Figure 41: RA Market Segmentation by Region (2005 and 2010) Figure 42: RA Market Value by Region ($m) 2005-2010 Table 18: RA Market Value by Region ($m) 2005-2010 9.1.7.3 RA Market Segmentation by Operator Type Figure 43: RA Market Segmentation by Operator Type ( %) (2005/2010) 9.1.7.4 Key Software for RA Initiatives Figure 44: Global % Leakage caused at Various Points in Revenue Generation Value Chain (2005/2010) Table 19: Global % Leakage caused at Various Points in Revenue Generation Value Chain (2005/2010) Figure 45: CAGR for RA Solutions/Software (2005-2010) 9.1.7.5 Forecast of Change in Revenue Loss Elements Table 20: Elements Affecting the Revenue Loss Figure 46: Total Revenue Loss Figure 47: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in US Market (2005-2010) Table 21: Elements of Revenue Loss in the US Market (2005/2010) Figure 48: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in Saturated Markets (2005-2010) Table 22: Elements of Revenue Loss in Saturated Markets (2005/2010) Table 23: Elements of Revenue Loss in Emerging Markets (2005/2010) Figure 49: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging for Emerging Markets (2005-2010) Table 24: Average Market Revenue Loss (2005/2010) 9.2 Impact of Financials Over Time 9.2.1 Pay-back Period For RA Programme Figure 50: Payback Evolution during an RA Programme 9.2.2 Return On Investments (ROI) From RA Programme Table 25: Example (Effect on Bottom line through RA) Figure 51: ROI from Traditional Approach to RA Figure 52: ROI from Using Advanced RA Tools 9.2.3 Case Study: Tier 2 European Operator Table 26: Programme Deliverables Figure 53: Revenue Recovery Details 10. APPENDICES Appendix 1: Companies Interviewed Appendix 2: Web Addresses LIST OF FORECASTS Mobile Subscribers Mobile Subscriber Growth Worldwide (m) (2005-2010) Revenue Loss Figures Total Global Revenue Loss ($m) Forecast (2005-2010) Global Mobile and Average Operator Revenue Losses (%) (2002-2010) Global % Leakage caused at Various Points in Revenue Generation Value Chain (2005/2010) Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in US Market (2005-2010) Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in Saturated Markets (2005-2010) Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging for Emerging Markets (2005-2010) Mobile Data Revenues Global Mobile Data Revenues ($m) (2004-2010) Expected and Realised Global Data Revenues (2004-2010) ($m) Revenue Assurance Market Potential RA Market Value ($m) for Vendors/Consultants (2004/2010) Global Market for RA and Mediation ($m) (2003-2010) Operator Approach to RA (2004/2008) RA Market Segmentation by Region (2004 and 2010) RA Market Value by Region ($m) 2005-2010 RA Market Segmentation by Operator Type (%) (2005/2010) CAGR for RA Solutions/Software (2005-2010) LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Rating Guidelines Table 2: Typical Rating Benchmarks for Telco's in Different Markets Table 3: Leaks in 3G/2.5G Networks Table 4: Scoring the Existing Leaks Table 5: Vendors/Product Details Table 6: Areas of Expertise of Key RA Consultants Table 7: RA Issues, Solutions and Vendors Table 8: Companies within Revenue Leakage Range Table 9: Global Revenue Loss (%) of Total Revenue (2002-2004) Table 10: Revenue Recovery Opportunities (%) as Predicted by Key Players in RA Market Table 11: Average and Acceptable Loss Table 12: Acceptable Revenue Loss (%) by Operator Type Table 13: Global Mobile and Average Operator Revenue Losses (%) (2002-2010) Table 14: Global Mobile Data Revenues ($m) (2004-2010) Table 15: Expected and Realised Global Data Revenues (2004-2010) ($m) Table 16: RA Market Opportunity for Vendors ($m) (2004/2010) Table 17: Global Market for RA and Mediation ($m) (2003-2010) Table 18: RA Market Value by Region ($m) 2005-2010 Table 19: Global % Leakage caused at Various Points in Revenue Generation Value Chain (2005/2010) Table 20: Elements Affecting the Revenue Loss Table 21: Elements of Revenue Loss in the