Home > Back to Publisher > Report Information
|
|
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About This Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2. Introduction to Cancer Biology and the Diagnostic Industry
- 2.1 Biomarkers
- 2.1.1 The Biomarker Market Drivers
- 2.1.1.1 The Sector
- 2.1.1.2 The Critical Path Opportunities
- 2.1.1.3 The Capital Markets
- 2.2 Cancer Detection and Treatment with Biomarkers
- 2.2.1 The Problem
- 2.3 Cancer: The Disease
- 2.3.1 Metastasis
- 2.3.2 Demographics and Statistics of Cancer
- 2.4 Drivers of the Biotech and Diagnostics Industry
- 2.4.1 Venture Funding of Biotech Sector
- 2.4.2 Technological Innovation
- 2.4.3 Government Funding
- 2.4.4 Pharmaceutical Development and Bioanalytical Services
- 2.4.5 The War on Cancer
- 2.4.6 Current Oncology Drug Development
- 2.5 Outlook for Tumor Markers
- 2.6 Focus on Proteomics
- 2.6.1 Scientific Background
- 2.6.2 The Relationship between Proteins and Diseases
- 2.6.3 Limitations of Existing Diagnostic Approaches
- 2.6.4 Addressing the Heterogeneity of Cancer
- 2.6.5 Validation of Biomarkers Through Proper Study Design
- 2.6.6 Exploiting the Power of Mass Spectrometry to Improve Assay Specificity
- 2.6.7 Creating and Maintaining a Multi-Disease Product Pipeline
- 2.6.8 Partnerships for Developing Proteomic Biomarkers
- 2.7 Epigenic Markers for Cancer
- 2.8 Molecular Diagnostics Testing for Cancer
- 2.9 Market Opportunities
- 2.9.1 Industry Overview
- 2.9.2 Medical Indications and Medically Useful Information
- 2.9.3 Research Market
- 2.9.4 Competition
- 2.9.5 Diagnostic Services
- 2.9.6 Clinical Image Analysis
- 2.9.7 Research Imaging Market
- 2.9.8 Genomic Disease Management and In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays (IVDMIA)
- 2.9.9 Predictive Expression Profiles
- 3. Market Analysis of the Cancer Biomarkers Space
- 3.1 Scope of this Chapter
- 3.2 The Overall Market Opportunity and Segmentation of the Total Cancer Biomarkers Marketplace
- 3.3 Potential Cancer Biomarker Commercial Applications
- 3.3.1 Market for Routine Tumor Markers
- 3.3.2 Market for Genomic Cancer Biomarkers
- 3.3.3 Market Size and Forecasts for Companion Diagnostic Tests for Cancer Therapeutics
- 3.3.4 SWOT Analysis of the Major Cancer Biomarker Market Segments
- 3.3.4.1 Traditional Serum Cancer Biomarkers
- 3.3.4.2 Proteomic Cancer Biomarkers
- 3.3.4.3 Companion Diagnostic Cancer Biomarkers
- 3.4 Cancer Biomarker Market Estimates by Tissue of Origin
- 3.4.1 Colorectal
- 3.4.2 Prostate
- 3.4.3 Lung
- 3.4.4 Breast
- 3.4.5 Ovarian
- 3.5 Challenges Facing Cancer Biomarker Developers
- 3.6 Unmet Product Needs in the Cancer Biomarkers Space
- 3.7 Competitive Landscape of the Cancer Biomarkers Marketplace
- 4. Major Clinical Applications of Cancer Biomarkers
- 4.1 Launched Products and Pipeline
- 4.2 CYP2C9 Pharmacogenetics and Role in Personalized Medicine
- 4.3 Personalized Breast Cancer Therapy
- 4.4 Personalized NSCLC Therapy
- 4.5 AmpliChip®-based Personalized Medicine
- 5. Breast Cancer
- 5.1 Overview of Breast Cancer Disease
- 5.2 BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes
- 5.2.1 Types of Genetic Testing Available for Breast Cancer
- 5.2.1.1 DNA Sequencing
- 5.2.1.2 Multi-Site Analysis
- 5.2.1.3 Single-Site Analysis
- 5.2.2 BRCA Test Results
- 5.2.2.1 What Does a Positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 Test Result Mean?
- 5.2.2.2 What Does a Negative BRCA1 or BRCA2 Test Result Mean?
- 5.2.2.3 What Does an Ambiguous BRCA1 or BRCA2 Test Result Mean?
- 5.2.2.4 What are the Options for a Person Who Tests Positive?
- 5.2.3 What are Some of the Benefits of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Risk?
- 5.2.4 What Are Some of the Risks of Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk?
- 5.3 Estrogen Receptors and Breast Cancer
- 5.3.1 Expression and Prognostic Value of ER
- 5.3.2 Progesterone Receptors and Breast Cancer
- 5.3.3 ER and PR Predict Response to Endocrine Therapy
- 5.4 HER2 Gene and Protein
- 5.4.1 HER2 Tests
- 5.4.1.1 IHC Test
- 5.4.1.2 FISH Test
- 5.4.1.3 Questions About Testing
- 5.4.1.4 HER2 Tumor Status
- 5.5 Herceptin® Treatment
- 5.6 Tumor Assays for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- 5.7 Use of Genomics to Understand Breast Cancer
- 5.8 Genetic Analysis Solution
- 5.8.1 The Use of Proteomics in Breast Cancer
- 5.8.2 Tissue Microarrays
- 5.8.3 Protein Microarrays
- 5.9 Gene Expression Microarrays and Recurrence Prediction
- 5.9.1 Oncotype DX
- 5.9.2 Oncotype DX for Breast Cancer
- 5.9.3 Risk Assessment
- 5.9.4 Use of Chemotherapy
- 5.9.5 Utility of the Oncotype Test
- 5.9.6 Clinical Development and Validation of Oncotype DX
- 5.9.6.1 Clinical Development of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score
- 5.9.6.2 Clinical Validation of Prediction of Recurrence and Survival in N−, ER+ Patients Treated with Tamoxifen
- 5.9.6.3 Oncotype DX Predicts the Likelihood of Recurrence
- 5.9.6.4 Oncotype DX Predicts the Likelihood of Breast Cancer Survival in a Community Hospital Setting
- 5.9.6.5 Oncotype DX Predicts both Prognosis and Tamoxifen Benefit
- 5.10 Economic Benefits of Oncotype DX
- 5.11 Increased Clinical Utility of Oncotype DX
- 5.12 Second Generation Oncotype DX
- 5.12.1 Recurrence and Benefit Test for N−, ER− Breast Cancer
- 5.12.2 Taxane Benefit Test
- 5.13 MammaPrint
- 5.14 Rotterdam Signature 76-Panel
- 5.15 Summary of Microarray Technologies
- 5.16 Mass Spectrometry-based Approaches
- 5.16.1 Gel-based Approaches
- 5.16.2 Non-Gel-based Approaches
- 5.16.2.1 SELDI-TOF MS
- 5.16.2.2 SELDI and Prognosis
- 5.16.2.3 SELDI and Treatment Monitoring
- 5.16.3 Limitations of Mass Spectroscopy
- 5.17 Outlook
- 5.18 Future Perspectives
- 5.19 Breast Cancer Program (NMP66)
- 5.20 Myriad Genetics
- 5.21 Veridex GeneSearch™ Breast Lymph Node
- 5.22 OncoVue Cancer Risk Test
- 5.23 Research Biomarkers for Breast Cancer
- 5.24 Protein Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Prevention
- 5.25 Biomarker Prognosis of Breast Cancer Treated with Doxorubicin
- 6. Ovarian Cancer
- 6.1 Serum Markers
- 6.2 Biomarkers
- 6.2.1 Strategies for Discovering New Cancer Biomarkers
- 6.3 Serum Protein Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer
- 6.3.1 Clinical Proteomics
- 6.4 Ovarian Cancer Triage Testing
- 6.4.1 Vermillion’s Ovarian Cancer Triage Diagnostic Program
- 7. Prostate Cancer
- 7.1 Overview
- 7.1.1 Prevalence
- 7.1.2 Prostate Cancer Progression and Recurrence Test
- 7.1.3 Current Market Size
- 7.2 Genes Involved in Prostate Cancer
- 7.3 Androgen Independence
- 7.4 Gene Markers in Prostate Cancer
- 7.5 Microarray Gene Identification of Prostate Biomarkers
- 7.6 GEArray DNA Microarrays
- 7.7 Vermillion’s Cancer Diagnostic Program
- 7.8 Hepsin
- 7.9 Matritech’s Prostate Cancer Program (NMP48)
- 7.10 Gen-Probe’s PCA3 Assay
- 7.11 Early Prostate Cancer Antigen-2 (EPCA-2)
- 7.12 Mass Spectrometry
- 7.13 Summary
- 8. Bladder Cancer
- 8.1 Overview
- 8.1.1 Prevalence
- 8.1.2 Progression and Recurrence
- 8.1.3 Bladder Cancer Risk Factors
- 8.1.4 Bladder Cancer Symptoms
- 8.2 Bladder Cancer Tests
- 8.3 UroVysion Bladder Cancer Kit
- 8.4 Ikoniscope® Robotic Digital Microscopy Platform
- 8.4.1 The CellOptics Platform
- 8.4.2 Cell Staining and Genetic Characterization
- 8.4.3 Ikoniscope/IkoniLAN Automated Microscopy
- 8.5 Nuclear Matrix Protein Markers
- 8.6 ImmunoCyt™/uCyt+™
- 8.7 Cangen Microsatellite DNA
- 8.8 Bladder Cancer Market
- 8.8.1 Urologist Market
- 8.8.2 Clinical Lab Market
- 8.8.3 Primary Care Market
- 8.8.4 Private and Public Sector Markets
- 8.8.5 POC Market
- 8.8.6 Market Distribution
- 8.8.7 Reimbursement
- 9. Colorectal Cancer
- 9.1 Overview
- 9.1.1 Prevalence
- 9.1.2 Progression and Recurrence
- 9.2 Screening for CRC
- 9.2.1 Stool-based DNA (sDNA) Screening
- 9.3 Almac Diagnostics DSA
- 9.4 Colon Cancer Program (NMP35)
- 9.5 Myriad Genetics Colaris AP Risk Assessment
- 9.6 Summary
- 10. Genetic Diagnostics Set to Revolutionize Cancer Diagnostic Testing
- 10.1 Overview
- 10.1.1 Clinicians Need for More Information with Regard to Therapeutic Treatment Drives Demand for Pharmacogenomic Testing
- 10.1.2 Predictive Medicine Shows Potential for Genetic Diagnostics
- 10.1.3 Different Rates of Growth
- 10.1.4 Effective Competitive Strategies
- 10.1.5 Improvements in Marketing Effectiveness
- 10.1.6 Emerging Technologies Imply Start of a New Era and Offer Tremendous Growth Opportunities
- 10.1.7 Increased Market Share
- 10.1.8 Technologies Used in Genetic Testing
- 10.2 AMAS Test
- 10.3 Corixa Antibodies as Tumor Markers
- 10.4 Cytovision
- 10.5 Ariol System
- 10.6 Mammaglobin Protein Expression
- 10.7 L523S or KOC RNA Binding Protein
- 10.8 CA1-18 from EDP Biotech
- 11. Leukemia Biomarkers
- 11.1 Overview
- 11.1.1 Prevalence
- 11.1.1.1 Progression and Recurrence
- 12. Lung Cancer
- 13. Enabling Technologies for Oncology Biomarker Discovery
- 13.1 Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS®)
- 13.1.1 ACIS for HER2 Protein Expression Testing
- 13.1.2 ACIS for ER Protein Expression Testing
- 13.1.3 ACIS for PR Protein Expression Testing
- 13.1.4 ACIS for Cell Proliferation Expression
- 13.1.5 ACIS for Protein Expression
- 13.1.6 ACIS for Protein Micrometastases in Bone Marrow
- 13.1.7 ACIS for Protein Micrometastases in Tissue
- 13.1.8 ACIS for Tissue Microarray
- 13.1.9 ACIS for DNA Ploidy
- 13.1.10 ACIS for HPV
- 13.2 DNA Methylation
- 13.2.1 Differential Methylation Hybridization (DMH)
- 13.2.2 MIRA-Assisted Microarrays for DNA Methylation Analysis and Cancer Diagnosis
- 13.3 Proteomics
- 13.3.1 Proteomics Technologies for Cancer Marker Discovery
- 13.3.2 Validation of Candidate Biomarkers
- 13.3.3 Requirements Bringing a New Marker into the Market
- 13.3.4 Value Chain in the Development of New Cancer Biomarkers
- 13.4 Secreted Proteins as Cancer Biomarkers
- 13.4.1 Markers of Known Tissue Origin
- 13.4.2 Secreted Proteins as Low Abundance Markers
- 13.4.3 Secreted Proteins in Tissue and Blood
- 13.5 Noncodings RNA as Potential Tumor Markers
- 13.5.1 miRNA Meets Microarray
- 13.5.2 Mimetics and Inhibitors
- 13.5.3 Clinical Patterns in Cancer
- 13.6 Architect TIMP-1 (Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1) Immunoassay for Colorectal Cancer Detection
- 13.7 Companies Developing Automated Microscope-based Analysis Systems
- 13.8 Companies Developing Research Products for Tumor Cell Isolation
- 13.9 Companies Supplying Fluorescently Labeled Antibodies to Characterize Tumor Cells
- 13.10 PerkinElmer High Throughput Platforms: AlphaScreen®, AequoScreen®, DELFIA® and LANCE® Technologies
- 14. Biomarker Tests Co-developed with Cancer Therapeutics as Companion Diagnostics
- 14.1 Sector Overview
- 14.2 Companion Diagnostics
- 14.3 EGFR for Colorectal Cancer and Camptostar (Irinotecan)
- 14.4 EGFR Express and Erbitux (Cetuximab)
- 14.5 HER2 and Heceptin
- 14.6 Myriad’s TheraGuide 5-FU
- 14.7 TheraScreen: EGFR29
- 14.8 Drivers and Barriers to Companion Diagnostics
- 14.9 Partnerships with Pharma Companies to Identify Therapeutic Targets
- 14.10 Future Developments for Companion Diagnostics
- 15. Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine: Biology, Approaches, Pipeline and Regulatory Trends
- 15.1 Scope of this Chapter
- 15.2 Introduction to Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 15.3 The Compelling Case for Personalized Medicine
- 15.4 Drug Metabolism and Implications for Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 15.5 Examples of Personalized Medicine
- 15.6 Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Testing Product Pipeline
- 15.7 The Personalized Medicine Coalition
- 15.8 Regulatory Trends and Guidelines in the Personalized Medicine Space
- 15.8.1 The Changing Regulatory Landscape for Personalized Medicine
- 15.9 Patenting Personalized Medicine
- 15.10 The Leading Edge of Personalized Medicine: Specific Examples of Clinical Situations Where Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics is Appropriate and Being Deployed
- 15.10.1 EGFR Assay
- 15.10.2 Individualized Warfarin Therapy
- 15.10.3 UGT1A1 Molecular Assay for Camptosar
- 15.10.4 Response to Gleevec in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- 15.10.5 LabCorp, ARCA Personalized Medicine Deal for Cardiovascular Diseases
- 15.10.6 Osmetech Licenses Epidauros Biotechnologie AG CYP2D6 Biomarker to Push into Companion Diagnostics
- 15.11 Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine: Qualitative and Quantitative Market Analysis
- 15.11.1 Market Analysis of Molecular Diagnostics and Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 15.11.2 Diagnostics vs. Pharmaceuticals
- 15.11.3 Molecular Diagnostic Market
- 15.11.4 Molecular Diagnostics Technology Platforms and their Impact on Personalized Medicine
- 15.12 Snapshot of Companion Diagnostics Industry Structure
- 15.13 The Case for Theranostics (Therapeutic/Companion Diagnostic)
- 15.14 Personalized Medicine Market Analysis—Market Survey Data Characterizing the Qualitative and Quantitative Industry Parameters
- 15.15 How the Market Segregates Today
- 15.16 Timeline for Impact of Various Segments in Personalized Medicine
- 15.17 Challenges for Personalized Therapeutics and Companion Diagnostics Development
- 15.18 Macro Trends in Personalized Medicine
- 15.19 Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics: Industry SWOT Analysis
- 16. Cancer Biomarker Testing Sector and Company Analysis
- 16.1 Abbott Molecular, Inc. (Formerly Vysis, Inc.)
