Home > Back to Publisher > Report Information
Companion Biomarkers in Drug DevelopmentTriMark PublicationsApril 1, 2009 320 Pages - SKU: TRI2207024 |
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About This Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2. Introduction: Companion Diagnostics in Drug Development
- 2.1 Companion Diagnostics as Biomarkers
- 2.1.1 Potential Benefits of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics
- 2.2 Biomarkers in Different Phases of Drug Development
- 2.2.1 Drug Discovery and Development Process
- 2.2.2 Biomarkers in Drug Development
- 2.3 Drug Targets
- 2.3.1 Target Discovery Using Functional Genomics
- 2.3.2 Functional Genomics
- 2.3.3 Target Validation
- 2.3.3.1 Target Discovery
- 2.3.3.2 Lead Identification
- 2.3.4 Target and Biomarker Discovery
- 2.3.4.1 Biomarker Validation
- 2.4 Biomarkers in Drug Discovery, Development and Clinical Diagnostics
- 2.4.1 Role of Biomarkers in Drug Discovery, Preclinical, Clinical Development and Diagnostics
- 2.4.2 The Pipeline Problem
- 2.4.3 Biomarkers in the Drug Discovery Process
- 2.4.4 Segmentation of Biomarker Usage
- 2.4.5 Efficacy of Biomarkers as Surrogate Endpoints
- 2.4.6 Biomarkers Used to Reduce the Cost of Drug Development
- 2.4.7 Biomarkers: Challenges and Opportunities
- 2.4.8 Biomarkers in Early Safety and Toxicity Assessment
- 2.4.9 Biomarkers in Determining Validation Parameters
- 2.4.10 Challenges in Development of Biomarkers
- 2.4.11 Using Biomarkers in Early Clinical Development
- 2.4.12 Translational Biomarkers
- 2.4.13 Use of Biomarkers in “Go”/No-Go” Decisions
- 2.4.14 Diagnostic Tests
- 2.4.15 Biomarkers in Deal Making
- 2.4.16 Payors Use Biomarkers in Decision-Making
- 2.5 World Pharmaceutical Markets
- 2.5.1 World Market Summary
- 2.5.2 Company Performance in this Segment
- 2.5.3 Forces Affecting the Structure of the Pharmaceutical Industry
- 2.5.3.1 Threats
- 2.5.3.2 Competitive Forces
- 2.6.1 Industry Overview
- 2.6.1.1 Pharmaceutical Industry Drug Pipeline
- 2.6.1.2 Asia-Pacific to Replace United States and Europe as Pharmaceutical Industry Center
- 2.6.1.3 The Changing Pharmaceutical Business Model
- 2.6.2 Benefits for Companion Diagnostic Tests in Drug Development
- 2.6.3 Strategies for the Creation of Partnerships - Predicting and Overcoming Challenges in Creating Drug Response Profiling Diagnostics
- 2.6.4 Options and Applications
- 2.6.4.1 Clinical Applications of Genomics: The Use of Evidence Based Frameworks by Decision-Makers
- 2.6.5 Challenges, Drivers and Trends
- 2.6.5.1 Macro Trends in Biomarkers
- 2.6.5.2 Biomarkers: Industry SWOT Analysis
- 2.6.6 Breakaway Technologies
- 2.6.7 Collaboration for Companion Diagnostics
- 2.6.8 Key Stake Holders in Companion Diagnostics
- 2.9 Future Developments
- 3. Biomarker Development Tools
- 3.1 New Technologies in Functional Genomics
- 3.1.1 Genomics-Derived Drug Pipeline
- 3.1.2 Future of Genomics Technologies for Drug Target Identification
- 3.2 Overview of Microarrays
- 3.2.1 General Theory of Microarrays
- 3.2.2 GeneChip Probe Array Technology
- 3.2.3 DNA Microarrays
- 3.2.3.1 DNA Microarray Market Size
- 3.2.3.2 DNA Microarrays in SNP Analysis
- 3.2.3.3 DNA Microarrays in Cancer
- 3.2.4 Protein Microarrays
- 3.2.4.1 Reasons Why Researchers Use Protein Microarrays
- 3.2.4.2 Factors for Adoption of Protein Microarrays Technology
