|
Published by: Datamonitor
Published: Apr. 20, 2005 - 219 Pages
Table of Contents
- ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE
- About the Oncology pharmaceutical analysis team
- CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Datamonitor insight into the hematological malignancy market
- R&D pipeline dynamics
- Cytotoxic drugs - first-line indication for MGI Pharma/Supergen's Dacogen confers leading player designation
- Immunotherapy - Chiron's low-dose Proleukin provides rebranding opportunity
- Molecular-targeted treatment - J&J's Zarnestra forges the way
- Millennium's paradigm-changing Velcade to have significant impact beyond myeloma
- Regulatory challenges - reduced rates of accelerated approval may affect hematological malignancy drug development
- Pharmacoeconomic constraints will increasingly influence up take of new agents
- MTT era will necessitate an evolution in clinical trial design
- CHAPTER 2 HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES: PIPELINE OVERVIEW
- Hematological malignancies are an intense focus of R&D activity with a total of 86 compounds in clinical development
- Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma remains the tumor type with the greatest developmental activity
- Molecular-targeted therapy (MTT) dominates the hematological malignancy pipeline
- Signal transduction inhibitors dominate the molecular-targeted treatment class
- Glivec: the exception rather than the rule - targeting a single molecular aberration is unlikely to be a model for success
- Resistance to signal transduction inhibitors an emerging problem
- Immunotherapy accounts for 29% of the pipeline and most R&D activity is focused on nonspecific immunoadjuvants
- Cytotoxics still focus of development
- PHASE III DEVELOPMENT IS LED BY COMPANIES WITH AN ESTABLISHED ONCOLOGY FRANCHISE
- High remission rates in certain hematological malignancies confer high barriers
- Key metrics
- Datamonitor pipeline assessment summary
- CHAPTER 3 PATIENT POTENTIAL: A DYNAMIC AND LUCRATIVE MARKET
- A diverse range of disease subtypes
- Genetic basis of cancer evolution
- Tumorigenesis is the result of cooperative accumulated mutations
- Existing pharmacotherapy approaches provide limited treatment benefit
- Cytotoxic drugs lack specificity
- Optimizing current treatment strategies is paramount
- The emergence of targeted treatment heralds a revolution in cancer pharmacotherapy
- Dynamic cancer market offers significant commercial opportunity
- Ongoing sales growth drives the market
- Intensive R&D produces a rich developmental pipeline
- Growing patient population and significant unmet needs propel innovation in the cancer market
- Cancer epidemiology - an expanding patient base
- Significant areas of unmet need persist
- Clinical and strategic threats to the commercialization of cancer drugs
- Progressively rising R&D costs threaten industry productivity
- High attrition rates can be mitigated by improved strategic decision-making
- Lengthening drug approval process a consequence of increased regulatory demands
- Pharmacoeconomic pressures drive payers to implement restrictive pricing and reimbursement policies
- Increased therapeutic and generic competition results in reduced periods of market exclusivity
- Segmentation of market will require changes in clinical trial methodology
- CHAPTER 4 R&D APPROACH
- Classification of pipeline products
- Cytotoxics drugs
- Molecular-targeted therapies (MTTs)
- Few pipeline MTTs meet the criteria suggested by some investigators in defining this drug class
- Development of targeted therapies relies on identification of biologic drivers of oncogenesis
- Signal transduction inhibitors
- Angiogenesis inhibitors
- Apoptosis inducers
- Cell cycle inhibitors
- Immunotherapy-based treatments
- Miscellaneous agents
- Evolution in oncology clinical trial design
- Patient selection is increasingly significant in the era of targeted treatment
- Clinical trials must have sufficient follow-up to establish true clinical benefit
- Diversity of targeted treatments will require an evolution in clinical trial design
- Most oncology clinical trials designate multiple endpoints
- Survival
- Quality of life
- Tumor response rates
- Toxicity
- Time to tumor progression