- 16.2 Agendia
- 16.3 AMDL, Inc.
- 16.4 Aureon Laboratories, Inc.
- 16.5 BioCurex
- 16.6 Biomarker Technologies
- 16.7 Biomedical Diagnostics LLC
- 16.8 Biomerica
- 16.9 Biomira, Inc.
- 16.10 Biomoda
- 16.11 Byk Gulden
- 16.12 Clarient
- 16.13 Correlogic Systems, Inc.
- 16.14 Cytogen Corporation
- 16.15 Dako (Formerly Dako Cytomation)
- 16.16 diaDexus
- 16.17 Diagnocure, Inc. (ImmunoCyt™/uCyt+™)
- 16.18 DxS Ltd.
- 16.19 Epigenomics
- 16.20 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
- 16.21 Genesis Genomics
- 16.22 Health Discovery Corporation
- 16.23 Immunicon
- 16.24 Ipsogen
- 16.25 InterGenetics
- 16.26 Miraculins, Inc.
- 16.27 Molecular Devices Inc. (Formerly Arcturus Bioscience, Inc.)
- 16.28 Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 16.29 Orion Genomics
- 16.30 Power3 Medical Products
- 16.31 Qiagen N.V.
- 16.32 SuperArray Bioscience Corporation
- 16.33 Upstream Biosciences, Inc.
- 16.34 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
- 16.35 Veridex
- 16.36 Vermillion
- 17. Business Trends in the Industry
- 17.1 Industry Consolidation
- 17.2 Breadth of Product Offering and Pricing
- 17.3 Government Regulation of Medical Devices
- 17.3.1 FDA Guidance on Drug Test Co-development
- 17.4 Strategic Business and Marketing Considerations
- 17.5 Commercial Opportunities in Cancer Markers
- 17.5.1 Licensing and Intellectual Property (IP) Constraints and how they will Impact New Product Development
- 17.6 Moderators of Growth
- 17.6.1 Roadblocks to Integrating Cancer Biomarkers into Clinical Practice
- 17.7 Biotechnology Industry Trends
- 17.8 Pharmaceutical Industry Trends
- 17.9 Acquisition, License Agreement, Partnerships
- 17.10 Legal Developments
- 17.11 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Tumor Marker Tests
- 17.11.1 North American Market
- 17.11.2 International Markets
- 17.11.2.1 Europe
- 17.11.2.2 Central and South America
- 17.11.2.3 Asia/Pacific
- 17.12 Product Commercialization
- 17.13 Reimbursement
- 17.14 Self Referral Rules
- 17.15 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
- 17.16 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)
- 17.17 In-Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) and Medical Device Regulations
- 17.18 FDA’s Quality System Regulation (QSR)
- 17.19 FDA’s OIVD on IVDMIAs
- 17.20 FDA’s Qualification of Cancer Biomarkers
- 17.20.1 Regulatory Perspectives of Biomarker Validation
- 17.21 Genetic Tests and Medical Records
- 17.21.1 Laws against Genetic Discrimination
- 17.22 Medicare Reimbursement
- 17.22.1 Medicare Part B Spending Trends
- 17.23 Global Drivers of Clinical Laboratory Testing
- 17.24 Global Outlook for Cancer Biomarkers
- 17.24.1 Which Companies are Utilizing Cutting-Edge Technologies to Develop, Validate and Implement Cancer Biomarkers for Clinical Use?
- 17.24.2 What Impediments Still Exist to Incorporating Promising Research into Clinical Practice?
- 17.24.3 Which Biomarkers Show the Most Promise for Approval?
- 17.24.4 How can Regulatory Oversight Drive Approval and Adoption of New Technologies?
- 17.24.5 Which Alliances Show the Greatest Synergy in Bringing Valid Biomarkers to Market?
- 17.24.6 Which Shared Technologies are Driving the Most Encouraging Development?
- 17.24.7 How Strategic Alliances and Interdisciplinary Involvement Drive Development and Implementation of Emerging Biomarker Technologies
- 17.25 Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative
- 17.26 FDA Critical Path
- 17.27 FDA Criteria for a Valid Biomarker
- 18. Companies Entering the Cancer Diagnostics Market with Novel Technology Platforms
- 18.1 Abbott Diagnostics
- 18.2 Affymetrix, Inc.
- 18.3 Agendia BV
- 18.4 Agensys, Inc.
- 18.5 Almac Group
- 18.6 AMDL, Inc.
- 18.7 Aureon Laboratories, Inc.
- 18.8 Bayer Diagnostics Corporation
- 18.9 Beckman Coulter, Inc.
- 18.10 Biocode S.A.
- 18.11 BioCurex, Inc.
- 18.12 Biomarker Technologies LLC
- 18.13 Biomedical Diagnostics LLC
- 18.14 Biomerica
- 18.15 bioMérieux
- 18.16 Biomira, Inc.
- 18.17 Biomoda, Inc.
- 18.18 Bruker Daltonics, Inc.
- 18.19 Byk Gulden
- 18.20 Cangen Biotechnologies, Inc.
- 18.21 Caprion Proteomics
- 18.22 Celera Diagnostics
- 18.23 Cepheid
- 18.24 Clarient, Inc.
- 18.25 Claros Diagnostics, Inc.
- 18.26 Clinical Data, Inc.: PGxHealth and Cogenics
- 18.27 Correlogic Systems, Inc.
- 18.28 CytoCore (Formerly Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.)
- 18.29 Cytogen Corporation
- 18.30 Dako (Formerly Dako Cytomation)
- 18.31 diaDexus LLC
- 18.32 DiagnoCure, Inc.
- 18.33 Diagnostic Products Corporation
- 18.34 Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc.
- 18.35 Digene Corporation
- 18.36 DRG International, Inc.
- 18.37 DxS Ltd.
- 18.38 EDP Biotech Corporation
- 18.39 Eisai Co., Ltd.
- 18.40 Epigenomics
- 18.41 Exact Sciences Corporation
- 18.42 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
- 18.43 Gene Logic, Inc.
- 18.44 Genesis Genomics, Inc.
- 18.45 Genomic Health, Inc.
- 18.46 Gen-Probe, Inc.
- 18.47 Health Discovery Corporation
- 18.48 Hologic, Inc. (Formerly Cytyc Corporation)
- 18.49 Ikonisys, Inc.
- 18.50 Immunicon Corporation
- 18.51 Immunomedics, Inc.
- 18.52 Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 18.53 InterGenetics®
- 18.54 Ipsogen
- 18.55 LabCorp®
- 18.56 Matritech, Inc.
- 18.57 Miraculins, Inc.
- 18.58 Mitsubishi Kagaku Medical
- 18.59 Molecular Devices (Formerly Arcturus Biosciences, Inc.)
- 18.60 Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 18.61 NimbleGen Systems, Inc.
- 18.62 Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
- 18.63 Oncotech, Inc.
- 18.64 Orion Genomics
- 18.65 Oxford Genome Sciences
- 18.66 Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 18.67 Phenomenone Discoveries
- 18.68 Polymedco, Inc.
- 18.69 Power3 Medical Products
- 18.70 Proteome Systems Ltd.
- 18.71 Qiagen N.V.
- 18.72 Sanko Junyaku Co., Ltd.
- 18.73 SensiGen LLC
- 18.74 SuperArray Bioscience Corporation
- 18.75 Third Wave Technologies, Inc.
- 18.76 Tosoh Medics, Inc.
- 18.77 TriPath Imaging, Inc.
- 18.78 Upstream Biosciences, Inc.
- 18.79 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
- 18.80 Veridex LLC
- 18.81 Vermillion, Inc. (Formerly Ciphergen)
- Appendix 1: Cancer Biomarker Centers of Research
- Appendix 2: Myriad Patents on Genes BRAC1 and BRAC2
- Appendix 3: Common Laboratory Tests for Cancer
- Appendix 4: Questions/Issues in the Cancer Biomarkers Space
- Appendix 5: Cancer Markers Currently in Common Clinical Use
- Appendix 6: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Staging System for Primary Carcinoma of the Ovary
- Appendix 7: FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submission
- A7.1 Introduction
- A7.2 Background
- A7.3 Submission Policy
- A7.3.1 General Principles
- A7.3.2 Specific Uses of Pharmacogenomic Data in Drug Development and Labeling
- A7.3.3 Benefits of Voluntary Submissions to Sponsors and FDA
- A7.4 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data
- A7.4.1 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data During the IND Phase
- A7.4.2 Submission of Pharmacogenomic Data to a New NDA, BLA, or Supplement
- A7.4.3 Submission to a Previously Approved NDA or BLA
- A7.4.4 Compliance with 21 CFR Part 58
- A7.4.5 Submission of Voluntary Genomic Data from Application-Independent Research
- A7.5 Format and Content of a VGDS
- A7.6 Process for Submitting Pharmacogenomic Data
- A7.7 Agency Review of VGDSs
- Glossary
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 3.1: Potential Market for Cancer Biomarkers, 2006
- Figure 3.2: Segmentation of the Cancer biomarkers Marketplace Based Upon Commercial Offerings—Products and Services
- Figure 3.3: Geographical Distribution of Cancer Tumor Diagnostic Testing
- Figure 3.4: Cancer Biomarkers Research Market, 2006-2011
- Figure 3.5: Breast Cancer Biomarker Market Potential, 2005
- Figure 3.6: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Proteomic Cancer Biomarkers
- Figure 3.7: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Companion Diagnostic Cancer Biomarkers
- Figure 3.8: Challenges in the Study or Utilization of Serum Cancer Markers
- Figure 3.9: Top Unmet Needs in Commercial Products in the Cancer Biomarkers Space
- Figure 5.1: Hybridization Process
- Figure 5.2: FISH Test Procedure
- Figure 5.3: Gene Expression Profiling
- Figure 15.1: Phase I and II Processes of Drug Metabolism
- Figure 15.2: Human Phase I Enzymes
- Figure 15.3: Human Phase II Enzymes
- Figure 15.4: Hepatic Distribution of Human CYP450
- Figure 15.5: Relative Contribution of CYP450 Enzymes to Drug Metabolism
- Figure 15.6: Genetic Components Determine Drug Metabolism
- Figure 15.7: From Genetic Content to Personalized Medicine
- Figure 15.8: Remuneration for Diagnostics
- Figure 15.9: Breakout of the Molecular Diagnostics Marketplace
- Figure 15.10: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation
- Figure 15.11: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation by Technology
- Figure 15.12: Market Survey Respondent Demographics
- Figure 15.13: Breakout of the Respondent Pool by Affiliation
- Figure 15.14: Segmentation of the Personalized Medicine Market
- Figure 15.15: Personalized Medicine Market Drivers
- Figure 15.16: Challenges in the Personalized Medicine Space
- Figure 16.1: Epigenomics Product Development Pipeline
- Figure 17.1: Medicare Part B Spending on Clinical Laboratory Services, 1991-2005
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Cancer Biomarkers at the Nexus Point
- Table 2.2: Drug Development by Type of Cancer
- Table 2.3: Organ Specific Medicines in Development for Cancer, 2006
- Table 2.4: Estimates for the Leading Sites of New Cancer Cases and Deaths in the U.S. by Sex, 2007
- Table 2.5: Estimated Worldwide Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Type of Cancer
- Table 2.6: Estimated Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Region
- Table 2.7: Cancer Death Rates per 100,000 Population (and Rank) for All Cancer Sites by Country
- Table 2.8: Cancer Associated Genes
- Table 2.9: Carcinogens in the Workplace
- Table 2.10: Cancer Biomarker Markets
- Table 2.11: Private Funding Levels for the Biotechnology Segment, 1995-2006
- Table 2.12: Global Pharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending, 1995-2006
- Table 2.13: U.S. Government NIH Research Budget, 1995-2007
- Table 2.14: Tumor Markers Currently in Common Use
- Table 2.15: Herceptin Worldwide Sales, 1999-2007
- Table 2.16: Classes of Drugs Used to Treat Breast Cancer
- Table 2.17: Solutions to Biomarker Developments
- Table 2.18: Vermillion Collaborations
- Table 2.19: Uses of Molecular Diagnostics in Detection and Management of Cancer
- Table 2.20: U.S. Cancer Diagnostic Testing Market Size, 2005-2012
- Table 2.21: Market Opportunities for Cancer Biomarker Technology Platforms
- Table 3.1: Characteristics of Different Cancer Biomarker Types and Associated Market Opportunities
- Table 3.2: Segmentation of the Cancer Biomarker Market by Type/Lineage of Cancer Biomarkers and Market Size
- Table 3.3: In Vitro Cancer Marker Market Segments Worldwide, 2001 and 2007
- Table 3.4: Worldwide Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays Product Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.5: U.S. Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays Product Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.6: Worldwide In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.7: U.S. In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.8: Japanese In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.9: European In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.10: Global Distribution of IVD Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostic Testing, 2005
- Table 3.11: Estimated Market Share of Major Competitors in U.S. Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market
- Table 3.12: Major Presence in Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Markets
- Table 3.13: Worldwide CEA Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 3.14: U.S. CEA Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 3.15: Cancer Genomic Biomarker Markets, 2002-2012
- Table 3.16: Cancer Biomarkers Research Market Forecast, 2006-2011
- Table 3.17: Cancer Biomarker Market Estimates by Tissue of Origin
- Table 3.18: Companies Developing New Proteomic Cancer Biomarker Technology Platforms
- Table 4.1: Cancer Biomarkers Used to Maximize Likelihood of Response
- Table 4.2: Biomarkers for Monitoring Therapeutic Effectiveness and Resistance
- Table 4.3: Biomarkers for Dose Response of Therapy
- Table 4.4: Decision on Optimal Duration of Therapy
- Table 5.1: U.S. Breast Cancer Rate Decline, 2002-2006
- Table 5.2: BRCA Development Model
- Table 5.3: BRCA Test Development and Commercialization
- Table 5.4: BRAC Analysis
- Table 5.5: Revenue for BRACAnalysis® Risk Assessment Test, 2002-2006
- Table 5.6: GEArray DNA Microarrays and RT2 Profiler PCR Arrays
- Table 5.7: Product Development Opportunities in Breast Cancer
- Table 5.8: Concentration of Some Abundant Proteins, New Cancer Biomarkers Identified by SELDI-TOF, and Classical Cancer Biomarkers in Serum
- Table 5.9: Questions Related to Diagnostic SELDI-TOF Technology
- Table 6.1: Worldwide CA-125 Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 6.2: U.S. CA-125 Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 6.3: Some Clinically Established Cancer Serum Markers Currently in Use for Cancer
- Table 6.4: Pathophysiology of Ovarian Cancer and Characterization of Ovarian Epithelial Tumors
- Table 7.1: Worldwide PSA Sales, 2000-2010
- Table 7.2: U.S. PSA Sales, 2000-2010
- Table 7.3: Molecular Gene Markers for Prostate Cancer
- Table 8.1: Worldwide Bladder Cancer Marker Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 8.2: U.S. Bladder Cancer Marker Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 8.3: Worldwide NMP22 Sales, 2001-2010
- Table 8.4: Summary of Matritech’s Product Development Programs
- Table 8.5: Opportunities for Bladder Cancer Biomarkers
- Table 9.1: TNM Staging for Colorectal Cancer
- Table 10.1: Genetic Diagnostics Market, 2004-2012
- Table 13.1: Genomic and Proteomic Technologies
- Table 14.1: Potential Benefits of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics
- Table 14.2: Utility of Biomarker as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development
- Table 14.3: Device Submission Elements for the FDA
- Table 14.4: Summary of Biomarker Use in the Commercialization of Novel Oncology Pharmacotherapeutics
- Table 14.5: Pharmacoeconomic Challenges to the Implementation of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostic Tests
- Table 15.1: Percentage of Non-Responders in Various Drug Classes
- Table 15.2: High Profile Drug Withdrawals from the Marketplace
- Table 15.3: Drug Metabolism Drives Drug Efficacy/Toxicity
- Table 15.4: Population Frequency of the Various Cytochromes
- Table 15.5: Selected List of Personalized Medicine Tests
- Table 15.6: Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Product Pipeline
- Table 15.7: Marketed Personalized Therapies, 2006
- Table 15.8: Various Molecular Diagnostics Technologies: Timeline for Impact
- Table 15.9: Various Molecular Diagnostics Technologies: Impact on Different Therapeutic Areas in Personalized Medicine
- Table 15.10: Various Molecular Diagnostics Technologies: Technical Challenges in the Deployment for Personalized Medicine
- Table 15.11: Classification of Diagnostics by Risk
- Table 15.12: Areas in Personalized Medicine—Timeline of Impact
- Table 15.13: Impact of Personalized Medicine on Various Therapeutic Areas
- Table 15.14: Hurdles in Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Development in Various Therapeutic Areas
- Table 15.15: Market Opportunities in Personalized Medicine
- Table 15.16: Challenges for Market Adoption of the Various Personalized Medicine Tests
- Table 15.17: Personalized Medicine Industry SWOT
- Table 16.2: Clarient Revenue, 2002-2006
- Table 16.3: Clarient Percentage of Revenue, 2004-2006
- Table 16.4: Opportunities for Biomarkers in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Table 16.5: Myriad Biomarker Revenue, 2002-2006
- Table 17.1: List and Discounted Prices for Abbott Tumor Marker Tests
- Table 17.2: Hospital Laboratory Share of Part B Medicare Spending, 1996-2005
- Table 17.3: Medicare Spending on Clinical Lab Services, 1991-2005
- Table 17.4: Medicare Part B Spending Per Medicare Enrollee, 1998-2005
- Table 18.1: Tumor Diagnosis Immunoassay
- Table 18.2: Tumor Diagnosis Radioimmunoassay
- Table 18.3: Summary of Matritech’s Product Development Programs
- Table A1: Team Descriptions
- Table A5: Cancer Markers in Use
- Cancer Cell Therapy Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 About this Report
- 1.2 Scope of the Report
- 1.3 Objectives
- 1.4 Methodology
- 1.5 Executive Summary
- 2. Biology of Cellular Therapy for Cancer: Different Cell Types Deployed and Disease Areas Addressed
- 2.1 Components of the Hematopoietic System that can be Leveraged for Cancer Cellular Therapy
- 2.1.1 Dendritic Cells
- 2.1.2 Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs)
- 2.1.3 Natural Killer (NK) Cells
- 2.1.4 Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) also known as Lymphokine-activated Killers (LAKs)
- 2.1.5 Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSCs)
- 2.2 Adult Stem Cell-based Therapies (ASCs)
- 2.3 Stem Cell-based Cellular Therapies
- 2.3.1 Effectiveness in Transplants of Peripheral Versus Bone Marrow Stem Cells
- 2.3.2 What do HSCs do and what Factors are Involved in these Activities?