- 3.2.4.3 Future Innovations in Protein Microarray Technology
- 3.2.5 New Technologies
- 3.2.5.1 Antibody Microarrays
- 3.2.5.2 Peptide Microarrays
- 3.2.5.3 Peptide MHC Microarrays
- 3.2.5.4 Tissue Microarrays
- 3.2.5.5 Key Points for Developing Microarray Based Applications
- 3.2.5.6 Reasons Why Researchers use DNA Microarrays
- 3.2.5.7 Factors for Difficulties Applying DNA Microarrays Technology
- 3.2.5.8 Emerging Microarray Trends
- 3.2.5.9 Emerging Microarray Applications
- 3.2.5.10 Key Findings on Use of Microarrays
- 3.2.5.11 Advantages and Drivers of Microarrays
- 3.2.5.12 Limitations and Barriers to Use of Microarrays
- 3.2.5.13 qRT-PCR Use in Biomarker Identification and Drug Development
- 3.2.5.14 Microarray Quality Control (MAQC) Project
- 3.3 Theranostics
- 3.3.1 Theranostics in Drug Development
- 3.3.2 Trends in Theranostics
- 3.3.3 Timeline for Impact on Various Segments in Theranostics
- 3.3.4 Challenges for Biomarker Based Therapeutics Development
- 3.4 Pharmaceutical Development and Bioanalytical Services
- 3.4.1 Wyeth Singulex’s Erenna
- 3.5 Metabolomics in Drug Discovery
- 3.6 Bioinformatics
- 3.6.1 Definition and Role of Bioinformatics
- 3.6.2 Bioinformatics Sector Overview
- 3.6.3 Future Status of Bioinformatics
- 3.6.3.1 Future in Drug Discovery
- 3.6.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions Could Deter Bioinformatics Growth
- 3.6.3.3 Barriers to Bioinformatics Growth
- 3.6.3.4 Types of Data and Bioinformatics Applications
- 3.6.3.5 Validated Core Modeling Technology
- 3.6.3.6 Applicability of Bioinformatics for Biomarker Discovery
- 3.6.3.7 Biomarker Data Management Compliant with Industry Standards
- 3.6.3.8 Data Management for Biomarkers
- 3.6.3.8.1 Data Transformation for Biomarker Development
- 3.6.3.8.2 Biomarker Data Collaboration
- 3.6.3.8.3 Interface for Online Data Sources for Genomic Structures
- 3.6.3.8.4 Target Markets for Informatics Software
- 3.6.3.8.5 Bioinformatics Drivers and Challenges in the Pharmaceutical Industry
- 3.6.3.8.6 Products of Bioinformatics
- 3.6.3.8.7 Informatics Tools and Functionalities
- 3.6.3.8.8 Bioinformatics in Lead Identification and Optimization
- 3.6.3.8.9 Bioinformatics in Drug Development and Formulation
- 3.6.3.8.10 Role of Bioinformatics in the Drug Discovery Value Chain
- 3.6.3.8.11 Bioinformatics Software for Drug Discovery and Biomarker Development
- 3.6.3.8.12 Bioinformatics Services
- 3.7 Biomarkers and Proteomics
- 3.7.1 Scientific Background
- 3.7.2 Applying Proteomics to Biomarker Discovery
- 3.7.2.1 Challenges Facing Biomarker Developers
- 3.7.3 Limitations of Proteomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery
- 3.7.4 Validation of Biomarkers Using LC-MS/MS Systems
- 3.7.5 Use of Mass Spectrometry in Biomarker Discovery
- 3.7.5.1 Multiple Reaction Monitoring Assays (MRMs)
- 3.7.5.2 Gel-based Approaches
- 3.7.5.3 Non-Gel-based Approaches
- 3.7.5.4 SELDI-TOF MS
- 3.7.5.5 SELDI and Prognosis
- 3.7.5.6 SELDI and Treatment Monitoring
- 3.7.5.7 Limitations of Mass Spectroscopy
- 3.7.6 Partnerships for Developing Proteomic Biomarkers
- 3.7.7 Proteomics in Developing a New Cancer Marker
- 3.7.7.1 Translating Proteomic Oncology Discoveries to the Clinic: Development of Analytical Reference Materials, Reagents, Data, and Technology Assessment and Validation