- Modification of accelerated approval process may impact significantly on approval times for hematologic oncology drugs
- CHAPTER 5 CYTOTOXICS - FIRST-LINE INDICATION FOR MGI PHARMA/SUPERGEN'S DACOGEN CONFERS LEADING PLAYER DESIGNATION
- Bendamustine (SDX-105), Salmedix
- Bendamustine demonstrates promising single-agent activity in refractory and relapsed indolent NHL
- Synergy of bendamustine and rituximab without excessive toxicity
- Bendamustine/mitoxantrone/rituximab (BMR) combination, active in refractory and relapsed indolent lymphoma
- Activity in broad spectrum of the hematological malignancies affords expanded commercial opportunity
- Bendamustine's established safety profile will facilitate regulatory approval
- Nelarabine, GlaxoSmithKline
- Nelarabine demonstrates activity in aggressive, treatment-resistant pediatric patients with T-ALL
- Nelarabine fails to exhibit the same efficacy in adults
- Nelarabine hindered by limited patient population
- Decitabine, MGI Pharma/Supergen
- Decitabine demonstrates significant improvements in time to AML or death compared to best supportive care in patients with MDS
- Decitabine as a potential treatment for Glivec-resistant/refractory CML
- Enhanced understanding of molecular biology generates renewed interest in DNA demethylators
- Pixantrone, Cell Therapeutics
- Pixantrone demonstrates promising single agent activity
- Successful results from a randomized Phase III trial of CPOP versus CHOP will drive uptake
- Pixantrone would benefit from co-licensing agreement with Roche
- Pixantrone, high commercial potential if problems associated with genericization can be overcome
- Cloretazine (VNP-40101M), Vion Pharmaceuticals
- Leukemia and MDS are the focus of ongoing development
- Development of fast-tracked Cloretazine recently progressed to Phase III trials
- Phase II trials displayed encouraging results among patients with limited treatment options
- Significant opportunity for Vion Pharmaceuticals
- Cytotoxic sales forecasts to 2014
- Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- CHAPTER 6 IMMUNOTHERAPY - CHIRON'S LOW-DOSE PROLEUKIN PROVIDES REBRANDING OPPORTUNITY
- Ceplene (histamine dihydrochloride, subcutaneous), Maxim Pharmaceuticals
- Ceplene improves leukemia-free survival but not overall survival in adult AML patients in first remission
- FDA requests additional Phase III trial despite primary endpoints being met
- Maxim will need to form a strategic alliance to ensure Ceplene's commercialization
- Proleukin (aldesleukin), Chiron
- Phase II trials demonstrate that Proleukin augments rituximab activity in NHL
- Low-dose approach is the key to success
- Chiron's long-standing association with IL-2 will facilitate Proleukin uptake following approval of expanded indication
- Revlimid (lenalidomide), Celgene
- Revlimid achieves significant improvements in time to progression in previously treated multiple myeloma patients
- Phase II trial demonstrates 85% response rate in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
- Celgene anticipate initiating a Phase III trial examining Revlimid in MDS
- Phase II trials demonstrate Revlimid therapy facilitates transfusion independence in MDS patients
- Revlimid is most active in early-stage MDS
- Celgene's developmental strategy promises significant commercial potential
- Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) - extending the spectrum of indications beyond indolent NHL
- Dual mechanism of action enhances activity the radioimmunoconjugates (RICs)
- RICs are associated with a logistically complex administration schedule
- Radioisotope differences favor Biogen Idec's Zevalin
- Horizontal product expansion key to optimizing commercial value
- Opinion leaders remain divided about RICs' potential utility in DLBCL
- RICs have demonstrated promising single-agent activity in MCL
- Bexxar versus Zevalin: who will be the major player?
- Immunotherapy sales forecasts to 2014
- Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- CHAPTER 7 MOLECULAR-TARGETED TREATMENT - J&J'S ZARNESTRA FORGES THE WAY
- Temsirolimus (CCI-779), Wyeth Research
- Temsirolimus demonstrates significant antitumor activity in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in Phase II trial
- Phase III trials of temsirolimus may need to evaluate lower doses.