- 2.3.3 Self-renewal of HSCs
- 2.3.4 Differentiation of HSCs into Components of the Blood and Immune System
- 2.3.5 Migration of HSCs Into and Out of Marrow and Tissues
- 2.3.6 Apoptosis and Regulation of HSC Populations
- 2.4 Clinical Uses of HSC
- 2.4.1 Leukemia and Lymphoma
- 2.4.2 Inherited Blood Disorders
- 2.4.3 HSC Rescue in Cancer Chemotherapy
- 2.4.4 Graft-Versus-Tumor Treatment of Cancer
- 2.4.5 Other Clinical Applications of HSCs
- 2.5 What are the Challenges and Barriers to the Development of New and Improved Treatments Using HSCs?
- 2.5.1 Boosting the Numbers of HSCs
- 2.5.2 The Immune System in Host, Graft and Pathogen Attacks
- 2.5.3 Understanding the Differentiating Environment and Developmental Plasticity
- 2.6 Cancer Stem Cells
- 2.6.1 The Microenvironment
- 2.6.2 3-D Cultures and Spheres
- 2.6.3 Targeted Therapies
- 2.7 Cellular Immunotherapy with DCs in Cancer
- 2.7.1 Routes of DC Delivery
- 2.7.1.1 Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccines and DC Therapy
- 2.7.1.2 The Use of DCs for Cancer Vaccination
- 2.7.2 Immune Response to Vaccination
- 2.7.3 Clinical Studies with DCs
- 2.7.4 Future of DC Therapy for Cancer
- 2.8 Tumor Immunotherapy Using DCs Pulsed with Tumor-derived Peptides
- 2.9 Recent Advances on the Use of Stem Cells in Cancer Therapies
- 2.10 Growth Factor Signaling Inhibitors
- 2.10.1 EGFR Family Member Inhibitors
- 2.10.2 Hedgehog, Wnt/ß-Catenin and Notch Signaling Inhibitors
- 2.10.3 Combination Therapies
- 2.10.4 High-dose Cancer Therapy Plus HSCs
- 2.11 Cancer/Testis Antigens (CTAs): A Novel Cancer Marker?
- 2.12 Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Post-Bone Marrow Transplantation for Hemato-Oncological Diseases
- 2.12.1 Methods for Detection of MRD
- 2.12.1.1 Nonmolecular Methods
- 2.12.1.2 Immunophenotyping
- 2.12.1.3 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)
- 2.12.1.4 Southern Blotting for Detection of Clonal Genetic Markers
- 2.12.1.5 PCR for Detection of Clonal Genetic Markers
- 2.12.1.6 PCR of Minisatellite (VNTR) Sequences
- 2.12.1.7 PCR of Microsatellite Sequences
- 2.12.1.8 Y Chromosome-specific PCR
- 2.12.1.9 PCR-Amelogenin: Improved Single-step PCR Assay for Gender Identification
- 2.12.1.10 Quantitative PCR
- 2.12.1.11 Two-color Fluorescence In situ Hybridization (FISH): BCR/ABL Fusion Gene Detection
- 2.12.1.12 FISH in Sex-Mismatch Transplantation
- 2.13 Clinical Implications of Minimal Residual Disease
- 2.13.1 Upfront Transplantation Decision Based on MRD Findings
- 2.13.2 Prediction of Relapse Post-BMT
- 2.13.3 Adoptive Immunotherapy for CML Patients Relapsing after BMT
- 2.13.4 Mixed Allogeneic Chimerism as an Approach to Transplantation Tolerance
- 2.13.5 BMT in Thalassemia and SAA and Detection of MRD
- 2.13.6 Organ Transplantation
- 2.14 Genetic Engineering of Tumor Cells
- 2.14.1 Hybridoma Process
- 2.14.2 Hollow-fiber Perfusion
- 2.14.3 Heat Shock Protein Technology
- 2.14.4 Stem Cells Used as Platforms in Anticancer Therapies
- 2.14.5 Stem Cell Transplantation in Cancer
- 2.14.6 Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation
- 2.14.7 Cellular Immunotherapy Ex vivo Mobilization of Immune Cells
- 2.14.8 Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- 2.14.9 Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
- 2.14.10 Complications of Stem Cell Transplants in Cancer
- 2.14.11 Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant for Leukemia
- 2.14.12 MSC Transplantation in Cancer
- 2.14.13 hESC-derived NK Cells for Treatment of Cancer Long-term Results of HSC Transplantation
- 2.15 The Human Immune System
- 2.16 Cell Therapy Commercialization
- 3. Current Status of Cellular Therapies for Cancer
- 3.1 Introduction to the Cancer Vaccine Space
- 3.1.1 Tumor Cell Vaccines
- 3.1.2 Antigen Vaccines
- 3.1.3 DC Vaccines
- 3.1.3.1 Dendritic/Tumor Cell Fusion
- 3.1.3.2 Limitations of DC Vaccines for Cancer
- 3.1.3.3 The Future of Cell Therapy with DCs
- 3.1.4 Anti-Idiotype Vaccines
- 3.1.5 Vector-based Vaccines
- 3.1.6 Heat Shock Protein-based Vaccines
- 3.1.7 Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccines
- 3.1.8 Lymphocyte-based Cancer Therapies
- 3.1.8.1 Adoptive Immunotherapy
- 3.1.8.2 Rescue of CD8+ T Cells for Use in Tumor Immunotherapy
- 3.1.8.3 Expansion of Antigen-specific CTLs
- 3.1.8.4 Genetically Targeted T Cells for Treating B Cell Malignancies
- 3.1.8.5 LAK Cell Therapy
- 3.1.8.6 Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) Therapy
- 3.2 Vaccines in Development
- 3.2.1 GVAX Immunotherapies (Cell Genesys)
- 3.2.2 Oncophage (Antigenics)
- 3.2.3 Provenge (P-11) (Dendreon)
- 3.2.4 Sipuleucel-T (Dendreon)
- 3.2.5 DCVax® (Northwest Biotherapeutics)
- 3.2.6 Stimuvax® (EMD Pharmaceuticals)
- 3.2.7 JuvImmune™ (Juvaris BioTherapeutics)
- 3.2.8 Allovectin-7® (Vical)
- 3.2.9 BiovaxID (Biovest)
- 3.2.10 BLP25 Liposome Vaccine (Merck & Co.)
- 3.2.11 Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline)
- 3.2.12 Collidem® DC Vaccine (IDM Pharma)
- 3.2.13 EP-2101 Lung Cancer Vaccine (IDM Pharma)
- 3.2.14 FavId (Favrille)
- 3.3 Clinical Trials Pipeline for Various Types of Cellular Therapy for Cancer
- 3.4 Cancer Therapy Based on Natural Killer Cells
- 3.5 Cancer Stem Cells
- 3.6 ESC Vaccine for Prevention of Lung Cancer
- 3.7 Cell-based Therapies for Malignant Brain Tumors
- 3.7.1 DC Therapy for Brain Tumors
- 3.7.2 Targeting Stem Cells in Brain Tumors
- 3.7.3 Conclusions
- 3.8 Vaccine for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- 3.8.1 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- 3.8.2 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment
- 3.8.3 Development of Patient-specific Vaccine for NHL
- 3.8.4 BiovaxID Active Immunotherapy
- 3.8.5 BiovaxID Treatment and Production Process
- 3.8.6 FavId
- 3.8.7 MyVax
- 3.8.8 Sector Competition
- 3.9 Bone Marrow Transplants
- 3.10 The Market Opportunity for the Use of Stem Cells in the Cancer Therapy Marketplace
- 4. Tumor Antigens, Cancer Vaccines and Cellular Therapy
- 4.1 Scope of this Chapter
- 4.2 Tumor Antigens and Classes
- 4.3 Classes of Cancer Vaccines Based on Tumor Antigens
- 4.3.1 Antigen/Adjuvant Vaccines
- 4.3.2 Whole Cell Tumor Vaccines
- 4.3.3 DC Vaccines
- 4.3.4 Viral Vectors and DNA Vaccines
- 4.3.5 Idiotype Vaccines
- 4.4 Antigens that are Commonly Found in Cancer Vaccines under Investigation Today
- 4.4.1 Treatment Vaccines
- 4.4.2 Prevention Vaccines
- 4.5 Cancer Vaccines that have Reached Phase III Trials
- 4.6 Selected Companies in the Tumor Antigens and Vaccines Space with Novel Technology Platforms
- 4.6.1 Antigenics
- 4.6.2 AlphaVax
- 4.6.3 Argonex
- 4.6.4 Bavarian Nordic
- 4.6.5 Biomira
- 4.6.6 CancerVax Corp. (Micromet, Inc.)
- 4.6.7 Corixa (Acquired by GlaxoSmithKline)
- 4.6.8 CTL Immunotherapies
- 4.6.9 Dendreon
- 4.6.10 GenEra
- 4.6.11 GeneMax Pharmaceuticals
- 4.6.12 Genzyme Molecular Oncology
- 4.6.13 IDM
- 5. Other Competing Antibody Technologies
- 5.1 Competition
- 5.2 Companies Developing Human Antibodies
- 5.3 Antibody Sequence Libraries
- 5.4 Recombinant DNA Sequences
- 5.5 Companies with Antibody Products in Clinical Trials
- 5.6 Immunoconjugates
- 5.7 Protein Products
- 6. The Future of Cell Therapy Against Cancer
- 6.1 Innovations in Cell-based Therapy of Cancer
- 6.1.1 Cancer Therapy-based on NK-92 Cells
- 6.1.2 Myoblast-mediated Gene Therapy
- 6.1.3 Cancer Stem Cells
- 6.1.4 MSCs for the Treatment of Gliomas
- 7. Government Regulation of Cell Therapy Products
- 7.1 Pharmaceutical Product Regulation
- 7.1.1 Preclinical Phase
- 7.1.2 Biologics
- 7.1.3 Clinical Phase
- 7.2 New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologics License Application (BLA)
- 7.3 Fast-Track Review
- 7.4 Post-Approval Phase
- 7.5 Hatch-Waxman Act
- 7.6 Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs)
- 7.7 505(b)(2) Applications
- 7.8 Patent Term Restoration
- 7.9 ANDA and 505(b)(2) Applicant Challenges to Patents and Generic Exclusivity
- 7.10 Non-Patent Marketing Exclusivities
- 7.11 Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
- 7.12 Cell Debris Therapy Ban
- 8. Companies involved in Cancer Cell Therapy
- 8.1 Companies Involved in Cell-based Cancer Therapy
- 9. Company Profiles
- 9.1 Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 9.2 Antigenics, Inc.
- 9.3 Biomira, Inc.
- 9.4 Biovest International, Inc.
- 9.5 Cell Genesys, Inc.
- 9.6 Dendreon Corp.
- 9.7 EMD Serono (Parent Company is Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
- 9.8 Favrille, Inc.
- 9.9 Genitope Corporation
- 9.10 Genzyme Molecular Oncology
- 9.11 GlaxoSmithKline
- 9.12 IDM Pharma, Inc.
- 9.13 Juvaris BioTherapeutics, Inc.
- 9.14 Medarex, Inc.
- 9.15 Merck & Co., Inc.
- 9.16 Micromet, Inc.
- 9.17 Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
- 9.18 Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 9.19 Vical, Inc.