- 3.7.7.2 Challenges of Discovering and Validating Clinical Protein Biomarkers
- 3.7.7.3 Importance of Proteomics in Biomarker Discovery
- 3.8 Toxicogenomics
- 3.8.1 Toxicogenomics Concerns in Drug Safety Data
- 3.8.2 Toxicogenomics and Prioritization of Drug Candidates
- 3.8.3 Genomic Biomarkers for Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity
- 3.8.4 Use of Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity
- 3.8.5 Use of Biomarkers of Drug-induced Hepatotoxicity
- 3.8.6 Transgenic Biomarkers for Adverse Drug-Drug Interactions
- 3.8.7 Challenges to Toxicogenomics
- 3.8.8 The Future Use of Toxicogenomics in Drug Discovery
- 4. Market for Biomarkers in Drug Development
- 4.1 C-KIT (CD117) Expression
- 4.2 CCR5 -Chemokine C-C Motif Receptor
- 4.3 CYP2C19 Variants
- 4.4 CYP2C9 Variants
- 4.5 CYP2D6 Variants
- 4.6 CYP2D6 Variants with Alternate Context
- 4.7 Clinical Biomarkers
- 4.8 Targeting Kidney Toxicity
- 4.8.1 Proximal and Distal Tubular Injury (alpha-GST & Pi-GST)
- 4.8.2 Collecting Duct and Loop of Henle Injury (RPA-1 and RPA-2)
- 4.8.3 Glomerular Injury (Collagen IV)
- 4.8.4 KIM-1
- 4.9 Targeting Hepatotoxicity
- 4.9.1 Breast Cancer
- 4.9.2 Colorectal Cancer
- 4.9.3 Prostate Cancer
- 4.9.4 Cystic Fibrosis
- 4.10 Biomarker Application in Oncology Clinical Development
- 4.10.1 Specific Example of Companion Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology
- 4.10.2 Integration of a Companion Diagnostic Strategy into Oncology Drug Development
- 4.10.2.1 Lilly to Co-Develop Companion IVDs for Cancer Drugs
- 4.10.2.2 Celera to Work on Companion Diagnostics for Merck Cancer Drugs
- 4.10.2.3 BioMérieux to Develop Companion Test for Ipsen’s New Breast Cancer Drug
- 4.10.2.4 Perlegen and Roche’s 454 Develop Companion Tests
- 4.10.2.5 Ventana Medical Systems and the Critical Path Institute
- 4.10.2.6 Biomarkers in Recentin/AZD 2171 Development
- 4.10.2.7 Biomarkers in Development of Iressa
- 4.10.2.8 Epigenomics’ Methylation Biomarker Septin
- 4.11 Targeting Diabetes Related Heart Disease
- 4.12 Key Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Targeted Therapeutics
- 5. Imaging Biomarkers in Drug Discovery
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.1.1 Validation of Imaging Biomarkers
- 5.1.2 Types of Imaging Used in Drug Development
- 5.1.3 Development of Imaging Technologies
- 5.2 Molecular Imaging
- 5.2.1 Use in Drug Discovery
- 5.2.2 Use in Clinical Applications
- 5.2.3 Use in Clinical Trials
- 5.2.4 Cell-based Screening Technologies in Drug Development
- 5.2.5 Optical Biomarkers
- 5.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 5.4 Positron Emission Tomography
- 5.5 FDG-PET Patient Phase I Studies
- 5.6 Imaging Biomarkers as Study Endpoints
- 5.6.1 Oncology
- 5.6.2 Parkinson’s Disease
- 5.6.3 Cardiac Disease
- 5.7 IT Solutions for Imaging Biomarkers in Biopharmaceutical Research and Development
- 6. Clinical Biomarkers Improving Trial Design
- 6.1 Strategies to Improve the Measurement of Biomarkers for Drug Trials
- 6.2 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and Commercialization
- 6.2.1 Contract Research Companies
- 6.3 What Strategies Help Translate Biomarkers from Preclinical to Clinical Development?
- 6.4 How Should Biomarker Data Be Compared to “Traditional” Safety and Efficacy Data?
- 7. Biomarkers as Surrogate Endpoints
- 7.1 What is a Surrogate Endpoint?