US Market (2005/2010) Table 22: Elements of Revenue Loss in Saturated Markets (2005/2010) Table 23: Elements of Revenue Loss in Emerging Markets (2005/2010) Table 24: Average Market Revenue Loss (2005/2010) Table 25: Example (Effect on Bottom line through RA) Table 26: Programme Deliverables LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Revenue Assurance Value Chain Figure 2: RA Framework Figure 3: Elements of a RA Programme Figure 4: The Environment Figure 5: Global Mobile Penetration Figure 6: Typical Spider Chart for a US Telco Figure 7: Typical Spider Chart for a Telco in a Saturated Market Figure 8: Typical Spider Chart for a Telco in an Emerging Market Figure 9: Importance of Key Elements of Revenue Loss Figure 10: RA Value Chain and Key Drivers Figure 11: Prioritising Leakages Figure 12: RA Actions Figure 13: WeDo Consulting's Approach to RA Figure 14: Integrity Assurance Module Figure 15: WeDo's Revenue Control Module Figure 16: WeDo's Events Control Module Figure 17: Impact of Cost vs. Revenue Figure 18: Time Frames for RA Programme Figure 19: RA Performance Scorecard Figure 20: Cost Benefit Analysis Figure 21: Time Frames for RA Programme Figure 22: Components in KPN's Network Figure 23: KPN's Approach to RA Figure 24: Architecture of Optimus RA System Figure 25: % Companies within Revenue Leakage Range Figure 26: Mobile Subscriber Growth Worldwide (m) (2005-2010) Figure 27: Total Global Revenue Loss ($m) Forecast (2005-2010) Figure 28: Global Revenue Loss (%) of Total Revenue (2002-2004) Figure 29: Revenue Recovery Opportunities as Predicted by Key Players in RA Market Figure 30: Percentage of Revenue Recovered by Successive Projects Figure 31: Revenue Recovery Illustrative by Project Figure 32: % Revenue Loss of Total Revenue by Market (2005) Figure 33: Average and Acceptable Loss Figure 34: Acceptable Revenue Loss (%) by Operator Type Figure 35: Mobile and Average Operator Revenue Losses (%) (2002-2010) Figure 36: Global Mobile Data Revenues ($m) (2004-2010) Figure 37: Expected and Realised Global Data Revenues (2004-2010) ($m) Figure 38: Potential RA Market Value ($m) for Vendors/Consultants (2004/2010) Figure 39: Global Market for RA and Mediation ($m) (2003-2010) Figure 40: Operator Approach to RA (2004/2008) Figure 41: RA Market Segmentation by Region (2005 and 2010) Figure 42: RA Market Value by Region ($m) 2005-2010 Figure 43: RA Market Segmentation by Operator Type ( %) (2005/2010) Figure 44: Global % Leakage caused at Various Points in Revenue Generation Value Chain (2005/2010) Figure 45: CAGR for RA Solutions/Software (2005-2010) Figure 46: Total Revenue Loss Figure 47: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in US Market (2005-2010) Figure 48: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging in Saturated Markets (2005-2010) Figure 49: Changes in Value of Elements Contributing to Revenue Loss/Plugging for Emerging Markets (2005-2010) Figure 50: Payback Evolution during an RA Programme Figure 51: ROI from Traditional Approach to RA Figure 52: ROI from Using Advanced RA Tools Figure 53: Revenue Recovery Details AbstractThe risk from revenue leakage is set to grow as new products are launched, new content and distribution partners enter the value chain, more sophisticated fraud methods are deployed, and business processes become more complex.While the complete eradication of revenue leakage is the goal, complete plugging of revenue loss is an unrealistic objective and not uneconomically viable in most cases. The consensus from several operators, consultancies and vendors remains that there are few solutions which cover the entire revenue generating chain. As a result the aim is to present a comprehensive range of solutions from vendors and consultancies to combat the risk areas identified herein, with the approach and solutions specifically tailored and adopted for each particular market. Get Full Details About This Report >> |
|
|||
|
About MarketResearch.com
|
||||