- 9.20 Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Appendix I: List of Human Clusters of Differentiation (CD) Antigens
- Appendix II: Glossary of Terms in the Stem Cells Space
- Appendix III: Markers Commonly Used to Identify Stem Cells and to Characterize Differentiated Cell Types (Hematopoietic-focused)
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Autologous Process for Cancer Vaccination
- Figure 2.2: Patient Treatment Schedule for Second Line Caner Cell Therapy
- Figure 2.3: Cell Maturation Process
- Figure 2.4: CTL Cell Division
- Figure 2.5: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen
- Figure 2.6: Exosomes
- Figure 2.7: Current End-user Utilization Category of CSCs
- Figure 2.8: Current End-user Utilization Category of Adult Stem Cells (ASCs)
- Figure 2.9: Current End-user Utilization Category of hESCs
- Figure 2.10: Current End-user Utilization Category of Human Cord Blood Stem Cells
- Figure 3.1: Cancer Vaccine Active Immune-Therapy Process
- Figure 3.2: Current End-user Utilization Category of CSCs
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: TC Cell Activation
- Table 2.2: Innate Versus Adaptive Immunity
- Table 2.3: Proposed Cell-Surface Markers of Undifferentiated HSCs
- Table 3.1: Clinical Trials for Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccines
- Table 3.2: Pipeline of Cancer Vaccines
- Table 3.3: List of Cell Therapy Clinical Trials
- Table 3.4: Distribution of Adoptive Immunotherapy of Cancer Clinical Studies being Performed Worldwide
- Table 3.5: Clinical Studies Utilizing MSCs
- Table 3.6: Distribution of MSC-based Cancer Clinical Studies being Performed Worldwide
- Table 3.7: HSC-based Cancer Therapy
- Table 3.8: Distribution of HSC-based Cancer Clinical Studies Being Performed Worldwide
- Table 3.9: Characteristics of Different Stem Cell Types and Associated Market Opportunity
- Table 3.10: Segmentation of the Stem Cell Market by Type/Lineage of Stem Cell
- Table 4.1: Classes of Tumor Antigens
- Table 4.2: Cancer Vaccines in Phase III Clinical Trials
- Table 9.1: Cell Genesys Clinical Pipeline
- Table 9.2: Favrille Development Programs
- Cancer Diagnostic Testing World Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About this Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2. Introduction to Cancer Biology and the Diagnostic Industry
- 2.1 Cancer
- 2.1.1 The Disease
- 2.1.2 Metastasis
- 2.1.3 Demographics and Statistics of Cancer
- 2.2 The Drivers of the Biotech and Diagnostics Industry
- 2.2.1 Technological Innovation
- 2.2.2 Government Funding
- 2.3 Outlook for Tumor Markers
- 3. Tumor Markers Market Segment Analysis: Size, Growth and Share
- 3.1 Market Description
- 3.2 Clinical Diagnostic Serum-Based Cancer Markers
- 3.3 PSA Testing Market Size
- 3.4 DNA Markers
- 3.5 Serum Proteins
- 3.6 Enzymes
- 3.7 Occult Blood
- 3.8 Histology and In Situ Hybridization (ISH)
- 3.9 Cervical Cytology
- 3.10 IHC
- 3.11 In Vivo Detection Cancer Products
- 3.12 Radionuclides and X-Ray Detection Products
- 3.13 HPV Testing
- 3.14 Bladder Cancer Testing
- 3.15 Tumor Assays for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- 4. Diagnostic Methods for Cancer Detection
- 4.1 Organ-Specific Tumor Markers
- 4.1.1 Colon Cancer
- 4.1.2 Prostate Cancer
- 4.1.3 Pancreatic Cancer
- 4.1.4 Breast Cancer
- 4.1.5 Ovarian Cancer
- 4.1.6 Cervical Cancer
- 4.1.7 Lung Cancer
- 4.1.8 Testicular Cancer
- 4.1.9 Bladder Cancer
- 4.1.10 Hepatic Cancer
- 4.1.11 Stomach Cancer
- 4.1.12 Malignant Melanoma
- 4.1.13 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Acute Lymphoblastoid Leukemia (ALL)
- 4.1.14 Lymphoma
- 4.2 Clinical Laboratory Methods for Measuring Tumor Markers
- 4.2.1 Abbott Diagnostics AxSYM
- 4.2.2 Roche Diagnostics Elecsys
- 4.2.3 Beckman Coulter Diagnostics Access
- 4.2.4 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics ADVIA Centaur
- 4.2.5 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Immulite
- 4.2.6 Tosoh Bioscience AIA-2000
- 4.2.7 Thermo Fisher Scientific B.R.A.H.M.S. KRYPTOR
- 4.2.8 Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Vitros ECiQ
- 4.2.9 Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inc.
- 4.2.10 bioMerieux Vidas
- 4.2.11 Eisai Picolumi
- 4.3 New Technologies for Cancer Diagnostics
- 4.3.1 New and Improved Immunoassays
- 4.3.2 IHC Tests
- 4.3.3 Molecular (DNA and Genomic) Diagnostic Assays
- 4.3.4 Genomics and Genetic Markers
- 4.3.5 Proteomics and New Protein Markers
- 4.3.5.1 Inside the ProteinChip System
- 4.3.5.2 Rapid Biological Assays on a Chip
- 4.3.5.3 Proteome Pattern Recognition
- 4.3.6 New Platform Technologies Including Flow Cytometry
- 4.3.7 Stem Cell Markers
- 4.3.8 mAbs
- 4.3.9 Proteomics and Cancer Antibodies
- 4.3.10 Pharmacogenomics and Oncology Diagnostics
- 4.3.11 DNA Microarrays
- 4.3.12 In Vitro Diagnostic Multi-variate Index Assays (IVDMIA)
- 4.3.13 Prostate PX Score
- 4.3.14 Prostate-63
- 4.3.15 Future Directions
- 4.4 Clinical Methods for Diagnosis of Cancer
- 4.4.1 Screening
- 4.4.2 Sigmoidoscopy
- 4.4.3 Imaging
- 4.4.4 Theranostics
- 5. Implications of Molecular Biology for New Diagnostic Cancer Tests
- 6. Companies Entering the Cancer Diagnostics Market with Novel Technology Platforms
- 6.1 Abbott Diagnostics
- 6.2 Affymetrix, Inc.
- 6.3 Agendia BV
- 6.4 Ambrilia Biopharma, Inc.
- 6.5 AMDL, Inc.
- 6.6 Asuragen, Inc.
- 6.7 Aureon Laboratories, Inc.
- 6.8 Bard Diagnostics, Inc.
- 6.9 Beckman, Dickinson and Company (BD) Diagnostics - TriPath
- 6.10 Beckman Coulter, Inc.
- 6.11 Biocode S.A.
- 6.12 BioCurex
- 6.13 Biomedical Diagnostics
- 6.14 Biomerica
- 6.15 bioMerieux
- 6.16 BioModa, Inc.
- 6.17 Bruker Daltonics
- 6.18 Byk Gulden
- 6.19 Cepheid
- 6.20 Clarient, Inc.
- 6.21 Correlogic Systems, Inc.
- 6.22 CytoCore (formerly Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.)
- 6.23 Cytogen Corporation (now EUSA Pharma)
- 6.24 diaDexus, Inc.
- 6.25 DiagnoCure, Inc.
- 6.26 Diagnostic Automation / Cortez Diagnostics, Inc.
- 6.27 DRG International, Inc.
- 6.28 Eisai Co., Ltd.
- 6.29 Enigma Diagnostics Ltd.
- 6.30 Epigenomics AG
- 6.31 Exact Sciences Corporation
- 6.32 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
- 6.33 Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inc.
- 6.34 Gene Logic, Inc.
- 6.35 Gen-Probe, Inc.
- 6.36 Genomic Health
- 6.37 Geron Corporation
- 6.38 Hologic, Inc. (formerly Cytyc Corporation)
- 6.39 Immunicon Corporation (now Veridex, LLC)
- 6.40 Immunomedics, Inc.
- 6.41 Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.42 Ipsogen
- 6.43 LabCorp
- 6.44 Matritech
- 6.45 Mitsubishi Kagaku Medical
- 6.46 Molecular Devices (formerly Arcturus Bioscience, Inc.)
- 6.47 Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 6.48 Nexell Therapeutics, Inc.
- 6.49 Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
- 6.50 Nuvelo, Inc.
- 6.51 Oncotech, Inc.
- 6.52 Oncothyreon, Inc. (formerly Biomira)
- 6.53 Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.54 Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.55 Polymedco, Inc.
- 6.56 Princeton BioMeditech Corporation
- 6.57 Qiagen
- 6.58 Roche (F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd.)
- 6.59 Sanko Junyaku Co., Ltd.
- 6.60 Siemens Heathcare Diagnostics
- 6.61 Tosoh Corporation (Bioscience division)
- 6.62 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
- 6.63 Veridex, LLC
- 6.64 Vermillion, Inc.
- 6.65 Worldwide Medical Corporation
- 6.66 Xenomics, Inc. (TrovaGene, Inc.)
- 7. Business Trends in the Industry
- 7.1 Industry Consolidation
- 7.2 Breadth of Product Offering and Pricing
- 7.3 Government Regulation of Medical Devices
- 7.4 Commercial Opportunities in Cancer Markers
- 7.5 Moderators of Growth
- 7.6 Biotechnology Industry Trends
- 7.7 Pharmaceutical Industry Trends
- 7.8 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Tumor Marker Tests
- 7.8.1 North American Market
- 7.8.2 International Markets
- 7.8.2.1 Europe
- 7.8.2.2 Central and South America
- 7.8.2.3 Asia/Pacific
- 8. Tumor Marker Testing: Important Issues
- 8.1 Trends in Patient Care and Reimbursement
- 8.2 Trends in Reimbursement Practice
- 8.3 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)
- 8.4 Unmet Needs in Tumor Markers
- 9. Important New Technology Areas
- 9.1 Proteins
- 9.2 DNA Sequencing
- 9.3 The Human Genome Project (HGP)
- 9.4 Liquid Phase Chromatography
- 9.5 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- 9.6 Capillary Electrophoresis
- 9.7 Proteomics
- 9.8 Use of MS in Sequencing
- 9.9 High-Throughput Organic Synthesis
- 10. New Cancer Markers in Basic Research
- 10.1 Genetics of Cancer
- 10.1.1 Activator genes (Oncogenes)
- 10.1.2 Inactivating Genes (Tumor Suppressor Genes)
- 10.2 DNA Mismatch Repair Genes (MMRs)
- 10.3 Telomeres
- 10.4 Diseases
- 10.4.1 t(15;17) in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
- 10.4.2 t(12;21) in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
- 10.4.3 Retinoblastoma and Constitutional 13q14 Deletion
- 10.4.4 Stomach Cancer
- 10.4.5 Head and Neck Cancer
- 10.4.6 Breast and Ovarian Cancers
- 10.4.7 Prostate Cancer
- 10.4.8 Cervical Cancer: NMPI79
- 10.4.9 Uterine and Kidney Cancer: MN/CA9
- 10.4.10 Colon Cancer: Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGF)
- 10.4.11 Lung Cancer: Ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 and microRNA Markers
- 10.5 Tumor Markers
- 10.5.1 Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative
- 10.5.2 CRC: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Doubling Time
- 10.5.3 MUC1, 2, 3 and 4
- 10.5.4 Cytokeratins
- 10.5.5 RAK Antigens
- 10.5.6 Serum Urokinase Receptors
- 10.5.7 Survivin
- 10.5.8 Reg-4 Protein
- 10.5.9 NADPH Oxidases 1 and 2 (NOX1 and NOX2)
- 10.5.10 Prostate Secretory Protein 94- (PSP94)-Binding Protein
- 10.5.11 Shc Proteins
- 10.5.12 Anti-Glycan Antibodies
- 10.5.13 YKL-40
- 10.5.14 Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-L3
- 10.5.15 Transthyretin and Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1)
- 10.5.16 A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM)
- 10.6 Technology
- 10.6.1 Chips
- 10.6.2 Ettan DIGE Technology
- 10.6.3 DNA Methylation Technology
- 10.7 Disease-specific Technology
- 10.7.1 Ovarian Cancer: Bio-Rad's SELDI-based ProteinChip
- 10.7.2 Lung Cancer: Labeled Porphyrin Binding
- 10.7.3 C-MAP, A Cervical Cancer Screening System
- 10.7.4 Lung Cancer: Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (ProGRP)
- 10.7.5 Prostate Cancer: PCA3
- 10.7.6 Bladder Cancer: ImmunoCyt/uCyt+
- 11. Market Trends and Forecasts
- 11.1 Ultrasensitive Cancer Tests
- 11.2 Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As) of Diagnostic Companies
- 11.3 Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
- 11.4 Genetic Tests of Hereditary Cancer Risk
- 11.5 DNA Measurements
- 11.6 Technical and Practical Issues for Potential New Markers
- 11.7 Genetic Profiling
- 11.8 Ploidy
- 11.9 Advances in Sputum Analysis for Screening and Early Detection of Lung Cancer
- 11.10 Pharmacogenetic Tests for Cancer
- 11.11 Worldwide Healthcare Spending
- Appendix 1: Web Links
- Appendix 2: Cancer Information Resources
- Appendix 3: Colon Cancer Staging
- Appendix 4: Reimbursement for Tumor Marker Testing
- Appendix 5: The Pathology of Prostate Cancer
- Appendix 6: Government Regulation of Tumor Marker Tests
- Appendix 7: The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)
- Appendix 8: Marketers of Occult Blood Diagnostic Test Kits
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 4.1: Model of CRC Development
- Figure 4.2: Progression of CRC Development
- Figure 4.3: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Equivocal Results with IHC
- Figure 4.4: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Results by FISH
- Figure 4.5: The BTA stat Test vs. Cytology
- Figure 10.1: PCA3 Test Volume in U.S., 2005-2008
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Organ-Specific Medicines in Development for Cancer
- Table 2.2: Leading Sites of New Cancer Cases and Deaths in 2010 in the U.S. by Sex
- Table 2.3: Worldwide Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Type of Cancer
- Table 2.4: Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Region
- Table 2.5: Cancer-Associated Genes
- Table 2.6: Carcinogens in the Workplace
- Table 2.7: Private Funding Levels for the Biotechnology Segment, 1995-2010
- Table 2.8: Herceptin Worldwide Sales, 2000-2015
- Table 2.9: Classes of Drugs Used to Treat Breast Cancer
- Table 3.1: Tumor Biomarkers Currently in Common Use
- Table 3.2: Global IVD Cancer Tumor Marker Testing Market Segments Growth Rates, 2005-2015
- Table 3.3: Worldwide Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays Product Market, 2001-2015