- 7.2 Benefits and Drawbacks of Surrogate Endpoints
- 7.2.1 Benefits
- 7.2.2 Drawbacks
- 7.3 Improving the Efficacy of Clinical Surrogate End Points Using Biomarkers
- 7.4 Surrogate Endpoint Validation
- 7.5 Effective Use of Surrogates
- 7.5.1 FDG-PET as a Surrogate Endpoint in Oncology Studies
- 7.6 Conclusions
- 8. Market Size, Collaborations and Future Directions for Companion Diagnostics
- in Drug Development
- 8.1 Strategies to Improve the Measurement of Biomarkers for Drug Trials
- 8.1.1 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and Commercialization
- 8.1.2 The Rationale Behind Biomarker Strategy
- 8.1.3 New Development Strategies and Their Implications for Deal Making
- 8.1.4 How Biomarkers Are Being Used To Reduce Attrition in Development
- 8.1.5 Combined Therapeutics and Diagnostics Biomarker Business Makes Sense
- 8.1.6 Use of Biomarkers In House or Partner with a Diagnostics Company
- 8.2 What is the Best Balance of Resources to Have the Most Efficient Pathway to Develop Biomarkers?
- 8.3 Current and Future Trends in Drug Development
- 8.4 Future Role of Biomarkers in Healthcare
- 8.5 What are the Current Organizational Obstacles in Biomarker Implementation?
- 9. Regulatory Issues for Biomarkers in Drug Development
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.1.1 Role of Regulatory Agencies in Development of Biomarkers
- 9.2 FDA Perspective of Biomarkers in Clinical Trials
- 9.2.1 FDA as a Gatekeeper of Companion Biomarkers
- 9.2.2 FDA Criteria for a Valid Biomarker
- 9.2.3 FDA Product Submission and Review Process
- 9.2.4 FDA Pipeline for Biomarker Tests
- 9.2.5 Adaptive Clinical Trial Design
- 9.2.6 Orphan Drug Act and Biomarkers: Options and Opportunities
- 9.3 Role of StaRT-PCR™ in Increasing Value of Pharmacogenomic Data
- 9.4 Supporting IND, NDA, and BLA Submissions
- 9.5 Performance Characteristics of Biomarker Tools
- 9.6 Biomarker Initiative and VGDs
- 9.7 Biomarker Qualification Pilot Process at the FDA
- 9.7.1 Introduction
- 9.7.2 Biomarker is Validity
- 9.7.3 Biomarker Qualification Process Map
- 9.7.4 Biomarker Qualification Pilot Process
- 9.7.5 The Pipeline Problem
- 9.7.6 FDA Critical Path
- 9.7.6.1 Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products
- 9.7.6.2 The NIH Roadmap
- 9.7.6.3 Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
- 9.7.7 Negotiating the Critical Path
- 9.7.8 Technical Dimensions along the Critical Path
- 9.7.9 Product Development Toolkit
- 9.7.10 Tools for Assessing Safety
- 9.7.11 Tools for Demonstrating Medical Utility
- 9.7.12 Tools for Manufacturing
- 9.7.13 Orphan Products Grant Program
- 9.7.14 Slowdown in New Medical Products
- 9.7.15 Factors Contributing to the Decline in New Product Applications
- 9.7.16 Factors that Cause Unnecessary Delays in New Product Approvals
- 9.7.17 Reducing Avoidable Delays in Time to Approval
- 9.7.18 Reducing Delays in Medical Device Reviews
- 9.7.19 Reducing Delays in Animal Drug Reviews
- 9.7.20 Quality Systems Approach to Medical Product Review
- 9.7.20.1 Instituting Quality Systems in Review of New Drugs and Biologics
- 9.7.20.2 Implementing of the Common Technical Document (CTD) and the electronic CTD
- 9.7.20.3 Implementing Medical Device Quality Initiatives
- 9.7.21 Case Study: Nephrotoxicity Biomarkers
- 9.7.22 Role of the FDA
- 9.8 CMS Regulatory Responsibilities
- 9.9 Role of National Institute of Standards and Technology in Validation of Biomarkers
- 9.10 Biomarkers and FDA’s Voluntary Genomic Data Submission
- 9.11 Federal Health Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative
- 9.12 Orphan Drug Act and Pharmacogenomics: Options and Opportunities
- 9.13 Post-market Covigilance Programs
- 9.14 Technology Options, Potential Diagnostic Partners and Regulatory Hurdles
- 9.15 What Regulatory Guidance Is Needed for Companion Biomarkers?
- 9.16 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
- 9.17 IRB Approval in Clinical Trials
- 10. Business Decisions Using Companion Biomarkers in Drug Development
- 10.1 Advantages of a Pharmacogenomic Assessment of Biomarkers to Determine
- Clinical Dose
- 10.2 Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and Commercialization
- 10.3 What Are the Current Obstacles in Biomarker Implementation?
