Mobile Backhaul Trends and Telcos' Strategies
IDATE
July 1, 2011 60 Pages - SKU: IDT6504516
|
|
This report spotlights
telcos’ strategies regarding
backhauling and fixed
mobile convergence, how
the transport network is
evolving within the
migration to all-IP and
which choices telcos take
to meet the increasing
demand of bandwidth. The
study analyses the
evolution of backhaul
networks, its investment
control and the necessary
implementation with the
legacy infrastructure.
Key questions
- How high are the Capex and Opex related to the mobile
backhaul infrastructure? What are the technologies used
and which one can be a cost-effective alternative?
- What are the stakes for operators? How can they improve
their mobile backhaul infrastructure ?
- What are the upcoming trends for backhhaul upgrade? How are
the major MNOs deploying their backhaul strategy?
- Is optical fibre the unique answer to rising mobile data traffic
due to LTE deployment?
Please note:The online download price is for 1-5 users.
|
- 1. Executive Summary
- 1.1. New mobile technologies improve network capacity and data rates
- 1.2. Traditional backhaul model is unsustainable
- 1.3. Beyond capacity, cost is the determinant criterion for backhaul migration
- 1.4. Combination of FTTx and LTE backhaul investments could ease backhaul upgrade
- 2. Methodology
- 3. Backhaul in the eyes of the telcos
- 3.1. Dramatic growth of data traffic
- 3.1.1. Global data traffic will quadruple by 2014
- 3.1.2. Current data growth driven by mobile usage
- 3.2. Telcos still cautious with network spends
- 3.2.1. No additional capex foreseen by telcos
- 3.2.2. Operator investments in legacy mobile backhaul are not sustainable
- 4. Backhaul, the state of the art
- 4.1. Definition of backhaul
- 4.2. Backhaul network elements and RAN requirements / constraints
- 4.2.1. Capacity, latency and jitter
- 4.2.2. Quality of Service (QoS)
- 4.2.3. Clock synchronisation
- 4.2.4. Management with Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM)
- 4.2.5. Supporting legacy and IP over new backhaul network
- 4.3. Various technologies can support backhaul at Physical Layer
- 4.4. Microwave
- 4.4.1. Copper
- 4.4.2. Fibre
- 4.4.3. Others
- 4.4.4. Summary
- 4.5. Transport network options for backhaul
- 4.6. Future options for mobile backhauling
- 5. Case studies
- 6. Conclusions
- 6.1. Key backhaul challenges faced by MNOs
- 6.2. Analysis of strategy options for MNOs
- Figures
- Figure 1: Gap between revenues and traffic growth
- Figure 2: Circuit emulation with pseudowire
- Figure 3: Operator strategies in migrating backhaul networks
- Figure 4: FTTH network adapted for LTE backhaul
- Figure 5: Backhaul technologies breakdown today
- Figure 6: Backhaul technologies breakdown in 2016
- Figure 7: Global IP traffic trends with breakdown applications, 2009-2014
- Figure 8: Annual mobile traffic 2010-2020, EB
- Figure 9: Gap between revenues and traffic growth
- Figure 10: MNO capex in value and growth rates, 2005-2010
- Figure 11: Protocol stacks in mobile backhaul
- Figure 12: Typical network costs breakdown
- Figure 13: Illustration of mobile backhaul
- Figure 14: Circuit emulation with pseudowires
- Figure 15: TDM emulation technologies
- Figure 16: Options to transport legacy over packet networks, and inversely
- Figure 17: Cell sites and Aggregate gateways
- Figure 18: Available backhaul support technologies
- Figure 19: TDM and Ethernet evolution over microwave
- Figure 20: Different architectures: Point-to-point and Point-to-multipoint
- Figure 21: Adaptive Coding and Modulation
- Figure 22: Relative weight of microwave among backhaul support technologies in 2010
- Figure 23: Several options to use xDSL as mobile backhaul
- Figure 24: Relative weight of copper among backhaul support technologies in 2010
- Figure 25: Evolution of VDSL2 rate-reach curves for downstream and upstream traffic
- Figure 26: FTTH network adapted for LTE backhaul
- Figure 27: GPON as mobile backhaul
- Figure 28: Relative weight of fibre among backhaul support technologies in 2010
- Figure 29: Theoretical backhaul capacity and radio capacity requirements
- Figure 30: Breakdown of mobile backhauling choice by Telecom Italia
- Figure 31: Comparison of cost per bandwidth requirement between fibre and microwave
- Figure 32: Backhaul technologies breakdown today
- Figure 33: Backhaul technologies breakdown in 2016
- Figure 34: Mobile transport options
- Figure 35: Gradual migration with bonded E1/T1
- Figure 36: Gradual migration with data offload on Ethernet network
- Figure 37: Gradual migration with separate legacy and Ethernet backhaul networks
- Figure 38: Gradual migration with Unique Ethernet backhaul using Pseudowire for legacy services
- Figure 39: Full Ethernet backhaul
- Figure 40: Fibre-based broadband roll out
- Figure 41: Mobile network coverage, by technology
- Figure 42: Planned deployment of FTTH
- Figure 43: Cableco Hybrid Fiber-Coax networks used for mobile backhaul
- Figure 44: Decision-making criteria
- Figure 45: Possible stages for backhaul migration
- Figure 46: Development of radio access architecture and its impact on backhaul
- Figure 47: Operator strategies in migrating backhaul networks
- Tables
- Table 1: Major trends in terms of backhaul
- Table 2: Microwave vs Fibre
- Table 3: Preferred operator choices in backhaul physical media
- Table 4: MNO capex growth rate between 2009 and 2010
- Table 5: Mobile capacity requirements
- Table 6: Specific backhaul requirements, by mobile generation
- Table 7: Strengths and weaknesses of major layer 1 backhaul technologies
- Table 8: AT&T roadmap
- Table 9: T-Mobile backhaul agreements in 2008
- Table 10: LTE subscriber forecasts
- Table 11: Preferred operator choices in backhaul physical media
- Table 12: Actual number of fibre-fed cell sites in 2010 (IDATE estimates)
Share this report
Other tasks Related Markets Networks Reports Free Alert Me service Receive bi-weekly email alerts on new market research Sign Up Today!
|