- Table 3.4: U.S. Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays Product Market, 2001-2015
- Table 3.5: Worldwide In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2015
- Table 3.6: U.S. In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2015
- Table 3.7: Japanese In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2015
- Table 3.8: European In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2015
- Table 3.9: Market Share of Major Competitors in U.S. Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market
- Table 3.10: Major Presence in Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Markets
- Table 3.11: Worldwide PSA Sales, 2000-2015
- Table 3.12: U.S. PSA Sales, 2000-2015
- Table 3.13: Serum Markers Used Clinically
- Table 3.14: Drivers of IHC Growth
- Table 3.15: Bladder Cancer Testing Efforts in the U.S. and Germany
- Table 3.16: Worldwide Bladder Cancer Marker Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 3.17: U.S. Bladder Cancer Marker Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 3.18: Worldwide NMP22 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 3.19: Current Breast Cancer Products and Product Opportunities
- Table 3.20: Products in Various Stages of Development for Cancers Other than Breast Cancer
- Table 4.1: CRC Stages
- Table 4.2: Worldwide CEA Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.3: U.S. CEA Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.4: Population Statistics of Serum Levels of PSA in Men Over 50 Years of Age
- Table 4.5: Cell Doubling Time and Time to Reach PSA Level of 1,000 ng/mL
- Table 4.6: Worldwide CA 19-9 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.7: U.S. CA 19-9 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.8: CA 19-9 Levels in Management of Pancreatic Cancer
- Table 4.9: Worldwide CA 15-3 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.10: U.S. CA 15-3 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.11: TPA Marker Sensitivity
- Table 4.12: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: How to Interpret Test Results
- Table 4.13: Siemens Oncogene Science Biomarker Group Reagents
- Table 4.14: Worldwide CA-125 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.15: U.S. CA-125 Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.16: Number of Pap Smears Performed by Country
- Table 4.17: Lung Cancer Survival Rates
- Table 4.18: American Cancer Society Lung Cancer Facts
- Table 4.19: Tests Identifying Molecular Markers in Urine
- Table 4.20: Patient Category Applications
- Table 4.21: Worldwide AFP Marker Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.22: U.S. AFP Cancer Marker Sales, 2001-2015
- Table 4.23: Potential Uses of Molecular Diagnostics in Cancer Management
- Table 4.24: Markers Frequently Used to Identify Adult Stem Cells in the Prostate, Breast and Intestine
- Table 4.25: CRC mAb Imaging Kits
- Table 4.26: MammaPrint: Key Features
- Table 6.1: Tumor Marker Tests
- Table 6.2: Tumor Diagnosis Immunoassays
- Table 6.3: Tumor Diagnosis Radioimmunoassays
- Table 6.4: Summary of Matritech's Product Development Programs
- Table 6.5: PBM Product List
- Table 7.1: List and Discounted Prices for Abbott Tumor Marker Tests
- Table 8.1: CPT Codes for Tumor Markers
- Table 10.1: Categories of Oncogenes
- Table 10.2: Familial Cancer Syndromes and Tumor Suppressor Genes
- Table A3: TNM Classification
- Table A7: Financial Comparison for Moderate and Waived CLIA Labs
- Table A8: List of Marketers of Occult Blood Diagnostic Test Kits
- Cancer Therapeutics Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Goals and Objectives
- 1.3 Study, Scope and Format
- 1.4 Methodology
- 1.5 Summary of Major Findings
- 2. Introduction to the Cancer Therapeutic Market
- 3. Cancer Therapeutics Market Overview
- 3.1 Cancer Therapeutics in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industry
- 3.2 Business Analysis of the Cancer Market
- 3.2.1 Growth Potential
- 3.2.2 Demographics of Cancer
- 3.2.3 The Global Market for Cancer Therapies
- 3.2.3.1 European Cancer Market
- 3.2.3.2 The Environment in the U.K. for Clinical Research into New Anti-Cancer Therapies
- 3.2.3.3 The Suitability of Current U.K. and E.U. Regulatory Regimes
- 3.2.3.4 Comments on the Current E.U. Regulatory Environment
- 3.3 The Pharmaceutical Industry
- 3.4 Cancer Therapies
- 3.4.1 Market Size
- 3.5 New Product Trends
- 3.5.1 Chemotherapy
- 3.5.2 Hormone Therapy
- 3.5.3 Photodynamic Therapy and Photosensitizers
- 3.5.4 Gene Therapy
- 3.5.4.1 Tumor-Suppressor Gene Therapy
- 3.5.4.2 Immunomodulatory Gene Therapy
- 3.5.4.3 Suicide Gene Therapy
- 3.5.5 Radiation Therapy
- 3.5.6 Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTIs)
- 3.5.7 Genetic Screening
- 3.5.8 Biological Therapies
- 3.5.9 Interferons
- 3.5.10 Interleukins
- 3.5.11 Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)
- 3.5.12 Colony-Stimulating Factors (CSFs)
- 3.5.13 Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs)
- 3.5.14 Cancer Vaccines
- 3.5.15 Anti-Sense Therapy
- 3.5.16 Adjuvants
- 3.5.17 Angiogenesis Inhibitors
- 3.5.18 Hyperthermia
- 3.5.19 Transplants
- 3.5.19.1 Bone Marrow Transplants
- 3.5.19.2 Stem Cell Transplants
- 4. The Disease of Cancer
- 4.1 Incidence of Cancer
- 4.1.1 U.S. Statistics
- 4.1.2 Global Statistics
- 4.2 Causes of Cancer
- 4.3 Risk Factors
- 4.3.1 Smoking
- 4.3.2 Diet
- 4.3.3 Radiation
- 4.3.4 Occupational Risks
- 4.3.5 Medicine and Infection
- 4.3.6 Environmental Pollution
- 4.3.7 Reproductive Factors
- 4.3.8 Socio-Economic Factors
- 4.4 Cancer Costs
- 5. Specific Cancers
- 5.1 Bladder Cancer
- 5.1.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.1.2 Diagnosis and Staging
- 5.1.3 Therapy
- 5.1.4 Test for Bladder Cancer Analyzes DNA in Urine
- 5.1.5 Drugs in Development
- 5.2 Brain Cancer
- 5.2.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.2.2 Treatment Options
- 5.3 Breast Cancer
- 5.3.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.3.2 Therapeutic Drugs
- 5.3.3 Market Overview for Breast Cancer Therapeutics
- 5.4 Cervical Cancer
- 5.4.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.4.2 Treatment Options
- 5.5 Colon Cancer
- 5.5.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.5.2 Treatment Options
- 5.5.3 Market Overview for Colon Cancer Therapeutics
- 5.6 Leukemia
- 5.6.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.6.2 Treatment Options
- 5.7 Lymphoma
- 5.7.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.7.2 Treatment Options
- 5.8 Lung Cancer
- 5.8.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.8.2 Treatment Options
- 5.8.3 Breakthrough Treatments for Lung Cancer
- 5.8.4 Market Overview for Lung Cancer Therapeutics
- 5.9 Ovarian Cancer
- 5.9.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.9.2 Treatment Options
- 5.10 Prostate Cancer
- 5.10.1 Overview of the Disease
- 5.10.2 Treatment Options
- 6. Corporate Profiles
- 6.1 AstraZeneca Plc
- 6.2 Biogen Idec, Inc.
- 6.3 Bristol-Myers Squibb
- 6.4 Genentech, Inc.
- 6.5 Genta, Inc.
- 6.6 Genzyme Oncology
- 6.7 GlaxoSmithKline Plc
- 6.8 ImClone Systems, Inc.
- 6.9 Medarex
- 6.10 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.11 Novartis AG
- 6.12 Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.13 OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.14 Pfizer
- 6.15 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- 6.16 Roche
- 6.17 Sanofi-Aventis
- 7. References
- 7.1 Online References for Cancer
- 7.2 Print Sources
- 7.3 Product Approvals for Cancer Indications
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: The 646 Medicines in Development for Cancer, 2006
- Table 2.2: Drug Approvals for Cancer Indications, 1996-2007
- Table 3.1: Opportunities for Molecular-Targeting Therapeutics for Cancer
- Table 3.2: Top U.S. Biotechnology Companies by Market Capitalization
- Table 3.3: Top Pharmaceutical Companies by Market Capitalization
- Table 3.4: Clinical Development for some of Hoffman-La Roche Products
- Table 3.5: Global Pharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending, 1995-2006
- Table 3.6: U.S. Government NIH Research Budget, 1995-2007
- Table 3.7: Health Spending as Percentage of GDP by Country
- Table 3.8: Spending on Health by Country
- Table 3.9: Annual Spending on Cancer Drugs Per Person
- Table 3.10: Patients Per Cancer Specialist
- Table 3.11: World Healthcare Cancer Therapeutics Markets by Region
- Table 3.12: U.S. Market for Cancer Therapeutics, 1998-2006
- Table 3.13: European Market for Cancer Therapeutics, 1998-2006
- Table 3.14: Japanese Market for Cancer Therapeutics, 1998-2006
- Table 3.15: Cancer Vaccines Approved or in Phase III Clinical Trials
- Table 3.16: Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Clinical Trial for Cancer
- Table 4.1: New Cancer Cases and Deaths in the U.S. by Sex for all Cancer Sites, 2007
- Table 4.2: New Cancer Cases and Deaths for Ten Leading Cancer Sites in the U.S., by Sex, 2007
- Table 4.3: Worldwide Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Leading Cancer Sites and by Level of Economic Development, 2007
- Table 4.4: Estimated Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by World Area, 2007
- Table 4.5: Cancer Death Rates per 100,000 Population (and Rank) for all Cancer Sites by Country, 2006
- Table 4.6: Genes and Cancer Risk
- Table 4.7: Carcinogens in the Workplace
- Table 5.1: Drugs Used in Bladder Cancer Therapy
- Table 5.2: Drugs in Development for Bladder Cancer
- Table 5.3: Medicines in Development for Brain Cancer
- Table 5.4: Classes of Chemotherapy Drugs Used to Treat Breast Cancer
- Table 5.5: U.S. Sales of Doxorubicin, 2001-2009
- Table 5.6: New Therapeutics for Breast Cancer
- Table 5.7: Other Classes of Drugs Used to Treat Breast Cancer
- Table 5.8: Worldwide AstraZeneca’s Nolvadex Sales, 2000-2005
- Table 5.9: Aromatase Inhibitors
- Table 5.10: Worldwide Sales Estimates for Arimidex, 2000-2008
- Table 5.11: Worldwide Herceptin Sales, 1999-2005
- Table 5.12: Innovative Drug Therapies applied to the Breast Cancer Market Sector
- Table 5.13: Treatment Regimens for Advanced Breast Cancer
- Table 5.14: Medicines in Development for Cervical Cancer
- Table 5.15: New Therapies for Colon Cancer
- Table 5.16: Worldwide Sales for Xeloda, 2001-2005
- Table 5.17: Worldwide Sales of Tomudex, 1998-2005
- Table 5.18: Medicines in Development for Leukemia
- Table 5.19: Pricing of Novartis’ Gleevec in Various Strengths in the U.S.
- Table 5.20: Medicines in Development for Lymphoma
- Table 5.21: U.S. Sales of Rituxan, 1999-2005
- Table 5.22: Cytotoxics for Lung Cancer Therapy
- Table 5.23: Anti-Angiogenics for Lung Cancer
- Table 5.24: Drugs in Development for Lung Cancer
- Table 5.25: Current Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
- Table 5.26: Emerging Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
- Table 5.27: New Development Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
- Table 5.28: New Drug Types for Ovarian Cancer
- Table 5.29: Medicines in Development for Prostate Cancer
- Table 6.1: Potential Therapeutic Indications and Development Stages
- Table 6.2: Products in Clinical Development in Phase II and III (Including Additional Indications)
- Table 7.1: Drugs Currently Approved for the Treatment of Cancer
- Cancer Vaccines Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 About this Report
- 1.2 Scope of the Report
- 1.3 Objectives
- 1.4 Methodology
- 1.5 Executive Summary
- 2. Overview of Cancer
- 2.1 Cancer Statistics
- 2.2 The Cost of Cancer
- 2.3 Cancers Being Targeted by Vaccine Therapies: Overview of Disease and Market
- 3. Introduction to Cancer Vaccines
- 3.1 Overview of the Types of Cancer Vaccines
- 3.2 Antigen/Adjuvant Vaccines
- 3.3 DNA Vaccines
- 3.4 Vector-based Vaccines
- 3.5 Tumor Cell Vaccines
- 3.6 Dendritic Cell (DC) Vaccines
- 3.7 Anti-Idiotype Vaccines
- 4. Prophylactic Vaccines on the Market and in Development
- 4.1 Cervical Cancer (HPV)
- 4.2 Prophylactic Breast Cancer Vaccine in Development
- 5. Therapeutic Vaccines on the Market and in Development
- 5.1 Breakthroughs in the Cancer Vaccine Market: Vaccines on the Market
- 5.2 Vaccines in Development (by Type of Vaccine)
- 6. Challenges and Issues in Cancer Vaccine Development
- 6.1 Eliciting Appropriate Immune Response Against Cancer
- 6.2 Clinical Trial Design
- 6.3 Combination Therapies
- 7. Regulatory Issues
- 7.1 Pharmaceutical Product Regulation
- 7.2 New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologics License Application (BLA)
- 7.3 Post-Approval Phase
- 7.4 Fast-Track Review
- 7.5 Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
- 7.6 What Regulatory Guidance Is Needed for Companion Biomarkers?