- Phase II trial suggests temsirolimus may have activity in ALL.
- Novelty of target and competition from Millennium's Velcade will challenge commercial potential
- Wyeth has the experience to launch novel oncology products successfully
- Tipifarnib (R-115777; Zarnesta), Janssen Pharmaceutica BV and Johnson & Johnson
- Tipifarnib demonstrates activity in poor risk, previously untreated elderly AML
- Molecular markers predict tipifarnib response in AML
- Phase II trials suggest activity in MDS with limited toxicity
- Tipifarnib most advanced farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) in clinical development.
- J&J's global marketing and distribution presence will facilitate tipifarnib uptake
- Focus on gene expression profiling may lead to fragmentation of market
- First-to-market designation doesn't guarantee commercial success
- Arsenic trioxide (Trisenox), CTI
- Arsenic trioxide demonstrates activity in drug-resistant multiple myeloma
- Arsenic trioxide demonstrates synergy with ascorbic acid and dexamethasone.
- CTI-sponsored Phase III development for myeloma unlikely
- Arsenic trioxide is active in both high- and low-risk MDS
- Competitive landscape means that arsenic trioxide is unlikely to make a significant impact in the MDS market
- Arsenic trioxide will benefit from patent extension
- Arsenic trioxide will most likely be used in combination with other therapies
- Innovative early-stage MTTs
- BMS-354825, Bristol-Myers Squibb
- BMS-354825 overcomes Glivec resistance in chronic phase CML patients
- BMS-354825 already faces potential competition from Novartis's AMN107
- Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006), Onyx and Bayer
- Multi-targeted approach makes sorafenib an attractive proposition
- Phase I trials demonstrate limited anti-leukemic activity
- Combinatorial treatment approaches are likely to be the key to success
- Flt-3 inhibition offers a lucrative new target
- Cephalon's Lestaurtinib demonstrates activity in preliminary Phase II AML trials
- Lestaurtinib represents the first generation of a of a new class of agents
- Cephalon's limited commercial experience will require augmenting
- Avastin, Genentech/Roche
- Combining Avastin with R-CHOP does not significantly increase toxicity
- Avastin's first-to-market status provides Genentech/Roche with valuable head start
- Genentech/Roche's established oncology franchise will help drive sales in what will be a competitive antiangiogenic market
- Suberanilohydroxyamic acid (SAHA), Merck & Co.
- Histone deacetylation plays a pivotal role in transcriptional regulation
- Phase I study demonstrates differences in DLTs between IV and oral formulations
- Phase II trial demonstrates promising activity in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)
- Commercial opportunity offered by CTCL indication is weak
- MTT sales forecasts to 2014
- Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- CHAPTER 8 ALTERNATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS - MILLENIUM'S PARADIGM-CHANGING VELCADE TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BEYOND MYELOMA
- Velcade (bortezomib), Millennium Pharmaceuticals
- Potential clinical utility of Velcade in indolent NHL
- Velcade demonstrates particularly promising activity in MCL
- Millennium will need to define how this novel technology should be integrated into conventional NHL treatment paradigms
- Parentin, Ligand Pharmaceuticals
- Development of Ligand Pharmaceuticals' Parentin capsules (alitretinoin) for the treatment of hematological malignancies appears to have stalled
- Promising early-stage results in APL but despite initiation of a Phase III trial no results have been forthcoming
- Suboptimal treatment tolerability limits development for MDS
- APPENDIX A
- Report methodology
- Datamonitor forecast methodology
- Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- List of tables
- List of figures
- List of abbreviations
- APPENDIX B
- Opinion leader interview transcripts
- Contributing experts
- Opinion leader 1
- Opinion leader 2
- Opinion leader 3
- Opinion leader 4
- APPENDIX C
- Bibliography
- About Datamonitor
- About Datamonitor Healthcare
- Datamonitor Healthcare's therapy area capabilities
- About the Oncology analysis team
- Disclaimer
- List of Tables
- Table 1: Drugs in development for the treatment of hematological malignancies, 2005
