IT Risk Management - Planning Cost-effective Mitigation of Risks to IT Services

Butler Group
December 1, 2008
200 Pages - SKU: BTL2071663
License type:
"In any organisation large enough to deploy IT solutions, IT systems deliver substantial value through the automation of repetitive tasks; the synchronisation of interactions with customers, suppliers, and partners; the management of high-value and sensitive information and the delivery and analysis of this information on behalf of users; and increasingly the automation and optimisation of end-to-end processes and the enforcement of business and

statutory policies. For each of these benefits, IT professionals have to be ready to answer the inevitable question: “What happens when it goes wrong?”. IT systems are fallible: they can fail for different causes and in many different ways. Sometimes a failure will be immediately obvious to the organisation, and the business might start to suffer considerable financial loss straight away. In other circumstances a failure might be insidious, causing cumulative damage that might go unnoticed for a considerable period. However, other failures, although apparent, might be relatively trivial in their impact and would not justify the cost of a high-technology fix. "

KEY FINDINGS
  • Business executives need to take personal responsibility for the conduct of key IT processes, with particular respect to Data Loss Prevention and Information Security.
  • The business needs to understand that there are real, quantifiable costs associated with different types of IT risk.
  • A properly executed risk management initiative based on a set of approved standards will raise the level of confidence of outside organisations or individuals in trading with the business.
  • The IT Risk Management strategy needs to be kept aligned with the corporate risk management strategy and attitudes towards corporate tolerance of risk.
  • With increasing dependence on the extended supply chain, a failure experienced by a business partner can be just as damaging as a failure in the organisation’s own IT environment.
  • Mature standards and methodologies can assist an organisation to steer a proven path through the multiple facets of implementing IT Risk Management.
  • The initiative in supporting technologies is moving from niche specialist vendors towards the large system and security management vendors.
  • Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) technologies will play an increasingly important role in IT Risk Management, but they will only be used at their most cost-effective potential when deployed within well-conceived, constantly-reviewed, and consistently-enforced processes.
  • The potential for sensitive information to reach unintended and unauthorised recipients through the loss of portable media or Web-based security exposures can cause severe corporate embarrassment and considerable loss of revenue.
  • Enforcement of legislation has focused the minds of corporate executives on compliance with minimum standards of risk avoidance.
  • Some risks cannot be avoided 100% of the time in a cost-effective manner, and the business must plan for the cost of any incidents that do occur.



Additional Information

This Report reveals:
  • Why IT Risk Management should have a senior executive sponsor and a formal hierarchy of roles and responsibilities.
  • How protection of information against loss, corruption, or misuse has become an issue of public awareness as well as legal liability.
  • Why IT Risk Management should be designed into IT projects rather than added as an afterthought.
  • How to address the risk of projects failing to deliver against business expectations as part of IT Risk Management.
  • Why a business continuity plan should have its budget protected from other resource demands.
  • Why Risk Management decisions should be reviewed on an ongoing cycle rather than treated as permanent fixes.
  • How multiple standards and methodologies are available to assist organisations to plan and structure the IT Risk Management effort.
  • Why the market for Risk Management technologies is likely to consolidate around a small set of major vendors.