- 7.7 Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative
- 7.8 IRB Approval in Clinical Trials
- 7.9 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
- 8. Trends Affecting the Cancer Vaccine Market
- 8.1 Screening and Cancer Detection
- 8.2 Public Perception of Vaccines
- 8.3 Insurance Issues
- 8.4 New Technological and Scientific Developments
- 8.5 Personalized Medicine
- 9. Business Landscape
- 9.1 Technology and Market Trends
- 9.2 M&A Activity
- 9.3 Partnering
- 9.4 Competitive Situation
- 9.5 Intellectual Property Rights 97
- 9.6 Industry Challenges and Strategic Recommendations for Commercialization
- 9.7 Opportunities and Strategic Recommendations
- 9.8 Requirements for a Successful Cancer Vaccine Products Industry
- 10. Company Profiles
- 10.1 Advaxis
- 10.2 Agenus (formerly Antigenics)
- 10.3 AlphaVax
- 10.4 Antigen Express
- 10.5 Apthera
- 10.6 Argos Therapeutics
- 10.7 AVAX Technologies
- 10.8 Bavarian Nordic
- 10.9 Bellicum Pharmaceuticals
- 10.10 BioSante Pharmaceuticals
- 10.11 Biovest International
- 10.12 Celldex Therapeutics
- 10.13 CG Therapeutics
- 10.14 CureVac
- 10.15 DanDrit Biotech
- 10.16 Dendreon
- 10.17 EMD Serono
- 10.18 Geron
- 10.19 GlaxoSmithKline
- 10.20 GlobeImmune
- 10.21 Immatics Biotechnologies
- 10.22 ImmunoCellular Therapeutics
- 10.23 Immunovaccine
- 10.24 Inovio Pharmaceuticals
- 10.25 KAEL-Gemvax
- 10.26 MannKind
- 10.27 Mologen AG
- 10.28 NewLink Genetics Corporation
- 10.29 Northwest Biotherapeutics
- 10.30 NovaRx
- 10.31 Oxford BioMedica
- 10.32 Prima BioMed
- 10.33 Scancell
- 10.34 Transgene
- 10.35 Trimed Biotech
- 10.36 Vaccinogen
- 10.37 Vical
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Estimates of National Expenditures for Cancer Care in 2006 by Cancer Site
- Figure 2.2: Person-Years of Life Lost (PYLL) in the U.S. Due to Cancer, Male, 2006
- Figure 2.3: Person-Years of Life Lost (PYLL) in the U.S. Due to Cancer, Female, 2006
- Figure 3.1: Antigen Presentation
- Figure 3.2: Antigen/Adjuvant Cancer Vaccine Immunotherapy Process
- Figure 3.3: DNA Cancer Vaccine Immunotherapy Process
- Figure 3.4: Viral Vector Cancer Vaccine Immunotherapy Process
- Figure 3.5: Modified Tumor Cell Cancer Vaccines
- Figure 3.6: Dendritic Cell Vaccination Process
- Figure 3.7: Schematic of Anti-idiotype Antibodies for Cancer Vaccines
- Figure 5.1: New Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Entering Clinical Study Per Year During 1990-2006
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths in the U.S. by Sex for all Cancer Sites, 2010
- Table 2.2: Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths for Ten Leading Cancer Sites in the U.S. in 2010, by Sex
- Table 2.3: Worldwide Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Leading Cancer Sites and by Level of Economic Development, 2008
- Table 2.4: Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths by World Area, 2008
- Table 2.5: Estimated Annual Costs of Cancer in the U.S. in Billions, 2008
- Table 2.6: Cancer Vaccines in the Pipeline, by Cancer Type
- Table 3.1: Infectious Agents Involved in Cancer
- Table 3.2: Cancer Vaccine Technologies
- Table 3.3: Antigens Commonly Found in Cancer Vaccines
- Table 3.4: Adjuvants Commonly Found in Cancer Vaccines
- Table 4.1: Cervical Cancer Vaccines on the Market
- Table 5.1: Therapeutic Vaccines on the Market
- Table 5.2: Pipeline of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, by Type of Vaccine
- Table 5.3: Antigen/Adjuvant Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.4: DNA and RNA Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.5: Vector-based Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.6: Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.7: Allogeneic Tumor Cell Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.8: Dendritic Cell Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.9: Anti-Idiotype Vaccines in Development
- Table 5.10: Competitors with Phase III Cancer Vaccine Candidates in Their Pipelines
- Table 6.1: Mechanisms of Immune Evasion by Cancers
- Table 6.2: Key Recommendations for Cancer Vaccine Clinical Trial Design
- Table 6.3: Challenges and Strategic Recommendations for Clinical Trial Design
- Table 6.4 Combination Strategies to Enhance a Vaccine's Anti-Tumor T-Cell Response
- Table 7.1: Focus Areas for the FDA Critical Path Initiative
- Table 9.1: Industry Challenges and Strategic Recommendations for Commercialization
- Table 9.2: Required Elements of a Manufacturing Facility
- Table 9.3: CMO Qualification Audit-Points to Investigate
- Table 9.4: Strategies for Marketing Cancer Vaccines
- Companion Diagnostics in Personalized Medicine and Cancer Therapy
- 1 Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About This Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2 Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 2.1 Scope of this Section
- 2.2 Introduction to Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 2.3 Drug Metabolism and Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine
- 2.4 Examples of Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostic Tests
- 2.5 Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostic Testing Product Pipeline
- 2.6 The Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC)
- 2.7 Regulatory Trends and Guidelines in the Personalized Medicine Space
- 2.7.1 The Changing Regulatory Landscape for Personalized Medicine
- 2.8 Companion Diagnostics Play an Increasing Role in Cancer Care
- 2.9 Specific Examples of Clinical Situations Where Companion Diagnostics Are Being Deployed
- 2.9.1 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Assay
- 2.9.2 Individualized Warfarin Therapy
- 2.9.3 UGT1A1 Molecular Assay for Camptosar
- 2.9.4 Response to Gleevec in GIST
- 2.9.5 LabCorp, ARCA Personalized Medicine Deal for Cardiovascular Diseases
- 2.9.6 Osmetech Licenses Epidauros Biotechnologie AG CYP2D6 Biomarker to Enter Companion Diagnostics
- 2.10 Diagnostic Tests for Personalized Analysis of Cancer Therapy Effectiveness
- 3 Companion Diagnostics: Qualitative and Quantitative Market Analysis
- 3.1 Market Analysis of Molecular Diagnostics and Companion Diagnostics
- 3.2 Costs of Companion Diagnostics in Healthcare Expenditures
- 3.3 Molecular Diagnostic Market
- 3.4 Molecular Diagnostics Technology Platforms and Their Impact on Clinical Medicine
- 3.5 Snapshot of Companion Diagnostics Industry Structure
- 3.6 The Case for Theranostics
- 3.7 Companion Diagnostics Market Analysis—Market Survey Data Characterizing the Qualitative and Quantitative Industry Parameters
- 4 Trends and Overview
- 4.1 Companion Diagnostics: Industry SWOT Analysis
- 4.2 Macro Trends in Companion Diagnostics
- 4.3 Challenges for Companion Diagnostics Development
- 4.4 Timeline for Impact of Various Segments in Companion Diagnostics
- 4.5 Use of Proteomics to Develop Individualized Tests
- 4.6 The Market Problem: Finding Value with Diagnostics for Personalized Medicine
- 5 Biomarker Tests Co-developed with Cancer Therapeutics as Companion Diagnostics
- 5.1 Sector Overview
- 5.1.1 Impact of New Technology Platforms
- 5.1.2 Impact on Drug Discovery
- 5.1.3 Biomarkers as Endpoints in Drug Discovery
- 5.1.4 Targeted Therapy
- 5.2 Companion Diagnostics on the Market
- 5.3 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Companions
- 5.3.1 Bevacizamab (Avastin)
- 5.3.2 EGFR for Colorectal Cancer and Camptosar (Irinotecan)
- 5.3.3 EGFR Express and Erbitux (Cetuximab)
- 5.3.4 HER2 and Heceptin (Trastuzumab)
- 5.3.5 Iressa and Tarceva Companion Test
- 5.3.6 Tykerb (GSK), and Vectibix™ (Amgen) Companion Tests
- 5.3.7 EGFRx Assay
- 5.3.8 Monogram eTag
- 5.3.9 Veripath OncoDiagnostics EGFR PharmDX
- 5.4 Myriad’s TheraGuide 5-FU
- 5.5 Companions for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Erlotinib and Gefitinib
- 5.5.1 TheraScreen: EGFR29
- 5.5.2 The K-RAS Mutation Detection Kit
- 5.6 Irinotecan and UGT1A1
- 5.7 Gleevec (Imatinib) Companions
- 5.7.1 DakoCytomation’s c-Kit (9.7) pharmDx
- 5.8 Companion Diagnostics Involving Metabolizing Enzymes
- 5.8.1 Companions for TMPT, CYP2C9, and UGT1A1 Enzymes
- 5.8.2 Companions for Aromatase Inhibitors
- 5.8.3 Companions for Actos and Avandia
- 5.9 Drivers and Barriers to Companion Diagnostics
- 5.10 Partnerships with Pharma Companies to Identify Therapeutic Targets
- 5.11 Circulating Tumor Cell Assay: Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer
- 5.12 Companion Diagnostics Used by Clinical Service Laboratories
- 5.13 New Technologies and Products under Development
- 5.13.1 OncoMethylome
- 5.14 Blood-Based Technologies
- 5.14.1 Oncotech
- 5.15 Monogram Biosciences HIV Personalized Platform
- 5.16 Wako LBA\AFP Test for Liver Cancer
- 5.17 Future Developments for Companion Diagnostics
- 6 Business and Regulatory Trends in the Companion Biomarker Testing Sector
- 6.1 Industry Consolidation
- 6.2 Breath of Product Offering and Pricing
- 6.3 Government Regulation of Medical Devices
- 6.3.1 FDA Guidance on Drug Test Co-development
- 6.3.2 Device Classes
- 6.3.3 Investigational Use of IVDM Assays
- 6.3.4 Post-market Requirements
- 6.4 Strategic Business and Marketing Considerations
- 6.5 Commercial Opportunities in Companion Markers
- 6.6 Moderators of Growth
- 6.6.1 Roadblocks to Integrating Companion Biomarkers into Clinical Practice
- 6.6.2 Management of Targeted Therapeutics by Third-Party Payers
- 6.7 Biotechnology Industry Trends
- 6.8 Pharmaceutical Industry Trends
- 6.9 Acquisition, License Agreement, Partnerships
- 6.10 Legal Developments
- 6.11 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Tumor Marker Tests
- 6.11.1 International Markets
- 6.12 Product Commercialization
- 6.13 Reimbursement
- 6.14 Self-Referral Rules
- 6.15 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
- 6.16 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)
- 6.17 In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) and Medical Device Regulations
- 6.18 FDA’s Quality System Regulation (QSR)
- 6.19 FDA’S OIVD on IVDMIAs
- 6.20 FDA’s Qualification of Cancer Biomarkers
- 6.20.1 Regulatory Perspectives of Biomarker Validation
- 6.21 Genetic Tests and Medical Records
- 6.21.1 Laws against Genetic Discrimination
- 6.22 Medicare Reimbursement
- 6.22.1 Medicare Part B Spending Trends
- 6.23 Global Drivers of Clinical Laboratory Testing
- 6.24 Global Outlook
- 6.25 Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative
- 6.26 FDA Critical Path
- 6.27 Biomarkers and FDA’s Voluntary Genomic Data Submission
- 6.28 From Personalized to Predictive Medicine
- 6.29 Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness at the Individual Level
- 6.30 The Patient and Advocate Perspective: An Evolution of Influence
- 6.31 Real-World Experiences Translating the Vision of Personalized Medicine into Practice
- 7 Companies Entering the Companion Diagnostics Market
- 7.1 Industry Overview
- 7.2 Representative Companion Diagnostic Development Companies
- 7.2.1 20/20 GeneSystems
- 7.2.2 Abbott Diagnostics
- 7.2.3 Affymetrix
- 7.2.4 Agendia BV
- 7.2.5 Agensys
- 7.2.6 Almac Group
- 7.2.7 AMDL
- 7.2.8 Arcturus Bioscience (acquired by Molecular Devices)
- 7.2.9 Aureon Laboratories
- 7.2.10 BD
- 7.2.11 Beckman Coulter
- 7.2.12 Biocode Hycel
- 7.2.13 BioCurex
- 7.2.14 Biomarker Technologies
- 7.2.15 Biomedical Diagnostics
- 7.2.16 Biomerica
- 7.2.17 bioMérieux
- 7.2.18 BioModa
- 7.2.19 Bruker Daltonics
- 7.2.20 Cangen Biotechnologies
- 7.2.21 Caprion Proteomics
- 7.2.22 Celera Diagnostics
- 7.2.23 Cepheid
- 7.2.24 Claros Diagnostics
- 7.2.25 Clinical Data: PGxHealth and Cogenics
- 7.2.26 Ciphergen Biosystems renamed Vermillion, Inc.
- 7.2.27 Clarient
- 7.2.28 Correlogic Systems
- 7.2.29 CytoCore
- 7.2.30 Cytogen
- 7.2.31 Cytyc Corporation
- 7.2.32 Dako (formerly DakoCytomation)
- 7.2.33 DiaDexus
- 7.2.34 Digene (acquired by Qiagen)
- 7.2.35 DiagnoCure
- 7.2.36 Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (acquired by Beckman Coulter)
- 7.2.37 DRG International
- 7.2.38 DxS
- 7.2.39 EDP Biotech
- 7.2.40 Epigenomics
- 7.2.41 EXACT Sciences Corporation
- 7.2.42 Exagen Diagnostics
- 7.2.43 Gene Logic
- 7.2.44 Genesis Genomics
- 7.2.45 Genomic Health
- 7.2.46 Gen-Probe
- 7.2.47 Health Discovery Corporation
- 7.2.48 Ikonisys
- 7.2.49 Immunicon
- 7.2.50 Immunomedics
- 7.2.51 Incyte
- 7.2.52 InterGenetics
- 7.2.53 Ipsogen
- 7.2.54 LabCorp
- 7.2.55 Matritech
- 7.2.56 Miraculins
- 7.2.57 Mitsubishi Kagaku latron
- 7.2.58 Monogram Biosciences
- 7.2.59 Myriad Genetics
- 7.2.60 NimbleGen Systems
- 7.2.61 Northwest Biotherapeutics
- 7.2.62 Nycomed
- 7.2.63 Oncotech
- 7.2.64 Oncothyreon (formerly known as Biomira)
- 7.2.65 Orion Genomics
- 7.2.66 Oxford Genome Sciences
- 7.2.67 Panacea Pharmaceuticals
- 7.2.68 Perlegen Sciences
- 7.2.69 Polymedco
- 7.2.70 Power3 Medical Products
- 7.2.71 Prometheus
- 7.2.72 Proteome Systems
- 7.2.73 Qiagen
- 7.2.74 Sanko Junyaku
- 7.2.75 SensiGen
- 7.2.76 SuperArray Bioscience
- 7.2.77 Third Wave Technologies
- 7.2.78 Tosoh Biosciences
- 7.2.79 TrimGen
- 7.2.80 TriPath Imaging (acquired by BD)
- 7.2.81 Upstream Biosciences
- 7.2.82 Ventana Medical Systems
- 7.2.83 Veridex
- Appendix 1: FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submission (March 2005)
- Appendix 2: Histochemical Markers for Cancer
- LIST OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Timeline for Development of Companion Diagnostics
- Table 2.2: Personalized Medicine at the Nexus Point
- Table 2.3: Percentage of Non-Responders in Various Drug Classes
- Table 2.4: High-Profile Drug Withdrawals from the Marketplace
- Table 2.5: Metabolism of Drugs by Hepatic Enzymes
- Table 2.6: Drug Metabolism Drives Drug Efficacy/Toxicity
- Table 2.7: Population Frequency of the Various Cytochromes
- Table 2.8: Selected List of Personalized Medicine Tests
- Table 2.9: Personalized Medicine Product Pipeline
- Table 2.10: Marketed Personalized Therapies in 2006
- Table 2.11: Typical Response Rates in Therapeutic Areas
- Table 2.12: Prevalence of People Taking Medications Metabolized by Liver Enzymes
- Table 2.13: UGT1A1 Helps to Determine Risks Associated with Irinotecan
- Table 2.14: Current Product Labels: Enzyme Metabolism
- Table 3.1: Timeline for Impact of Various Molecular Diagnostics Technologies on Personalized Medicine
- Table 3.2: Impact of Molecular Diagnostics Technologies on Therapeutic Areas in Personalized Medicine
- Table 3.3: Challenges of Various Molecular Diagnostics Technology Platforms in Personalized Medicine
- Table 3.4: FDA Classification of Diagnostics by Risk
- Table 4.1: Personalized Medicine Industry SWOT Analysis
- Table 4.2: Market Opportunities in Personalized Medicine
- Table 4.3: Challenges for Market Adoption of Various Personalized Medicine Tests
- Table 4.4: Hurdles to Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Development
- Table 4.5: Timeline of Impact in Areas of Personalized Medicine
- Table 4.6: Impact of Personalized Medicine on Various Therapeutic Areas
- Table 5.1: Potential Benefits of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics
- Table 5.2: Utility of Biomarker as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development
- Table 5.3: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: How to Interpret Test Results
- Table 5.4: Device Submission Elements for the FDA
- Table 6.1: List and Discounted Prices for Abbott Tumor Marker Tests
- Table 6.2: Medicare Spending on Clinical Lab Services, 1996 to 2005
- Table 6.3: Hospital Laboratory Share of Part B Medicare Spending, 1996 to 2005
- Table 6.4: Medicare Part B Lab Spending Per Medicare Enrollee, 1998 to 2005
- Table 6.5: Summary of Biomarker Use in the Commercialization of Novel Oncology Pharmacotherapeutics
- Table 6.6: Pharmacoeconomic Challenges to the Implementation of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostic Tests
- Table 7.1: Major Players in Companion Diagnostic Sector
- Table 7.2: Tumor Diagnosis Immunoassay
- Table 7.3: Tumor Diagnosis Radioimmunoassay
- Table 7.4: Summary of Matritech’s Product Development Programs
- LIST OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Personalizing Drug Treatment
- Figure 2.2: Approaches to Personalized Medicine
- Figure 2.3: The Phase I and II Processes of Drug Metabolism
- Figure 2.4: Hepatic Distribution of Human CYP450
- Figure 2.5: Relative Contribution of CYP450 Enzymes to Drug Metabolism
- Figure 2.6: Genetic Components Determine Drug Metabolism
- Figure 2.7: Personalized Medicine Drugs in Development
- Figure 3.1: From Genetic Content to Personalized Medicine
- Figure 3.2: Impact of Diagnostic Testing on Healthcare Decision Making
- Figure 3.3: Impact of Diagnostic Testing on Healthcare Spending
- Figure 3.4: Breakout of the Molecular Diagnostics Marketplace by Country
- Figure 3.5: Breakout of the Molecular Diagnostics Marketplace by Vendor
- Figure 3.6: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation
- Figure 3.7: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation by Technology
- Figure 3.8: Market Survey Respondent Demographics
- Figure 3.9: Breakout of the Respondent Pool by Affiliation
- Figure 3.10: Segmentation of the Personalized Medicine Market
- Figure 4.1: Personalized Medicine Market Drivers
- Figure 4.2: Challenges in the Personalized Medicine Space
- Figure 5.1: Carcinogenesis Is a Multi-Step Process
- Figure 5.2: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Equivocal Results with IHC
- Figure 5.3: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Results by FISH
- Figure 5.4: MGMT Methylation Status Correlates to Survival Rate
- Figure 6.1: Part B Spending on Clinical Lab Services, 1991 to 2005
- Cytology and HPV Testing World Markets
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About this Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 2. Introduction to Cancer Biology and the Diagnostic Industry
- 2.1 Cancer
- 2.1.1 The Disease
- 2.1.2 Metastasis
- 2.1.3 Demographics and Statistics of Cancer
- 2.2 The Drivers of the Biotech and Diagnostics Industry
- 2.2.1 Top Ten Biotech Corporations Based on Innovation as Determined by FastCompany Magazine
- 2.2.2 Technological Innovation
- 2.2.3 Government Funding
- 2.2.4 Pharmaceutical Development
- 2.3 Outlook for Tumor Markers
- 2.4 The Cancer Market
- 3. Cervical Cytology Testing Overview
- 3.1 Sector Background
- 3.2 Market Opportunity
- 3.3 Cervical Cancer
- 3.3.1 Screening for Cervical Cancer
- 3.3.2 Screening Procedures and Pap Smear Technology
- 4. Human Papillomavirus Testing Overview
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.1.1 Human Papillomavirus
- 4.1.2 North American Market
- 4.1.3 European Market
- 4.1.4 Latin American Market
- 4.2 Hybrid Capture 2 Technology
- 4.3 Histology Market Overview
- 5. Cytology Market Structure
- 5.1 Key Players
- 5.1.1 BD Diagnostics-TriPath
- 5.1.2 Hologic, Inc. (Acquired Cytyc)
- 5.1.3 CytoCore, Inc. (Formerly Known as Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.)
