Home > Back to Publisher > Report Information

The 2009-2014 Outlook for Biologics in the United States

Icon Group International, Inc.
December 2, 2008
731 Pages - SKU: ICN2100144

Abstract Table of Contents Search inside this report Related Reports

Countries covered: United States

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for biologics across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,900 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for biologics. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved.

This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for biologics in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

1 INTRODUCTION: 1.1 Overview; 1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.?; 1.3 The Methodology
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: 2.1 Latent Demand in The US
3 FAR WEST: 3.1 Executive Summary; 3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska; 3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska; 3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska; 3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California; 3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California; 3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California; 3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii; 3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii; 3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii; 3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada; 3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada; 3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada; 3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon; 3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon; 3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon; 3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington; 3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington; 3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington
4 GREAT LAKES: 4.1 Executive Summary; 4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois; 4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois; 4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois; 4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana; 4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana; 4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana; 4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan; 4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan; 4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan; 4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio; 4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio; 4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio; 4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin; 4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin; 4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin
5 MID-ATLANTIC: 5.1 Executive Summary; 5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware; 5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware; 5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware; 5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia; 5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia; 5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia; 5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland; 5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland; 5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland; 5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey; 5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey; 5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey; 5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York; 5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York; 5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York; 5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania; 5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania; 5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania
6 NEW ENGLAND: 6.1 Executive Summary; 6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut; 6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut; 6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut; 6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine; 6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine; 6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine; 6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts; 6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts; 6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts; 6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire; 6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire; 6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire; 6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island; 6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island; 6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island; 6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont; 6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont; 6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont
7 PLAINS: 7.1 Executive Summary; 7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa; 7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa; 7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa; 7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas; 7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas; 7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas; 7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota; 7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota; 7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota; 7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri; 7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri; 7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri; 7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska; 7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska; 7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska; 7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota; 7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota; 7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota; 7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota; 7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota; 7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota
8 ROCKIES: 8.1 Executive Summary; 8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado; 8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado; 8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado; 8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho; 8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho; 8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho; 8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana; 8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana; 8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana; 8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah; 8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah; 8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah; 8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming; 8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming; 8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming
9 SOUTHEAST: 9.1 Executive Summary; 9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama; 9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama; 9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama; 9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas; 9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas; 9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas; 9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida; 9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida; 9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida; 9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia; 9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia; 9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia; 9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky; 9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky; 9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky; 9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana; 9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana; 9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana; 9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi; 9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi; 9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi; 9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina; 9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina; 9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina; 9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina; 9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina; 9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina; 9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee; 9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee; 9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee; 9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia; 9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia; 9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia; 9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia; 9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia; 9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia
10 SOUTHWEST: 10.1 Executive Summary; 10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona; 10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona; 10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona; 10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico; 10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico; 10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico; 10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma; 10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma; 10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma; 10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas; 10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas; 10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS: 11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor; 11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions

More United States Biopharmaceuticals Reports

The US Pharmaceutical Market Outlook to 2016 - Evolving Opportunities in the Biologics Segment by AM Mindpower Solutions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report titled “The US Pharmaceutical Market Outlook to 2015 – Evolving Opportunities in the Biologics Segment” provides a comprehensive analysis on the Pharmaceutical ...

Specialty Physicians Discuss their Opinions of the United States Biosimilars Market by Frost & Sullivan
The U.S. biosimilars market is a fast approaching reality. However, much uncertainty lies ahead, including the market potential as a function of physician adoption of ...

Biosimilar/Follow-on Biologics Market Report & Forecast: A Focus on the US (2011-2020) by IMARC
With sales worth US$ 57 Million in 2010, biosimilars are still far from their billion dollar sales potential that most analysts believe they will generate. ...

Freedonia Focus on Biologics by Freedonia Focus
This report discusses US biologics demand for the years 2005 and 2010, with forecasts for 2015. Topics covered include product and application segmentation, ...

Biologics by Freedonia Group Inc
US demand to exceed $100 billion by 2015 Demand for biologics will exceed $100 billion in 2015, experiencing continuing strong growth following a decade of ...

See all reports like this >>

More United States Reports

e-Discovery Software Publishing in the US - Industry Market Research Report by IBISWorld
e-Discovery Software Publishing in the US Finding growth : Electronic discovery (more often known as e-discovery) refers to a data search, location and securing process for use ...

D&B Country RiskLine Report: The United States of America by Dun & Bradstreet Inc.
This D&B Country RiskLine Report will help you analyze the risks, opportunities and likely payment delays when doing business in this country. It includes ...

D&B Country Report: The United States of America by Dun & Bradstreet Inc.
D&B Country Report. Comprehensive information for evaluating risks and opportunities when trading or investing in this country. Providing critical information and analysis on ...

Country Report United States January 2011 by Economist Intelligence Unit
Country Reports analyse political and economic trends in featured countries. They show you exactly how national, regional and global events will affect your business in ...

Coal - US - a snapshot (2010) by Mintel - Snapshots
Coal in US by Mintel Global Market Navigator provides you with annual year-end market size data, most recently updated in 2010. This market covers consumption ...

See all reports like this >>

The 2009-2014 Outlook for Biologics in the United States

Share this report

Other tasks

Research Assistance

Related Markets

Biopharmaceuticals Reports

Free Alert Me service