- 10.4 How Do Business Strategies, Such as Those Relating to Acquisition, Drive Biomarker Strategies?
- 10.5 What is the Right Balance Between Using External Partnerships and Developing Internal Infrastructure?
- 10.6 How Might Novel Biomarker Development Lead to Acquisition Strategies and Their Implications For Deal Making?
- 10.7 Which Types of Biomarkers Should Be Developed at Various Stages in the Drug Pipeline?
- 10.8 What Strategies Help Translate Biomarkers From Preclinical to Clinical Development?
- 10.9 In What Class of Drugs Is the Value of Using Biomarkers in Decision Making the Highest?
- 10.10 Increased Clinical Trial Costs in Targeted Phase I Trials
- 10.11 How Can Big Pharma Co-develop Biomarkers in a Cost-sharing Model for Regulatory Acceptance?
- 10.12 How Are Biomarkers Being Used to Reduce the Attrition Rate in Drug Development?
- 10.13 How Is ROI Measured Using Biomarkers in Drug Development?
- 10.14 How Might Organizational Structures Limit the Use of Biomarkers in Drug Development and How Should R&D Organizations Address This Problem?
- 10.15 How to Maximize Business Development through Biomarker Strategies
- 10.16 What Is the Best Type of Business Model for Developing Biomarkers?
- 10.17 What Are Organizational Impediments Limiting the Use of Biomarkers in Drug Development?
- 10.18 What Are Internal Capabilities for Novel Biomarker Development and Application?
- 10.19 How Can Key Biomarker Technical Expertise Be Applied Across a Complex and Highly-Stratified R&D Value Chain?
- 10.20 At What Stage of Drug Development Have Biomarkers Provided the Most Benefit?
- 10.21 What Companies Are the most Innovative in Development of Biomarkers?
- 10.22 Best Values for Biomarkers in Drug Development and in Diagnostics
- 10.23 Companion Biomarkers Can Increase Value in an Associated Drug
- 11. Company Profiles
- 11.1 Abbott Laboratories
- 11.2 Accelrys
- 11.3 Affymetrix
- 11.4 Agilent Technologies
- 11.5 Amgen
- 11.6 Ananomouse
- 11.7 Applied Maths
- 11.8 Ariadne Genomics
- 11.9 ArrayIt (Integrated Media Holdings)
- 11.10 AstraZeneca
- 11.11 AutoGenomics
- 11.12 Axontologic
- 11.13 Beckman Coulter
- 11.14 BD
- 11.15 Bender MedSystems
- 11.16 Bioalma
- 11.17 BioAnalytics Group
- 11.18 BioCat GmbH
- 11.19 Biocept
- 11.20 BioChain
- 11.21 BioData
- 11.22 BioDiscovery
- 11.23 BioForce Nanosciences
- 11.24 BioGenex
- 11.25 Bioinformatics Solutions
- 11.26 Biomax Informatics
- 11.27 BioMérieux
- 11.28 Biomind
- 11.29 Bio-Rad Laboratories
- 11.30 Biosite
- 11.31 BioSystems International
- 11.32 Biotrin
- 11.33 BioWisdom
- 11.34 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
- 11.35 Caliper Life Sciences
- 11.36 Caprion Proteomics
- 11.37 Carestream Health
- 11.38 Celera
- 11.39 Cepheid
- 11.40 Chang Bioscience
- 11.41 Clontech Laboratories
- 11.42 CombiMatrix
- 11.43 Compugen
- 11.44 Corimbia
- 11.45 Covance
- 11.46 Cybrdi
- 11.47 CyVera
- 11.48 Dako A/S
- 11.49 Decodon
- 11.50 Definiens
- 11.51 DiagnoSwiss
- 11.52 Discerna
- 11.53 DNAStar
- 11.54 DNATools
- 11.55 Eidogen-Sertanty
- 11.56 Electric Genetics
- 11.57 Eli Lilly and Company
- 11.58 Entelos
- 11.59 ePitope Informatics
- 11.60 Eurogentec
- 11.61 Exiqon A/S
- 11.62 Forensic Bioinformatics
- 11.63 Fujitsu
- 11.64 Future Diagnostics
- 11.65 Genaissance Pharmaceuticals
- 11.66 Gene Codes
- 11.67 Genedata
- 11.68 GeneGo
- 11.69 Gene Network Sciences
- 11.70 Geneva Bioinformatics
- 11.71 Genomatica
- 11.72 Genomic Solutions
- 11.73 Genomining
- 11.74 Gen-Probe
- 11.75 GE Healthcare
- 11.76 GeneStudio