- 5.2 BD-TriPath Products
- 5.2.1 Cervical Cytology Product Line
- 5.2.1.1 BD SurePath Pap Test
- 5.2.1.2 BD PrepStain Slide Processor
- 5.2.1.3 BD FocalPoint Slide Profiler
- 5.2.1.4 Molecular Oncology
- 5.2.1.5 Molecular Imaging Systems
- 5.2.1.6 Blood-based Reagents
- 5.3 Hologic Products
- 5.3.1 The ThinPrep System
- 5.3.1.1 Additional Applications of the ThinPrep System
- 5.3.1.2 The ThinPrep Process
- 5.3.1.3 Clinical Studies Evaluating the ThinPrep Pap Test
- 5.3.1.4 Selenia Dimensions System
- 5.3.1.5 Competition
- 5.3.2 Surgical Products
- 5.3.2.1 The NovaSure System
- 5.3.2.2 Competition
- 5.4 CytoCore, Inc. Products and Services
- 5.4.1 SoftPAP Cervical Cell Collector
- 5.4.2 Cocktail-CVX and Cocktail-GCI Assays
- 5.4.3 Cervical Drug Delivery System
- 5.5 Marketing and Sales Strategies
- 5.5.1 BD-TriPath Marketing and Sales
- 5.5.2 Hologic Marketing and Sales
- 6. Human Papillomavirus Testing Market Structure
- 6.1 Key Players
- 6.1.1 QIAGEN (Acquired Digene)
- 6.1.2 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (A Member of the Roche Group)
- 6.2 QIAGEN Products
- 6.2.1 HPV Tests
- 6.2.2 Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests
- 6.2.3 Blood Virus Tests
- 6.2.4 Instrumentation and Accessory Products
- 6.3 Sales and Marketing
- 6.3.1 International Markets
- 6.3.2 Europe
- 6.3.3 Central and South America
- 6.3.4 Asia-Pacific
- 6.3.5 Strategy
- 6.4 Competition
- 6.5 HPV Vaccines
- 6.6 Ventana (A Member of the Roche Group)
- 6.6.1 Ventana/Roche Staining Products
- 7. Business Trends in the Industry
- 7.1 Industry Consolidation
- 7.2 Breadth of Product Offering
- 7.3 Government Regulation of Medical Devices
- 7.4 Strategic Business and Marketing Considerations
- 7.5 Commercial Opportunities in Cancer Markers
- 7.6 Moderators of Growth
- 7.7 Biotechnology Industry Trends
- 7.8 Pharmaceutical Industry Trends
- 7.9 Acquisition, License Agreement and Partnerships
- 7.10 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Tumor Marker Tests
- 7.10.1 North American Market
- 8. Product Regulation
- 8.1 Government Regulation
- 8.2 U.S. FDA Approval
- 8.2.1 CLIA and State Laboratory Laws
- 8.2.2 Foreign Regulatory Approval
- 9. Third-Party Reimbursement
- 9.1 Limited Reimbursements by Third-Party Payers Obstruct Sales
- 9.2 Hologic ThinPrep
- 9.3 CPT Codes and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Codes
- 9.4 Reimbursement Codes Classification
- 9.4.1 Reporting Screening and Diagnostic Pap Smears
- 9.4.2 HCPCS Code Definitions
- 9.4.3 CPT Code Definitions
- 9.5 Cervical Cytology Product Line
- 9.6 Molecular Diagnostic Products and Imaging Systems
- 10. Barriers in Business
- 10.1 Barriers in the Business Section
- 10.1.1 Hologic Barriers
- 10.1.2 QIAGEN Risk Factors
- 10.1.3 Ventana Medical Systems (A Member of the Roche Group)
- 10.1.3.1 Ventana/Roche Factors that could Affect Future Results
- 11. Acquisition Activity
- 11.1 Acquisition
- 11.2 Hologic, Inc. Acquires Cytyc Corporation
- 11.3 Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) Diagnostics Acquires TriPath Imaging, Inc.
- 11.4 QIAGEN Acquires Digene Corporation
- 12. Research & Development Activity
- 12.1 Hologic In-Process R&D and Developed Technology
- 12.2 BD-TriPath R&D
- 12.2.1 Development of Molecular Diagnostic Products
- 12.3 QIAGEN (and Formerly Digene) R&D
- 12.4 Ventana (Subsidiary of the Roche Group) R&D
- 12.4.1 Instrumentation Development Projects
- 12.4.2 Reagent Development Projects
- 13. Intellectual Property
- 13.1 BD-TriPath Proprietary Technology and Intellectual Property
- 13.2 QIAGEN Intellectual Property
- 13.2.1 Hybrid Capture Technology
- 13.2.2 Rights to HPV Types
- 13.2.3 Other Intellectual Property
- 13.3 Ventana (Now a Member of the Roche Group) Patents and Proprietary Rights
- 14 Industry/Market Landscape
- 14.1 Industry Overview
- 14.1.1 Industry Definition
- 14.1.1.1 Cytology Products
- 14.1.1.2 Molecular Diagnostic Products
- 14.1.2 Industry Key Players
- 14.2 Outlook on the Industry
- 14.2.1 Hologic
- 14.2.2 BD-TriPath
- 14.2.3 QIAGEN
- 14.3 Trends, Issues, Challenges and Opportunities: An Analysis
- 14.3.1 Hologic
- 14.3.2 BD-TriPath
- 14.3.3 QIAGEN
- 14.4 Competitive Landscape
- 14.4.1 Hologic's Competition
- 14.4.2 BD-TriPath's Competition
- 14.4.2.1 BD-TriPath's Competitive Advantage
- 14.4.2.2 Molecular Diagnostic Reagents
- 14.4.2.3 Collaboration with Ventana/Roche
- 14.4.3 QIAGEN's Competition
- 14.4.3.1 QIAGEN's Competitive Advantage
- 14.4.3.2 Collaboration with Abbott Diagnostics
- 14.4.3.3 Molecular Diagnostic Reagents
- 14.5 Products/Business Segments
- 14.5.1 Hologic
- 14.5.1.1 Diagnostic Products
- 14.5.1.2 The ThinPrep Process
- 14.5.1.3 Surgical Products
- 14.5.1.4 The NovaSure System
- 14.5.2 BD-TriPath
- 14.5.2.1 Cervical Cytology Product Line (Formerly the i3 Series Product Line)
- 14.5.2.2 Molecular Oncology Products
- 14.5.3 QIAGEN
- 14.5.3.1 digene HPV Tests
- 14.5.3.2 Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests
- 14.5.3.3 Blood Virus Tests
- 14.5.3.4 Instrumentation and Accessory Products
- 15. Analytical Section
- 15.1 Company Strategies
- 15.1.1 QIAGEN
- 15.1.2 BD-TriPath
- 15.1.3 Hologic
- 15.2 SWOT Analysis
- 15.2.1 QIAGEN
- 15.2.2 BD-TriPath
- 15.2.3 Hologic
- Appendix 1: Breast Cancer
- Appendix 2: Ovarian Cancer
- Appendix 3: Malignant Melanoma
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Drug Development by Type of Cancer
- Table 2.2: Organ-specific Medicines in Development for Cancer
- Table 2.3: Estimates for the Leading Types of New Cancer Cases and Deaths in the U.S. by Sex, 2010
- Table 2.4: Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Sex for All Types of Cancer
- Table 2.5: Estimated Number of Cancer Cases and Deaths by World Area
- Table 2.6: Cancer Death Rates per 100,000 Population (and Rank) for All Cancer Sites by Country
- Table 2.7: Cancer-Associated Genes
- Table 2.8: Carcinogens in the Workplace
- Table 2.9: Private Funding Levels for the Biotechnology Segment, 1995-2009
- Table 2.10: Global Pharmaceutical Industry R&D Spending, 1995-2010
- Table 2.11: U.S. Government NIH Research Budget, 1995-2010
- Table 2.12: Herceptin Worldwide Sales, 2000-2015
- Table 2.13: Classes of Drugs Used to Treat Breast Cancer
- Table 2.14: Women's Cancers in the U.S., 2010
- Table 2.15: Five-Year Relative Survival Rates by Stage at Diagnosis
- Table 3.1: Number of Pap Smears Performed by Country, 2009
- Table 3.2: Global Market for HPV Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2007-2015
- Table 3.3: U.S. Market for HPV Diagnostic Testing, 2007-2015
- Table 5.1: Pap Tests in Top European Markets
- Table 5.2: Pap Tests in Top Asian Markets
- Table 6.1: HPV Market Size, 2003-2015
- Table 6.2: Product, Infection and Market
- Table 6.3: Instrumentation and Accessories, Infection and Market
- Table 7.1: List and Discounted Pricing for Abbott Tumor Marker Tests
- Table 9.1: CPT and HCPCS Codes
- Table 9.2: National Limitation Amounts (NLAs)
- Table 9.3: NLAs for Various CPT Codes
- Table 13.1: HPV Types Status and Patents
- Table 14.1: QIAGEN's Diagnostic Test Kit Products, Instrumentation and Markets
- Molecular Diagnostics in Cancer Testing
- 1. Overview
- 1.1 Statement of Report
- 1.2 About This Report
- 1.3 Scope of the Report
- 1.4 Objectives
- 1.5 Methodology
- 1.6 Executive Summary
- 2. Introduction to Molecular Diagnostics
- 2.1 Opening-up of Opportunities in Molecular Diagnostics
- 2.2 Impact of the Human Genome Project on Molecular Diagnostics
- 2.3 Considerations for Molecular and Clinical Diagnostics
- 2.4 Molecular Diagnostics in the Post-Genomic Era
- 2.5 Advances in Molecular Diagnostics Technologies
- 2.6 Oligonucleotide Array Platforms
- 2.7 Emerging Cancer Personalized Medicine Market
- 2.7.1 Predictive Cancer Molecular Diagnostics
- 2.8 Companion Tests for Drug Development
- 2.9 Opportunities for IVDMIA Companies
- 3. Cancer Diagnostics Molecular Testing Market
- 3.1 Market Description
- 3.1.1 Market Overview
- 3.1.2 Tumor Markers
- 3.1.3 Molecular Diagnostic Markers
- 3.1.4 Competitive Landscape
- 3.1.5 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Cancer Tests
- 3.1.5.1 North American Market
- 3.1.5.2 International Markets
- 3.1.5.3 Europe
- 3.1.5.4 Asia-Pacific
- 4. Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Cancer
- 4.1 Cancer Diagnostic Tests
- 4.1.1 Use of Genomics to Understand Cancer
- 4.1.2 Molecular Diagnostic Tools Solutions
- 4.1.3 Technology of Gene Expression Analysis
- 4.1.3.1 Amplify and Detect Diminished Amounts of RNA Consistently
- 4.1.3.2 Analyze Hundreds of Genes
- 4.1.3.3 Employ Advanced Information Technology
- 4.2 Breast Cancer
- 4.2.1 Cancer Prognostic Assays
- 4.2.1.1 Myriad Genetics (BRACA1 and BRACA2)
- 4.2.1.2 Genomic Health (Oncotype DX)
- 4.2.1.2.1 Single Gene Reporting (ER, PR, HER2)
- 4.2.1.2.2 Node Positive (N+)
- 4.2.1.2.3 Aromatase Inhibitors
- 4.2.1.2.4 Product Development
- 4.2.1.2.5 Product Development Opportunities in Breast Cancer
- 4.2.1.3 InterGenetics, Inc.
- 4.2.1.4 LabCorp (HER-2)
- 4.2.1.5 Clarient, Inc.
- 4.2.1.6 BioTheronostics (AviaraDx)
- 4.2.1.7 Agendia B.V. (MammaPrint)
- 4.2.1.8 Oncogene Science (Wilex)
- 4.2.2 Competition and Comparison of Methods
- 4.2.3 Competitive Structure and Market Share Analysis
- 4.2.3.1 Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market Size
- 4.2.3.1.1 Global Market
- 4.2.3.1.2 U.S. Market
- 4.2.3.1.3 European Market
- 4.2.3.2 Market Forecasts
- 4.2.3.2.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 4.2.3.3 Market Drivers and Restraints
- 4.2.3.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.2.3.3.2 Market Restraints
- 4.2.3.4 Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market and Technology Trends
- 4.2.3.4.1 Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market Trends
- 4.2.3.4.2 Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Technology Trends
- 4.2.3.4.3 Breast Cancer Testing Assay Strategic Recommendations
- 4.3 Colorectal Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Market
- 4.3.1 Colon Cancer Testing Platforms
- 4.3.1.1 Genomic Testing
- 4.3.1.1.1 IVD Multiplex Index Analysis (MIA)
- 4.3.1.1.2 The BRAF Test
- 4.3.1.1.3 KRAS
- 4.3.1.1.3.1 Background on KRAS Mutation
- 4.3.1.1.4 mSEPT9
- 4.3.1.2 Screening Test
- 4.3.2 Players in the Colorectal Cancer Space
- 4.3.3 Competitive Structure and Market Share Analysis
- 4.3.3.1 Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market Size
- 4.3.3.1.1 Global Colon Cancer testing Market
- 4.3.3.1.2 U.S. Colon Cancer testing Market
- 4.3.3.1.3 European Colon Cancer testing Market
- 4.3.3.2 Market Forecasts
- 4.3.3.2.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 4.3.3.3 Market Drivers and Restraints
- 4.3.3.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.3.3.3.2 Market Restraints
- 4.3.3.4 Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market and Technology Trends
- 4.3.3.4.1 Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market Trends
- 4.3.3.4.2 Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Technology Trends
- 4.3.3.4.3 Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Strategic Recommendations
- 4.4 Prostate Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Market
- 4.5 Other Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Markets
- 4.5.1 Bladder Cancer
- 4.5.2 Ovarian Cancer
- 4.5.2.1 Incidence of Ovarian Cancer
- 4.5.2.2 Key Players in Ovarian Testing market
- 4.5.2.3 Ovarian Cancer Market Size
- 4.5.2.4 Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market Size
- 4.5.2.4.1 Global Ovarian Cancer testing Market
- 4.5.2.4.2 U.S. Ovarian Cancer testing Market
- 4.5.2.4.3 European Ovarian Cancer testing Market
- 4.5.2.5 Market Forecasts
- 4.5.2.5.1 Revenue Forecasts
- 4.5.2.6 Market Drivers and Restraints
- 4.5.2.6.1 Market Drivers
- 4.5.2.6.2 Market Restraints
- 4.5.2.7 Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market and Technology Trends
- 4.5.2.7.1 Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Market Trends
- 4.5.2.7.2 Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Technology Trends
- 4.5.2.7.3 Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Assay Strategic Recommendations
- 4.5.3 Lung Cancer
- 4.5.4 Melanoma
- 4.6 Molecular Diagnostic Screening Test for Cancer
- 4.6.1 Extreme Drug Resistance assay (Oncotech EDR Assay)
- 4.6.2 Multidrug Resistance Protein (MRP)
- 4.7 Companion Diagnostic Tests for Cancer Therapeutics
- 5. Business
- 5.1 Technology and Market Trends
- 5.1.1 Technology Trends
- 5.1.2 Market Trends
- 5.2 M&A Activity
- 5.3 Partnerships
- 5.4 Competitive Analysis
- 5.4.1 Primary Competitors
- 5.4.1.1 Summary of Market Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats
- 5.4.2 Industry Challenges and Strategic Recommendations
- 5.4.3 Commercialization of Molecular Diagnostic Products
- 5.5 SWOT Comparison of Business Models for Cancer Diagnostic Testing
- 5.6 Intellectual Property Rights
- 5.6.1 BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Patents
- 5.6.2 Current Patent Disputes
- 6. Reimbursement and Billing
- 6.1 Overview
- 6.2 Trends in Reimbursement Practice
- 6.2.1 Medicare Reimbursement
- 6.2.2 Analysis of ROI for MD Tests for Cancer Using Medicare Reimbursement Rules
- 6.2.3 Reimbursement for Insight Dx, MammaPrint and Oncotype Dx
- 6.2.4 Reimbursement for JAK2 Mutation Testing for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
- 6.3 Breast Cancer Tests
- 6.4 Colon Cancer Tests
- 6.5 Trends in Patient Care and Reimbursement
- 6.6 Revenue Threats
- 6.6.1 Medicare Exceptions
- 6.6.2 Three Areas for Denial of Claims by Biomarkers
- 6.7 Billing
- 6.7.1 Medicare Billing Procedures
- 6.7.2 Medicare CPT Coding Rules for Cancer Biomarkers
- 7. Government Regulation
- 7.1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- 7.2 CLIA Regulations
- 7.3 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)
- 7.4 State Licensing for Service Laboratories
- 7.5 FDA Treatment of Multivariate Index Assays (IVDMIAs)
- 7.6 510(k) Clearance
- 7.7 Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
- 7.8 ASRs
- 7.9 What Regulatory Guidance is Needed for Companion Biomarkers?