- Table 2: Developmental pipeline of drugs targeting hematological malignancies by phase and class, 2005
- Table 3: Forecast incidence of hematological malignancies in the seven major pharmaceutical markets, 2004-14
- Table 4: Late-phase pipeline malignant hematology sales forecasts ($m), 2005-14
- Table 5: Datamonitor drug assessment summary
- Table 6: Common mutations involved in tumor development
- Table 7: Forecast incidence of hematological malignancies in the seven major pharmaceutical markets, 2004-14
- Table 8: FDA approval information for drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies
- Table 9: Pipeline cytotoxic drugs for hematological malignancies, 2005
- Table 10: Single-agent bendamustine demonstrates acceptable hematological toxicity and moderate non-hematological toxicity
- Table 11: Nelarabine is active in aggressive, refractory childhood T-ALL
- Table 12: Nelarabine in adult CTCL and PTCL demonstrated low efficacy
- Table 13: Nelarabine trial in adult CTCL and PTCL was halted due to unacceptable toxicity
- Table 14: Comparison between Vidaza and Dacogen
- Table 15: Replacing doxorubicin with pixantrone in CHOP regime has tolerable toxicity profile
- Table 16: Ongoing clinical trials exploring Cloretazine in hematological malignancies
- Table 17: Cytotoxic drugs sales forecast assumptions
- Table 18: Cytotoxic drugs sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Table 19: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for pipeline cytotoxic drugs
- Table 20: Immunotherapy drugs in development for hematological malignancies
- Table 21: Proleukin augments rituximab activity in rituximab-resistant NHL, Phase II trial results
- Table 22: Phase II trial results of Revlimid in patients with refractory multiple myeloma
- Table 23: Ongoing clinical trials exploring Revlimid in hematological malignancy
- Table 24: Comparison of radioisotopes in Bexxar and Zevalin
- Table 25: Ongoing studies evaluating RICs
- Table 26: Immunotherapy sales forecasts assumptions
- Table 27: Immunotherapy drugs sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Table 28: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for pipeline immunotherapy drugs
- Table 29: MTTS drugs in development for hematological malignancies
- Table 30: Phase II trial results of temsirolimus in refractory mantle cell lymphoma
- Table 31: Ongoing Phase II and Phase I trials for temsirolimus
- Table 32: Phase I/II/III trials of tipifarnib in hematological malignancies
- Table 33: Toxicities associated with tipifarnib in high-risk MDS patients
- Table 34: Phase II drug regime of multiple myeloma patients receiving arsenic trioxide, ascorbic acid and dexamethasone
- Table 35: Phase I/II/III/IV trials of arsenic trioxide in hematological malignancies
- Table 36: Phase II trials of Avastin in AML and NHL
- Table 37: MTT sales forecasts assumptions
- Table 38: MTT sales forecasts, 2004-15
- Table 39: Research, clinical and commercial attractiveness summary for pipeline MTT drugs
- Table 40: Alternative innovative drugs in clinical development for the treatment of hematological malignancies
- Table 41: Phase II study of Velcade in NHL: Owen et al., 2003
- Table 42: Phase II study of Velcade in NHL: Goy et al., 2003
- Table 43: Ongoing and planned trials of Velcade in hematological malignancies
- Table 44: Datamonitor drug assessment parameters
- Table 45: Abbreviations used in PI: Hematological Malignancies
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Number of compounds in clinical development for hematological malignancies, 2005
- Figure 2: Number of compounds in clinical development by drug class, 2005
- Figure 3: Molecular-targeted treatment dominates the hematological malignancy pipeline
- Figure 4: Signal transduction inhibitors dominate the MTT class
- Figure 5: Non-specific immunoadjuvants dominate immunotherapy class
- Figure 6: Topoisomerase inhibitors dominate the cytotoxic pipeline
- Figure 7: Phase III development is dominated by companies with an existing oncology franchise
- Figure 8: Phase II development reflects a more heterogeneous mix of company profiles