- 11.77 Genomatix Software
- 11.78 GenomeQuest
- 11.79 Genus BioSystems
- 11.80 Genzyme
- 11.81 Geospiza
- 11.82 GlaxoSmithKline
- 11.83 Golden Helix
- 11.84 Grace Bio-Labs
- 11.85 Gyros AB
- 11.86 HealthCare IT
- 11.87 High Throughput Genomics
- 11.88 Human Genome Sciences
- 11.89 Illumina
- 11.90 Imgenex
- 11.91 Imaxia
- 11.92 INCOGEN
- 11.93 Incyte
- 11.94 InforSense
- 11.95 Ingenuity Systems
- 11.96 InPharmix
- 11.97 Insightful Corporation
- 11.98 Integromics, S.L
- 11.99 IBM
- 11.100 IO Informatics
- 11.101 Ipsen
- 11.102 Jerini AG
- 11.103 Johnson & Johnson
- 11.104 Koada Technology
- 11.105 KOOPrime
- 11.106 Life Technologies Corporation
- 11.107 LINCO Research
- 11.108 Luminex
- 11.109 Marligen Biosciences
- 11.110 Matrix Science
- 11.111 MDS
- 11.112 Merck & Company
- 11.113 Merck KGaA
- 11.114 Meso Scale Discovery
- 11.115 Metabolon
- 11.116 Microbionix
- 11.117 MicroDiscovery
- 11.118 Millennium Pharmaceuticals
- 11.119 Millipore
- 11.120 MiraiBio
- 11.121 Molecular Connections
- 11.122 MolMine AS
- 11.123 Molsoft
- 11.124 Monogram Biosciences
- 11.125 MTR Scientific
- 11.126 Multimetrix
- 11.127 Nanogen
- 11.128 Nanosphere
- 11.129 NetGenics
- 11.130 NextGen Sciences
- 11.131 NimbleGen Systems
- 11.132 Nonlinear Dynamics
- 11.133 Novartis
- 11.134 Nuvera Biosciences
- 11.135 Ocimum Biosolutions
- 11.136 OmniViz
- 11.137 One Lambda
- 11.138 Oracle
- 11.139 Ore Pharmaceuticals
- 11.140 Orla Protein Technologies
- 11.141 Osmetech
- 11.142 Oxonica
- 11.143 PamGene BV
- 11.144 Panomics
- 11.145 Partek
- 11.146 Pepscan
- 11.147 Perbio Science
- 11.148 Perlegen Sciences
- 11.149 Pfizer
- 11.150 PharmaSeq
- 11.151 Pierce Biotechnology
- 11.152 Platypus Technologies
- 11.153 Predictive Patterns Software
- 11.154 Proceryon
- 11.155 Protagen AG
- 11.156 ProteinOne
- 11.157 Proteome Sciences
- 11.158 PubGene
- 11.159 Qiagen
- 11.160 Radix BioSolutions
- 11.161 Randox Laboratories
- 11.162 RayBiotech
- 11.163 Redasoft
- 11.164 RedStorm Scientific
- 11.165 Reel Two
- 11.166 Rescentris
- 11.167 Roche
- 11.168 Rosetta Biosoftware
- 11.169 Rules-Based Medicine
- 11.170 SAS
- 11.171 Schleicher & Schuell BioScience
- 11.172 SciTegic
- 11.173 Semantx Life Sciences
- 11.174 Sequenom
- 11.175 Sigma-Aldrich
- 11.176 Silicon Genetics
- 11.177 Singulex
- 11.178 Softberry
- 11.179 SoftGenetics
- 11.180 SomaLogic
- 11.181 Spotfire
- 11.182 SPSS
- 11.183 Strand Life Sciences
- 11.184 Stratagene
- 11.185 SuperBioChips Laboratories
- 11.186 SurroMed
- 11.187 Sun Microsystems
- 11.188 Sygnis Pharma AG
- 11.189 Techne Corporation
- 11.190 Tepnel Life Sciences
- 11.191 Teranode
- 11.192 Textco BioSoftware
- 11.193 TG Services
- 11.194 Thermo Fisher Scientific
- 11.195 Third Wave Technologies
- 11.196 TIBCO Software
- 11.197 TimeLogic
- 11.198 TriStar Technology Group
- 11.199 Tyrian Diagnostics (formerly Proteome Systems)
- 11.200 VBC-Genomics Bioscience Research GmbH
- 11.201 Ventana Medical Systems
- 11.202 ViaLogy
- 11.203 Wyeth
- 11.204 Zeptosens
- 11.205 Zeus Scientific
- 11.206 Zyagen
- Appendix 1: FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submission
- A 1.1 Introduction
- A 1.2 Background
- A 1.3 Submission Policy
- A 1.3.1 General Principles
- A 1.3.2 Specific Uses of Pharmacogenomic Data in Drug Development and Labeling
- A 1.3.3 Benefits of Voluntary Submissions to Sponsors and FDA
- A 1.4 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data
- A 1.4.1 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data during the IND Phase
- A 1.4.2 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data to a New NDA, BLA, or Supplement