- 7.10 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
- 7.11 IRB Approval in Clinical Trials
- 7.12 Oncology Biomarkers Qualification Initiative Project
- 7.13 FDA Clearance Picture for Insight Dx, MammaPrint, and Oncotype DX
- 7.14 FDA Packaging Requirements for Erbitux
- 7.15 Micoarray Quality Control (MAQC)
- 7.16 CAP Evidence-based Recommendations to Improve the Accuracy of ER and PR Testing
- 7.17 ER and PR Proficiency Testing
- 8. Business Decisions Using Molecular Diagnostic Tests in Drug Development
- 8.1 Advantages of a Pharmacogenomic Assessment of Genetic Biomarkers to Determine Clinical Dose
- 8.2 What are Key Opportunities in Biomarker Discovery, Development and Commercialization?
- 8.3 What are the Current Obstacles in Biomarker Implementation?
- 8.4 How do Business Strategies, such as those Relating to Acquisition, Drive Biomarker Strategies?
- 8.5 What is the Right Balance between External Partnerships and Internal Infrastructure?
- 8.6 How might Novel Biomarker Development Lead to Acquisition Strategies?
- 8.7 Which Types of Genetic Biomarkers should be Developed by Diagnostic Companies?
- 8.8 What Strategies Help Translate Genetic biomarkers from Preclinical to Clinical Development?
- 8.9 In what Class of Drugs is the Value of Using Genetic biomarkers in Decision making the Highest?
- 8.10 How can Regulatory Oversight Drive Approval and Adoption of New Technologies?
- 8.11 How can Big Pharma Co-develop Genetic Biomarkers for Regulatory Acceptance?
- 8.12 How are Genetic Biomarkers being Used to reduce the Attrition Rate in Drug Development?
- 8.13 How is ROI Measured Using Genetic Biomarkers in Drug Development?
- 8.14 How might Organizational Structures Limit the Use of Genetic Biomarkers in
- Drug Development and How Should R&D Organizations Address This Problem?
- 8.15 How to Maximize Business Development through Biomarker Strategies?
- 8.16 What is the Best Type of Business Model for Developing Genetic Biomarkers?
- 8.17 What are Organizational Impediments in Genetic Biomarkers in Drug Development?
- 8.18 What are Internal Capabilities for Novel Biomarker Development and Application?
- 8.19 How can Key Biomarker Technical Expertise be Applied across a Complex and Highly-Stratified R&D Value Chain?
- 8.20 At what Stage of Drug Development have Genetic Biomarkers Provided the Most Benefit?
- 8.21 What Companies are the most Innovative in Development of Genetic Biomarkers?
- 8.22 Best Values for Genetic Biomarkers in Drug Development and in Diagnostics
- 8.23 Molecular Diagnostic Tests can Increase Value in an Associated Drug
- 9. Company Profiles
- 9.1 Agendia
- 9.2 ArcticDx, Inc.
- 9.3 Arcxis Biotechnologies
- 9.4 Aureon Laboratories
- 9.5 bioTheranostics (AviaraDx)
- 9.6 Clarient, Inc.
- 9.7 CombiMatrix Corporation
- 9.8 DiagnoCure
- 9.9 Epigenomics
- 9.10 Exact Sciences Corporation
- 9.11 Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
- 9.12 Exiqon
- 9.13 Ferrer inCode
- 9.14 Genomic Health, Inc.
- 9.15 Genoptix, Inc.
- 9.16 Gen-Probe
- 9.17 InterGenetics, Inc.
- 9.18 LabCorp
- 9.19 Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 9.20 Nuvera Biosciences
- 9.21 Orion Genomics
- 9.22 QIAGEN NV
- 9.23 Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
- 9.24 Seegene
- 9.25 Sequenom, Inc.
- 9.26 SABiosciences Corporation
- 9.27 Source MDx
- 9.28 Targeted Molecular Diagnostics
- 9.29 Xenomics, Inc.
- Appendix 1: Definition of Terms for Molecular Diagnostics
- Appendix 2: Standard Cancer Therapeutic Panels
- Appendix 3: Menu of Specialized Technologies Used to Assess and Characterize
- Cancer
- Appendix 4: Technical Assessment of the KRAS Mutation Test by Several
- Methodologies and Specialty Oncology Laboratories
- Appendix 5: Overview of Microarrays
- INDEX OF FIGURES
- Figure 2.1: Finding Genes with Microassays
- Figure 2.2: Use of Microassays for Studying Gene Expression
- Figure 2.3: Using DNA Microarrays to Compare Cancer and Normal Cells
- Figure 2.4: Microarrays for Prediction of Survival in Cancer
- Figure 2.5: Finding New Drugs with Microarrays
- Figure 2.6: Using Gene Expression Patterns to Chose Treatment
- Figure 2.7: Segmentation of the Biomarker Development Market
- Figure 3.1: Molecular Diagnostic Markets for Cancer Testing Globally, 2010
- Figure 3.2: Molecular Diagnostic Markets for Cancer Testing U.S., 2010
- Figure 3.3: Key Players Market Share in Global Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Testing Markets
- Figure 3.4: Market Growth and Evolution of MD Cancer Biomarkers
- Figure 4.1: Using DNA Microassays to Measure Gene Expression
- Figure 4.2: Schematic of Molecular Diagnostics for Studying Gene Expression in Patients
- Figure 4.3: HER-2/NEU Protein as a Target in Cancer Therapy
- Figure 4.4: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Equivocal Results with IHC
- Figure 4.5: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Results by FISH
- Figure 4.6: Action of Herceptin in Breast Cancer Patients
- Figure 4.7: Analysis of Cancer Tissue by Microarray
- Figure 4.8 Global Market Size and Share of Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic
- Market, 2010
- Figure 4.9 Incidence of CRC by Age Group
- Figure 4.10 HNPCC Mutation Increases Risk of Cancer
- Figure 4.11 APC Mutation Increases the Risk of Cancer
- Figure 4.12 U.S. Market Share of Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Market, 2010
- Figure 4.13 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen
- Figure 4.14 Estimates for PCA3 Test Volume in U.S., 2005-2008
- Figure 4.15 U.S. Market Share of Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Market,
- 2010
- Figure 5.1: FDA Co-developed Products as a Model for Collaboration
- Figure 5.2: Segmentation of the Biomarker Development Market
- Figure 6.1: Number of Oncotype DX Tests Performed, 1991-2006
- Figure 7.1: OBQI and the Relationship of Governmental Regulatory Agencies
- Figure 8.1: Discovery, Validation and Use of Genetic Biomarkers
- INDEX OF TABLES
- Table 2.1: Genes and Cancer Risk
- Table 2.2: Use of Cancer Biomarkers to Enhance Patient Care
- Table 2.3: Targeted Drug Therapies for Cancers
- Table 2.4: Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Drug Development
- Table 2.5: Utility of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development
- Table 2.6: Time Line for Development of Companion Diagnostics
- Table 3.1: Global Market for Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Testing, 2008-2016
- Table 3.2: U.S. Market for Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Testing, 2008-2016
- Table 3.3: Molecular Diagnostic Markets for Cancer Testing, 2010
- Table 3.4: Key Players and Market Share in Global Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Testing Market
- Table 3.5: Business Factors Influencing Advanced Oncology Testing Services
- Table 3.6: Specific Diagnostic Products Categories Comprising the Cancer Diagnostic Market
- Table 3.7: In Vitro Cancer BioMarker Market Segments Worldwide, 2007 and 2010
- Table 3.8: Tumor Markers Currently in Common Use
- Table 3.9: Global IVD Cancer Tumor Marker Testing Market Segments Growth Rates
- Table 3.10: Worldwide Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays
- Product Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.11: U.S. Market Size in Dollar Volume for Tumor Marker Assays Product Market, 2001-2010
- Table 3.12: Worldwide In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.13: U.S. In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.14: Japanese In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.15: European In Vitro Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market Size, 2001-2010
- Table 3.16: Global Distribution of IVD Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostic Testing
- Table 3.17: Market Share of Major Competitors in U.S. Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Market
- Table 3.18: Major Presence in Cancer Tumor Marker Diagnostics Markets
- Table 3.19: Highlights of the Cancer Diagnostic Testing Segment
- Table 3.20: Highlights of Certified Clinical Labs Specializing in Cancer Genetics and Molecular Diagnostic Services
- Table 3.21: Strategies for Marketing Cancer Diagnostic Products
- Table 3.22: Key Elements of MD Diagnostic Companies Marketing Plan
- Table 4.1: Estimates for the Leading Sites of New Cancer Cases and Deaths in the U.S. by Gender
- Table 4.2: Emerging Molecular Diagnostic Technologies
- Table 4.3: Key Elements for Business Competition in Gene Expression Profiling for Cancer
- Table 4.4: Key Elements for Future Success in the Gene Profiling for Cancer Segment
- Table 4.5: Companies Marketing Products in the Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Sector
- Table 4.6: Breast Cancer Overview
- Table 4.7: Overview of ER/PR Testing and Response to Therapy
- Table 4.8: Key Players in the Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Space
- Table 4.9: Commercially Available Molecular Diagnostic Products for Breast Cancer Assay
- Table 4.10: Clinical Utility and Health Economic Benefits of Oncotype DX
- Table 4.11: Overview of HER2/neu and Herceptin
- Table 4.12: MammaPrint: Key Features
- Table 4.13: Oncogene Science Biomarker Group Reagents
- Table 4.14: Major Companies Marketing Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Tests, 2010
- Table 4.15: Global Market for Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2005-2010
- Table 4.16: U.S. Market for Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing,
- 2005-2010
- Table 4.17: Global Market Forecast for Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2011-2016
- Table 4.18: U.S. Market Forecast for Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing,
- 2011-2016
- Table 4.19: Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Drivers Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 4.20: Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Restraints Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 4.21: Summary of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Breast Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Market
- Table 4.22: Colorectal Cancer Overview
- Table 4.23: KRAS Mutation Assay
- Table 4.24: KRAS Assays by Analytical Type
- Table 4.25: KRAS Mutation Analysis Summary
- Table 4.26: DxS KRAS Mutation Test Summary
- Table 4.27: KRAS and BRAF in Clinical Use
- Table 4.28: Product Development Opportunities in Cancer Tumor Types, 2008
- Table 4.29: Key Players in the Colorectal Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Space
- Table 4.30: ArcticDx Genetic Test, Colo Risk
- Table 4.31: NexCourse CRC Test Offering and Treatment Direction
- Table 4.32: Global Market for Molecular Diagnostic Colon Cancer Testing, 2005-2010
- Table 4.33: U.S. Market for Molecular Diagnostic Colon Cancer Testing, 2005-2010
- Table 4.34: Global Market Forecast for Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2011-2016
- Table 4.35: U.S. Market Forecast for Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2010-2016
- Table 4.36: Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Drivers Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 4.37: Colon Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Restraints Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 4.38: Summary of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Colon Cancer Market
- Table 4.39: Players in the Prostate Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Space
- Table 4.40: Players in the Bladder Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Space
- Table 4.41: Commercially Available Molecular Diagnostic Products for Ovarian Caner Assay
- Table 4.42: Global Market for Molecular Diagnostic Ovarian Cancer Testing, 2005-2010
- Table 4.43: U.S. Market for Molecular Diagnostic Ovarian Cancer Testing, 2005-2010
- Table 4.44: Global Market Forecast for Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2011-2016
- Table 4.45: U.S. Market Forecast for Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing, 2010-2016
- Table 4.46: Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Drivers in Order of Impact
- Table 4.47: Ovarian Cancer Molecular Diagnostic Testing Market: Market Restraints in Order of Impact
- Table 4.48: Summary of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Ovarian Cancer Market
- Table 4.49: Lung Cancer Survival Rates
- Table 4.50: Lung Cancer Facts
- Table 4.51: Potential of Cancer Biomarkers in Drug Delivery and Development
- Table 4.52: Barriers to Adoption of Biomarkers in Clinical Use
- Table 5.1: Technology Trends in Cancer Testing
- Table 5.2: Trends in Theranostics
- Table 5.3: Market Trends in Cancer Testing
- Table 5.4: Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Market: Market Drivers Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 5.5: Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Market: Market Restraints Ranked in Order of Impact
- Table 5.6: Companies That Offer Products to Profile Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
- Table 5.7: Principal Competitive Factors in the Cancer Screening Market
- Table 5.8: Summary of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Glucose Point of Care Market
- Table 5.9: Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Market: Strategic Recommendations on Molecular Diagnostic Sector Business Functions
- Table 5.10: Total Molecular Diagnostics Cancer Market: Impact of Top Industry Challenges (U.S.)
- Table 5.11: Utility of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development
- Table 6.1: CPT Codes for Tumor Markers
- Table 6.2: Genomic Health Oncotype DX Sales, 2006-2010
- Table 6.3: Drivers in KRAS Testing
- Table 6.4: Factors Determining Third-Party Payment for Advanced Cancer Tests
- Table 7.1: Rules that Affect the Ability of a Cancer Diagnostic Service Lab to Conduct Business
- Table 7.2: Focus Areas for the FDA Critical Path Initiative
- Table A1: Tumor Markers Currently in Common Use 200
Related Markets
Oncology/Hematology Reports
- Triple Analysis: Prostate Cancer, Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Peptides
- Triple Analysis: Prostate Cancer, Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Antibodies
- Triple Analysis: Prostate Cancer, Cancer Vaccines and Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Triple Analysis: Prostate Cancer, Apoptosis and Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Triple Analysis: Prostate Cancer, Angiogenesis and Protein Kinase Inhibitors