- Figure 9: Cytotoxics for hematological malignancies sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Figure 10: Molecular-targeted agents for hematological malignancies sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Figure 11: Immunotherapy agents for hematological malignancies sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Figure 12: Datamonitor drug assessment summary for pipeline cytotoxics in development for malignant hematology
- Figure 13: Drug assessment summary for the late-phase immunotherapy drugs
- Figure 14: Datamonitor's drug assessment summary for the late-phase pipeline MTT drugs
- Figure 15: Future focus the challenges
- Figure 16: Forecasted global oncology sales, 2002-09
- Figure 17: Oncology pipeline, 2003
- Figure 18: Forecast incidence of hematological malignancies across the seven major markets, 2004-14
- Figure 19: Increasing combined incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma with increasing age, 2004
- Figure 20: Incidence increases, while the rate of cure and death reduces disease prevalence
- Figure 21: Disparity in relative point prevalence compared to incidence for leukemia and lymphoma, 2004
- Figure 22: Unmet needs in cancer, 2005
- Figure 23: Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival with bendamustine and rituximab in indolent and mantle cell lymphoma
- Figure 24: Bendamustine versus chlorambucil in treatment-naïve B-CLL patients, Phase III trial design
- Figure 25: Over half of treatment-resistant pediatric patients with T-ALL exhibited a response to nelarabine
- Figure 26: Phase III trial of decitabine in MDS patients demonstrates significant
- Figure 27: Cytotoxic drugs sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Figure 28: Drug assessment summary for the late-phase pipeline cytotoxic drugs.
- Figure 29: Phase III PEaRL trial design
- Figure 30: Immunotherapy drugs sales forecasts, 2005-14
- Figure 31: Drug assessment summary for the late-phase immunotherapy drugs
- Figure 32: MTT sales forecasts, 2004-15
- Figure 33: Datamonitor's drug assessment summary for the late-phase pipeline MTT drugs
- Figure 34: Example of Datamonitor drug assessment scorecard
- Figure 35: Example of Datamonitor drug assessment graph
AbstractIntroduction
Given an enhanced understanding of the biological basis for oncogenesis and the benefit of immunotherapy approaches such as Genentech/Roche's Rituxan, it is no surprise that targeted treatments and immunotherapy dominate the pipeline. Integrating these novel technologies into existing treatment paradigms and demonstrating the 'value' of these high cost treatments will provide major challenges.
Scope
- Overview of hematological malignancy market including patient segmentation, unmet needs and how novel therapies will alter existing treatment patterns
- Profiles of key agents in late stage development including cytotoxics, immunotherapies and targeted treatments
- Analysis of trial data, marketing factors and sales forecasts for key technologies in late-stage clinical development
- Clinical, regulatory and pharmacoeconomic challenges and strategies for commercialization
Highlights
Targeted therapies dominate the pipeline, constituting 47% of drugs in clinical development. The signal transduction inhibitors (STIs) dominate the MTT class. Focusing on STIs offers developers the potential to target drivers of oncogenesis that may exhibit commonality across a spectrum of hematological malignancies.
Of the drugs in late-stage clinical development, Datamonitor is of the opinion that Chiron's Proleukin and MGI Pharma/ Supergen's Dacogen hold the greatest commercial potential with estimated peak sales by 2014 of $200m and $500m respectively
While there is much hype surrounding the use of the MTTs for the pharmacotherapy of hematological malignancies, the cytostatic nature of some of these agents mean that it is likely that significant tumor regressions will more frequently be seen in context of combinatorial therapy employing traditional cytotoxic drugs.
Reasons to Purchase
- Understand unmet needs in the hematological malignancy market based on opinion leader comments regarding both currently marketed and pipeline products
- Gain a greater understanding how future economic and regulatory constraints may affect approval for hematological malignancy drugs
- Assess the global sales forecasts of late-stage pipeline drugs for hematological malignancies and examine their clinical and commercial potential
Get Full Details About This Report >>
|
|
US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
|
|
|