- A 1.4.3 Submission to a Previously Approved NDA or BLA
- A 1.4.4 Compliance with 21 CFR Part 58
- A 1.4.5 Submission of Voluntary Genomic Data from Application-Independent
- Research
- A 1.5 Format and Content of a VGDS
- A 1.6 Process for Submitting Pharmacogenomic Data
- A 1.7 Agency Review of VGDSs
- Glossary
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Drug Discovery and Development Paradigm
- Figure 2.2: Paradigm of Drug Discovery and Development Illustrating the Central and Essential Role of Biomarkers in Screening
- Figure 2.3: Functional Genomic Process for Drug Development
- Figure 2.4: Reimbursement for Diagnostics in Healthcare Decision Making
- Figure 2.5: Market Growth and Evolution of Companion Biomarkers
- Figure 2.6: Medical Product Development Models
- Figure 2.7: Segmentation of the Biomarker Development Market
- Figure 2.8: Medical Research in the U.S. Outpaces the Rest of the World
- Figure 2.9: Worldwide Pharmaceutical Products Markets
- Figure 2.10: Biomarkers Market Drivers
- Figure 2.11: Challenges in the Biomarkers Space
- Figure 2.12: FDA Co-Developed Products
- Figure 3.1: Informatics Applications Along the Drug Discovery Value Chain
- Figure 3.2: Bioinformatics Software Flow Chart
- Figure 3.3: Growth of GenBank, 1982 - 2008
- Figure 3.4: Role of Bioinformatics in the Drug Discovery Value Chain
- Figure 3.5: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Proteomic Biomarkers
- Figure 3.6: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Companion Diagnostic Biomarkers
- Figure 3.7: Top Unmet Needs in Products in the Biomarkers Space
- Figure 4.1: Growth and Evolution of the Biomarker Space
- Figure 4.2: Revenue Forecast Projections for Global Biomarker Markets by Segments, 2005 - 2012
- Figure 4.3: Biomarker Discovery by Therapeutic Area
- Figure 4.4: Kidney Biomarker Paradigm
- Figure 4.5: Hepatic Biomarker Paradigm
- Figure 9.1: IPRG Biomarker Qualification Process
- Figure 9.2: Critical Path for Drug Development
- Figure 9.3: Path for R&D Product Development
- Figure 9.4: Dimensions of the Critical Path
- Figure 9.5: FDA Interactions During Drug Development
- Figure 9.6: Problem Resolution During the FDA Review Process
- Figure 9.7: VGDS Process Flow
- Figure 10.1: Discovery, Validation and Use of Biomarkers
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Utility of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development
- Table 2.2: Biomarker End Points in Drug Development
- Table 2.3: Value of Biomarkers in Phase II Clinical Trials
- Table 2.4: Comparative Genome Sizes of Humans and Other Organisms
- Table 2.5: Global Pharmaceutical Drug Sales, 2004 - 2012
- Table 2.6: Worldwide Generic Pharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012
- Table 2.7: Worldwide OTC Pharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012
- Table 2.8: Worldwide Biopharmaceutical Drug Market, 2003 - 2012
- Table 2.9: Top Ten Pharmaceutical Companies by Worldwide Sales, 2008
- Table 2.10: Pharmaceutical Companies’ Drug Sales as Percent of the Worldwide Market, 2008
- Table 2.11: Threats to Pharmaceutical Industry Productivity
- Table 2.12: Competitive Forces Governing the Pharmaceutical Industry
- Table 2.13: Time Line for Development of Companion Diagnostics
- Table 2.14: Leading Therapy Classes for R&D, 2008
- Table 2.15: Global Pharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending, 1995 - 2008
- Table 2.16: Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures by World Region, 1990 - 2006
- Table 2.17: U.S. Government NIH Research Budget, 1995 - 2008
- Table 2.18: Pharmaceutical Companies Ranked by Total R&D Expenditures, 2006
- Table 2.19: Global Pharmaceutical Sales by Region, 2007
- Table 2.20: World’s Top-Selling Drugs, 2007
- Table 2.21: Top Pharmaceutical Companies by Healthcare Revenue, 2008
- Table 2.22: Leading Therapy Classes by Global Pharmaceutical Sales, 2007
- Table 2.23: Leading Ten Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Sales, 2003, 2006 and 2007
- Table 2.24: Top Ten Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Dispensed Prescriptions, 2006
- and 2007
- Table 2.25: Top Ten Brand Drugs by Retail Dollars, 2007
- Table 2.26: Pharmaceuticals Industry Challenges
- Table 2.27: Reasons for Developing Phase I Biomarkers
- Table 2.28: Percentage of Non-Responders in Various Drug Classes
- Table 2.31: High Profile Drug Withdrawals from the Marketplace
- Table 2.30: Market Opportunities in Biomarkers
- Table 2.31: Challenges for Market Adoption of the Various Biomarkers Tests
- Table 2.32: Biomarkers Industry SWOT
- Table 3.1: Worldwide Microarray Market Size, 2004 - 2012
- Table 3.2: List of DNA Array Manufacturers
- Table 3.3: U.S. qRT-PCR Market, 2007 - 2013
- Table 3.4: Theranostics Technology Platforms—Timeline of Impact
- Table 3.5: Impact of Personalized Medicine on Various Therapeutic Areas
- Table 3.6: Hurdles in Biomarkers Development in Therapeutic Areas
- Table 3.7: Data Source and Bioinformatic Investigations
- Table 3.8: Drivers and Challenges of the Bioinformatics Industry
- Table 3.9: Bioinformatics Activities, Sub-Activities and Key Players
- Table 3.10: Concentration of Some Abundant Proteins, New Cancer Biomarkers
- Identified by SELDI-TOF, and Classical Cancer Biomarkers in Serum
- Table 3.11: Device Submission Elements for the FDA
- Table 3.12: Toxicogenomic Standards and Their Organizations
- Table 3.13: Genomic and Proteomic Technologies
- Table 4.1: Companion Biomarker Market Size, 2008 - 2013.
- Table 4.2: Kidney Biomarkers
- Table 4.3: Herceptin Worldwide Sales, 1999 - 2007
- Table 4.4: Characteristics of Different Cancer Biomarker Types and Associated Market Opportunities
- Table 4.5: Segmentation of the Cancer Biomarker Market by Type of Cancer Biomarkers and Market Size
- Table 4.6: Cancer Biomarker Market Estimates by Tissue of Origin
- Table 4.7: Companies Developing New Proteomic Cancer Biomarker Technology
- Platforms
- Table 4.8: Cancer Biomarkers Used to Maximize Likelihood of Response
- Table 4.9: Biomarkers for Monitoring Therapeutic Effectiveness and Resistance
- Table 6.1: Contract Research Companies
- Table 8.1: Stakeholders in Biomarker Development
- Table 9.1: Structure of the Critical Path
- Table 9.2: Device Submission Elements for the FDA
Related Markets
- Biotechnology
- Biomarkers
- Diagnostics
- In Vitro Diagnostics
- Pharmaceuticals
- Drug Delivery
- Drug Discovery
Drug Discovery Reports
- Retinal Vein Occlusion Therapeutics - Pipeline Assessment and Market Forecasts to 2019
- Patient Perspectives - Patient Reported Outcomes Drive Drug Development, but Improving Patient Involvement Remains a Challenge
- Arthritis Therapeutics Market to 2018 - Novel Oral JAK Inhibitors and Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) Will Drive Continued Growth Across Key Indications
- Outsourcing in Drug Discovery: The Contract Research Organization (CRO) Market, 5th Edition
- Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Global Clinical Trials Review, H1, 2012

